Tuesday, December 21, 2010

hope n change humor

Showing us once again why Hawaii is called "the sense of humor" state, authorities there placed Barack Obama's dog under quarantine until it could prove its identity and show irrefutable documentation.

Which means that at this point, Bo the dog is better documented than the alleged president himself, and more eligible for a future political career than Obama's Aunt Zeituni who has no papers whatsoever (nor, apparently, an invitation to spend Christmas in Hawaii with her alleged nephew).

In order to get out of quarantine, Bo had to get a medical inspection and prove identification. Interestingly, it's far easier to get a Hawaiian "Certification of Live Birth," the only document Barack Hussein Obama has ever showed to prove citizenship. All someone has to do is tell a grass-skirted clerk "there's a baby at my house, gimme a certification of live birth" and pay a small fee consisting of pineapples and coconuts.

Such a "certification" is not considered acceptable proof of identity or birth even in Hawaii (which isn't exactly a place where they're sticklers for formality). To get a real birth certificate, you need to have a doctor's signature (or in Bo's case, a veterinarian) along with other verification.

Assuming that such a document even exists, it remains unseen. And just last week, the alleged president refused to show it even though this seemingly simple act would have prevented a military doctor from being sentenced to six months in prison for asking to see it.

Then again, maybe Barry can take the birth certificate out of the vault while he's vacationing in Hawaii...rather than let everyone continue to be dogged by the ongoing mystery.

Know The Enemy - by Colonel Allen West, who will be sworn in as a Congressman in January

by Colonel Allen West, who will be sworn in as a Congressman in January
Think Islamic problems caused by a small minority of Muslims?

“Demoting Islam’s Religion Status.” - Understanding the Name Martel Sobieskey -

For a detailed list of links and references to support the statements in this video, read an article by Islam Exposed: 3 Things You Should Know About Islam.

Friday, December 17, 2010

Keyes Update - Obama Ineligibility Cover Up Destroys Military Doctor

Keyes Update -
 Obama Ineligibility Cover Up Destroys Military Doctor

Lakin Legal Hands Tied and Denied Right to Pursue Defense

Obama's cover up of his Constitutional Ineligibility to be president has reached a new low as Obama has now destroyed the Military Career of Col. Terry Lakin a true man of honor, a medical doctor, a patriot and a heroic martyr to the cause of ordered liberty. Lakin was sentenced today to six months in a military prison. He also will be dismissed from the military, and will forfeit a nearly $90,000 annual salary and a pension of his unblemished and decorated 18 year military career.

LTC Lakin's entire trial has been rigged to ensure the truth of Obama's deception is never revealed. Justice has been repeatedly denied and due process squelched in the name of dirty, extremist politics. LTC Lakin's only hope is a massive public outcry where Americans demand justice... not only for the Lakin family, but for the sovereignty of our country and the integrity of our Constitution.

Lakin, who refused to deploy to Afghanistan because he challenged Obama's undocumented and unconfirmed eligibility for office has been forced by Obama's government henchmen -- including Lakin's ethically-compromised and politically-motivated military superiors -- to plead guilty to refusing orders.

"I was praying and soul searching," Lakin told the court. "I believed there was a question that needs to be answered to ensure a valid chain of command. But I had asked every question, done everything else I could short of disobeying orders, without success."

We will continue to support Col. Lakin and his family; he needs it now more than ever. We must press for the New 112th Congress -- self-proclaimed as rededicated to American Constitutionalism -- to open an IMMEDIATE investigation into this shameful miscarriage of justice, and at the least restore Col. Lakin's right to defend himself and his right to evidentiary discovery, which were blatantly denied him in this case.

Obama will be home for Christmas, sheltered and secure in the the White House because dedicated military professionals and brave war heroes like Col. Terry Lakin have spent their lives in harms' way defending us as they serve and stand guard over America. Obama: you have dishonored all who serve and are a disgrace to the office of president and an abomination to the Constitution.

Declaration Alliance needs your help to save LTC Terry Lakin & the Constitution!
Select Here To Blast Congress and Obama, Donate and HELP Terry Now!

The convictions were inevitable after Lakin was denied the right to discovery, and the "hanging judge" who assigned this case forbade the defense from producing any evidence or experts who might persuade the court martial panel, a jury of Army officers, that Lakin's deliberate disobedience of orders was justifiable.

The fix was in from the outset; Lakin's hands were tied by every earlier ruling effectively forbidding what might be any authentic or effective line of defense, specifically the argument that any order originating with Obama might in fact be illegal as long as Obama's eligibility remains unproven.The Obama cover-up is in full swing, and unless you help him today, a brave patriot, and yes quite possibly our entire way of life will be railroaded by the anti-freedom forces presently cementing their control over every aspect of our lives.

On Tuesday, Dec. 14, the court martial of Lt. Col. Terry Lakin began and this brave man was convicted on all counts and now will be incarcerated for his conscientious fealty to the Constitution. This fine officer was prosecuted for his efforts to assure that orders currently issuing from the U.S. military chain of command flow from a constitutionally qualified, and therefore lawful, commander in chief.

There was a time when responsible military authorities fully understood that soldiers had the right to reasonable assurance that their orders came from a valid source, and that officers had the duty to confirm this when there was reasonable doubt. During the Battle of the Bulge, for example, English-speaking German soldiers dressed in American uniforms had infiltrated American forces. Their activities gave rise to disquieting rumors and confusion in the ranks. In immediate response, checkpoints were set up all over the Allied rear, and military policemen drilled servicemen on things which every true American soldier was expected to know, such as the identity of Mickey Mouse's girlfriend, baseball scores, or the capital of a U.S. state.

Today, American troops are every day risking and laying down their lives in battle just as they did in World War II. But rather than acting responsibly and effectively to protect the integrity of the chain of command, current military hierarchs seem ruthlessly determined to intimidate anyone who seeks reassurance against the now widespread question concerning the constitutional identity of the person who presently occupies the office of commander in chief. Lt. Col. Lakin is saying, simply, "I don't know that Barack Obama is the person the Constitution says he must be. The Constitution is the supreme law of the land. Therefore, I cannot know that in obeying his orders I am defending the Constitution, as I am sworn to do."

Declaration Alliance needs your help to save LTC Terry Lakin & the Constitution!
Select Here To Donate and HELP Terry Now!

LTC Lakin faced the politically driven court martial and smear job against him, designed not to seek justice, but to protect the Imposter in Chief. Terry Lakin has been denied all avenues of proper defense, and now convicted in this show trial of doing his duty, LTC Lakin will be sent directly to the military prison at Ft. Leavenworth or some other military jail for his loyalty to his duty, and heaven alone knows when his young children may ever know another Christmas with Daddy.

The slavish Obama media lapdogs have stifled this story in an effort to further protect the usurper now sitting in the oval office. Legal case after legal case challenging Obama has been suppressed and dismissed on procedural grounds -- never on the merits. None of Obama's records are public. The American people now need to know how this brave Army officer has risked everything; his career, his liberty and his family to protect our ordered liberty and uphold the Constitution. The public needs to know the truth about Obama's birth certificate! WE WILL NOT LEAVE TERRY LAKIN TO THIS UNJUST SENTENCE!!

Declaration Alliance needs your help to save LTC Terry Lakin & the Constitution!
Select Here To Blast Congressmen and Obama, Donate and HELP Terry Now!
So today I need a sacrificial gift from you to enable Declaration Alliance to fearlessly sound the clarion call and rally the American people to LTC Lakin's side as we battle to press for the New Congress to open an investigation and restore Col. Lakin's right to defend himself . Without the Constitution, we are not America, and all our institutions of freedom and law are imperiled.

We must quickly mobilize public opinion against this travesty. We can gain LTC Lakin the support he deserves by waking up Congress, producing a public relations campaign and national outcry that reaches millions of your fellow citizens with this critical information. We may bring more legal action ourselves. All of these efforts will be expensive. But I know you will agree, FREEDOM IS WORTH THE COST!

A gift of $125 or perhaps even $250 or $500 will help deliver the truth to households all across America. The fact is, unless we get out word about LTC Lakin's plight, an honorable and heroic military man, standing in the gap for you and me in the cause of liberty will be publicly defamed by his own politically-compromised chain of command, and the Constitution trampled.

I know you cherish freedom as much as I do, so please help us fight back TODAY!.

Keep Faith,

Ambassador Alan Keyes

If you prefer to donate by check, please mail to:
Declaration Alliance
National Processing Center
PO Box 131728
Houston, TX 77219-1728

Wednesday, December 15, 2010

Sunday, December 12, 2010

What Could Possibly Go Wrong?

Let me get this straight . . . .

We're going to be "gifted" with a health care
plan we are forced to purchase and
fined if we don't,

Which purportedly covers at least
ten million more people,
without adding a single new doctor,
but provides for 16,000 new IRS agents,

written by a committee whose chairman
says he doesn't understand it,

passed by a Congress that didn't read it but
exempted themselves from it,

and signed by a President who smokes,

with funding administered by a treasury chief who
didn't pay his taxes,

for which we'll be taxed for four years before any
benefits take effect,

by a government which has
already bankrupted Social Security and Medicare,

all to be overseen by a surgeon general
who is obese,

and financed by a country that's broke!!!!!

'What the hell could
possibly go wrong?'

AKA Obama now a tax cut-loving, Sarah Palin-admiring, Rush Limbaugh-quoting conservative who's no longer sure he was born in America

After being literally held hostage by Republicans for three days - "bound, gagged, blindfolded in a dark room somewhere outside Washington" - Obama, in the grips of weird symptoms associated with the Stockholm Syndrome, became a tax cut-loving, Sarah Palin-admiring, Rush Limbaugh-quoting conservative who's no longer sure he was born in America (video follows with partial transcript and commentary):

Read more: http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2010/12/12/snl-republicans-really-did-hold-obama-hostage-now-hes-tax-cut-loving-#ixzz17w0M6szp

Scientists Dissent Over Man-Made Global Warming Claims

Shredding the “climate consensus” myth: More Than 1000 International Scientists Dissent Over Man-Made Global Warming Claims – Challenge UN IPCC & Gore
Posted on December 8, 2010 by Anthony Watts
From Climate Depot, read more here


More than 1000 dissenting scientists (updates previous 700 scientist report) from around the globe have now challenged man-made global warming claims made by the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and former Vice President Al Gore. This new 2010 320-page Climate Depot Special Report — updated from 2007′s groundbreaking U.S. Senate Report of over 400 scientists who voiced skepticism about the so-called global warming “consensus” — features the skeptical voices of over 1000 international scientists, including many current and former UN IPCC scientists, who have now turned against the UN IPCC. This updated 2010 report includes a dramatic increase of over 300 additional (and growing) scientists and climate researchers since the last update in March 2009. This report’s release coincides with the 2010 UN global warming summit being held in Cancun.

The more than 300 additional scientists added to this report since March 2009 (21 months ago), represents an average of nearly four skeptical scientists a week speaking out publicly. The well over 1000 dissenting scientists are almost 20 times the number of UN scientists (52) who authored the media-hyped IPCC 2007 Summary for Policymakers.

The chorus of skeptical scientific voices grew louder in 2010 as the Climategate scandal — which involved the upper echelon of UN IPCC scientists — detonated upon on the international climate movement. “I view Climategate as science fraud, pure and simple,” said noted Princeton Physicist Dr. Robert Austin shortly after the scandal broke. Climategate prompted UN IPCC scientists to turn on each other. UN IPCC scientist Eduardo Zorita publicly declared that his Climategate colleagues Michael Mann and Phil Jones “should be barred from the IPCC process…They are not credible anymore.” Zorita also noted how insular the IPCC science had become. “By writing these lines I will just probably achieve that a few of my future studies will, again, not see the light of publication,” Zorita wrote. A UN lead author Richard Tol lead author grew disillusioned with the IPCC and lamented that it had been “captured” and demanded that “the Chair of IPCC and the Chairs of the IPCC Working Groups should be removed.” Tol also publicly called for the “suspension” of IPCC Process in 2010 after being invited by the UN to participate as lead author again in the next IPCC Report.

Other UN scientists were more blunt. South African UN scientist declared the UN IPCC a “worthless carcass” and noted IPCC chair Pachauri is in “disgrace”. He also explained that the “fraudulent science continues to be exposed.” Alexander, a former member of the UN Scientific and Technical Committee on Natural Disasters harshly critiqued the UN. “‘I was subjected to vilification tactics at the time. I persisted. Now, at long last, my persistence has been rewarded…There is no believable evidence to support [the IPCC] claims. I rest my case!” See: S. African UN Scientist Calls it! ‘Climate change – RIP: Cause of Death: No scientifically believable evidence…Deliberate manipulation to suit political objectives’ [Also see: New Report: UN Scientists Speak Out On Global Warming -- As Skeptics!] Geologist Dr. Don Easterbrook, a professor of geology at Western Washington University, summed up the scandal on December 3, 2010: “The corruption within the IPCC revealed by the Climategate scandal, the doctoring of data and the refusal to admit mistakes have so severely tainted the IPCC that it is no longer a credible agency.”

Selected Highlights of the Updated 2010 Report featuring over 1000 international scientists dissenting from man-made climate fears:

“We’re not scientifically there yet. Despite what you may have heard in the media, there is nothing like a consensus of scientific opinion that this is a problem. Because there is natural variability in the weather, you cannot statistically know for another 150 years.” — UN IPCC’s Tom Tripp, a member of the UN IPCC since 2004 and listed as one of the lead authors and serves as the Director of Technical Services & Development for U.S. Magnesium.

“Any reasonable scientific analysis must conclude the basic theory wrong!!” — NASA Scientist Dr. Leonard Weinstein who worked 35 years at the NASA Langley Research Center and finished his career there as a Senior Research Scientist. Weinstein, is presently a Senior Research Fellow at the National Institute of Aerospace.

“Please remain calm: The Earth will heal itself — Climate is beyond our power to control…Earth doesn’t care about governments or their legislation. You can’t find much actual global warming in present-day weather observations. Climate change is a matter of geologic time, something that the earth routinely does on its own without asking anyone’s permission or explaining itself.” — Nobel Prize-Winning Stanford University Physicist Dr. Robert B. Laughlin, who won the Nobel Prize for physics in 1998, and was formerly a research scientist at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory.

“In essence, the jig is up. The whole thing is a fraud. And even the fraudsters that fudged data are admitting to temperature history that they used to say didn’t happen…Perhaps what has doomed the Climategate fraudsters the most was their brazenness in fudging the data” — Dr. Christopher J. Kobus, Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Oakland University, specializes in alternative energy, thermal transport phenomena, two-phase flow and fluid and thermal energy systems.

“The energy mankind generates is so small compared to that overall energy budget that it simply cannot affect the climate…The planet’s climate is doing its own thing, but we cannot pinpoint significant trends in changes to it because it dates back millions of years while the study of it began only recently. We are children of the Sun; we simply lack data to draw the proper conclusions.” — Russian Scientist Dr. Anatoly Levitin, the head of geomagnetic variations laboratory at the Institute of Terrestrial Magnetism, Ionosphere and Radiowave Propagation of the Russian Academy of Sciences.

“Hundreds of billion dollars have been wasted with the attempt of imposing a Anthropogenic Global Warming (AGW) theory that is not supported by physical world evidences…AGW has been forcefully imposed by means of a barrage of scare stories and indoctrination that begins in the elementary school textbooks.” — Brazilian Geologist Geraldo Luís Lino, who authored the 2009 book “The Global Warming Fraud: How a Natural Phenomenon Was Converted into a False World Emergency.”

“I am an environmentalist,” but “I must disagree with Mr. Gore” — Chemistry Professor Dr. Mary Mumper, the chair of the Chemistry Department at Frostburg State University in Maryland, during her presentation titled “Anthropogenic Carbon Dioxide and Global Warming, the Skeptic’s View.”

“I am ashamed of what climate science has become today,” The science “community is relying on an inadequate model to blame CO2 and innocent citizens for global warming in order to generate funding and to gain attention. If this is what ‘science’ has become today, I, as a scientist, am ashamed…Science is too important for our society to be misused in the way it has been done within the Climate Science Community.” Swedish Climatologist Dr. Hans Jelbring,

“Those who call themselves ‘Green planet advocates’ should be arguing for a CO2- fertilized atmosphere, not a CO2-starved atmosphere…Diversity increases when the planet was warm AND had high CO2 atmospheric content…Al Gore’s personal behavior supports a green planet – his enormous energy use with his 4 homes and his bizjet, does indeed help make the planet greener. Kudos, Al for doing your part to save the planet.” — Renowned engineer and aviation/space pioneer Burt Rutan, who was named “100 most influential people in the world, 2004″ by Time Magazine and Newsweek called him “the man responsible for more innovations in modern aviation than any living engineer.”

“Global warming is the central tenet of this new belief system in much the same way that the Resurrection is the central tenet of Christianity. Al Gore has taken a role corresponding to that of St Paul in proselytizing the new faith…My skepticism about AGW arises from the fact that as a physicist who has worked in closely related areas, I know how poor the underlying science is. In effect the scientific method has been abandoned in this field.” — Atmospheric Physicist Dr. John Reid, who worked with Australia’s CSIRO’s (Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization) Division of Oceanography and worked in surface gravity waves (ocean waves) research.

“We maintain there is no reason whatsoever to worry about man-made climate change, because there is no evidence whatsoever that such a thing is happening.” — Greek Earth scientists Antonis Christofides and Nikos Mamassis of the National Technical University of Athens’ Department of Water Resources and Environmental Engineering.

“There are clear cycles during which both temperature and salinity rise and fall. These cycles are related to solar activity…In my opinion and that of our institute, the problems connected to the current stage of warming are being exaggerated. What we are dealing with is not a global warming of the atmosphere or of the oceans.” — Biologist Pavel Makarevich of the Biological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences

“Because the greenhouse effect is temporary rather than permanent, predictions of significant global warming in the 21st century by IPCC are not supported by the data.” — Hebrew University Professor Dr. Michael Beenstock an honorary fellow with Institute for Economic Affairs who published a study challenging man-made global warming claims titled “Polynomial Cointegration Tests of the Anthropogenic Theory of Global Warming.”

“The whole idea of anthropogenic global warming is completely unfounded. There appears to have been money gained by Michael Mann, Al Gore and UN IPCC’s Rajendra Pachauri as a consequence of this deception, so it’s fraud.” — South African astrophysicist Hilton Ratcliffe, a member of the Astronomical Society of Southern Africa (ASSA) and the Astronomical Society of the Pacific and a Fellow of the British Institute of Physics.

The Vindication of George W. Bush re WMD

Larry Elder Larry Elder – Thu Dec 9, 3:00 am ET

The WikiLeaks de facto declassification of privileged material makes it case closed: Saddam Hussein possessed weapons of mass destruction — and intended to restart his program once the heat was off.

President George W. Bush, in the 2003 State of the Union address, uttered the infamous "16 words": "The British government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa."

Former Ambassador Joe Wilson sprang into action and, in an op-ed piece, in effect wrote, "No, the Cheney administration sent me to investigate the allegation — and I found it without merit."

Put aside that Wilson's CIA-employed wife, not the evil Vice President Dick Cheney — as Wilson implied — sent him on the African errand. Put aside that the British still stand by the intelligence on which Bush made the claim. And put aside that the anti-Bush Washington Post, in an editorial, concluded that Wilson had lied about not finding evidence to support the Iraq-in-Africa-for-uranium claim, since he told the CIA the opposite when he reported back from Africa.

Bush claimed that Iraq sought uranium, specifically "yellowcake." What is yellowcake, and why would its presence or attempted acquisition corroborate the nearly unanimous assumption that Saddam possessed WMD?

The Associated Press called yellowcake "the seed material for higher-grade nuclear enrichment" and said that it "also can be enriched for use in reactors and, at higher levels, nuclear weapons using sophisticated equipment."

"Bush and Iraq: Follow the Yellow Cake Road" headlined a euphoric Time magazine July 2003 piece — written when the Bush administration began backtracking from the Iraq-sought-uranium-from-Africa claim. Time said no yellowcake equals no WMD equals bogus basis for war.

The article led with this ripper: "Is a fib really a fib if the teller is unaware that he is uttering an untruth? That question appears to be the basis of the White House defense, having now admitted a falsehood in President Bush's claim, in his State of the Union address, that Iraq had tried to buy uranium in Africa."

Time hoisted (the now discredited) Joe Wilson on its shoulders as The Man Who Told the Truth to Power: "Just last weekend, the man sent by the CIA to check out the Niger story broke cover and revealed that he had thoroughly debunked the allegation many months before President Bush repeated it." Never mind that the bipartisan Senate Intelligence Committee concluded that Wilson's report "lent more credibility to the original Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) reports on the uranium deal" sought by Iraq in Niger.

Let's recap.

Bush, in building the case for war against Iraq, lied to the nation. He falsely claimed that Iraq was attempting to purchase yellowcake from Africa. Time magazine specifically referred to the yellowcake "lie" in accusing Bush of fabricating the case for war. Therefore, were Iraq to have had yellowcake — an assertion called a "lie" — it would have confirmed the presence of WMD, giving credence to Bush's declaration of Iraq as a "grave and gathering threat."

But ... there ... was ... yellowcake. This brings us back to WikiLeaks.

Wired magazine's contributing editor Noah Shachtman — a nonresident fellow at the liberal Brookings Institution — researched the 400,000 WikiLeaked documents released in October. Here's what he found: "By late 2003, even the Bush White House's staunchest defenders were starting to give up on the idea that there were weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. But WikiLeaks' newly-released Iraq war documents reveal that for years afterward, U.S. troops continued to find chemical weapons labs, encounter insurgent specialists in toxins and uncover weapons of mass destruction (emphasis added). ... Chemical weapons, especially, did not vanish from the Iraqi battlefield. Remnants of Saddam's toxic arsenal, largely destroyed after the Gulf War, remained. Jihadists, insurgents and foreign (possibly Iranian) agitators turned to these stockpiles during the Iraq conflict — and may have brewed up their own deadly agents."

In 2008, our military shipped out of Iraq — on 37 flights in 3,500 barrels — what even The Associated Press called "the last major remnant of Saddam Hussein's nuclear program": 550 metric tons of the supposedly nonexistent yellowcake. The New York Sun editorialized: "The uranium issue is not a trivial one, because Iraq, sitting on vast oil reserves, has no peaceful need for nuclear power. ... To leave this nuclear material sitting around the Middle East in the hands of Saddam ... would have been too big a risk."

Now the mainscream media no longer deem yellowcake — the WMD Bush supposedly lied about — a WMD. It was, well, old. It was degraded. It was not what we think of when we think of WMD. Really? Square that with what former Democratic National Chairman Howard Dean said in April 2004: "There were no weapons of mass destruction." MSNBC's Rachel Maddow goes even further, insisting, against the overwhelming evidence to the contrary, that "Saddam Hussein was not pursuing weapons of mass destruction"!

Bush, hammered by the insidious "Bush Lied, People Died" mantra, endured one of the most vicious smears against any president in history. He is owed an apology.

When Hollywood makes "The Vindication of George W. Bush," maybe Sean Penn can play the lead.

Ans here Condoleezza Rice Schools Katie Couric on Why U.S. Invaded Iraq:

They still don't get it! Spineless Republicans are at it again

Spineless Republicans are at it again. They broke their word and they violated our trust. Instead of standing firm and stopping Barack Obama and the Pelosi-Reid Gang from raising taxes on ALL Americans, they're playing Santa Claus with the extreme left and giving them bundles of Porkulous Joy.

Why? Because their insatiable urge to "compromise" with the enemy, for no apparent reason, yet again, was greater than the promises they made to the American people.

We thought they had learned their lesson. Two weeks ago, Senate Republicans showed rare backbone and told Harry Reid and Barack Obama that they would effectively filibuster everything until they agreed NOT to raise taxes on the American people.

But they hadn't learned their lesson. Days later, Obama appeared to blink. He told Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell that he was ready to play Let's Make A Deal and he offered Senate Republicans a "compromise" (there's that word again). But it was no "compromise," ... it wasn't simply a flawed deal... it was a RAW DEAL... and it was a deal that Republicans NEVER should have even considered in the first place.

But like a junkie offered just one more draw off of a crack-pipe, the Republican Leadership in the Senate simply couldn't resist the urge... they gave up their position of strength and jumped on Obama's raw deal without hesitation... they simply couldn't help themselves... their urge to "compromise" was simply too great... the habit was simply too hard to break.

And then, the other shoe dropped. The Pelosi-Reid Gang, showed the resolve, the backbone and the intestinal fortitude that the Republican Senate Leadership should have shown. They drew a line in the sand. Behaving like petulant children, they threw a temper tantrum. Jumping up and down, they screamed and ranted and looked Barack Obama and the Republican Senate Leadership firmly in the eye and said... NO DEAL.

You could almost hear them saying: 'You've got to be kidding... you want us to agree NOT to raise taxes on the American people and you're only offering us hundreds of billions of dollars in senseless pork in exchange... NO WAY. That's not how 'compromise' works in this town... we're supposed to get everything and the American people are supposed to get nothing.'

And, here's the kicker; as things now stand, Republican leaders are defending and fighting for a deal they NEVER SHOULD HAVE MADE IN THE FIRST PLACE.

But make no mistake, left to their own devises and inclinations, they'll go far beyond championing their idiotic "compromise" with Barack Obama... they WILL EVENTUALLY "COMPROMISE" SOME MORE... they'll sell our children's future and our nation's prosperity to the radical left and get nothing in return... if we let them... and that's why they must hear from you right here and right now.

Saturday, December 11, 2010

LTC Lakin's attorney speaks on eligibility issue - VIDEO


DADT Study Biased!

DADT Study Biased


Retired Army Maj. Gen. Patrick Brady (Medal of Honor)

I was surprised to see the magnitude of favorable coverage of the Pentagon study on ending the ban on lesbians, gays, bisexual and transgender people serving in the military. The negatives on a quad-sexual military don't make the front page.

Where was it reported that 1,167 retired generals and flag officers support the ban on homosexuals? Why wasn't the focus that the vast majority of our combat troops and Marines oppose a quad-sexual military?

Let's put this study in perspective. The commander gives the order to take the hill. Wait, let's poll the troops. Duh! The study presented those polled with a fait accompli — not if but how. Amazingly, no question on ban repeal was asked! Why? The pollsters said troops shouldn't vote on policy. Excuse me. The whole purpose of the poll was to support a vote on policy about to be jammed through Congress.

Few Americans object to working with LGBT folks — but most do not want to live with them. Forced intimacy is not an American favorite as we see in the outrage over patdowns in airports. Intimacy is common, indeed, necessary in the military. Who wants to share showers, bathrooms and sleeping areas with those who see them as sexual objects (71 percent oppose open showers)? Rather than asking if our troops were biased against LGBTs in the workplace, they should have asked questions concerning forced intimacy, forced morality and the LGBT medical readiness issues.

Military communities are different. Try searching someone who enters a gated civilian community if you doubt that. Is the military OK with LGBT clubs on posts and near posts; and same-sex couples in military housing? Do military families agree to their children being taught the goodness of same-sex sex in post schools? Are they OK with forced morality at church? Imagine a gay pride parade at Fort Sam Houston. I have seen them in San Francisco; no child should be exposed to one.

Many Americans may be OK with the civilian chain of command dancing together, but many soldiers will have a problem if their commander is seen dancing and romancing another male at the O'club.

Surely it's known that once we legalize sodomy in the Uniform Code of Military Justice (required to legalize a quad-sexual military) we will have to do the same with adultery.

Most egregiously, the military will have to be retrained — and re-moralized — before implementation since there will be zero tolerance for opposition to homosexual conduct. What does that mean? Soldiers will have to abandon their belief system? Are they serious? Think draft.

Nothing in the study cited benefits to readiness (24 percent would leave or consider leaving); astonishingly, the logistics of implementation were ignored. When will some courageous journalist headline the tragic health disparities in the LGBT community? Multiple studies document significant, and costly, health disparities in rates of disease among sexual minorities resulting in loss of productivity (sickness), reduced life span, attempted suicide and substance abuse. An active homosexual cannot give blood, vital in combat. Who would knowingly receive a transfusion from a homosexual?

The military has a saying: Amateurs talk tactics, professionals talk logistics. For example, one university added special toilet units for transgendered people with privacy concerns costing $2,500 each. Extrapolate that to the military. Amateurs did this study.

Retired Army Maj. Gen. Patrick Brady is a recipient of the Medal of Honor in Vietnam, where he flew more than 2,500 combat missions and helped rescue more than 5,000 wounded.

Friday, December 10, 2010

We could all learn something from this guy


Madurai, India (CNN) -- Narayanan Krishnan was a bright, young, award-winning chef with a five-star hotel group, short-listed for an elite job in Switzerland. But a quick family visit home before heading to Europe changed everything.

"I saw a very old man eating his own human waste for food," Krishnan said. "It really hurt me so much. I was literally shocked for a second. After that, I started feeding that man and decided this is what I should do the rest of my lifetime."

Krishnan was visiting a temple in the south Indian city of Madurai in 2002 when he saw the man under a bridge. Haunted by the image, Krishnan quit his job within the week and returned home for good, convinced of his new destiny.

"That spark and that inspiration is a driving force still inside me as a flame -- to serve all the mentally ill destitutes and people who cannot take care of themselves," Krishnan said.

Krishnan founded his nonprofit Akshaya Trust in 2003. Now 29, he has served more than 1.2 million meals -- breakfast, lunch and dinner -- to India's homeless and destitute, mostly elderly people abandoned by their families and often abused.
"Because of the poverty India faces, so many mentally ill people have been ... left uncared [for] on the roadside of the city," he said.

Video: Akshaya Home
Mental Health
Social Issues
Krishnan said the name Akshaya is Sanskrit for "undecaying" or "imperishable," and was chosen "to signify [that] human compassion should never decay or perish. ... The spirit of helping others must prevail for ever." Also, in Hindu mythology, Goddess Annapoorani's "Akshaya bowl" fed the hungry endlessly, never depleting its resources.

Krishnan's day begins at 4 a.m. He and his team cover nearly 125 miles in a donated van, routinely working in temperatures topping 100 degrees Fahrenheit.

He seeks out the homeless under bridges and in the nooks and crannies between the city's temples. The hot meals he delivers are simple, tasty vegetarian fare he personally prepares, packs and often hand-feeds to nearly 400 clients each day.

Krishnan carries a comb, scissors and razor and is trained in eight haircut styles that, along with a fresh shave, provide extra dignity to those he serves.

He says many of the homeless seldom know their names or origins, and none has the capacity to beg, ask for help or offer thanks. They may be paranoid and hostile because of their conditions, but Krishnan says this only steadies his resolve to offer help.

"The panic, suffering of the human hunger is the driving force of me and my team members of Akshaya," he said. "I get this energy from the people. The food which I cook ... the enjoyment which they get is the energy. I see the soul. I want to save my people."

How to nominate a CNN Hero

The group's operations cost about $327 a day, but sponsored donations only cover 22 days a month. Krishnan subsidizes the shortfall with $88 he receives in monthly rent from a home his grandfather gave him.

Krishnan sleeps in Akshaya's modest kitchen with his few co-workers. Since investing his entire savings of $2,500 in 2002, he has taken no salary and subsists with the help of his once-unsupportive parents.

"They had a lot of pain because they had spent a lot on my education," he said. "I asked my mother, 'Please come with me, see what I am doing.' After coming back home, my mother said, 'You feed all those people, the rest of the lifetime I am there, I will feed you.' I'm living for Akshaya. My parents are taking care of me."

For lack of funding, the organization has been forced to halt construction on Akshaya Home, Krishnan's vision of a dormitory where he can provide shelter for the people he helps. Despite the demands and few comforts his lifestyle affords, Krishnan says he's enjoying his life.

"Now I am feeling so comfortable and so happy," he says. "I have a passion, I enjoy my work. I want to live with my people."

Want to get involved? Check out the Akshaya Trust Web site and see how to help.

Thursday, December 9, 2010

Intellectual Conservative Publishes My Latest Article

Intellectual Conservative Publishes My Latest Article
How to Create a Crisis and Steal a Nation


Please comment!

Wednesday, December 8, 2010

Gulf of Aden axial magnetic anomaly - some real science on the phenomenon.

Just in case you have heard some of the wild stories about UFOs, time warps, wormholes, etc. I want my readers to know that it isn't all B.S.  Something is going on but it probably has scientific explanation rather than a melodramatic explanation.

Gulf of Aden axial magnetic anomaly and the Curie temperature isotherm

D. Tamsett & R. W. Girdler

School of Physics, The University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK

The main features of magnetic anomalies over ocean ridges have been explained1 as a corollary of seafloor spreading and geomagnetic reversals. Oceanic crust is formed in a narrow region, becoming magnetized in the direction of the Earth's magnetic field as its temperature falls through the Curie point of the magnetic minerals present. The Gulf of Aden was one of the first places where reversely magnetized sea floor was recognized2. The seafloor spreading direction and latitude are such that the anomaly due to normal magnetization is negative and slightly skewed. Positive anomalies were also observed suggesting the presence of reverse magnetization. A short wavelength magnetic anomaly which frequently occurs superimposed on the axial magnetic anomaly in the Gulf of Aden is now described. Various interpretations are considered; the preferred involves a dramatic shallowing of the Curie temperature isotherm close to the seafloor spreading centre. The interpretation has implications for models of the generation of oceanic lithosphere and for locating possible geothermal areas in rifted regions.

References 1. Vine, F. J. & Matthews, D. H. Nature 199, 947−949 (1963). | ISI |
2. Girdler, R. W. & Peter, G. Geophys. Prosp. 8, 474−483 (1960).
3. Laughton, A. S., Whitmarsh, R. B. & Jones, M. T. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A267, 227−266 (1970). | ISI |
4. Girdler, R. W. & Styles, P. Nature 271, 615−617 (1978). | ISI |
5. Girdler, R. W., Brown, C., Noy, D. J. M. & Styles, P. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A298, 1−43 (1980). | ISI |
6. Talwani, M. & Heirtzler, J. R. in Computers in the Mineral Industries, part 1: Stanford Uni. Publ., Geol. Sci. 9, 464−480 (1964).
7. La Breque, J. L., Kent, D. V. & Cande, S. C. Geology 5, 330−335 (1977). | ISI |
8. Larson, R. L. & Speiss, F. N. Science 163, 68−71 (1969). | ISI |
9. Luyendyk, B. P. J. geophys. Res. 74, 4869−4881 (1969). | ISI |
10. Verosub, K. L. & Banerjee, S. K. Rev. Geophys. Space Phys. 15, 145−155 (1977).
11. Talwani, M., Windisch, C. C. & Langseth, M. G. J. geophys. Res. 76, 473−517 (1971). | ISI |
12. Atwater, T. & Mudie, J. D. J. geophys. Res. 78, 8665−8686 (1973). | ISI |
13. Prevot, M. & Lecaille, A. Earth planet Sci. Lett. 33, 164−168 (1976). | Article | ISI | ChemPort |
14. Banerjee, S. K. J. geophys. Res. 85, 3557−3566 (1980). | ISI |
15. Kent, D. V., Honnorez, B. M., Opdyke, N. D. & Fox, P. J. Geophys. J. R. astr. Soc. 55, 513−537 (1978). | ISI |
16. Heirtzler, J. R., Le Pichon, X. & Baron, J. G. Deep Sea Res. 13, 427−443 (1966). | Article |
17. Sclater, J. G. & Klitgord, K. D. J. Geophys. Res. 78, 6951−6975 (1973). | ISI |
18. Klitgord, K. D. Earth planet Sci. Lett. 29, 201−209 (1976). | Article | ISI |
19. Roeser, H. A. J. Geophys. 42, 73−80 (1976). | ISI |
20. Rea, D. K. & Blakely, R. J. Nature 255, 126−128 (1975). | ISI |
21. Kidd, R. G. W. Earth planet Sci. Lett. 33, 310−320 (1977). | Article | ISI |
22. Cande, S. C. & Kent, D. V. J. geophys. Res. 81, 4156−4162 (1976).
23. Blakely, R. J. Am. geophys. Un. Monogr. 19, 227−234 (1976).
24. Stefansson, V. Geothermal Systems: Principles and Case Histories (eds Rybach, L. & Muffler, L. J. P.) 273−294 (Wiley, New York, 1981).

Tuesday, December 7, 2010

Advice to presidential candidates

Advice to presidential candidates

It won't be long now before we see presidential candidates queuing up to impress upon us what worthy successors they will be to Barack Hussein Obama.

I don't think I have ever looked forward to a presidential campaign quite as enthusiastically as I do 2012.

Already we see likely candidates visiting Iowa and New Hampshire and other important primary states. But, before things really get started with declared candidacies and exploratory committees, I have a word of advice for all those considering this challenge.

Before you throw your hat into the ring, locate your long-form birth certificate, your school records, your travel history, your Selective Service registration and your medical reports, and be prepared to release them publicly.

It's not just a word of advice. It's going to be a requirement of American voters in the future. Mark my words.

As I have mentioned before, the production of the birth certificate may even be a requirement of law in some states – a necessary component of getting on the ballot.

Check out WND's full line of eligibility products – bumper stickers, post cards, DVDs and more!

In fact, I would suggest reviewing all these documents long before you craft, or commission a ghostwriter to craft, your autobiography.

Why would I suggest the review?

Because I suspect that was the fatal flaw in Barack Obama's political strategy.

I suspect he commissioned his own autobiography, "Dreams of My Father," long before he ever thought about running for president. I suspect he had much lower ambitions in mind at the time – perhaps the office of mayor in the city of Chicago.

So, with the likely help of wordsmith Bill Ayers, he created a profile. It was not necessarily the profile of a future president. But it was an interesting, well-written narrative, if not entirely honest.

In fact, factually, it is full of holes big enough to drive Air Force One through.

And there's the problem.

Why can't Obama release all those missing documents, from his birth certificate to his college records?

There may be many reasons.

But, I suspect at least one reason is that they will contradict his official life story. They would prove he lied to the American people about who he is. That would be pretty disconcerting, especially given his latest popularity ratings.

That's why I am offering this advice to future presidential candidates: Don't make the same mistake as Obama. Don't let Bill Ayers write your autobiography. Write it yourself and stick to the truth.

There are other reasons I would like to see 2012 candidates forthcoming with their personal records:

It will provide a stark contrast between them and Obama in the increasingly unlikely event he should he choose to run for re-election.

It will increase the pressure on Obama to release his – even late in his first term. I don't think he will ever do it, no matter what, but it's still important to demonstrate to the minority of American voters who don't understand what he's hiding.

The American people actually do have a right to know those they are considering to be their president.

And there actually is a constitutional requirement to prove eligibility for the office.

In the future, we don't need to have any doubts about who the occupant of the White House truly is. It's not healthy for America. It's not good for national security. As we can see from Obama's example, it's not even a good idea for sitting presidents for their credentials to be suspect.

That's why I absolutely support legislation in all 50 states to require future candidates for the highest office in the land to prove their constitutional eligibility before they ever get on a ballot.

Bush job approval rating higher than Obama's

Rush on WikiLeaks: Where's Obama's birth certificate?

Rush on WikiLeaks: Where's Obama's birth certificate?
Limbaugh asking for 'the real good stuff' to be released

© 2010 WorldNetDaily

PALM BEACH, Fla. – With global secrets continuing to drip out from WikiLeaks, radio host Rush Limbaugh wondered today where "the real good stuff" is, including President Obama's original, long-form hospital-generated birth certificate, which has still never been released two years into his presidency.

In his irreverent style, Limbaugh said: "Where are the WikiLeaks documents to prove 9/11 was inside job by George Bush and Dick Cheney? Let me ask you liberals, where are these cables?

"Where are the documents to prove Bush intentionally lied about weapons of mass destruction in Iraq in order to invade the country? Where is the WikiLeaks document, the State Department cable, whatever, that [Karl] Rove leaked Valerie Plame's name to the media? Where's all this good stuff? ...

"Where are the WikiLeaks cables proving that the CIA invented AIDS? Where is Obama's birth certificate? Where's the real good stuff? And how about all the hundreds of other left-wing lies we've been hearing about for years? [Is] WikiLeaks covering up for the United States?"

Perfect Solution to Protecting America's Secrets!

"If we want to keep our Nation's secrets, 'SECRET' ... store them where President Obama stores his college transcripts and birth certificate."

SEE: Obama “I have nothing to hide but I’m hiding it.”

Stealth Aircraft Eliminates America's Greatest Danger!

Saturday, December 4, 2010

A Different Christmas Poem

State legislative elections results, 2010

There were 6,125 seats up for election on November 2.
Initial results are that Republicans landed a dominating victory on November 2 in the state legislatures. As of late evening on November 3, at least 19 state legislative chambers switched from Democratic to Republican. There are still two that are too close to call.


Who is AKA Obama? The no-questions, no-proof media

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?pageId= 234281

The no-questions, no-proof media
Exclusive: Joseph Farah decimates editor's claim Obama is eligible for presidency
The news media are still at it.

They are still suggesting we should take Barack Obama at his word about his background and personal history – even though virtually everything he has told the American people has proven false under scrutiny.

And it's not just the Big Media in New York and Washington that ridicule anyone who dares ask a tough question or suggests we actually should enforce the law of the land and demand proof of Obama's claims. It's the regional and local media that are often just as guilty.

Take for example a recent column by the editorial page editor of the Amarillo Globe-News – John Kanelis.

He is attacking Texas legislator Leo Berman for introducing a bill that would do something highly commendable – ensure that future presidential candidates prove constitutional eligibility for office before getting on the state ballot. You might think this is a no-brainer. You might think such safeguards already exist. You might ask, "How can anyone argue with such a common-sense measure?"

Meet John Kanelis – watchdog not of the people's interests, but of Obama's self-interest.

Kanelis begins his commentary by asserting this "fact": "President Obama is a native-born American and is duly qualified to serve in the office to which he was elected in 2008 with a resounding Electoral College majority."

Notice Kanelis' claim that Obama is a "native-born American." Firstly, it is not fact in evidence. And, secondly, it might be irrelevant, because "native-born" is not the criteria the Constitution stipulates for holding the office of the presidency.

But it gets worse.

Get a FREE, comprehensive report answering the question: Does Barack Obama meet the requirements of the U.S. Constitution to occupy the hallowed Oval Office?

With head firmly ensconced in sand, he pretends there is no doubt in the minds of Americans about Obama's eligibility – even though an astonishing 58 percent of Americans express such grave doubts in the most recent polling done by CNN.

Kanelis' "proof" that Obama is a "natural born citizen" as the Constitution requires?

It's the same old legerdemain invoked by countless other pundits who try to build a case for eligibility:

Two Hawaiian newspaper published birth announcements for Obama in August 1961. To non-inquisitive journalists with no imagination or familiarity with how birth announcements get into their own newspapers, this proves he was born there. The only other explanation for them, to Kanelis, is that those around Obama registered his birth to ensure he would one day be eligible to be president. Ludicrous! Obama's putative dad was Kenyan citizen with at least one wife and other children in his native land. And people like Kanelis can't think of another reason his mother and grandparents might want to establish Obama's birthrights in America? Every single day in America illegal immigrants attempt to establish American birthrights for their children – not with the hope that they will someday become president of the United States, but because of the tremendous advantages it bestows upon them. That's why I have no doubts Obama's mother or grandparents registered his birth in Hawaii. But that does not suggest the birth took place there. Nor does it prove the information provided on the "certification of live birth" is accurate. That's why the long-form birth certificate is an invaluable document and newspaper announcements are not.

Kanelis wants us to take the word of the governor of Hawaii on the fact that Obama was born there. But Linda Lingle has herself acknowledged she has never seen the birth certificate.

Kanelis asserts that Hawaii officials "have produced a birth certificate that confirms Obama's birth – in Hawaii." That is just plain untrue – and reveals either a palpable disingenuousness or an equally inexcusable ignorance of the facts.
Meanwhile, a bold state legislator in Texas is being smeared by the local press. Berman is doing exactly the right thing – defending the Constitution, defending the law of the land, defending what's right, defending justice and truth and equal standards.

Kanelis and the local paper also invoke the race card against Berman.

"And it's fair to ask: Is this question solely a function of the fact that Barack Obama is the first black man to hold the office of president?" states Kanelis.

No, it's not fair to ask.

What would be fair to ask is why John McCain had to prove his eligibility when legitimate questions were raised, but Obama continues to get a free ride from the no-question, no-proof media.

Saturday, November 27, 2010

My Experience with TSA in Orlando!

We just returned from a Western Caribbean cruise aboard the Carnival Dream.

We docked at Port Canaveral and were driven to the Orland airport for return to Naples.

I have a pacemaker implanted in my chest so I never go through the scanners.  I gave the TSA agent the universal sign language that I was a pacemaker passenger and was taken out of line for the full physical body search as usual.

I was wearing my Navy Aviation baseball cap.
The TSA Officer said, "I see you are a veteran."  I replied "Yes, and I am also a member of the Association of Intelligence Officers and I know what we are up against.  It isn't just a small minority.  It is millions of religious fanatics who obsessively scheme to kill Americans.  I am glad you are on the job and exercising your duties professionally."

When the officer finished he said "God bless you ,sir and thank you for your service to our country.
Support for terrorism: All the Muslim populations polled display a solid majority of support for Osama bin Laden. Asked whether they have confidence in him, Muslims replied positively, ranging between 8 percent (in Turkey) to 72 percent (in Nigeria). Likewise, suicide bombing is popular. Muslims who call it justified range from 13 percent (in Germany) to 69 percent (in Nigeria). These appalling numbers suggest that terrorism by Muslims has deep roots, and will remain a danger for years to come.
One in eight UK Muslims world wide 'support terrorist attacks.'
A recent European poll found that 65% of Palestinians "support Al-Qaeda actions in the USA and Europe." (Fafo-Norwegian-based NGO, in Al-Hayat Al-Jadida, December 23, 2005) This strong support of those who would destroy America came in spite of hundreds of millions of dollars in annual US aid to the Palestinian alliance and was documented before the US announced a freeze in funding, after the election of the Hamas government.

A document, which was produced by officials from MI5 (British Intelligence) and the British Home and Foreign Offices, entitled "Young Muslims and Extremism" and drawn up for the prime minister by officials at the Home and Foreign and Commonwealth Offices, also states that anecdotal evidence suggests that up to 13 per cent, or 208,000 of Britain's 1.6 million Muslims, defended the terrorist attacks against the United States on September 11, 2001, while only 26 per cent feel loyalty toward England. That is not a tiny minority.
Muslim support for terrorist attacks against civilians

Jordan: 88% sometimes or rarely, 11% never

Lebanon: 58% sometimes or rarely, 33% never

Pakistan: 44% sometimes or rarely, 35% never
Source: Islamic Extremism: Common Concern for Muslim and Western Publics


Supremes challenged to put Constitution above Twitter


Saturday, November 27, 2010

WorldNetDaily Exclusive

Supremes challenged to put Constitution above TwitterCase questioning eligibility says
facts don't support Obama story

Posted: November 26, 2010
11:45 pm Eastern

By Bob Unruh


The U.S. Supreme Court is being asked to decide whether the Constitution will trump Twitter on issues of national importance, including the eligibility of a president, which could determine the very future of the American form of government.

The request is being made in a petition for writ of certiori, or a request for the Supreme Court to review the decision of a lower appellate court, in a case brought on behalf of Col. Gregory S. Hollister, a retired Air Force officer.

He is among the many who have brought court challenges to Obama's tenure in the Oval Office based on doubts about whether Obama qualifies for the position under the U.S. Constitution's demand that presidents be a "natural born citizen," a qualification not imposed on many other federal officers.

Get the free, in-depth special report on eligibility that could bring an end to Obama's presidency

The pleadings submitted to the court, compiled by longtime attorney John D. Hemenway, cite the incredible importance of the claims that Obama, in fact, failed to qualify for the office.
"If proven true, those allegations mean that every command by the respondent Obama and indeed every appointment by respondent Obama, including the appointment of members [Elena Kagan and Sonia Sotomayor] of this and every other court, may be only de facto but not de jure [by right of law]," states the pleading.

"Further, his signature on every law passed while he occupies the Oval Office is not valid if he is not constitutionally eligible to occupy that office de jure," it continued.

"Thus, it is not hyperbole to state that the entire rule of law based on the Constitution is at issue. Moreover, it would indicate that the respondent Obama ran for the office of president knowing that his eligibility was at the very least in question," it continued.

The case made headlines at the district court level because of the ruling from District Judge James Robertson of Washington.

Judge James Robertson

In refusing to hear evidence about whether Obama is eligible, Robertson wrote in his notice dismissing the case, "The issue of the president's citizenship was raised, vetted, blogged, texted, twittered, and otherwise massaged by America's vigilant citizenry during Mr. Obama's two-year-campaign for the presidency, but this plaintiff wants it resolved by a court."

Besides the sarcasm involved, the pleading states, the very evidence pertinent to the dispute at issues was ignored.

The pleading outlines that information, which challenges Obama's claim to eligibility and his campaign's citation of a computer-generated Certification of Live Birth from the state of Hawaii, a document also made available to those not necessarily born in the state, as proof of Obama's eligibility.

It suggests there are "sufficient allegations" that Obama was not born inside the United States, and outlines the law and regulations in force at the time of Obama's birth, in 1961.

"At the time of the birth of the respondent Obama in 1961 as alleged, Congress had … the Immigration and Naturalization Act of 1952. Under the applicable provision of that act … for the respondent Obama to have been a naturalized citizen of the United States at birth, were he born of one U.S. citizen parent and one alien parent, as he has alleged throughout his political career he was, his mother would have had to have been continuously resident in the United States for a period of 10 years preceding the date of his birth and, most importantly, she would have had to have resided continuously for five years preceding his birth in the United State after she had turned 14 years old. Since she was only 18 when Obama was born, this condition was clearly not fulfilled," the arguments said.

It also raised the suggestion that there are sound arguments to the effect that a "natural born citizen" is someone born to two citizen parents, and Obama himself has documented that his father never was a citizen of the U.S.

The fact that the evidence never was reviewed and the judge based a "biased" decision on "a completely extrajudicial factor" [twittering], prevented Hollister from having the constitutional rule of law applied, the petition states. .

"A further example of this bias based on extrajudicial factors by the district court was its observation that a lawyer associated with the initiation of petitioner Hollister's case, a prominent Democrat in Pennsylvania who backed Hillary Clinton in her successful primary there against respondent Obama, though never admitted in the case, was 'probably' the 'real plaintiff' in the case and that he and another lawyer who signed filings but was also never admitted … were 'agents provocateur' whose efforts to raise the issue of the respondent Obama's constitutional eligibility in lawsuits were a crusade in which the petitioner Hollister was a dupe," the petition says.

The questions suggested by the petition are weighty:

"Did the district court examine the complaint, as required by the decisions of this and every other federal court, to see if it alleged facts to support its claims?"

"By refusing to consider the issue of defendant Obama not being a 'natural born citizen' as set out in Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 of the Constitution, did the district court violate its obligations to consider the issues raised by the complaint?"

"In … relying on extrajudicial criteria such as an assertion that 'the issue of the president's citizenship was raised, vetted, blogged, texted, twittered and otherwise massaged by America's vigilant citizenry during Mr. Obama's two-year-campaign for the presidency' combined with an attack on petitioner … did the district court not engage in such obvious political bias and upon extrajudicial factors as to render its opinion void?"

"Did the … bias engaged in lead to a decision which ignored the law as set out above and as a result place the respondent-defendant Obama above that law and the rule of law in this country generally and threaten the constitutional basis and very existence of our rule of law?"

"Did the courts below not completely ignore the decisions of this court and the clear language of Rule 15 of the federal Rules of Civil Procedure concerning amendments so as to compound its biased elevation of the defendant Obama above the rule of constitutional law?"
While the district judge dismissed the case because it had been "twittered," the appeals court simply adopted his reasoning, but wouldn't even allow its opinion affirming the decision to be published, the petition explains.

Hollister's concern rests with the fact that as a retired Air Force officer in the Individual Ready Reserve, it is possible that he at some point could be subject to Obama's orders.

"If Congress called up the Air Force Individual Ready Reserve the respondent Obama would have to give the order … If, as it appears, those orders would not be lawful, Col. Hollister would be bound … to question them and look to the respondent [Vice President Joe] Biden as constitutionally next in succession for lawful orders," the pleading said.

This case doesn't have the "standing" dispute that has brought failure to so many other challenges to Obama's eligibility, the pleading explains, because Robertson "found that it had jurisdiction of the case, and therefore that petitioner Hollister had standing."

Courts in other case have ruled that the plaintiffs suffered no injury themselves that was not general to the population, so they weren't allowed to sue. However, because of Robertson's handling of the case, standing here has been established, the pleading states, allowing the appeal actually to argue the merits of the case, and note how Supreme Court precedents have been contradicted in the handling of the challenge to Obama.

Officials told WND that this case is an opportunity for the Supreme Court to re-establish that its precedents are binding.

The district judge also remarked "sarcastically" that there may be as many as a "couple of dozen" people concerned about the dispute. In fact, polls done by CNN and others indicate almost 6 in 10 in American don't believe Obama's birth narrative, which would give those doubting the president a total in the range of 180 million or more.

"In fact, reliable polls have shown the number of such people to be in the tens of millions and growing," the pleading explains.

"The combination of bias and ridicule of a person like the plaintiff wanting his concerns resolved by a court as being, essentially, an 'unthinkable' notion, is an expressed denial of a citizen's right to access to the courts," the case pleading continues.

The document also explains that both Robertson and Obama have "held management positions on boards of the Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights Under the Law, and thus are acquainted with each other. There is every appearance of bias here," it said.

John Eidsmoe, an expert on the U.S. Constitution now working with the Foundation on Moral Law, has told WND a demand for verification of Obama's eligibility appears to be legitimate.

Eidsmoe said it's clear that Obama has something in the documentation of his history, including his birth certificate, college records and other documents that "he does not want the public to know."

WND reported just days ago on another case, Kerchner v. Obama, that was before the Supreme Court with a request for review, on the same subject.

The case focuses on the "Vattel theory," which argues that the writers of the Constitution believed the term "natural-born citizen" to mean a person born in the United States to parents who were both American citizens.

"This case is unprecedented," said Mario Apuzzo, the attorney bringing the suit. "I believe we presented an ironclad case. We've shown standing, and we've shown the importance of the issue for the Supreme Court. There's nothing standing in their way to grant us a writ of certiorari."

WND has reported on dozens of legal and other challenges to Obama's eligibility. Some suggest he was not born in Hawaii has he claims; others say his birth location makes no difference because a "natural born citizen" was understand at the time to be a child of two citizen parents, and Obama's father was subject to the British crown when Barack Obama was born.


Wednesday, November 24, 2010

Federal judge confirms CAIR is Hamas....

CAIR's headquarters in Washington, D.C., just three blocks from the U.S. Capitol.

WASHINGTON – A federal judge has determined that the Justice Department provided "ample evidence" to designate the most prominent Muslim group in America as an unindicted terrorist co-conspirator.

According to a federal court ruling unsealed Friday, the Washington-based Council on American-Islamic Relations has been involved in "a conspiracy to support Hamas," a federally designated
terrorist group that has murdered at least 17 Americans and injured more
than 100 U.S. citizens.

The 20-page order, signed by U.S. District Judge Jorge A. Solis, cites "ample evidence" that CAIR participated in a "criminal conspiracy" led by the Holy Land
Foundation, Hamas's main fundraising arm in the U.S. As a result, the
judge refused CAIR's request to strike its name from documents listing
it as an unindicted co-conspirator in the case.

"The four pieces of evidence the government relies on do create at least a prima facie case as to CAIR's involvement in a conspiracy to support Hamas," Solis wrote in his July 2009 ruling.

The evidence includes documents introduced by the government showing CAIR and its founding chairman Omar Ahmad have operated as key members of Hamas' U.S. wing, known as the "Palestine Committee." In addition, FBI wiretaps and agent testimony have placed both Ahmad and CAIR's acting executive director – Nihad Awad – at a secret meeting last decad with Hamas leaders in Philadelphia. Meeting in a hotel room,
participants hatched a scheme to disguise payments to Hamas suicidebombers and their families as charity.

CAIR founding chairman Omar Ahmad, who arranged and led the secret Hamas meeting in Philadelphia

"The attendees agreed not to mention the word Hamas but to refer to Hamas as 'Samah,' which is Hamas spelled backwards," Solis said. "The Philadelphia conference essentially laid out the path that the
Palestine Committee would take to accomplish its goal of supporting
Hamas in the future."

During the meeting – which was organized and led by CAIR founder Ahmad – the Hamas operatives agreed to form CAIR as an outwardly benign front group skilled in media manipulation. "They did not want to be
viewed as being aligned with terrorist groups," he said.

The judge did not dispute "press accounts and blog entries" that "CAIR is a criminal organization that supports terrorism," according to the ruling.

The government's evidence undermines CAIR's public face as a "civil-rights advocacy organization," while corroborating the findings of the bestselling book, "Muslim Mafia: Inside the Secret Underworld
That's Conspiring to Islamize America." The book chronicles the
undercover investigation of P. David Gaubatz and his son, who interned
at CAIR's national headquarters.

CAIR has sued the Gaubatzes for trespassing, but has not denied any of the book's explosive findings tying CAIR closer to terrorism.
According to Politico.com, a federal grand jury in Washington is actively hearing evidence against CAIR emerging from the Holy Land trial, while also reviewing the thousands of pages of evidence gathered in the "Muslim Mafia" investigation. Prosecutors subpoenaed the evidence shortly after
the book was published last fall.

CAIR, which has not been charged with a crime, denies allegations it works for Hamas – even as it refuses to condemn the terrorist group by name.

"CAIR is not a front group for Hamas," insisted CAIR spokesman Ibrahim Hooper, "or any of the other false and misleading associations our detractors seek to smear us with."
CAIR maintains it is simply a Muslim-rights group, but the Justice Department says it is a front group not only for Hamas, but for its parent the radical Muslim Brotherhood – a worldwide jihadist
movement that prosecutors say has a secret plan to impose Shariah law on
the U.S.

"From its founding by Muslim Brotherhood leaders, CAIR conspired with other affiliates of the Muslim Brotherhood to support terrorists," said assistant U.S. Attorney Gordon Kromberg in a separate court filing.

CAIR Executive Director Nihad Awad, implicated in a major terror case, shakes hands
with undercover intern Chris Gaubatz at CAIR headquarters in Washington.

In 2007, U.S. prosecutors first named CAIR an unindicted co-conspirator in a criminal scheme led by the Holy Land Foundation to funnel more than $12 million to Hamas suicide bombers and their
families. A jury in 2008 convicted the charity and its leaders on all 108 felony counts.

"CAIR has been identified by the government at trial as a participant in an ongoing and ultimately unlawful conspiracy to support a designated terrorist organization – a conspiracy from which CAIR never
withdrew," said assistant U.S. Attorney Jim Jacks, who recently won an award from Attorney General Eric Holder for convicting the Holy Land terrorists.

The Holy Land revelations prompted the FBI to sever ties with CAIR until it can demonstrate it is not a terror front.

"Until we can resolve whether there continues to be a connection between CAIR or its executives and Hamas, the FBI does not view CAIR as an appropriate liaison partner," advised assistant FBI Director Richard Powers in a 2009 letter to the Senate Judiciary Committee.

Media outlets – including Fox News, which is financed by the same Saudi prince funding CAIR – continue to invite Awad and other CAIR leaders on the air to argue against airport profiling and other issues
on CAIR's agenda. Fox has offered CAIR guests full segments unopposed by critics and without viewer caveats regarding CAIR's court-documented terror connections.

DRAGNET 2010 - Obama gets questioned by Joe Friday!

U.S. Supreme Court confers on Obama eligibility

U.S. Supreme Court confers on Obama eligibility
Is president a 'natural-born citizen' as Constitution requires?

By Brian Fitzpatrick
© 2010 WorldNetDaily
WASHINGTON – Is this the case that will break the presidential eligibility question wide open?

The Supreme Court conferred today on whether arguments should be heard on the merits of Kerchner v. Obama, a case challenging whether President Barack Obama is qualified to serve as president because he may not be a "natural-born citizen" as required by Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution.

Unlike other eligibility cases that have reached the Supreme Court, Kerchner vs. Obama focuses on the "Vattel theory," which argues that the writers of the Constitution believed the term "natural-born citizen" to mean a person born in the United States to parents who were both American citizens.

"This case is unprecedented," said Mario Apuzzo, the attorney bringing the suit. "I believe we presented an ironclad case. We've shown standing, and we've shown the importance of the issue for the Supreme Court. There's nothing standing in their way to grant us a writ of certiorari."

If the Supreme Court decides to grant the "writ of certiorari," it may direct a federal trial court in New Jersey to hear the merits of the case, or it may choose to hear the merits itself. The court's decision on the writ could be announced as early as Wednesday.

Rest of story: http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=232073

Sunday, November 21, 2010

The Night Watchmen - A wonderful illustration of your Government at work!

The Night Watchmen

A wonderful illustration of your Government at work!

Once upon a time the government had a vast scrap yard in the middle of a desert.

Congress said, "Someone may steal from it at night." So they created a night watchman position and hired a person for the job.

Then Congress said, "How does the watchman do his job without instruction?"

So they created a planning department and hired two people, one person to write the instructions,

and one person to do time studies.

Then Congress said, "How will we know the night watchman is doing the tasks correctly?"

So they created a Quality Control department and hired two people. One to do the studies, and one to write the reports.

Then Congress said, "How are these people going to get paid?"

So they created the following positions, a time keeper, and a payroll officer, then hired two people.

Then Congress said, "Who will be accountable for all of these people?" So they created an Administrative section and hired three people, an Administrative Officer, Assistant Administrative Officer, and a Legal Secretary.

Then Congress said, "We have had this command in operation for one Year and we are $180,000 over budget,

we must cutback overall cost." So they laid off the night watchman.

NOW slowly, let it sink in...

Quietly, we go like sheep to slaughter.

Does anybody remember the reason given for the establishment of the DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

during the Carter Administration?




Didn’t think so!

Bottom line. We've spent several hundred billion dollars in support of an agency...

the reason for which not one person who reads this can remember!

It was very simple...and at the time, everybody thought it very appropriate.

The Department of Energy was instituted on 8-04-77, TO LESSEN OUR DEPENDENCE ON FOREIGN OIL.

Hey, pretty efficient, huh???

AND NOW IT'S 2010 -- 33 YEARS LATER --




33 years ago 30% of our oil consumption was foreign imports. Today 70% of our oil consumption is foreign imports.

Ah, Yes -- good ole bureaucracy.



Congressional Reform Act of 2010

Congressional Reform Act of 2010

1. Term Limits.

12 years only, one of the possible options below..

A. Two Six-year Senate terms
B. Six Two-year House terms
C. One Six-year Senate term and three Two-Year House terms

2. No Tenure / No Pension.

A Congressman collects a salary while in office and receives no pay when they are out of office.

3. Congress (past, present & future) participates in Social Security.

All funds in the Congressional retirement fund move to the Social Security system immediately. All future funds flow into the Social Security system, and Congress participates with the American people.

4. Congress can purchase their own retirement plan, just as all Americans do.

5. Congress will no longer vote themselves a pay raise. Congressional pay will rise by the lower of CPI or 3%.

6. Congress loses their current health care system and participates in the same health care system as the American people.

7. Congress must equally abide by all laws they impose on the American people.

8. All contracts with past and present Congressmen are void effective 1/1/11.

The American people did not make this contract with Congressmen. Congressmen made all these contracts for themselves.

Serving in Congress is an honor, not a career. The Founding Fathers envisioned citizen legislators, so ours should serve their term(s), then go home and back to work.

If each person contacts a minimum of twenty people then it will only take three days for most people (in the U.S. ) to receive the message. Maybe it is time.