Tuesday, April 21, 2009

Obama “I have nothing to hide but I’m hiding it.”

Special update April 11, 2011
AKA Obama - We've Got Your Number - 042-68-4425

“I have nothing to hide but I’m hiding it.”
AKA Obama Fans: All together now – say OMG!!

by Aristotle the Hun

(AKA - Also Known As: an acronym used to describe suspicious persons who use more than one name)

Somehow, you know its coming. That OMG moment is just around the corner. You can feel the inescapable reality creeping up on you. Something will leak. Someone will spill the beans.

“For nothing is hid that shall not be made manifest, nor anything secret that shall not be known and come to light.” Luke 8:17

1. Oh what a tangled web we weave . . .
2. Please get this straight:
3. The Birth Document published on AKA Obama’s Web Site Isn’t Adequate Evidence of Place of Birth Even if it Isn’t a Forgery
4. No Evidence of a Hawaiian Birth for AKA Obama – What About Kenya?
5. The Crux of the Legal Straw That Can Break AKA Obama’s Back
6. Enough on the Hidden Birth Certificate and Forged Documents. What if AKA Obama was Actually Born in Hawaii?
9. What we know for sure that makes AKA Obama ineligible
10. Pay attention to this next quoted paragraph:
11. AKA Obama’s crimes

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

1. Oh what a tangled web we weave . . .It isn’t hard to imagine the gnawing anxiety that AKA OBAMA lives with, day in and day out. Much has been written about AKA OBAMA’s behavior that reminds mental health experts and others of NPD (Narcissistic Personality Disorder.) A frequent manifestation of such a disorder is The Narcissist, as Liar and Con-man.

This disorder is frequently misunderstood as “self-love.” A more accurate understanding is love of a reflection of one’s self. Abused, abandoned and neglected children will compensate for damaged egos by creating an ideal reflection of themselves that they then embellish and vigorously defend. A person with NPD is quite capable of a mind twisting position like, “I have nothing to hide, but I am hiding things anyway.” AKA OBAMA certainly fits the model of having such a childhood. While I am not in the position to deliver an official In Absentia diagnosis of a full strength NPD case, many of the indicators are present.

If AKA OBAMA were not in a position of public trust, most of us would probably overlook such deception and secrecy. For those of us who care about our Constitution and the rule of law, the issue becomes clear in this article that appeared in on-line Pravda by international columnist Mark S. McGrew, The Mysterious Shadow: Code Name Obama.

Most Americans do not want their president to be secretive about his past. However, if one is living a lie to preserve the ego compensating, idealized reflection of self, one will go to great lengths to hide things that most would routinely reveal.

For the person who has NPD tendencies, the lies used to create the reflection become so numerous that eventually the man in the mirror cracks, and so does the real human being hiding behind the reflection.

A useful tool in evaluating things that are not known with certainty is Occam’s razor. When multiple competing hypotheses are equal in other respects, the principle recommends selecting the hypothesis that introduces the fewest assumptions and postulates the fewest entities. It is in this sense that Occam's razor is usually understood. I condense this to the simple question: what is most likely? In our discussion of the documents which AKA has hidden, most of this article is an examination of which explanation is most likely.

For example, which is most likely;
(a) AKA OBAMA is hiding documents that are innocuous?
(b) AKA OBAMA is hiding documents that are damaging?

What we know with certainty is that AKA OBAMA is not practicing the virtue of full disclosure. “ The biggest question, and the biggest reason for asking more questions, is the fact Obama has enlisted law firms across the nation to battle every attempt to access, among other documents, his birth, schooling, immigration or passport records.” New Jersey attorney Mario Apuzzo

There are so many potential sources that can end AKA OBAMA’s Presidency that it is impossible to keep them all quiet. It’s just a matter of time. As columnist Davvy Kidd says, IMPOSTOR PRESIDENT OBAMA: VICTORY WILL BE SHORT LIVED. First, let’s think of all the lawyers and support staff involved in keeping the birth certificate issue quiet. Isn’t it likely that some of them know what they are hiding? Isn’t it likely that several people at the Hawaiian Department of Public Health know what is, or is not, on the original birth certificate that AKA OBAMA refuses to release? Did you know that there is a one million dollar reward offered for AKA OBAMA’s Hawaiian birth certificate?

2. Please get this straight:
Hawaiian officials have not validated AKA OBAMA’s place of birth. What they have said is that they “have the original document” on file. They haven’t offered a clue as to what information is in that document nor have they said what kind of birth certificate is on file; a conventional birth certificate issued by a hospital with a doctor’s signature or the kind of birth certificate issued by Hawaii on the basis of an affidavit? The Hawaiian officials are not part of a cover-up. They can not legally validate what is on that document without a court order or permission from “our” Chicago con-man. Recently a Hawaiian government official stepped over the legal line and overtly stated that AKA Obama’s “vital records” showed that he was born in Hawaii. It is entirely possible for the “vital records” of Hawaii to show than a person was born in Hawaii when in fact that person could have been born elsewhere.

Laws of the Territory of Hawaii ACT 96 To Provide For The Issuance Of Certificates Of Hawaiian Birth was in effect from 1911 until 1972 and allowed someone who was born outside the Hawaiian Islands to be registered as though he were born in Hawaii. Under that law, someone simply would have presented herself to the Hawaiian authorities and declared that the child was born in Hawaii. The person could have sworn under oath and presented witnesses and other evidence. If the authorities accepted it, that was the end of it. All a person had to do was file a false statement and Hawaii took them at their word.

One could not just say "My kid was born in Des Moines but I want him to have a Hawaiian birth record". But if you lied no investigation was conducted to validate your claim and the Hawaiian birth record was issued no questions asked.

Knowledge of this practice was wide spread and there are probably thousands of people who obtained Hawaiian birth records between 1911 and 1972 through the process of affidavits and witnesses rather than hospitals and delivery doctors.

One high profile example of the Hawaiian birth certificate policy was the president of the first Chinese republic. Sun Yat-sen was born on 12 November 1866 to a peasant family in the village of Cuiheng, China, but by 1904 he had a Hawaiian birth certificate and was officially a citizen of the United States. The wording on Sun Yat-sen’s Hawaiian birth certificate reveals that at age 18 he “made application for a Certificate of Birth. And that it appears from his affidavit and the evidence submitted by witnesses that he was born in the Hawaiian Islands.” Appears? It also appears that AKA Obama was born in Hawaii. Does the AKA Obama birth certificate on file with the State of Hawaii have language similar to the birth certificate of SunYat-sen?

The only way to know where AKA OBAMA was actually born is to view AKA OBAMA's original birth certificate on file in Hawaii to see what kind of birth certificate it is, and to examine what corroborating evidence supports what it says about AKA OBAMA's alleged place of birth. If the birth was in a hospital, as AKA OBAMA has maintained, such evidence would be the name of the hospital and the name and signature of the doctor who delivered him.

Here is the information on Hawaiian law that makes it clear why we will never know the truth until we see the actual birth certificate.http://www.westernjournalism.com/?page_id=2697

The records of hospitals in Hawaii have been searched and there is no record of Stanley Ann Obama ever having given birth to a child. In a November 2004 interview with the Rainbow Newsletter, Maya Soetoro told reporters her half-brother Sen. Barack Obama was born on Aug. 4, 1961, at Queens Medical Center in Honolulu. After it was concluded that Obama and his mother were never there in February 2008, Maya told reporters for the Honolulu Star-Bulletin that Obama was at the Kapiolani Medical Center for Women and Children. Obama and Mom were never there either. AKA Obama has said he was born at Kapiolani Medical Center yet no hospital official has suggested that their facility should be designated as the birth place of a President. Odd!

Which is most likely?
AKA Obama is hiding a conventional birth certificate issued by a hospital and signed by a doctor?
AKA Obama is hiding a birth certificate attested to by witnesses with no hospital or doctor mentioned?

3. The Birth Document published on AKA Obama’s Web Site Isn’t Adequate Evidence of Place of Birth Even if it Isn’t a Forgery

The Certification of Live Birth that was published on AKA OBAMA’s campaign web site is not a Birth Certificate. It is easy to tell the difference between the two types of documents. It is very likely that the COLB used by AKA OBAMA’s campaign is a fraudulent document. Several forensic document examiners have carefully scrutinized the COLB and declared it suspicious or an obvious forgery.

Forensic document examiner Sandra Ramsey Lines, a Former Federal Examiner with a long history of expert testimony in state and federal courts, has testified in an affidavit that states, in part:

Sandra Lines says, “I can state with certainty that the COLB presented on the internet by the various groups, which include the “Daily Kos,” the Obama Campaign, “Factcheck.org” and others cannot be relied upon as genuine. Dr. Polarik raises issues concerning the COLB that I can affirm. Software such as Adobe Photoshop can produce complete images or alter images that appear to be genuine; therefore, any image offered on the internet cannot be relied upon as being a copy of the authentic document.” Sandra Ramsey Lines summary is posted at U. S. Law Blog.

Who Certified AKA Obama as "Natural Born" at FactCheck?

Joe Miller and Jess Henig, that's who! They are a couple of partisan Obots -- just what you'd expect -- Jess took the photos presented on their webpage and did all of the writing, while Bob basically held the COLB open for Jess to photograph. Those two are completely unqualified to perform any kind of forensic examination of any document, and FactCheck.org knows it -- and so do Henig and Miller.

Here is another thing to consider. Birth Certificates might be protected by privacy laws in Hawaii but transactions for purchase should be available as public record. The COLB that AKA Obama offers as his proof (and has been deemed unreliable) just showed up without explanation. There is nothing from the State of Hawaii about AKA Obama requesting a copy of his BC.

Obama, nor the DNC has come forward with evidence of a request for the copy so where did it come from? These cost $10 to get and if requested via the phone someone would have had to use a credit card or sent a check or money order by mail, yet, nothing is, or ever has been, offered as proof of even a request for the copy. Someone could have said here is a CC receipt, or a canceled check, or the remitter’s copy of a money order.Someone should have this without a doubt. Has anyone asked the State of Hawaii if there is a record of payment for a COLB from AKA Obama?This is something that could even be forged easily but not even a forged receipt or record of payment of any kind has been offered.Could the reason for this be that Obama’s COLB is a forgery and no one even thought to forge a receipt for it from Hawaii?

Q: Is that COLB a false document like some people are claiming?
A: No, of course not, here is the receipt for the COLB from the State of Hawaii.
And be sure to see this documented evidence that AKA Obama's COLB is different than other COLBs
AKA Obama COLB Filed But Never Accepted - Click Image For Full View

AKA Obama Eligibility - Important Research I missed on my previous updates.

Nail in the COLB Coffin

4. No Evidence of a Hawaiian Birth for AKA Obama – What About Kenya?

As for AKA Obama’s birth in Kenya we hear this from attorney Mario Apuzzo “We have not heard from one international, federal, state, or local police or security agency that Obama's birth place has been officially confirmed.An Investigator working for Philip Berg, Esq. learned the following which is contained in the investigator's affidavit dated October 30, 2008, that was filed with a Federal District Court in the case of Berg v. Obama, O8-cv-04083: Obama's step-grandmother, Sarah Obama, told Bishop McRae, who was in the United States, during a telephonic interview on October 12, 2008, while she was in her home located in Alego-Kogello, Kenya, that was full of security police and people and family who were celebrating then-Senator Obama's success story, that she witnessed Obama's birth in Kenya, not the United States (the English and Swahili conversation is recorded and available for listening). She was adamant about this fact not once but twice. The conversation which was placed on speaker phone was translated into English by "Kweli Shuhubia" and one of the grandmother's grandsons who were present with the grandmother in the house. After the grandmother made the same statement twice her grandson intervened, saying "No, No, No, He was born in the United States." During the interview, the grandmother never changed her reply that she was present when Obama was born in Kenya. The fact that later in the same interview she change her statement to say that Obama was born in Hawaii does not change the fact that she at first stated twice that she was present when Obama was born in Kenya. I cannot imagine a grandmother not knowing whether she was present or not at the birth of her American Senator and U.S. Presidential candidate grandson.

The investigator then personally went to the hospital in Mombassa, Kenya. He spoke with the Provincial Civil Registrar and he learned that there were records of Ann Dunham giving birth to "Barack Hussein Obama, III" in Mombassa, Kenya on August 4, 1961. The investigator then "spoke directly with an Official, the Principal Registrar, who openly confirmed the birthing records of Senator Barack H. Obama, Jr. and his mother were present, however, the file on Barack H. Obama, Jr. was classified and profiled. The Official explained Barack Hussein Obama, Jr. [sic] birth in Kenya is top secret. [H]e was further instructed to go to the Attorney General's Office and to the Minister in Charge of Immigration if [he] wanted further information."

It is alleged that the Kenyan government authorities have refused to cooperate and have thwarted all efforts by anyone to obtain any documents concerning Obama.”

That is a real mind bender. Let’s see; AKA Obama wasn’t born in Kenya but his birth place is declared to be “top secret” by Kenyan officials. There are no records of AKA Obama being born in Kenya and those nonexistent records are being withheld and are “top secret”. That sounds so much like what the official position of AKA Obama could be; “I have nothing to hide but I’m hiding it.”

5. The Crux of the Legal Straw That Can Break AKA Obama’s BackAnother piece of information that many fail to realize is that in the birth certificate cases, all that is needed is for the case to be heard. This case will be over in the “Discovery” phase. Before a trial starts, both sides are required by the court to put all their cards on the table to avoid “trial by ambush.” The judge orders all evidence to be presented by both sides. Since this case is about discovering documents that are hidden, the case will be decided by court-ordered presentation of all relevant records. Lawyers in birth certificate cases don’t need to win a trial; they only need to get a trial.

For those of you who think ridicule and name calling are effective debate tactics, I refer your kool-aid drenched, tin foil protected brains (a dose of your own medicine) to this article from American Thinker: Why the Barack Obama Birth Certificate Issue Is Legitimate .

6. Enough on the Hidden Birth Certificate and Forged Documents. What if AKA Obama was Actually Born in Hawaii?What about the legal team that is keeping AKA OBAMA’s college records hidden? Several people probably know what they are hiding. The best guess as to what is so secret isn’t likely to be bad grades. More likely his admission papers will say he was a foreign student, or that he was receiving financial aid as a foreign student. How many people do you estimate already know what is on AKA OBAMA’s college documents? Those records were handled routinely for more than 20 years. How many personnel in the registrar’s offices of Occidental College, Columbia University, and Harvard University have seen AKA OBAMA’s records and know what is in them? How many of those people would be willing to talk about it, or maybe even “leak” just one sheet of paper that would put even more cracks in AKA OBAMA’s mirror? Is that number likely to be zero? Do you think that AKA OBAMA worries about how many people know something that could destroy his career? Fear of being “found out” is an obsession for NPD types. The Cost to hide Obama's past now 1.35 million.

So far we have only talked about the original birth certificate, supposedly locked up in Hawaii, and AKA OBAMA’s draft and college records. Already the potential sources for leaks are numerous. And you can bet that AKA OBAMA and his lawyers are concerned about many more possible leaks than these.There is a long list of vulnerability points for leaks, and there is a story behind every one of them. This list is one of many available and comes from one of my favorite blogs

Original, vault copy birth certificate — Not released — Lawyers fees — greater than $1,000,000 — birth certificate — $15.

Certification of Live Birth — Released – CounterfeitCase and Affidavits

Admitted British citizenship at birth — Confirmed via FactCheck.org/FightTheSmears.com

Birth Announcement — Alleged to be a forgery

Obama/Dunham marriage license — Not released

Obama/Dunham divorce – Released (by independent investigators)

Soetoro/Dunham marriage license — Not released

Soetoro adoption records — Not released

Fransiskus Assisi School School application — Released (by independent investigators)

Punahou School records — Not released

Soetoro/Dunham divorce – Released (by independent investigators)

Selective Service Registration — Released – Counterfeit – Document Locator Number update – another FOIA request

Occidental College records — Not released

Passport — Not released and records scrubbed clean by Obama’s terrorism and intelligence adviser

Columbia College records — Not released

Columbia thesis — “Soviet Nuclear Disarmament” – Not released

Harvard College records — Not released

Harvard Law Review articles — None

Illinois Bar Records — Not released.

Baptism certificate — None

Medical records — Not released

Illinois State Senate records — None

Illinois State Senate schedule — Lost

Law practice client list — Not released

University of Chicago scholarly articles — None

Kindergarten records – this” lost or hidden” incident deserves more detail:

“Obama began his education in Hawaii's public schools. He was enrolled in Ms. Sakai’s kindergarten class at Noelani Elementary School in 1967. He was only there a couple or three months before he was off to Indonesia.

Click photo for full image
The first little boy in the third row, left is "Barry Obama." Obama’s sister Maya Soetoro-Ng confirms that the boy is Obama.

The two white girls in the same row are probably the Nordyke twins. They were not identical twins, but they did have the same smile. They were born the same time as Obama. I still want to know what happened to their birth announcement. Twins, being born to a prominent physician is news. More specifically, I want to know what happened to the space their birth announcement was in.Or am I expected to believe that Vital Statistics included Obama's name on their announcement list, and forgot the Nordyke Twins? Born within hours of Obama according to Eleanor Nordyke, their names should be here: Birth Announcement here -- expand to regular size to read.

Those who strive to legitimize AKA Obama have made much of the questionable “birth announcement” that may have been published in the Hawaiian newspapers. This “evidence” if so flimsy that refuting it may actually lend substance to the claim.

There are literally dozens of anti-Birther articles in the media that continue to claim that AKA Obama's birth announcement was in "two different newspapers". These two newspapers are printed by the same publisher and share the same stories and sources. The purpose of this “two newspaper” claim is to falsely imply that these newspapers are independent of each other, and therefore, unlikely to run the same birth announcement.

Birth announcements were called in or mailed in all the time. The Nordyke twins were announced, then recently (about a year ago) that announcement was replaced with the AKA Obama one. And the original owner of the “birth” residence died about 2 years, before the newly discovered birth announcement was touted by the Obama campaign after AKA Obama's Hawaiian 'birth” was challenged. There is also evidence of splicing in the microfilm. The most likely scenario is that the Nordyke twin’s birth announcement was spliced out and replaced by a post-dated AKA Obama announcement. The fact that the home address in the fake AKA Obama announcement was never occupied by Ann Dunham and Barack Obama, and that the birth announcement just happened to appear right after the actual tenant of the home died, pretty much drives a stake though the heart of this story. Here is WND's story about the birth address.

A more comprehensive analysis debunking the birth announcement claim; Here is “jbjd’s” answer:

There isn't one single, credible source that has any concrete facts whatsoever, that Obama was born in Hawaii.


Eleanor Nordyke of Manoa shows the birth certificates of her twin daughters. They were born at Kapiolani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital the day after Obama was born

 Here's a surprise! Hawaii's Department of Education has been unable to find AKA Obama’s Kindergarten records. By this time maybe you are no longer surprised.

Obama's Noelani Elementary School Kindergarten records, oddly missing from the State of Hawaii Department of Education, is the first in a series of chronological "coincidences" that obscure AKA Obama’s history.Although Obama has had a first-class education that spanned 25 years, there is only a single document that has ever been released, the application for entrance to the Franciscus Assisi Primary School (next item) -- and that document was discovered by independent investigators.

This is an important feature because Kindergarten records for original school entry would have contained the following:
1. Obama's REAL Birth Certificate.
2. An application with the following:
• His Legal name.
• Parents or Legal Guardians’ names.
• Date of Birth
• Place of Birth
• Vaccination Records (revealing a timeline to the place and DOB.)

It also is important for two additional reasons:
A. The Department of Education does not "lose" the records of one particular student. (So, who paid whom what sum to make this record disappear?)
B. There would have been NO shameful low-test scores, NO embarrassing Equal Opportunity advancements, and NO trails of fraudulent funding to hide that could possibly "excuse" the quashing of public school Kindergarten entry records. For the rest of his life he attended very expensive private schools and has had his records legally sealed to deny the public his true life story.

This is different. Hawaii should be able to verify he attended their school since he is featured in class photographs. State and federal tax dollars paid for his initial year of education. Why is there no documentation?

This is the beginning of an intentionally erased life of a fraud and conman and it reeks of complicity by officials within the State of Hawaii’s Dept. of Health and Dept. of Education.” Hat tip to Don Fredrick at http://www.colony14.net/

International columnist Mark S. McGrew sums up AKA Obama’s missing history succinctly: “With all of Obama’s different names, with his documented long term relations to convicted criminals, with his active efforts to prohibit us from knowing where he was born, with his active efforts to keep us from seeing his credentials, with his documented registration to practice law, professing to have only one name, with his being an ex-attorney not authorized to practice law, but representing himself as such, with his non-existent “Office of The President Elect,” with the dozen or so lawsuits against him to determine his citizenship status, with the various promises he made to voters and on which he has since reneged, with his documented lack of respect to America, with his refusal to salute the American flag with others on stage or even to stand at attention, and his other disrespectful actions, with his many millions of dollars in campaign funds suspected to be from foreign sources, with campaign donations accepted from possible terrorists groups, . . . Obama has proven beyond a shadow of a doubt that he can not in any way, shape or form be trusted.”

I would ask the reader to accept the premise that there are many potential leaks from those things that are being kept hidden by a man who promised transparency in government. But there are other problems from sources that are not hidden.

9. What we know for sure that makes AKA Obama ineligible
AKA OBAMA himself has made it known that his father was from Kenya.

We know that records indicate that AKA OBAMA’s biological father was Barack Obama SR, a Kenyan native, and a British subject whose citizenship status was governed by The British Nationality Act of 1948.

That same act governed the status of Obama SR’s offspring. We know that the geographical location of AKA OBAMA’s birth is not considered by British law. Who the father was determines citizenship, not where you are born. Had AKA OBAMA been born in Tokyo or Texas he would still be a citizen of the United Kingdom under The British Nationality Act. A similar practice governs who is considered a citizen in several countries. Judaism is matrilineal, meaning that your mother’s, lineage determines whether you are a Jew. That is why Jews from all over the world can claim Israeli citizenship.

British Nationality Act of 1948 (Part II, Section 5): Subject to the provisions of this section, a person born after the commencement of this Act shall be a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies by descent if his father is a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies at the time of the birth.In other words, at the time of his birth, AKA OBAMA might have been a U.S. citizen (by virtue of his allegedly being born in Hawaii) and a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies (the UKC) by virtue of being born to a father who was a citizen of the UKC.Obama’s British citizenship was short-lived. On Dec. 12, 1963, Kenya formally gained its independence from the United Kingdom. Chapter VI, Section 87 of the Kenyan Constitution specifies that:

1. Every person who, having been born in Kenya is, on 11th December, 1963 a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies or a British protected person shall become a citizen of Kenya on 12th December, 1963…
2. Every person who, having been born outside Kenya is, on 11th December, 1963 a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies or a British protected person shall, if his father becomes, or would but for his death have become, a citizen of Kenya by virtue of subsection (1), becomes a citizen of Kenya on the 12th of December, 1963.

As a citizen of the UKC who was born in Kenya, Obama’s father automatically received Kenyan citizenship via subsection (1). So given that Obama qualified for citizen of the UKC status at birth and given that Obama’s father became a Kenyan citizen via subsection (1), it follows that Obama did in fact have Kenyan citizenship after 1963.

So we know for sure that, if OBAMA Sr is in fact his legal father, then AKA OBAMA was a citizen of the United Kingdom and then Kenya. Given all the efforts to keep his birth certificate hidden, it is reasonable to assume that he is not a citizen of the United States, but even if he were born in downtown Denver he would still have triple citizenship, and is thus ineligible to hold the office of President.

There is a similar problem with AKA OBAMA’s possible Indonesian citizenship. School records have surfaced that clearly indicate AKA OBAMA being listed as a "Muslim" with "Indonesian" citizenship.

So AKA OBAMA has been a citizen of the UK, Kenya, and there are inconclusive documents indicating that he was also a citizen of Indonesia. The missing birth certificate may be a false clue that leads away from the big crime. Even if Obama were born in Hawaii* he would still be ineligible to serve as President because of his dual (perhaps triple) citizenship.

*not likely, given the effort expended to keep the information about his birth a secret. By AKA OBAMA's and Bob Bauer, AKA OBAMA's Lead Lawyer's, own reports, AKA OBAMA has spent Hundreds of thousands of Dollars on legal fees defending against lawsuits claiming that he is not eligible. Why would AKA OBAMA spend that much money to hide a $10 Birth Certificate?

10. Pay attention to this next quoted paragraph:
"Don’t be distracted by the birth certificate and Indonesian issues. They are irrelevant to Senator Obama’s ineligibility to be President. Since Barack Obama’s father was a Citizen of Kenya, and therefore subject to the jurisdiction of the United Kingdom at the time of Senator Obama’s birth, then Senator Obama was a British Citizen “at birth,” just like the Framers of the Constitution, and therefore, even if he were to produce an original birth certificate proving he were born on US soil, he still wouldn’t be eligible to be President." Leo C. Donofrio

The facts are clear, and the law is clear. All it will take is for a judge to issue a ruling. Do you think AKA OBAMA and his lawyers fret about this? They certainly are spending hundreds of thousands of dollars to fight this issue. So far, no court or judge has issued a ruling on the merits of any legal case against AKA OBAMA. Cases have been dismissed on legal technicalities, but no actual case has yet been heard.

There are other potential leaks that come from AKA OBAMA’s international history. If Obama was born in Kenya, there should be a record of that birth in UK records. There are probably people in England and Kenya who already have information that would put cracks in AKA OBAMA’s distorted reflection of himself, and there is other information that can be mined from archives. The same is true for Indonesia.

In the unlikely outcome that none of the people talk, and none of the documents surface, would AKA OBAMA than be free of obsessive fear of being found out? No, even if none of his secrets are revealed and none of his lies are exposed, he will continue to remain vulnerable.

11. AKA Obama’s crimes
Because of the way AKA OBAMA ran his campaign; donations from Donald Duck and Mickey Mouse, donations from illegal foreign sources, and ACORN’s crimes; More than half the voter registrations turned in by ACORN canvassers during the last election were not valid, according to testimony to be presented before a House Judiciary subcommittee, etc, AKA Obama is subject to criminal violations of the Internal Revenue Code, federal campaign finance laws, and laws against voter registration fraud, according to a memo by Cleta Mitchell, co-chairman of the Republican National Lawyers Association. In spite of all this Congressional Democrats still want ACORN to be eligible for federal money.
This is the first president in history to flout election campaign laws and receive millions from foreign countries (including Gaza), blockbusting stories that broke at Atlas all during the campaign.
“Obama’s overseas (foreign) contributors are making multiple small donations, ostensibly in their own names, over a period of a few days, some under maximum donation allowances, but others are aggregating in excess of the maximums when all added up.”
The contributions had come from over 50 specifically named countries and major cities.
“Thousands of Obama’s foreign donations ended in cents.” U.S. contributors very rarely contribute in anything other than whole dollar amounts, so the reason why contributions would end with anything other than “.00″ would almost always involve foreign currency translation.

Regardless of how lively an election season might be, a new study shows that more 3.3 million voters on current registration rolls across the country are dead. Another 12.9 million remain on voter registration lists in an area where they no longer live. The analysis was conducted by the Aristotle International Inc., a technology company specializing in political campaigns, developing software and databases for politicians. In total that means about 8.9 percent of all registered voters fall under the category of "deadwood" voters on the rolls, the term for voters who should no longer be eligible to vote in a precinct. The data is here . . .

You may have noticed that the usual role of the media in ferreting out high jinks in high places has not been mentioned. There is no “All the President’s Men” movie in the making. No one is being considered for a Pulitzer Prize for investigating AKA OBAMA. Is journalism dead in America? Well no, not quite.

Somebody, a major news outlet executive, has done the Pulitzer research. On his To The Point News website, Dr. Jack Wheeler said he will “Let the source of the information reveal it, in his own time. "...the details of what he told me are for him to reveal when he chooses, not me. I can tell you it is OMG wild."So get ready folks. One of these days I will be asking all of you AKA Obama fans to, “All together now, say OMG!”

Citizen Grand Juries Are the Power of the people when the government is corrupt
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
In United States vs. Williams (USSC 1992) Justice Scalia :
“Rooted in long centuries of Anglo-American history...the Grand Jury is mentioned in the Bill of Rights, but not in the body of the Constitution. It has not been textually assigned, therefore, to any of the three branches described in the first three Articles. It is a constitutional fixture in its own right.” In other words the power of the Grand Jury is assigned to We the People in order that we may maintain a "more perfect Union."
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Obama has been indicted by Citizens Grand Juries in several States. It is just a matter of time before our judiciary is compelled to issue arrest warrants pursuant to the First, Fifth, Ninth, Tenth and Eleventh Amendments of the United States Constitution. Keep in mind that the role of a grand jury is to determine if enough evidence exists to refer a case to the courts for trial. Can any objective person review information like that presented above and reject the premise that this case needs to be referred to the courts for prosecution?

One example of state laws defining the power of Grand Juries is Texas: “The grand jury's investigation of any matter may be initiated by the court, the district attorney, its own members, or any credible person. The grand jury may summon witnesses by subpoena and examine them under oath. On completion of an investigation the grand jury determines by vote whether or not an indictment should be presented to the court; nine votes are necessary for a decision to indict, and nine members also constitute a quorum.”

Constitutional scholar Gerry Donaldson has given speeches and conducted workshops on how citizens can form their own Grand Juries without judicial initiation or oversight.
It is very likely that the Citizens Grand Jury effort will result in an indictment by a conventionally impaneled Grand Jury.The Citizens Grand Jury was designed by our Founding Fathers to provide We the People with the Power to control our government.

A Sleeping Giant has been awakened in this Country with Patriots all across America voicing their outrage over the illegalities of the Obama campaign at Tea Parties and Town Hall meetings. Our Founding Fathers would be proud of these Patriots. Our Founding Fathers will be prouder still when these Patriots discover the Power of the Citizens Grand Jury.

Our Founding Fathers gave We the People the Fourth Branch of Government, the Citizens Grand Jury, in Our Bill of Rights. These 12 Simple Steps were created by an advising attorney and are the way for Patriots to keep control of the Government and Clean up Corruption in Washington:

“Do not even hint at the target of investigation or indictment. Grand Juries must be formed without bias. If a potential Grand Jury Member has any hint of who is about to be indicted that Grand Jury member may be biased and should not be allowed to serve.”
1) Advertise and Promote the Fact that you are forming a Grand Jury in Blogs, Local Newspapers and Community Organizations.
2) Form the Grand Jury and select a Foreman.
3) Select a Private Attorney General to make Presentments to Grand Jury, if local DA refuses to make presentments.
4) Select a convenient Meeting Place.
5) Communicate with all Citizens who have criminal information to present.
6) Schedule presentments by said Citizens.
7) Subpoena documents from Government Offices and Officials.
8) Schedule presentment of said Documents to Grand Jury by Grand Jury Attorney General.
9. Have Grand Jury Attorney General present said Documents to Grand Jury.
10) After investigation and deliberation is completed, vote and issue a True Bill (Indictment) or No True Bill.
11 Announce all Indictments to the Press.
12) Serve the Indictment on the Judiciary for the Issuance of Arrest Warrants.

One of my advising attorneys thought it was important for all people involved in the Grand jury movement to know about this tactic.It is very important that Patriots know to do this:
1) Find the CROOKED politicians in your City or Town that supported BO.
2) Link these CROOKED politicians to crimes committed by the BO Campaign.
3) Charge CROOKED politicians and BO as co-conspirators in the commission of campaign crimes and you have a Criminal Case against BO that can be prosecuted in Court in your County Seat.
4) Of course, you add all the other Crimes that BO committed elsewhere to your INDICTMENT also. But to prosecute BO in your State you have to link him as a co-conspirator to crimes committed in your State.

All we need is one jurisdiction to order “Discovery.” The case against AKA OBAMA is unique because it will be over in the Discovery phase, as the first step in a criminal complaint. The goal of the project I support is to discover what AKA OBAMA doesn’t want us to know, and why he doesn’t want us to know it. Our goal will be achieved before any trial or verdict. It will be achieved as soon as one honest judge in one State orders AKA to submit all of the documents that he has been hiding from the American People for the past two years.

Our goal is to present indictments in every jurisdiction of the union:

50 States
3,007 entities named “County”16 Boroughs in Alaska11 Census Areas in Alaska (areas not organized into Boroughs)64 Parishes in Louisiana42 Independent Cities (1 in Maryland, 1 in Missouri, 1 in Nevada, and the remainder in Virginia)1 District - the Federal District or District of Columbia.
For a total of 3,191 opportunities to bring criminal charges against offending politicians.

Even if an independently convened grand jury is mistakenly seen as merely people assembling to exercise their Constitutional right to “redress their grievances,” or report crimes, that is no small thing. Hundreds of people in such “assemblies” will be examining evidence and presenting the results of their investigation to appropriate county, state, and federal authorities, some of whom will almost certainly form more conventional grand juries to indict AKA OBAMA. Can one honestly surmise that there is not one prosecutor or judge in the entire nation who questions AKA OBAMA’s eligibility to be President? Once the Citizen Grand Jury presentments or indictments are issued, it is likely that many prosecutors and judges will want a copy of the evidence.

The Citizen Grand Jury Process with which I am affiliated is using recognized expert witnesses with a long professional history of forensic testimony. The guiding principles for the project are the usual protocols of epistemology, scientific methodology, and rules of evidence. Any prosecutor or judge who ignores such evidence and testimony is at risk of being seen as acquiescent.

Rev. Sewell, an ordained Christian clergyman, a Pastoral Psychotherapist, a member of Mensa, a U.S. Navy Veteran, and a Member of the Association For Intelligence Officers. He is a frequent commentator on religious and political issues.

For a discussion on the power of Citizen Grand Juries see: Pouring Oil on Troubled Waters

JOURNALISTS: If you read the articles at the three links below, and review the citations at the embedded links, you will be “literate” about the facts of the “eligibility” story and will be able to inform the public objectively.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
An attorney reviews the evidence relevant to Obama’s eligibility to serve:
Why Can’t Obama Give a Simple and Truthful Answer to the Birth Certificate Question?
by Mario Apuzzo
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
An objective view of both sides of the eligibility issue
Obama Presidential Eligibility – An Introductory Primer
by Stephen Tonchen
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Complete factual biography scrupulously researched:
The Obama Timeline
by Don Fredrick


Opus #6 said...

OMG, I hope this comes true, and SOON.

Aristotle The Hun said...

Get the word out. Spread this far and wide.

The people can rescue the nation.

Leo the Lawyer said...

Great work, Aristotle!

None of us can afford to be acquiescent about this.

All those who love Our Country have a duty as American Citizens to speak up about this Constitutional Crisis until Our Courts hear our Grievances.

Please watch the videos of Supreme Court Justices Thomas and Roberts on FoxNews.com. These are Honorable and Just Men. They will hear our cause if the lawyers present the right case.

TexGirl said...

Well done! OUTSTANDING article Aristotle, and you have dubbed the usurper with the most fitting name yet.... AKA OBAMA!

Anonymous said...

OMG we Obama fans are glad Bush is at home in Crawford, Palin is waiting for the snow to thaw someday right now and Cheney has nothing better to do then cry about Obama



Aristotle The Hun said...

And Obama will be deported to Kenya. I guess Hillery will be the next POTUS.


Also Known as: Appeal to Mockery, The Horse Laugh.
Description of Appeal to Ridicule
The Appeal to Ridicule is a fallacy in which ridicule or mockery is substituted for evidence in an " argument." This line of " reasoning" has the following form:
1. X, which is some form of ridicule, is presented (typically directed at the claim).
2. Therefore claim C is false.
This sort of "reasoning" is fallacious because mocking a claim does not show that it is false. This is especially clear in the following example: "1+1=2! That's the most ridiculous thing I have ever heard!"
Examples of Appeal to Ridicule
1. "Sure my worthy opponent claims that we should lower tuition, but that is just laughable."
2. "Support the ERA? Sure, when the women start paying for the drinks! Hah! Hah!"
3. "Those wacky conservatives! They think a strong military is the key to peace! There’s a tin foil hat idea"


Anonymous said...

cuz you never mock right?

Ok lets be serious then please explain how Obama meets the diagnostic criteria for narcassistic personality disorder in the DSM IV

Aristotle The Hun said...

Either you will need to actually read the posts you comment upon or I will need to quit responding to your comments.

I made it very clear that Obama does not meet the diagnostic criteria for narcassistic personality disorder in the DSM IV

1. Personality disorders are unique in that they are exaggerations of traits we might all have. Example: if I carefully pack and plan for a trip including selecting which underwear I will wear every day and color coordinate my ties and socks I would not be accurately diagnosed as having an obsessive compulsive disorder. The traits observed must result in a dysfunctional impediment to carry a DSM code. If I was so careful about packing that I missed my flight (dysfunction) then we might want a diagnostic referral for me. So, it is completely possible to exhibit many of the traits of a personality disorder without meeting the diagnostic criteria.

2. If there is one personality disorder there may be more. They come in clusters. The Narcissistic Personality Disorder is part of the “B” cluster disorders. (Cluster B (the Dramatic, Emotional, or Erratic Cluster) is comprised of the Antisocial, Borderline, Histrionic, and Narcissistic Personality Disorders.) So, if a person has one personality disorder he/she may have two or three more.

3. Obama exhibits several traits of the “B” cluster disorders but I do not think he can be seen as dysfunctional. So while a personality can be difficult and problematic it is not the same thing as being “diagnosable”.

4. I am sure we are all agreed that there is no such thing as an “In absentia” diagnosis.
5. So, in the interests of accuracy, it seems appropriate to say that Obama exhibits many of the traits associated with Cluster B (the Dramatic, Emotional, or Erratic Cluster) is comprised of the Antisocial, Borderline, Histrionic, and Narcissistic Personality Disorders, but he probably does not fit the diagnostic criteria for any of the cluster “B” disorders. That does not mean that he is not dangerous to the public and a PITA to all who know him.

Anonymous said...

I struggle to follow your logic. If he doesnt fit that diagnosis you need to stop throwing that term around. Most leaders are a PITA except when they are fighting for what you want.

You throw psycholocical terminology around but dont play by the rules. I could say you display some narcassistic traits as well by quoting yourself and using many links to your aown articles as well as having multilple blogs and mentioning MENSA every other day but you and I both know that in and of itself doesnt make you one so its ignorant to even make such a statement unless there is solid diagnostic proof to back that up.

Personality disorders are hard to figure out and harder to treat most of your readers dont know the intricasies of this and you use this to your advanage in your quest to make Obama look like a psychologicaly unstable madman.

Alls Im saying is untill I see you present a case that fits something in the DSM IV its all just mularkey.

Aristotle The Hun said...

I believe that you struggle, but not enough.

My post was to modify toward accuracy the more overt post of another person.

Again, had your read the post I wouldn't be needing to correct your inaccuracies now.

Please be considerate enough to read before you comment or I will lose my patience with responding to your comments and just delete them.

Anonymous said...

My comment was specific to the introduction then you went into the whole Obama birth thing and honestly Ive given up on you on that issue. You can chase your tail endlessly on that if you want Im more curious about your curious use of Psychology in politics as you well know.

I dont mind if you delete my comments its your blog you can do what you like.

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
GoFuckYourself said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
EatShit said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
nonstatist said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
NumberBetween1and10 said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
KnockKnock said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
johnqpublic said...

I'm looking forward to the day when all you 'birthers' are rounded up, put on buses, taken out of town to a field, handed entrenching tools, given 90 minutes or so to dig, and then machine-gunned into the trench.

Mohammad Atta said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
nonstatist said...

I'm looking forward to the day when all you 'birthers' are rounded up, put on buses, taken out of town to a field, handed entrenching tools, given 90 minutes or so to dig, and then machine-gunned into the trench.Sounds like a murdering leftist to me.

Tell me, did you prefer Pol Pot or Hitler? (that's democratic-socialist vs national-socialist)

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Anonymous said...

Good to see BO supporters expose themselves for the maliciously violent haters that they are.

This attack reeks of the stench of the unethical lawyer Bob Bauer, attorney for the defendant BO.

Aristotle The Hun said...


You didn't hit a nerve. The post was part of an obscenity attack overnight that came from the minds of those who voted for Obama.

They have been deleted now and their IP address noted.

Anonymous said...

How do you know that person voted for Obama? It would seem to have been directed at my last post considering this was the only thread that was left in and it didnt seem to be directed at you.

Mark S. McGrew said...

To johnqpublic:
And you wonder why we don't want Obama and his "useful idiot" Zombies in office. Keep posting. We're keeping name lists too.

Anonymous said...

Can one honestly surmise that there is not one prosecutor or judge in the entire nation who questions AKA OBAMA’s eligibility to be President?No.

But there's one little problem with this line of reasoning.

And that is, there's not one prosecutor or judge in the entire nation who can do anything about it.

The only entity which may prosecute, try, and subsequently remove a sitting president from office is Congress.


Aristotle The Hun said...

Corrrect! Now put the dots together. I know you are smart enough to figure out that evidence to indict equals evidence to impeach.

I am puzzled that there are people who seem to want a man in the office of POTUS who spends tons of money to keep people from knowing who he really is.

The DSM hasn't classified this behavior yet. Or have they?

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Aristotle The Hun said...

Geez I get tired of responding to your comments based on a false premise because you haven't read the article. The part you quoted is preceded by this.

"Even if an independently convened grand jury is mistakenly seen as merely people assembling to exercise their Constitutional right to “redress their grievances,” that is no small thing."

Please note "mistakenly seen"

You are also just plain wrong on several other counts and I am not going to waste any more time on your misperceptions.

I have regular advice from three people who know lots more about this than you and they have a dramatically different interpretation. All three are attorneys. Two of whom you know their names and another who keeps a low profile because he is a professor of constitutional law at a law school.

Now, who should I listen to? You or the consensus of three attorneys who are involved in the eligibility law suits?

Anonymous said...

FYI the guy now signing his posts with K is not me I havent commented since

April 22, 2009 12:26 PM

Im just reading today =)


Aristotle The Hun said...


Boy am I glad to know that. I was afraid you had a lobotomy, or perhaps early onset dementia.

Liberal may mean many several negative adjectives, but you have never been as stupid as "K".

DSM 294.9?

Anonymous said...

A good way to tell is if there are no misspellings its probably not me.

Im not going to say one way or the other on what he said mostly because you guys are arguing constitutional legal minutia that Im no expert on.

Personaly I dont think the grand jury thing is going to touch Obama but its interesting to see that you guys seem to think it might so for now Ill just observe on that issue.

Liberal is to conservative as ying is to yang. The conotation of adjectives used in conjunction depends where on that spectrum you fall and how intolerant you are opposing views.


Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Aristotle The Hun said...


Expressed like a true son of academia.


Anonymous said...

Do you really not understand what I said?

I do work in Academia but as Academia goes Im in a pretty conservative spot. Lets just say Im the trouble making liberal around here. I also went to school at the same University and have experienced zero of the claims of liberal indoctrination that I see trumpeted.

Anonymous said...

that last part should say

"are to opposing views"

not "are opposing views"

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Aristotle The Hun said...

I didn't delete your posts because of their political content. There are plenty of liberals who post here. I deleted the posts because you are a jerk who posts low quality, inaccurate, rants that don't make sense.

I would have deleted them sooner but I have a liberal friend who posts as "K" and I thought you were him.

He let me know that the posts weren't from him.

So it is personal. I don't like you. Don't post again.

Thoughtful posts from sane, intelligent liberals are welcome.

Aristotle The Hun said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Aristotle The Hun said...

(916) 457-1046

Now you are as transparent as I am. Too bad Obama won't do the same.

I guess we will just need to out him since he won't practice the virtue of full disclosure with his own volition.

Anonymous said...

1) Find the CROOKED politicians in your City or Town that supported BO.

2) Link these CROOKED politicians to crimes committed by the BO Campaign.

3) Charge CROOKED politicians and BO as co-conspirators in the commission of campaign crimes and you have a Criminal Case against BO that can be prosecuted in Court in your County Seat.

4) Of course, you add all the other Crimes that BO committed elsewhere to your INDICTMENT also. But to prosecute BO in your State you have to link him as a co-conspirator to crimes committed in your State.

Anonymous said...

AK is an ostensibly black boy born into a family of a White Racist/Communist/Sexual Pervert Grandfather who raped his daughter Stanley and allowed a number Black men to rape his daughter Stanley.
After Stanley escaped Stanley, Stanley allowed a number of Black men to rape his Grandson Barry.
IMO without benefit of first hand diagnosis. That is AK.

Anonymous said...


Do you really want your beautiful daughters to undergo this SHAME!

If you accomplish nothing else good in your LIFE, BE a GOOD FATHER!

WeroInNM said...

Question: Could the capital of Mexico be ground zero for an orchestrated global epidemic of a new kind of flu?

My recent blog reveals that Mexican swine flu deaths has Mexican residents scared, angry and confused and spurred global epidemic fears, which also has world health experts deeply concerned, stating that it may be too late to contain the outbreak because, they feel that cases have probably been incubating around the world by now and there is currently no vaccine available to specifically protect against swine flu.

My blog also alerts you that there just might be another side to this swine flu outbreak, that I consider to be an extremely suspicious event because of its timing and numerous other suspicious and unexplained occurrences that we have recently been experiencing, which I believe, when put together, should raise some red flags for all of us-You Decide:


“Food For Thought”

“God Bless & Keep Our USA Safe”

Semper Fi!

Aristotle The Hun said...

The purpose of a comments section is to comment on the article posted above it. Your comment is way off topic.

The only reason I am not deleting it is because of the Semper Fi.

Please don't post off topic again.

If I find out you aren't really a Marine I'll come looking for you. Everyone who posts here reveals their IP address whether they know it or not.

Leverette Post said...

This is a fact from the very the foundation of United States Constitution: Article II, section 1, paragraph 5.

“No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that office who shall not have attained to the age of thirty five years, and been fourteen Years a resident within the United States.”

Section 4 - Disqualification
The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.

Amendment 20 - Presidential, Congressional Terms. Ratified 1/23/1933. History

Amendment 25 - Presidential Disability and Succession. Ratified 2/10/1967. Note History

"As a Kenyan native, Barack Hussein Obama Sr. (Deceased) was a British subject whose citizenship status was governed by The British Nationality Act of 1948. That same act governed the status of Obama Sr.'s children."

Barack Hussein Obama II is a child of Obama Sr., thus former Senator Obama was a British subject (British citizen) at birth, and not a natural born U.S. Citizen.

The Federal Grand Jury and the District Courts of the District of Columbia are the ONLY two entities for recourse for Impeachment!

§ 212. Citizens and Natives.


The citizens are the members of the civil society; bound to this society by certain duties, and subject to its authority, they equally participate in its advantages.

The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens.

As the society cannot exist and perpetuate itself otherwise than by the children of the citizens, those children naturally follow the condition of their fathers, and succeed to all their rights…I say, that, in order to be of the country, it is necessary that a person be born of a father who is a citizen; for, if he is born there of a foreigner, it will be only the place of his birth, and not his country.

The country of the fathers is therefore that of the children; and these become true citizens merely by their tacit consent. We shall soon see whether, on their coming to the years of discretion, they may renounce their right, and what they owe to the society in which they were born.








Semper Fidelis,
Jason Leverette

Tex said...

I can see wanting to Take Him Down. We have more that enought Proof that he should not, and can not be in Office.
But I have a link somewhere that I will blog soon that shows the IMF, The World Banks, The Feds., the IRS, all have been grooming BO for the last 16 years to get into office.
Its the False Profit they put into office to prepare us for the "New World Order"......
How do you fight the IMF, and The World Bank........? Tex

Annette said...

Tex put my thoughts into words (unfortunately). Hope I'm wrong tho.

Tex said...

I found the link and posted a blog. Its a clip that everyone Must See to know the truth about how it works on the inside.

Also a link to how our own Goverment planted the new flu going around.

^ganda^ said...

I am waiting for this to happen I can't wait.

Anonymous said...

oh my GAWD is right!

Great work bro! It is good to have a nice, detailed articulate piece to post on my blog under "Proof Obama was born in Kenya."

Thanks for your hard work! Gives hope, not the kind of hope Obama promised, but REAL HOPE we can remove him from office.

Anonymous said...

That IS pretty damning, I did not know about the Chinese emperor. Do you think we might actually lose this fraud?

BTW- Excellent graphic of Lisa Simpson!

Rob Howard said...

Sam, I came upon this blog via an intriguing post you wrote to the Ledger Enquirer. That was enough to lead me to this blog and, although I had some snippets of this controversy of the man I consider the junior president from Illinois, the OMG thread has proved to be a real eye-opener.

What a byzantine tangle this matter has become. Thanks for collating and organizing this Niagara of information. Much to consider.

BTW, as a longtime operator of weblogs and online fora, I can only commiserate with the attacks you have received from the usual mosquitoes rising from their fever swamp of anonymity. Their anonymity is based in their lack of accomplishments.

Sam said...

Read the whole thing, followed the links and all I can say is:

That's some egregious bullshit you're putting out. Just nonsense.

Unfortunately debating hardcore birthers on the topic of citizenship is rather like trying to play chess with a pigeon — it knocks the pieces over, craps on the board, and flies back to its flock to claim victory. Which is exactly the behavior you and your pro-birther commenters exhibit.

Please, find something else to do with your life - like work for Habitat for Humanity, volunteer at a soup kitchen, pick up litter - anything but spend time on the Internet where you make yourself ridiculous.

Tex said...

I can only fee sorry for the un-informed, until they show me they have read the info and cant see the light right in front of them.

But then they are on thier own. Some will neaver believe with the truth in front of thier own eyes.

This is exactly how we got into this mess in the first place........

PS. But then want to jump on the ban-wagon when we were right all along.

But there will always be 10%'ers of life, In Life !

Aristotle The Hun said...

dr. theo wrote, in response to AristotleTheHun:

I have never been one to jump on conspiracy theories either, Aristotle. In fact, you and I think similarly on all the issues you name. This whole birth certificate thing has only become a widely discussed issue because of Obama's refusal to allow it to be released (That and all the other missing history as listed in the article). My whole point is that if you and I are indeed a couple of nutcases, like millions of others, then why doesn't he just blow us all away and discredit the whacko right one and for all by releasing all the documentation of his birth, his education, adoption, etc. It just doesn't make any sense to stonewall the issue and encourage even more speculation.

American's know less about this man that claims to be president than any national leader in history. Once upon a time we had a national press that would have dug into and found all the missing information, but that clearly is not the case today.

Torben Bo said...

Dear Aristotle the Hun.
Thanks a million for “AKA Obama Fans: All together now – say OMG!!” It clarifies the whole issue. However, removing Obama and putting in another pawn to be moved by the ruling elite does not solve anything.
Moreover, seeing that you in the very beginning sites the bible (Luke 8:17), makes me a bit worried.
Just as in the case Obama, what is on the surface of religion is not the truth.
As Thomas Paine wrote:

“….the Christian religion is a parody on the worship of the Sun, in which they put a man whom they call Christ, in the place of the Sun, and pay him the same adoration which was originally paid to the Sun…”

Religion is at the root of our perils. It is a repressive mental structure maintained by the individuals own self, guarantying submission to the powers that be.

Yours sincerely,

Torben Bo Hansen

Agam said...

Nice work collating all this info into one place. I just wanted to alert you to one small error that you may want to correct (perhaps with a note that the correction was made). It's not exactly pertinent to the issues at hand, but best not to give the nay-sayers ammunition to attack you with.

Dr. Sun Yat-sen was not the former emperor of China, he was the president of the first Chinese republic, after the collapse of the Imperial throne in (I believe it was) 1911.

As I said, it doesn't change the validity of pointing out that foreign-born folks could get Hawaiian "certifications of birth" (Maya got one too, and I'm sure many more of these can be found). I'm actually a bit surprised that one of your Messiah-worshipping trolls hadn't already seized on this to question your work.

I would suggest fixing the text with a note that it had been so fixed. This is actually the beauty of blogs - the writer's ability to update an article whenever an error crops up, particularly in an important piece such as this one.

Best regards,
Agam in Thailand

Anonymous said...

If Obama is found ineligible to be POTUS, then Biden will replace him. So, how would proving Obama's ineligibility improve anything?

Aristotle The Hun said...

Think Roy. Research and think. I'll give you a clue. Fraudulent elections mean new elections will be held.

My fear is that the Republicans will lose again, to Hillary.

Torben Bo said...

The words below is from http://fightthesmears.com/articles/5/birthcertificate

“When Barack Obama Jr. was born on Aug. 4,1961, in Honolulu, Kenya was a British colony, still part of the United Kingdom’s dwindling empire. As a Kenyan native, Barack Obama Sr. was a British subject whose citizenship status was governed by The British Nationality Act of 1948. That same act governed the status of Obama Sr.‘s children.

Since Sen. Obama has neither renounced his U.S. citizenship nor sworn an oath of allegiance to Kenya, his Kenyan citizenship automatically expired on Aug. 4,1982.”

So, if we are to take Obama at his word, he is not a natural born citizen and not eligible to serve as president.

Tex said...

Texas Dar| 7.31.09 @ 5:01PM
"Wizzered 0f Bomma-Ozz" Health-Care "Shits Gona Hit FanWhen..........................

You find out that if it pass'es Bomma-Bogger will have acsess to your money and ues it as seen fit to treat you.

Read it, It'll get yr blood presuere cranked up........................This has gotten way out of control.

I hope DC gets it when New York gets it in Sep. Hell with NY, just take all the suitcase Nukes to DC.......................!


ACSial said...

Releasing his Mother's hospital records would seem to be the easiest way for B.O. to debunk the 'Birthers'. For someone who was so candid about things like his cocaine use, this secrecy is indeed puzzling.

I, for one, hope he *WAS* 'Born in the U.S.A.' As a Canadian, I realise that our economy is very affected by what goes on in your country. The economic fallout from an ineligible President would be horrific. EVERYTHING--from treaties, to stimulus contracts--would be either invalidated, or tied up in litigation. The result would probably be a global depression.

Aristotle The Hun said...


You hit the nail on the head as far as an explanation as to why many cowardly people refuse to take action on the issue of AKA Obama's ineligibility.

Serafinos said...

Bookmarked it!
God bless American & all that love, serve & defend her with truth & honor!
Vietnam Vet 70-71 & Proud Vets Wife

MinutemanCDC_SC said...

We have the truth; Mr. Obama has (limited) power.

Usually, might overrules right, unless and until greater might rallies to the banner of the truth and the right:
Moses vs. Pharaoh,
David vs. Goliath and the Philistines,
the Maccabees vs. the Seleucids,
the Habsburg army vs. the Ottoman Empire,
Great Britain, the U.S., and the Allies vs. the Third Reich,
Coalition forces led by the U.S. vs. Saddam Hussein and the Baathists of Iraq.

But there are notable exceptions:
Mahatma Gandhi in India,
Dr. Martin Luther King in the U.S.,
Lech Walesa in Poland,
Desmond Tutu in South Africa.

My great hope is for Divine intervention or for the Lord Jesus Christ to snatch up His church.

But until that happens, Mr. Obama probably considers the greatest threat to his usurpation to be the rallying of the U.S. armed forces to support and defend the Constitution of the United States.

I would rather petition the Joint Chiefs of Staff than any other human institution.

Border Raven's Blog said...

Timeline Barack H Obama II 1961 to 1982

Anonymous said...

From the constitution:

Article II section 1:

No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.

From Wikipedia:

The Constitution does not explain the meaning of "natural born". On June 18, 1787, Alexander Hamilton submitted to the Convention a sketch of a plan of government. The sketch provided for an executive "Governour" but had no eligibility requirements.
At the close of the Convention, Hamilton conveyed a paper to James Madison which he said delineated the Constitution which he would have wished to be proposed by the Convention; he had stated its principles in the course of the deliberations. Max Farrand wrote that it "was not submitted to the Convention and has no further value than attaches to the personal opinions of Hamilton". Article IX, section 1 of Hamilton's draft constitution provided:
"No person shall be eligible to the office of President of the United States unless he be now a Citizen of one of the States, or hereafter be born a Citizen of the United States."
On July 25, 1787, John Jay wrote to George Washington, presiding officer of the Convention:
Permit me to hint, whether it would not be wise and seasonable to provide a strong check to the admission of Foreigners into the administration of our national Government, and to declare expressly that the Command in chief of the American army shall not be given to, nor devolve on, any but a natural born Citizen.
There is no proof that deliberations took place at the convention on the subject of the letter. While the Committee on Detail originally proposed that the President must be merely a citizen as well as a resident for 21 years, the Committee of Eleven changed "citizen" to "natural born Citizen" without explanation. The Convention accepted the change without further debate.

The word citizen was capitalized to show a special type of citizen.

From Vattels "law of nations"

§ 212. Citizens and natives.
The citizens are the members of the civil society; bound to this society by certain duties, and subject to its authority, they equally participate in its advantages. The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens. As the society cannot exist and perpetuate itself otherwise than by the children of the citizens, those children naturally follow the condition of their fathers, and succeed to all their rights. The society is supposed to desire this, in consequence of what it owes to its own preservation; and it is presumed, as matter of course, that each citizen, on entering into society, reserves to his children the right of becoming members of it. The country of the fathers is therefore that of the children; and these become true citizens merely by their tacit consent. We shall soon see whether, on their coming to the years of discretion, they may renounce their right, and what they owe to the society in which they were born. I say, that, in order to be of the country, it is necessary that a person be born of a father who is a citizen; for, if he is born there of a foreigner, it will be only the place of his birth, and not his country.

All the founders of our constitution owned and had read Vattels Law of Nations, they were so familiar with it that they didnt feel any explanation of the term natural born Citizen be explained.

Now read the above thoroughly and then tell me where does Obama fit, eligible or not eligible?

Melvin E Holliday said...

I am reading this article on July 27, 2015 so I guess that by now it is evident that nothing has been done but we still have one ace in the hole. Donald Trump is running for President and if he gets elected he has been a peoples champion on Eligibility. Only time will tell if there will ever be any Justice on this subject but I still remain hopeful. We now have Ted Cruz, Marco Rubio and Bobbyo Jindal running for President and none of the three are any more qualified that Barry Soetero was and now even Conservative Republicans are calling the birthers liars while trying to get their own candidate elected the same way Liberals did with Obama.

Melvin E Holliday said...

I didn't have to read Vattel's law to remind me of what a "Natural Born Citizen" is all about.
Obama is not eligible to be President, never has been and never will be. Just when I thought I wouldn't have to talk about the subject any longer, here it is again, only this time it is the Republican's and not the Liberals. They now think that because Obama has had his try at destroying the Constitution and consequently America that they should run an equally ineligible candidate only they have three. Marco Rubio, Ted Cruz and Bobby Jindal, all on the American Presidential ballot and none are eligible while Congress continues to sit on its fingers and do nothing once again just as they did nothing to stop Obama all those long years ago.