- There is enough evidence to seek a federal indictment against AKA Obama for Social Security fraud
- AKA Obama has admitted that he is not a “Natural Born Citizen” which is a requirement for the Office of President under Article 2, Section 1 of the Constitution
- AKA Obama has never been properly vetted as being born in the United States, and many other aspects of his history have been hidden from the citizens of the United States.
AKA Obama - We've Got Your Number - 042-68-4425
Update: just to make things more solid look at this: Click for full image
This application (Thomas Louis Wood) is only one number off from AKA Obama’s (or Jean Paul Ludwig’s) number (042-68-4425) and was applied for on 3/21/77 in Hartford, CT.
Thomas Louis Wood died at age 19 but that probably isn’t relevant.
Now AKA Obama uses this number 042-68-4425 on his selective service application.
I don’t know quite what to make of this in total. But we do know that the selective service application displays a SS# that couldn’t possibly be Obama’s.
If I can figure this out I will take a crack at Unified Field Theory. Actually I have a better grasp of Unified Field Theory than I do of AKA Obama’s fraudulent Social Security number.
There isn't any doubt about the social security number AKA Obama used when he filed for a selective service number.
The full document is available at
The only thing that is causing confusion for some of my readers is the identity of who legitimately was assigned the social security number 042-68-4425.
There are so many SS#s and addresses assigned to AKA Obama that it is very confusing. It appears that multiple SS# and addresses were created by someone deliberately attempting to frustrate investigators. Private investigator Neil Sankey conducted research on Obama’s prior addresses and Social Society numbers. Using Intelius, Lexis Nexis, Choice Point and other public records, Sankey found around 25 Social Security numbers connected with Obama’s name and over 200 addresses.
Look at http://www.scribd.com/doc/20976501/Neil-Sankey-Barack-Obama-Addresses-SS-Numbers
Neil Sankey – Barack Obama Addresses and SS Numbers
Page 20 of 39
Name – OBAMA, BARACK
Street Address – OBAMA LN City, State, Zip – FRANKLIN WI 53132
Probable Current Address – No
Telephone Accountholder –
Social Security –
Date of Birth –
Deceased – No
Date Record Verified – Feb 08 – Jun 08
Barack Obama living on Obama Lane?
There is no such street in
There is so much “confetti” in the air that you can’t see the parade.
So, I may not fully understand all the aspects of this mystery but that is why indictments lead to investigations.
However, with Eric Holder serving as Attorney General what are the chances of there being a federal indictment against AKA Obama for Social Security fraud? And holding a trial for AKA Obama in Washington DC has as much chance of resulting in a conviction as a trial for O. J. Simpson with a jury selected from East Los Angeles.
* * * * * * * * * * *
2. AKA Obama is not a “Natural Born Citizen”
Just a Reminder - Before he was nominated AKA Obama Signed Resolution Describing Him As Ineligible
Even though only one of AKA Obama’s parents was a United States Citizen at the time of his birth, somehow the Obots continue to insist that he is still eligible to serve as Commander-in-Chief.
On April 10, 2008, Sens. Patrick Leahy (D-VT) and Claire McCaskill (D-MO) introduced a resolution to make clear that the US Senate deemed presidential candidate Sen. John McCain (R-AZ), born of two American citizens, on American soil, a Natural Born Citizen of the US as specified in the Constitution, and eligible to run for president. Sen. McCaskill knew Obama was not a U.S. Citizen, which is why she introduced this bill -- dressing it up to look like it was in Sen. John McCain's cause.
It was during the bill's hearing that Sen. Patrick Leahy, Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, made the following statement:
"Because he was born to American citizens, there is no doubt in my mind that Senator McCain is a natural born citizen," said Leahy. "I expect that this will be a unanimous resolution of the Senate."
At a Judiciary Committee hearing on April 3, Leahy asked Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff, himself a former Federal judge, if he had doubts that McCain was eligible to serve as President.
"My assumption and my understanding is that if you are born of American parents, you are naturally a natural-born American citizen," Chertoff replied.
"That is mine, too," said Leahy.
What's interesting here is that Sen. Leahy, the Chairman of the Senate Judiciary, confirms that a "natural born" citizen is the child of American citizen parents.
Parents -- that's two. That's BOTH parents.
Every time the words, "citizen" and "parent," are used by Sen. Leahy and Sec. Chertoff, the plural case, "citizens" and "parents," is used. The plural case is the operative case.
It is Sen. Leahy's opinion -- his own recorded words, in a formal Senate Resolution, and on his U. S. Senate website -- that Barack Obama is not a "natural born" citizen, and therefore not eligible to serve as Commander-in-Chief, regardless of his birthplace.
Obama had one American parent --singular -- his mother. His father was a citizen of
Kenya, and a subject of . Great Britain
Obama, himself, "at birth," was a citizen of
Kenya, and a subject of . He says so on his own campaign website. This fact introduces the concept of "divided loyalties," -- the reason the founders created the eligibility requirement in the first place -- a fact that further underlines Obama's ineligibility. Great Britain
The source of this information is Sen. Leahy's own website. The webpage contains a statement about the resolution; the resolution, itself; the Statement of Senator Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.); and an excerpt of Sec. Chertoff's testimony.
The plural word "parents" is used four times. When used to identify the parents, the word "citizens" is used five times. That's nine times that Sen. Leahy, on his own website describes the eligibility requirement. There is NO PLACE in any of these four documents where the singular case of "parent" or "citizen" is used.
The real purpose of this bill was to change article II, section 1, clause 5 of the Constitution of the
with reference to the requirements of being a "natural born citizen" by the Democratic Party leadership -- paving the way for an Obama run. United States
Both Leahy and Chertoff avoid addressing the "in the US mainland" (jus solis) element of the eligibility requirement and focus solely on parentage (jus sanguinis) in making their arguments and by doing so bring focus to the fundamental reason Obama is not qualified. He had one American parent and one foreign parent. Barack Obama is not a natural born citizen -- no matter where he was born.
Obama is a co-signer of this resolution. So, I guess he too agrees that one needs two American parents to be eligible for POTUS -- except he doesn't care -- after all, he's the Obamamessiah. Rules don't apply to him.
Here is the “however”:
Even though the
Senate unanimously passed the resolution declaring Senator McCain a “natural born citizen,” based on the above testimony, a resolution is not the same thing as legislation. So, it will probably take a Supreme Court decision to provide an official definition of “natural born.” Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas openly stated that the Supreme Court is “evading” the eligibility issue. VIDEO: Justice Thomas: We are evading the eligibility issue United States
* * * * * * * * * * *
3. AKA Obama has never been properly vetted as being born in the
I don’t doubt that Dr. Fukino is accurately reporting that the document she saw says that AKA Obama was indeed born in
“Laws of the Territory of Hawaii ACT 96 To Provide For The Issuance Of Certificates Of Hawaiian Birth http://tiny.cc/254e6 was in effect from 1911 until 1972 and allowed someone who was born outside the Hawaiian Islands to be registered as though he were born in Hawaii. Under that law, someone simply would have presented herself to the Hawaiian authorities and declared that the child was born in
One could not just say "My kid was born in
Knowledge of this practice was wide spread and there are probably thousands of people who obtained Hawaiian birth records between 1911 and 1972 through the process of affidavits and witnesses, rather than through the records of hospitals and delivery doctors. Not the least of these was the president of the first Chinese republic. Sun Yat-sen was born to a peasant family in the
The only way to know where AKA OBAMA was actually born is to view AKA OBAMA's original birth certificate on file in
There is a small textural difference between COLBs issued to those who were born in hospitals with full documentation and those who were given Hawaiian birth status through an affidavit process:
And be sure to see this documented evidence that AKA Obama's COLB is different than other COLBs
"Obama released his Hawaiian birth certificate and had it verified by an independent organization, and the results were posted online for everyone to see." Repeating this false propaganda over and over does not make it true. No matter what you might think, there is no escaping that AKA Obama is not practicing the virtue of full disclosure.
Which is most likely;
(a) AKA OBAMA is hiding documents that are innocuous?
(b) AKA OBAMA is hiding documents that are damaging?
In 1961, the Public Health Services, U. S Department of Health, Education and Welfare, National Center for Health Statistics, National Vital Statistics Division published the "Vital Statistics of the United States.
Here is a blank copy of the Standard Certificate of Live Birth used by all states including
. This is the information being hidden by Obama. http://thesteadydrip.blogspot.com/2009/07/blank-birth-certificate-form-aka-obama.html Hawaii
Plus, read the article that is included with the blank copy.
Here is what a real Hawaiian Birth Certificate looks like:http://thesteadydrip.blogspot.com/2010/02/obama-faces-fellow-hawaiian-with-real.html
Who Certified AKA Obama as "Natural Born"? http://thesteadydrip.blogspot.com/2009/11/this-from-obama-file-one-of-best.html
Do you really think AKA Obama would have won the election if all the things he is hiding were made known?
Do you really think AKA Obama will be able to finish his first term if all the things he is hiding are made known?
The only conspiracy is the media and the Obots who suppress the revelation of AKA Obama's history.
- What is a “birther”?
2. What are the eligibility requirements for President?
3. Why do birthers think Barack Obama is not eligible to be President?
4. How is “natural born citizen” defined?
5. In a nutshell, what is the Obama eligibility controversy?
6. Does the birthers’ viewpoint have any historical or legal merit?
7. What was the original purpose of the presidential “natural born citizen” requirement?
8. What is the difference between a “Constitutional” and a “statutory” natural born citizen?
9. Wouldn’t the most recent modern-day statutory meaning of “natural born citizen” take precedence over the original Constitutional meaning?
10. If Obama is not a “Constitutional natural born citizen”, so what? Why should anyone care?
11. Why has every birther lawsuit been dismissed?
12. What is a 14th Amendment natural born citizen?
13. In the 14th Amendment, what does “jurisdiction” mean?
14. Doesn’t the Wong Kim Ark decision make Obama a “natural born citizen”?
15. Doesn’t the Julia Lynch case show that Obama is a “natural born citizen”?
16. Could “natural born citizen” be based on the British Common Law principle of jus soli?
17. What’s the “beef” with President Obama’s birth certificate?
18. Didn’t the State of Hawaii recently verify that President Obama was born in Hawaii?
19. Doesn’t the mere existence of Barack Obama’s original Hawaiian birth certificate prove that he was born in Hawaii?
20. If President Obama’s birth certificate shows conclusively that he was born in Hawaii, would it end the eligibility controversy?
21. Where do we go from here?