Friday, May 13, 2022

The Bill Gates connection behind the dire baby formula shortages in the US (Connecting the Dots to the THE KISSINGER REPORT) December 10, 1974 Kissinger’s 1974 Plan for Food Control Genocide)

The Bill Gates connection behind the dire baby formula shortages in the US

Ansh Pandey by Ansh Pandey May 13, 2022in GeopoliticsReading Time: 3 mins read

https://tfiglobalnews.com/2022/05/13/the-bill-gates-connection-behind-the-dire-baby-formula-shortages-in-the-us/

The United States is currently suffering through a major crisis that is pushing the lives of infants in danger. Baby formula, an essential commodity required in the households with infants or toddlers is running short in the United States. This is happening apparently due to major supply-chain disruptions.

Parents across the U.S. are struggling to find the baby formula, driving to local stores and waiting for hours in search of nutrition for their babies. Most experts concerned with the matter say that this is the worst baby formula shortage the US has seen in decades.

The shortage is attributed to a contamination problem at an ‘Abbott Healthcare and Research’ factory that produces much of the Similac formula. The company had to voluntarily shut down the factory in February amidst the consumer complaints about the contaminated formula that was linked to the death of two infants.

Here’s the suspicious part though, this shortage could have been triggered by the pharma lobby and we have a piece of evidence explaining why is it possible.

Bill Gates and the Pharma Lobby

Bill gates and the Pharma lobby have deep roots in the production of factory-based essential commodities. The possibility of this duo being behind this notorious shortage cant be denied.

A new alternative to breast milk is arriving soon. In June 2020, BIOMILQ, a US-based start-up announced that it will be producing artificial human breast milk from cultured human mammary epithelial cells to be commercially available to consumers. The company claims the alternative to be environment friendly as well.

Surprisingly, the company received $3.5 million from a fund that was co-founded by big US Businessmen like Bill Gates, Jeff Bezos, Richard Branson, and Mark Zuckerberg. The fund was established to help prevent the ill effects of climate change.

BIOMILQ co-founder and cell biologist Leila Strickland stated in an interview that with this artificial breastmilk, parents, caretakers, and infants would be given more options for their early-stage nutrition. The product is slated to arrive in the next 3-5 Years.

Hence, it’s quite fishy that just before the arrival of the product, we’re getting to see these supply chain shortages and great uncertainties over restorations have erupted in the factory of the biggest shareholder of the baby food market.

Read More: Soros, Gates, Zuckerberg, Bezos, and Jack – the five men who are running the USA

Bill Gates – Shady Man with a Purpose

‘Genius’, ‘Billionaire’, and ‘Philanthropist’, Mr. Bill Gates has a history of being in the rounds of suspicion. There even have been conspiracy theories suggesting that Bill Gates is pushing his agenda in the shadow of the Coronavirus pandemic.

He has even been alleged with creating the virus, pushing the vaccine agenda, justifying lockdowns, and importantly, predicting the duration of a pandemic. None of the allegations are proven yet, but all this indeed is shady.

Furthermore, Bill Gates has been a staunch supporter of initiatives to tackle climate change. Whereas, dairy products such as baby food have a huge toll on climate change. Bill gates funded its alternative so he can push the product as an alternative to baby food.

Read More: Bill Gates – The most influential doctor and the richest farmer in America

Mr. Gates is certainly a man of suspicious character. He and other influential personalities in the Pharma Sector ‘may’ have triggered the shortage of baby food on purpose to make people realize the significance and need for an alternative.

 

THE KISSINGER REPORT:

December 10, 1974

https://www.reteccp.org/NWO/kissinger-report.pdf

May 1, 2013 (SNN) National Security Study Memorandum 200: Implications of Worldwide Population Growth for U.S. Security and Overseas Interests (NSSM200) was completed on December 10, 1974, by the United States National Security Council under the direction of Henry Kissinger. It was adopted as official U.S. policy by President Gerald Ford in November 1975. It was originally classified but was later declassified and obtained by researchers in the early 1990s. Click below to read the report: National Security Study Memorandum, NSSM 200, Implications of Worldwide Population Growth For U.S. Security and Overseas Interests (THE KISSINGER REPORT) December 10, 1974 Kissinger’s 1974 Plan for Food Control Genocide (Joseph Brewda) On Dec. 10, 1974, the U.S. National Security Council under Henry Kissinger completed a classified 200-page study, “National Security Study Memorandum 200: Implications of Worldwide Population Growth for U.S. Security and Overseas Interests.” The study falsely claimed that population growth in the socalled Lesser Developed Countries (LDCs) was a grave threat to U.S. national security. Adopted as official policy in November 1975 by President Gerald Ford, NSSM 200 outlined a covert plan to reduce population growth in those countries through birth control, and also, implicitly, war and famine. Brent Scowcroft, who had by then replaced Kissinger as national security adviser (the same post-Scowcroft was to hold in the Bush administration), was put in charge of implementing the plan. CIA Director George Bush was ordered to assist Scowcroft, as were the secretaries of state, treasury, defense, and agriculture. The bogus arguments that Kissinger advanced were not original. One of his major sources was the Royal Commission on Population, which King George VI had created in 1944 “to consider what measures should be taken in the national interest to influence the future trend of population.” The commission found that Britain was gravely threatened by population growth in its colonies, since “a populous country has decided advantages over a sparsely-populated one for industrial production.” The combined 1/3 effects of increasing population and industrialization in its colonies, it warned, “might be decisive in its effects on the prestige and influence of the West,” especially effecting “military strength and security.” NSSM 200 similarly concluded that the United States was threatened by population growth in the former colonial sector. It paid special attention to 13 “key countries” in which the United States had a “special political and strategic interest”: India, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Indonesia, Thailand, the Philippines, Turkey, Nigeria, Egypt, Ethiopia, Mexico, Brazil, and Colombia. It claimed that population growth in those states was especially worrisome since it would quickly increase their relative political, economic, and military strength. For example, Nigeria: “Already the most populous country on the continent, with an estimated 55 million people in 1970, Nigeria’s population by the end of this century is projected to number 135 million. This suggests a growing political and strategic role for Nigeria, at least in Africa.” Or Brazil: “Brazil clearly dominated the continent demographically.” The study warned of a “growing power status for Brazil in Latin America and on the world scene over the next 25 years.” Food as a weapon There were several measures that Kissinger advocated to deal with this alleged threat, most prominently, birth control and related population-reduction programs. He also warned that “population growth rates are likely to increase appreciably before they begin to decline,” even if such measures were adopted. A second measure was curtailing food supplies to targetted states, in part to force compliance with birth control policies: “There is also some established precedent for taking account of family planning performance in appraisal of assistance requirements by AID [U.S. Agency for International Development] and consultative groups. Since population growth is a major determinant of increases in food demand, allocation of scarce PL 480 resources should take account of what steps a country is taking in population control as well as food production. In these sensitive relations, however, it is important in style as well as substance to avoid the appearance of coercion.” “Mandatory programs may be needed and we should be considering these possibilities now,” the document continued, adding, “Would food be considered an instrument of national power? … Is the U.S. prepared to accept food rationing to help people who can’t/won’t control their population growth?” Kissinger also predicted a return of famines that could make exclusive reliance on birth control programs unnecessary. “Rapid population growth and lagging food production in developing countries, together with the sharp deterioration in the global food situation in 1972 and 1973, have raised serious concerns about the ability of the world to feed itself adequately over the next quarter of a century and beyond,” he reported. 2/3 The cause of that coming food deficit was not natural, however, but was a result of western financial policy: “Capital investments for irrigation and infrastructure and the organization requirements for continuous improvements in agricultural yields may be beyond the financial and administrative capacity of many LDCs. For some of the areas under heaviest population pressure, there is little or no prospect for foreign exchange earnings to cover constantly increasingly imports of food.” “It is questionable,” Kissinger gloated, “whether aid donor countries will be prepared to provide the sort of massive food aid called for by the import projections on a long-term continuing basis.” Consequently, “large-scale famine of a kind not experienced for several decades—a kind the world thought had been permanently banished,” was foreseeable—famine, which has indeed come to pass. Notify of Inline Feedbacks View all comments. 

Connecting the Dots:

Rajiv Shah is the administrator for the U.S. Agency for International Development (AID), was the undersecretary for research, education & economics at the U.S. Department of Agriculture for the Barack Obama administration and the director of agricultural development for the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation was a funder for the U.S. Agency for International Development (AID) and the Aspen Institute (think tank).

Foundation to Promote Open Society was a funder for the Aspen Institute (think tank).

George Soros was the chairman for the Foundation to Promote Open Society.

Henrietta Holsman Fore is a trustee at the Aspen Institute (think tank), a member of the Belizean Grove, was an administrator for the U.S. Agency for International Development (AID) and the director of U.S. foreign assistance for the U.S. Department of State.

Belizean_Grove is the equivalent to the male-only social group, the Bohemian Club.

Walter L. Cronkite was a member of the Bohemian Club.

Walter Cronkite, media mogul "glad to sit at the right hand of Satan!"

May 3, 2020

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O6FU9cPJdoI

George H.W. Bush is a member of the Bohemian Club and a friend of Bandar bin Sultan.

Bandar bin Sultan is a friend of George H.W. Bush and was a lifetime trustee at the Aspen Institute (think tank).

Henry A. Kissinger is a member of the Bohemian Club, was a lifetime trustee at the Aspen Institute (think tank) the secretary for the U.S. Department of State.

Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation was the Aspen Institute (think tank), the U.S. Agency for International Development (AID), and the Center for American Progress.

Foundation to Promote Open Society was a funder for the Aspen Institute (think tank) and the Center for American Progress.

George Soros was the chairman for the Foundation to Promote Open Society and a supporter for the Center for American Progress.

Melody C. Barnes was the EVP for the Center for American Progress, the domestic policy council, director for the Barack Obama administration and is Barack Obama’s golf partner.

Enough Project is an affiliated project with the Center for American Progress.

Gayle E. Smith is a co-founder for the Enough Project, was a senior fellow at the Center for American Progress and the chief of staff for the U.S. Agency for International Development (AID). 

Resources: Past Research 

US Quietly Releasing $1.6B in Pakistan Assistance (Past Research on Henry Kissinger, Bill Gates & the U.S. Agency for International Development)

SUNDAY, OCTOBER 20, 2013

https://thesteadydrip.blogspot.com/2013/10/us-quietly-releasing-16b-in-pakistan.html

No comments:

Post a Comment