tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3271022348837921425.post1420253653272629976..comments2023-10-25T11:19:33.493-04:00Comments on The Steady Drip: Pouring Oil on Troubled WatersUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger9125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3271022348837921425.post-78178196734300669782009-04-30T15:52:00.000-04:002009-04-30T15:52:00.000-04:00Greg,
U R Welcome!Greg,<br /><br />U R Welcome!Leo the Lawyerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01621663773729703133noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3271022348837921425.post-69829053906050955972009-04-28T17:02:00.000-04:002009-04-28T17:02:00.000-04:00Leo, I didn't understand your last post until I de...Leo, I didn't understand your last post until I decided to search a few of those cases. THANK YOU very much. That information, especially Scalias writings, is of great help to me.<br /><br />I am liking our Constitution more each day. It is a shame, however, we have to rely so much on it at this time in our history. I am certain our Constitution will survive, thank you,<br />GregGreg Gosshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05618441283107952475noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3271022348837921425.post-8730273523727769612009-04-27T20:52:00.000-04:002009-04-27T20:52:00.000-04:00For the FIRM Perkins-Coie
Nixon v. Sirica, 159 U....For the FIRM Perkins-Coie<br /><br />Nixon v. Sirica, 159 U.S. App. D.C. 58, 70, n. 54, 487 F.2d 700, 712, n. 54 (1973)<br /><br />United States v. Chanen, 549 F.2d 1306, 1312 (CA9 1977)<br /><br />United States v. Calandra, 414 U.S. 338, 343 (1974)<br /><br />Hannah v. Larche, 363 U.S. 420, 490(1960)<br /><br />Stirone v. United States, 361 U.S. 212(1960)<br /><br />Hale v. Henkel, 201 U.S. 43(1906) <br /><br />United States v. Morton Salt Co., 338 U.S. 632, 642-643 (1950) <br /><br />United States v. Calandra, 414 U.S. 338 (1974)<br /><br />United States v. Williams, 504 U.S. 36 at 48 (1992)<br /><br />Hannah v. Larche, 363 U.S. 420 <br />(1960)Leo the Lawyerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01621663773729703133noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3271022348837921425.post-76601978275975854472009-04-27T20:49:00.000-04:002009-04-27T20:49:00.000-04:00For the FIRM Perkins-Coie
Nixon v. Sirica, 159 U....For the FIRM Perkins-Coie<br /><br />Nixon v. Sirica, 159 U.S. App. D.C. 58, 70, n. 54, 487 F.2d 700, 712, n. 54 (1973)<br /><br />United States v. Chanen, 549 F.2d 1306, 1312 (CA9 1977)<br /><br />United States v. Calandra, 414 U.S. 338, 343 (1974)<br /><br />Hannah v. Larche, 363 U.S. 420, 490(1960)<br /><br />Stirone v. United States, 361 U.S. 212(1960)<br /><br />Hale v. Henkel, 201 U.S. 43(1906) <br /><br />United States v. Morton Salt Co., 338 U.S. 632, 642-643 (1950) <br /><br />United States v. Calandra, 414 U.S. 338 (1974)<br /><br />United States v. Williams, 504 U.S. 36 at 48 (1992)<br /><br />Hannah v. Larche, 363 U.S. 420 <br />(1960)Leo the Lawyerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01621663773729703133noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3271022348837921425.post-5960187618721530882009-04-27T20:14:00.000-04:002009-04-27T20:14:00.000-04:00That's the plan. In fact if they do not comply wi...That's the plan. In fact if they do not comply with the subpoena it is cause for action.<br /><br />No Grand Jury has yet held a session other than the one in GA that was based on a weak premise, i.e Magna Carta.Sam and Bunny Sewellhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17591489714406969020noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3271022348837921425.post-87393123953264660072009-04-27T18:05:00.000-04:002009-04-27T18:05:00.000-04:00You "say" you'll? change the Constitution?
Well, ...You "say" you'll? change the Constitution?<br /><br />Well, U know BO, we all want ta CHANGE UR HEAD!<br /><br />U better CHANGE UR MIND INSTEAD!<br /><br />But if ya go BOWING 2 da saud,<br />WE'LL ALL KNOW U AS A FRAUD!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3271022348837921425.post-41672898625919695062009-04-27T17:39:00.000-04:002009-04-27T17:39:00.000-04:00If the Grand Jury has subpoena powers why not just...If the Grand Jury has subpoena powers why not just subpoena the records?Greg Gosshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05618441283107952475noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3271022348837921425.post-13477066807042099992009-04-27T10:38:00.000-04:002009-04-27T10:38:00.000-04:00I totally agree with your message and think it is ...I totally agree with your message and think it is wise to mentally measure everything you read out here now that could throw the frightened into hysteria so that you don't paralyse yourself. Having walked through that fire of simply becoming aware of the situation, then denial and disbelief, the knot in your gut that keeps you up at night searching for more answers and whatever you can do stop this,then straight to righteous indignation and action. It is a long step out of anyones comfort zone to consider any of the possible scenarios playing out here. I am troubled, but not as much for what I do know as what I do not. So, I pray for strength and guidance, take long walks to clear and calm my mind and take what action I can. Still, sometimes even here there is the occasional teaspoon of kerosene instead of oil. And there is an underlying gut instinct, a sense of urgency, fear welling up inside that keeps saying patience is a virtue but the Lord helps those who helps themselves. I am engaged in any cause I believe will peacefully help lead us out of this pit we have dug ourselves into. But we are dealing with polarizing extremes and that may indeed be what it will take to save us. <br /><br />Respectfully,<br /><br />ShawnyAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3271022348837921425.post-79008180640348702762009-04-27T08:55:00.000-04:002009-04-27T08:55:00.000-04:00BRILLIANT!BRILLIANT!Leo the Lawyerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01621663773729703133noreply@blogger.com