Thursday, March 21, 2024

DOJ Lawsuit: Apple Monopolizes US Smartphone Market (Connecting the Dots: Apple, DOJ, The Federal Trade Commission & Soros Funding, All Networking)

DOJ Lawsuit: Apple Monopolizes US Smartphone Market (Connecting the Dots: Apple, DOJ, The Federal Trade Commission & Soros Funding, All Networking)

Newsmax

Thursday, 21 March 2024 11:03 AM EDT

The Apple store on Fifth Avenue, New York (Dreamstime)

https://www.newsmax.com/finance/streettalk/apple-doj-lawsuit/2024/03/21/id/1158050/

The Justice Department Thursday announced a sweeping antitrust lawsuit against Apple, accusing the tech giant of engineering an illegal monopoly in smartphones that boxes out competitors and stifles innovation.

The lawsuit, filed in federal court in New Jersey, alleges that Apple has monopoly power in the smartphone market and uses its control over the iPhone to “engage in a broad, sustained, and illegal course of conduct.”

Apple called the lawsuit “wrong on the facts and the law” and said it “will vigorously defend against it.”

The suit — which was also filed with 16 state attorneys general — is the latest example of the Justice Department’s approach to aggressive enforcement of federal antitrust law that officials say is aimed at ensuring a fair and competitive market, even as it has lost some significant anticompetition cases.

President Joe Biden has called for the Justice Department and the Federal Trade Commission to vigorously enforce antitrust statutes. The increased policing of corporate mergers and business deals has been met with resistance from some business leaders who have said the Democratic administration is overreaching, but it’s been lauded by others as long overdue.

The case is taking direct aim at the digital fortress that Apple Inc., based in Cupertino, California, has assiduously built around the iPhone and other popular products such as the iPad, Mac and Apple Watch to create what is often referred to as a “walled garden” so its meticulously designed hardware and software can seamlessly flourish together while requiring consumers to do little more than turn the devices on.

The strategy has helped make Apple the world’s most prosperous company, with annual revenue of nearly $400 billion and, until recently, a market value of more than $3 trillion. But Apple’s shares have fallen by 7% this year even as most of the stock market has climbed to new highs, resulting in long-time rival Microsoft — a target of a major Justice Department antitrust case a quarter-century ago — to seize the mantle as the world’s most valuable company.

Apple has defended the walled garden as an indispensable feature prized by consumers who want the best protection available for their personal information. It has described the barrier as a way for the iPhone to distinguish itself from devices running on Google’s Android software, which isn’t as restrictive and is licensed to a wide range of manufacturers.

Fears about an antitrust crackdown on Apple’s business model have contributed to the drop in the company’s stock price, along with concerns that it is lagging Microsoft and Google in the push to develop products powered by artificial intelligence technology.

But antitrust regulators made it clear in their complaint that they see Apple's walled garden most as a weapon to ward off competition, creating market conditions that enable it to charge higher prices that have propelled its lofty profit margins while stifling innovation.

“Consumers should not have to pay higher prices because companies violate the antitrust laws,” Attorney General Merrick Garland said in a statement. “We allege that Apple has maintained monopoly power in the smartphone market, not simply by staying ahead of the competition on the merits, but by violating federal antitrust law. If left unchallenged, Apple will only continue to strengthen its smartphone monopoly.”

With the attempt to rein in Apple's dominance, the Biden administration is escalating an antitrust siege that has already triggered lawsuits against Google and Amazon accusing them in engaging in illegal tactics to thwart competition, as well as unsuccessful attempts to block acquisitions by Microsoft and Facebook parent Meta Platforms.

Apple's business interests are also entangled in the Justice Department's case against Google, which went to trial last fall and is headed toward final arguments scheduled to begin May 1 in Washington, D.C. In that case, regulators are alleging Google has stymied competition by paying for the rights for its already dominant online search engine to be the automatic place to handle queries on the iPhone and a variety of web browsers in an arrangement that generates an estimated $15 billion to $20 billion annually.

Now that the Justice Department is mounting a direct attack across its business, Apple stands to lose even more.

The Justice Department is following up an other recent attempts to force Apple to change the way it runs the iPhone and other parts of its business.

Epic Games, the maker of the popular Fortnite video game, filed an antitrust lawsuit against Apple in 2020 in an effort break down the barriers protecting the iPhone App Store and a lucrative payment system operating within it. Apple has long collected commissions ranging from 15% to 30% on digital transactions completed within apps, a setup that Epic alleged was enabled by an illegal monopoly that drives up prices for consumers.

After a monthlong trial in 2021, a federal judge ruled mostly in favor of Apple with the exception of deciding that links to competing payment options should be permitted inside of iPhone apps. Apple unsuccessfully resisted that portion of the ruling until the U.S. Supreme Court refused to hear an appeal in January, forcing the company to relent. But the concessions that Apple made to comply with the ruling are still facing a “bad faith” challenge from Epic, which is seeking an April 30 hearing to ask U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers to order more changes.

Apple also had to open up the iPhone to allow apps to be downloaded and installed from competing stores in Europe to comply with a new set of regulators called the Digital Markets Act, or DMA, earlier this month but its approach is being pilloried by critics as little more than an end-around the rules that will enable it to continue to muscle out real competition. European Union regulators already have vowed to crack down on Apple if it finds the company's tactics continue to thwart true consumer choice.

All of this comes on top of a $2 billion (1.8 billion euro) fine that European regulators slapped on Apple earlier this month after concluding that the company had undermined competition in the music streaming through the iPhone, despite Spotify being the leader in that market.

Connecting the Dots:

Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr was the lobby firm for Apple Inc.

C. Boyden Gray was a partner at Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr and is a director at the Atlantic Council of the United States (think tank).

Open Society Foundations was a funder for the Atlantic Council of the United States (think tank) and

George Soros is the founder & chairman for the Open Society Foundations.

Frances Fragos Townsend is a director at the Atlantic Council of the United States (think tank), and was a counsel to the attorney general, assistant U.S. attorney for the Southern District for the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ).

Walter E. Dellinger III was the acting solicitor general for the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) and is a board of adviser’s member for the American Constitution Society.

Janet Reno was the attorney general for the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) and is a board of adviser’s member for the American Constitution Society.

Robert Raben was an assistant attorney general for the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) and a director at the American Constitution Society.

Eric H. Holder Jr. is attorney general at the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) for the Barack Obama Administration and was a board member for the American Constitution Society.

Open Society Foundations was a funder for the American Constitution Society.

George Soros is the founder & chairman for the Open Society Foundations.

Faith Elizabeth Gay was a director at the American Constitution Society, a partner at Sidley Austin LLP and is a partner at Quinn Emanuel Urquhart Oliver & Hedges, LLP.

Michelle Obama was a lawyer at Sidley Austin LLP.

Barack Obama was an intern at Sidley Austin LLP and Crystal Nix Hines’s law school friend.

Crystal Nix Hines is of counsel at Quinn Emanuel Urquhart Oliver & Hedges, LLP and was Barack Obama’s law school friend.

Edith Ramirez was a partner at Quinn Emanuel Urquhart Oliver & Hedges, LLP and is the chairman for the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) is a division of the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ).

William H. Webster was a director at the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and is an honorary director at the Atlantic Council of the United States (think tank).

Open Society Foundations was a funder for the Atlantic Council of the United States (think tank) and

George Soros is the founder & chairman for the Open Society Foundations.

C. Boyden Gray is a director at the Atlantic Council of the United States (think tank) and was a partner at Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr.

Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr was the lobby firm for Apple Inc.

Albert A. Gore Jr. is a director at Apple Inc. and the chairman for the Climate Reality Project.

Foundation to Promote Open Society was a funder for the Climate Reality Project.

George Soros was the chairman for the Foundation to Promote Open Society

Resources: Past Research

Rep. Ken Buck on D.C.’s Swamp: Politicians Are ‘Bought with Taxpayer Dollars’ (Researchers Note: Follow the Money!) (Past Research on the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ))

SATURDAY, APRIL 15, 2017

https://thesteadydrip.blogspot.com/2017/04/rep-ken-buck-on-dcs-swamp-politicians.html

FAKE NEWS: Google Targets Daily Wire, Other Conservative Sites With Left-Wing Fact Checks, Immunizes Left-Wing Sites (Past Research on Apple Inc.)

THURSDAY, JANUARY 11, 2018

https://thesteadydrip.blogspot.com/2018/01/fake-news-google-targets-daily-wire.html

FAKE NEWS: Google Targets Daily Wire, Other Conservative Sites With Left-Wing Fact Checks, Immunizes Left-Wing Sites (Past Research for Apple Inc.)

THURSDAY, JANUARY 11, 2018

https://thesteadydrip.blogspot.com/2018/01/fake-news-google-targets-daily-wire.html

Surveillance in aisle three (Past Research for the Federal Trade Commission (FTC))

TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 18, 2014

https://thesteadydrip.blogspot.com/2014/02/surveillance-in-aisle-three.html

No comments:

Post a Comment