Ocasio-Cortez
Joins Effort to Pressure Banks into Adopting the Far Left’s Anti-gun Agenda
NRA-ILA
Friday, March 29, 2019
The battle over politics in the financial marketplace
continues to intensify. The combatants include anti-gun politicians who insist
that banks have a social responsibility to sign onto the far left’s political
agenda. Opposing them are patriotic Americans of all stripes who believe that
federally chartered banks should serve the law-abiding public without
ideological or political discrimination.
At stake for gun owners is whether the industries that
provide firearms, ammunition, and related accessories to the civilian market
will be able to participate in the 21st Century economy.
It’s becoming increasingly clear what the world would
look like if the most dedicated opponents of the NRA and pro-gun politicians
had free reign to implement their vengeful and discriminatory agenda against
their political enemies.
They do not want a fair and open policy debate. They do not want to have to defend
their own objectives.
There is, in their minds, no legitimate opposition to
them, so any tactic is on the table to get what they want.
This includes the thinly-veiled extortion of wielding
government influence and the virtual outrage mob against anyone who will not
bow to their demands.
If you don’t believe us, just ask “Socialist Democrat”
and media darling Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.).
The freshman congresswoman is proving a quick study when
it comes to the extra-legal use of her official position and considerable
celebrity to promote political goals that have failed to advance through the
lawmaking process.
We recently reported
on how Ocasio-Cortez’s fellow gun control advocate Carolyn Maloney (D-NY) used
a congressional oversight hearing to berate a bank executive, not for actually
breaking the law, but simply for refusing to follow the example of other banks
in refusing business with law-abiding gun sellers. Maloney insinuated the bank
was somehow complicit in mass murder and explicitly accused it of “putting
profits over people.”
Never one to avoid the media spotlight, Ocasio-Cortez
took up that refrain last week by taking several national banks to task on
Twitter for helping to finance lawful projects or industries that she finds
distasteful, including “fossil fuel pipelines,”
“private prisons,”
and businesses involved with “assault rifles.”
Ocasio-Cortez, like Maloney, sits on the House Financial
Services Committee, which is involved in banking oversight. Perhaps just as
relevant, in what passes for the modern marketplace of ideas, she has nearly 4
million Twitter followers, many with seemingly endless time and energy to
execute whatever happens to be the social justice directive of the moment.
Ocasio-Cortez elaborated on what she was hoping to
accomplish in statements to Politico. "There's more than one way to skin a
cat, and not everything has to be done through legislation explicitly," she said. “We can
also use the tools that we have here to pressure change in other ways as
well."
That includes the implicit threat of telling regulated
entities they are now on the Official Naughty List for not toeing the political
line and unleashing activist hordes to bombard their social media feeds with
defamatory accusations or to perhaps take more drastic action in the real
world.
Fortunately, not everyone on Capitol Hill has adopted the
scorched earth outlook of Maloney and Ocasio-Cortez, and some are actively
trying to ensure that America’s business and banking sectors are not completely
subsumed into Washington, D.C.’s increasingly toxic political battles.
As we reported last week,
Sens. Kevin Cramer (R-ND) and John Kennedy (R-LA) introduced S. 821 the Freedom Financing
Act, a bill to prohibit discrimination against the firearms industry
in the provision of financial services.
This week, Mike Crapo (R-Idaho), chairman of the Senate
Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs, sent a series of letters this
week to the presidents and chief executive officers of America’s biggest
national banks. Those letters expressed concern with the increasing
politicization of banking services.
“Large banks, which receive significant forms of
government support and benefits, should continue to provide credit and services
to customers and companies that comply with federal and state law and should
not seek to replace legislators and policymakers,” Chairman Crapo wrote.
“Business lending decisions should be based on creditworthiness, rather than
politics and political pressure.”
Chairman Crapo’s letter also referenced the Politico
article quoting Ocasio-Cortez on “pressur[ing] change” outside the lawmaking
process as an example of this disturbing trend.
The Obama administration pursued similar tactics under
Operation Choke Point (OCP), with federal regulators leaning on banks to drop
relationships with gun sellers and other lawful but disfavored businesses who
were portrayed as a “reputational risk” to the institutions’ financial
soundness.
But those objectives were hotly denied by the
administration and dismissed as a “conspiracy theory”
by its media surrogates.
Yet now they are being openly promoted and celebrated by
those on the far left, which pursues the same style of government corruption,
but without the self-awareness to engage in any pretense of hiding it.
Ocasio-Cortez would apparently be only too happy to tell
you that OCP was A-OK.
For now, fortunately, these anti-gunners’ worst ambitions
are still kept somewhat in check by the division of political power in
Washington, D.C.
Should that situation change, lawful firearms businesses
and other targets of the far left’s wrath won’t just be fighting overreaching
legislation and bad publicity from a complicit press.
They’ll be facing their exclusion from modern society
altogether.
No comments:
Post a Comment