KNOWLES: The MSM
Proves It's Time To Teach The Bible In Schools
Religious illiteracy
By Michael J. Knowles
@michaeljknowles
April 19, 2019
The editors of the Associated Press consider it
newsworthy to report that the
“tourist mecca Notre Dame” is “also revered as [a] place of worship.” Imagine
their surprise when they learn the origins of the word “mecca.”
At least the Associated Press reported a religious
reality, albeit an obvious one. The New York Times was forced to issue a
correction yesterday when it bungled a report on a basic elements of Christian
doctrine. Fr. Jean-Marc Fournier ran inside the burning Cathedral of Notre Dame
to save the “body of Christ” from the flames, which reporter Elian Peltier
imagined entailed the hero priest's hauling out “a statue of Jesus” rather than
the Blessed Sacrament. In today’s New York Post, Mark Hemingway recounts several
other embarrassing occasions of religious ignorance on the part of the Times.
In 2013, the Gray Lady reported that Easter commemorates
Jesus’ “resurrection into heaven” rather than his resurrection from the dead.
The following year, it described the
Church of the Holy Sepulcher as “marking the site where many Christians believe
Jesus is buried.” That reporter holds a masters degree from Cambridge
University, which he appears to have earned despite never having read the New
Testament. If he peruse the Gospel, he missed the point of the story.
This embarrassingly ignorant reporting reveals a crisis
of religious education throughout the West. Such widespread ignorance imperils
not merely the future of the faith but the very civilization that Christianity
crafted. How can we expect students to appreciate Hamlet if they do not
first understand the story of Cain and Abel, Purgatory, or the
theological debates at the heart of the Protestant Revolution?
How much meaning can the Gettysburg Address convey, with its peculiar diction
and repeated references to ‘dedication,’ ‘consecration,’ and “devotion,”
without the context of the King James Bible? Why did John Adams warn the
Massachusetts militia that “our Constitution was made only for a moral and
religious people” and that “it is wholly inadequate to the government of any
other”?
Three months ago, President Trump endorsed elective Bible
literacy classes for public schools. At least six states have proposed laws
that would permit such classes. “The Bible is an integral part of our society
and deserves a place in the classroom,” explained North Dakota State
Representative Aaron McWilliams. He’s right, though he downplays the Good
Book’s significance. Not only is the Bible integral to our society, it
constitutes our society’s literary bedrock.
In 1962, the Supreme Court’s decision in Engel v.
Vitale outlawed prayer in public schools. The following year, the Court
decided in Abington School District v. Schempp also to ban Bible study,
which had formed the basis of American education since the Puritan era, from
public schools. The ensuing decades have witnessed the dumbing down of several
generations, each more ignorant than the next. Now the highly “educated”
writers at the New York Times can’t tell a crow’s ear from a
crosier.
We laugh at the religiously illiterate journalists, but
far more foolish were their forebears in the 1960s who imagined they could
educate students without teaching them the most important book in the history
of the world.
No comments:
Post a Comment