The Supreme Court’s denial of certiorari on lack of standing in the Kerchner case, coming after the multitude of no-standing cases, essentially confirms that the SCOTUS will not extend Marbury v Madison to review alleged Congressional deriliction under the Constitution, as opposed to alleged Congressional legislative infringement under the Constitution. That’s what Kerchner really means in legal terms — the Court defers to Congress on Const. Art 2, Sec 1.
This does, however, set the stage for the House of Representatives (first at the Armed Services Committee) to review the upcoming Lt.Col. Lakin Court Martial in the event the Lakin Military Tribunal refuses discovery. In essence, the Congress WILL undertake discovery.
And so THAT is how things will end for Mr. Obama, and very well could lead to new House Speaker John Boehner becoming either the 45th President of the United States (or the 44th POTUS if Obama’s ‘presidency’ were nullified, which POTUS nullification the SCOTUS felt it simply could not undertake as an extension of Marbury v Madison).
IMPORTANT ANALYSIS:
ReplyDeleteThe Supreme Court’s denial of certiorari on lack of standing in the Kerchner case, coming after the multitude of no-standing cases, essentially confirms that the SCOTUS will not extend Marbury v Madison to review alleged Congressional deriliction under the Constitution, as opposed to alleged Congressional legislative infringement under the Constitution. That’s what Kerchner really means in legal terms — the Court defers to Congress on Const. Art 2, Sec 1.
This does, however, set the stage for the House of Representatives (first at the Armed Services Committee) to review the upcoming Lt.Col. Lakin Court Martial in the event the Lakin Military Tribunal refuses discovery. In essence, the Congress WILL undertake discovery.
And so THAT is how things will end for Mr. Obama, and very well could lead to new House Speaker John Boehner becoming either the 45th President of the United States (or the 44th POTUS if Obama’s ‘presidency’ were nullified, which POTUS nullification the SCOTUS felt it simply could not undertake as an extension of Marbury v Madison).