Sunday, September 30, 2012

Mensa Health Sciences Seminar

Mensa News Release
Contact:   239/591-4565

Mensa Health Sciences Seminar
Sponsored by the South West Florida MENSA Chapter
Mensa membership is not required; this seminar is open to the public.
On Saturday, October 6 at 2 PM - Sam and Bunny Sewell are hosting:


Have you noticed that shortly after a drug company advertizing blitz about the latest “wonder drug,” there is another advertizing blitz from lawyers wanting you to join a lawsuit against the manufacturers of the same “wonder drug.”  “Dangerous Prescription” is a look inside the FDA, its recent record, and the debate over whether our nation’s drug safety system is broken.

As medications assume ever-larger roles in health care, the importance of FDA approval mounts. But what do average Americans know about the FDA process? What happens when a drug product harms consumers, and what role do drug companies play in approving and monitoring drugs?

DANGEROUS PRESCRIPTION offers a FRONTLINE investigation into the FDA and drug safety process, revealing the questionable effectiveness of the FDA in identifying or testing the efficacy of drugs they “approve” that soon are shown to not work, or cause significant harm.

This is an extremely important issue to millions of Americans!
Please share this with anyone who takes, or cares about, people who take prescription medications.

Always good discussions afterward.  Feel free to bring friends!

The follow up seminar, offering healthy alternatives to drugs, will be held the following Saturday October 13 at 2 PM

Sam & Bunny Sewell
10202 Vanderbilt Dr
(NE corner, @ 102nd Ave)
Naples, Fl 34108
Contributions benefit the Mensa Scholarship Fund

Limited space, please let us know ASAP if you would like to attend
RSVP: 239/591- 4565  

Wake Up, Jews!

Wake Up, Jews!

No doubt, it's hard for people to give up their lifelong attachments and identity.  But there are moments in history when a turning point arrives, and those with eyes to see and ears to hear recognize it.  Many Jews have made political liberalism their religion and personal identity and the Democrat Party their unexamined home and comfort zone.  But everything changed early September.

Rarely do modern-day political conventions startle.  The Democratic National Convention, however, was earthshaking and a warning to Jews to wake up.  Democrat delegates decided to stick it to Israel.  We no longer care, they roared, if Israel remains a Jewish state; flood her heartland with millions of so-called Palestinians whose goal is to make the state Islamic.  We will not condemn Hamas for targeting Jewish population centers with rockets.  Jerusalem is not Israel's indivisible capital but should be divided, like Berlin was.  Such was the undeniable sentiment of the delegates at the Convention.

After objections from outside the Convention, the chairman reinstated support for Jerusalem.  But he was resoundingly booed.  The world saw how those boos far outweighed the yeas.  My fellow Jews, the boos were for you; those boos were for Israel, a successful Israel that sticks in the craw of a leftist, socialist mindset that sees Israel not as the beacon of freedom and accomplishment she is, but as something outside the leftist ideological orbit.  Sure, they will take your contributions and your votes, but they don't want your Israel, and they expect you to forgo distinctly Jewish needs on the altar of leftism.  We saw not liberalism, but hardcore leftism, and we saw a home where the welcome mat is quite conditional and worn out.

The prophet Daniel saw the writing on the wall.  All too often throughout our history, we Jews, and especially heads of major Jewish organizations, have failed to see the writing on the wall.  We are afraid to see that which is a game-changer, and so we deny events we wish were not happening.  After all, who wants to change the comfort zone?

It was a convention, like the last four years of the Obama administration, reveling in class warfare.  Class warfare, like Occupy Wall Street and other scapegoating calls, has never been good for the Jews.  We are often the scapegoat of those envious.  Knowing this, Ahmadinejad scheduled a meeting with Occupy, a movement endorsed last year by many bigwigs in the Democratic Party and even President Obama himself.  Jihadists and much of Islam want to delegitimize the concept of a Jewish state by tarnishing Jews as "those rich capitalists" unworthy of a state among the community of nations.

Too often, we Jews have been beguiled into believing that Jews in positions of power have our interests at heart.  Debbie Wasserman Schultz is but the latest who would have us think she is "doing what is good for the Jews" when, in fact, she is doing and will continue to do what is good for Debbie and her power base.  Similarly, the heads of the major Jewish organizations have been conspicuously silent -- a silence that would not prevail if a Republican were doing the things to Israel Obama is doing.

Job openings are way down; 50% of college graduates, our children, can't find jobs; and Mr. Obama will continue to weaken national security and thus the safety of our families...and continue to make it more difficult for Israel to survive.  For many, all this is secondary and expendable for their more important agenda of abortion on demand and gay marriage.  How frivolous; how irresponsible!

We can determine what truly is important to a person when he is forced to choose between two values.  Since when is it a Jewish value to condemn Israel to misery just so one can be assured of abortion at any time, under any circumstance?  Most of your grandparents would have chosen Israel over abortion and gay marriage.  As our sages tell us: "The wages of immorality are further immorality."

President Obama has time to meet with Muslim Brotherhood Morsi of Egypt, who has declared his intention to get rid Israel, but Mr. Obama has no time to meet with Israel's Netanyahu, whose country is under imminent nuclear threat from Iran.  Israel's concern about a possible nuclear Holocaust is, for Mr. Obama, dismissed as mere noise, while his delegates at the U.N. on Sept. 24 are ordered to sit and listen to the vile noise of the Holocaust-denier and Iranian Jew-hater-in-chief.  It is clear that Mr. Obama's underlying sympathy is with the Muslim Brotherhood and its spread and influence around the world.  He is coaxing us to accept Islamic attitudes and norms.  This speaks volumes -- to those willing to see the facts as they truly are.

My friends, get off the train, now.  The track is pointing in a very dangerous direction.  You will not prevail over the trend; on the contrary, you will become part of the trend.  As an elder clergyman, I'm horrified as I watch many Jews -- young and old -- slowly evolve into proponents of positions unwholesome, dangerous, and destined toward spiritual and physical suicide.

True, you will be forced to stop your demonizing of Republicans.  You may have to vote for Romney, a candidate singular in his passion and love for Israel as a living concept, an indivisible Jerusalem, and for Israelis and Jews as Jews.  You will have to wipe away the gruesome fantasies you have concocted about Republicans and conservative Americans.  That's OK.  In fact, it is a nice thing to do and is good for the soul.

Rabbi Aryeh Spero is author of Push Back: Reclaiming our American Judeo-Christian Spirit. Contact: (212)

Page Printed from:

The Lying Obama Administration is exposed !

Saturday, September 29, 2012

Have You Heard the News? The Election is Over.

It's Over

By William L. Gensert
Give up -- Barack Obama has won. With the election only weeks away, it is clear from recent swing state polling that Mitt Romney has lost this election. According to the Quinnipiac numbers, in the battleground states of Ohio, Florida, and Pennsylvania, the president is ahead by 10%, 9% and 12%, respectively.
Romney can't win. Just ask any journalist or newscaster. He is toast -- stick a fork in him.
If anything, the closer we get to Election Day, the more apparent it is that Obama is not only losing, but losing big. The Obama campaign, and by "campaign" I mean members of the media and polling organizations, is trying to convince prospective Romney voters to believe that all is lost -- in which case, they hope, we will stay home.
But just because they say so, that doesn't make it true.
Everyone knew from the outset that Obama, with his sad record of continuous failure on almost every front, was going to air out his inner bitterness and envy, and campaign negatively. But did anyone suspect that his sole hope for victory would rest on trying to suppress the vote of his opponent with naked media bias and polling -- most of which assumes a higher Democrat turnout than in 2008, when the electorate, many Republicans included, swallowed whole Obama's vision of "hope and change"?
Well, three and a half years later, the digestion of that particular meal has given America and Americans an ulcer -- a bleeding ulcer. I can attest to that -- every time I see the man or hear him speak, it makes me sick to my stomach.
It is ludicrous to maintain that Obama, a curiously small giant of humanity, is ahead anywhere in this nation by 10%. The recent meme of the inevitability of Barack Obama is merely the delusional desperation of sycophantic minions. What else do they have? What else can they say?
The polls allege Obama is ahead by 10% in Ohio (or should I use the Hawaiian spelling, "Oiho") -- a mining state -- where part of the economy depends on King Coal and the money it brings in. This is the man who, through his agents at the EPA, has singlehandedly destroyed the coal industry in America.
He is said to be ahead by 12% in Pennsylvania -- also a mining state, and home of the Marcellus Shale natural gas field. Yet even the uninformed know that under Barack Obama there will be no drilling for oil, mining coal, or building nuclear power plants. And probably in a second term, the EPA will shut down fracking, which means no natural gas either.
Yeah...he's way ahead.
In Florida, he is leading by 9%. It is beyond belief that the state, with its large population of seniors and Jews, is going to vote overwhelmingly for the man whose signature legislation, ObamaCare, decimates Medicare and who has marginalized and insulted Israel repeatedly during his entire term. Remember, he had time for Whoopi, but not for Netanyahu.
And let's not forget that Florida is a state with no state income tax. In fact, many people move there for that reason -- how do you think they got Lebron? Yet we are supposed to believe they will vote for the man who gave us 20 new taxes through Obamacare and plans to raise taxes all around? And if you don't think his proposed one-year extension for most of the Bush tax cuts, set to expire January 1, 2013, is not a plan to let all tax rates rise a year later, you haven't been paying attention.
Yeah...he's going to win big there.
The truth is plain to see. Obama is not going to pick up any new voters with his record of economic destruction and the misery he has foisted upon the electorate. He will bleed support as his base withers away in the harsh glare of the Obama reality.
Take his vote total from 2008 and subtract out some portion of the voters who bought the dream but lived the nightmare.
Then, subtract out some portion of the youth vote, who have discovered that hope means no jobs and student loans they can't pay, while change means whatever coins they can find underneath the cushions of their mother's sofa -- in whose house they are relegated to live because of poor prospects and lack of opportunity.
Remove the women who don't agree with abortion on demand and contraceptives for all -- free and clear.
Remove the Catholics and other religious "folks" (a favorite Obama term) for the same reason, in addition to his assault on religious freedom, support of same-sex marriage, and antipathy for insulting the prophet of Islam, while accepting any slight on the Judeo-Christian American tradition.
...Oh my goodness, did I just hurt the feelings of Muslims by not capitalizing "prophet"? I anxiously await the knock on the door from the Obama secret police.
Remove the Jews who are appalled at his treatment of Israel and his obvious sympathy for Islamists.
Remove the sensible, who recognize Obama's impotence in the face of Iran's steady march toward acquiring a nuclear weapon. After all, we have nothing to fear from Iran, a nation whose leaders continuously call for the destruction of Israel and America.
Take out all those people who can no longer afford the drive to work, now that Obama has allowed the price of gasoline to double during his tenure.
In addition, many blacks, who have suffered most under this man's policies, will not be there for him this time around. They may not vote against him -- racial solidarity, and all that -- but many will certainly stay home.
Remove the voters who do not like the fact that for Barack, the buck always stops at Bush.
Simply put, people will not go out of their way to support someone who has tortured them into submission for three and a half years. Even though they may not tell pollsters that.
With that in mind, can anyone say there is the same level of electoral enthusiasm for the president as there was in 2008?
For many supporters, who still believe in the myth of Obama but are not so far gone they cannot see what he hath wrought lo these last few years, a second term for the president is like a colonoscopy -- they have to say yes. But really, who looks forward to it?
The once unstoppable Obama movement has constipated to a halt. He was once a god, and now he is man -- a nasty, unsuccessful man, who blames everyone and everything for his serial failures.
After all is said and done, what is he left with? The same hardcore group of delusional ideologues who would vote for him even if they came home from work and caught him beating their grandmothers to death with his Nobel Prize -- but these voters were never in play anyway.
Obama is going to lose in a landslide. And Barack Obama, the media, and the polling organizations will be appropriately shocked.
Shocked, I say!
Round up the usual suspects.

Page Printed from:

Thursday, September 27, 2012

Don't Vote For the Beast - Use Your Vote to Tame the Beast!

Most people see the conflict between limited government and big government as a political battle between conservatives and liberals. This conflict is much more profound than political theory can encompass.
“Children of The Beast”
By Sam Sewell


"The average man doesn't want to be free. He wants to be safe."   H.L. Mencken

Most people see the conflict between limited government and big government as a political battle between conservatives and liberals.  This conflict is much more profound than political theory can encompass.

In this essay the metaphor of “The Beast” is used to represent big government, and “Children of The Beast” to reveal the nature of those who support, or are dependent upon, big government.

My analysis is offered in two sections:
  1. The inherent inefficiency and inertia of large, complex entities
  2. The inherent evil of large, complex entities

“The Beast” is too big to be responsive to human will

“This system is like a steamroller with an unresponsive steering wheel; no matter who is in the driver’s seat it continues to crush the people.”
Aristotle The Hun

At every level of life we recognize that the more complicated any system becomes the less efficient its function. Complicated systems overwhelm the people who participate in them.

For example, let’s look at people and their possessions.  Most of us have made the observation that as we accumulate “things” there comes a time when our things own us, rather than us owning our things.  My wife has created a system that prevents her closet from taking over our house.  She will not put a new piece of clothing into her closet unless she eliminates something that is already there.

Many businesses have a similar policy.  In addition to not adding a new policy without eliminating an outdated policy, managers do a periodic analysis of the existing bureaucracy to determine what paperwork and procedures need to be eliminated.

Governments would do well to implement similar solutions.  Most government programs have a constituency of voters who object to “their” special interest program being eliminated, resulting in a system that eventually overwhelms the citizens.  Not only are government agencies inefficient, they often produce “schizophrenic” results, like attempts to reduce the use of tobacco at the same time that tobacco growers are receiving government subsidies.

This not just a modern problem!  The same dynamics were present in large systems thousands of years ago. Bureaucratic inertia was as much a cause for the fall of the Roman Empire as barbarians at the gates.  The ancient Jews had a solution to the problem that has escaped the attention of leaders of modern government systems.

"This fiftieth year is sacred—it is a time of freedom and of celebration, when everyone will receive back their original property, and slaves will return home to their families. "  Leviticus 25:10

Every fifty years all debts were cancelled, all slaves were freed, and all land was returned to the ancestral owners.  There were several other provisions associated with the Year of Jubilee. This religious tradition was a way for an entire culture to be reset, or “rebooted,” in order to wipe out the accumulated bureaucratic inertia.  We modern people can “defrag” our computers, but we don’t know how to “defrag” our federal government.

The problems associated with complex systems are not unique to the government of the United States.  In fact the founding fathers who created the Constitution built in some safeguards because they were already aware of the problem.  The 10th Amendment is one of those attempts to curtail the unrelenting tendency of government to grow into a curse upon free men and women.

“The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.”

This Constitutional Amendment was intended to restrict the power and size of the federal government.  Over the decades the federal government has steadily centralized its power, while the 10th amendment has been mostly ignored.

For example, if the 10th amendment were respected, the Federal Environmental Protection Agency would cease to exist, and individual state agencies would protect the environment of each state.  Also, the Federal Department of Education would be eliminated, and local school boards would set the standards and supervise the education in each individual community.

As you might suspect ““The Beast”” and “The “Children of The Beast”” are adamantly opposed to such corrections.

It is a fundamental truth that all systems grow to the point where their internal inertia causes them to fail.  So it is clear that we are struggling with dynamics more profound than modern politics in the United States.  These dynamics are rooted into the very nature of reality, even showing up in complicated systems of the physical world of engineering and physics.  The more complex the system, the less efficient and more unwieldy it becomes.

“The Beast” That Was, and Is Not, and Yet Is
(Revelation 17:8)

Now, there is a riddle for you!  I remember a speech I heard by the flamboyant trial attorney, Gerry Spence.  He said, “I had a very successful career working for corporations and the government.  I won every case that went to trial.  Then I became aware that I was working for virtual, non-human entities that had no actual existence.  My clients were artificial, abstract ‘creatures’ whose only claim on reality was a concept or a contract defined by the laws of man.  I also noticed that when I won a case for a corporation or the government that real live human beings, with blood pumping through their veins and breath moving in and out of their lungs, were victimized by the ‘non-breathers.’  That is when I vowed never to have another non-breathing client for the rest of my career.  If you can’t fog up a cold mirror with your breath, I will not be your attorney.”

I think Gerry Spence solved the above riddle.  If it doesn’t breathe, it is “The Beast.”  If “The Beast” serves human needs it should be domesticated, cared for, and kept on a tight rein.  If “The Beast” intimidates human beings and expects the humans to serve IT, the time has come to bring out the cattle prods and force ““The Beast”” back into submission. 

Metaphorically, American citizens are struggling with “The Beast” that has forgotten who is serving whom. I wonder if the right to bear arms includes cattle prods.  J

Our elected leaders are expected to accept the responsibility of controlling “The Beast.”  Why do you think the Constitution has all those phrases, “The government shall not …”?

If, instead, our elected leaders begin serving “The Beast,” it becomes the responsibility of each individual citizen to ensure that “The Beast” is properly subordinated to ‘We the People.’  Many of our elected leaders are “Children of The Beast.”  Many of our citizens have become “Children of The Beast.”  They worship the glory and the power of “The Beast.” They accept gifts from “The Beast,” and they become dependent upon “The Beast.”  

A vote that strengthens the BEAST is a danger to us all.  Vote to Tame the Beast!

Read the full article here:

Wednesday, September 26, 2012

A CALL OF CHRISTIAN CONSCIENCE - The Manhattan Declaration

As a signer of the Manhattan Declaration, you are part of a movement of 532,000 individuals whose faith in Jesus leads you to stand for life, marriage, and religious liberty. We are a massive movement! Yet, how often do you encounter fellow Christians who have never heard of us? Or have never "gotten around" to signing?

Christians, when they have lived up to the highest ideals of their faith, have defended the weak and vulnerable and worked tirelessly to protect and strengthen vital institutions of civil society, beginning with the family. It was in this tradition that a group of prominent Christian clergy, ministry leaders, and scholars released the Manhattan Declaration on November 20, 2009 at a press conference in Washington, DC. The 4,700-word declaration speaks in defense of the sanctity of life, traditional marriage, and religious liberty. It issues a clarion call to Christians to adhere firmly to their convictions in these three areas.

Tuesday, September 25, 2012

'Unskewed' polls show nearly 8-point Romney lead

NEW YORK – Arguing that most of the major polls reported by establishment media are “skewed” in favor of the Democratic Party and incumbent Barack Obama, a website contends that a true gauge of the presidential race, based on more realistic models, shows Republican challenger Mitt Romney leading by an average of nearly eight points.
In its daily readjustment of the polling data, also produces a table showing the spread in President Obama’s approval/disapproval ratio is an average of 8.8 percent more disapproval, as of Monday.
Not a single major poll or approval/disapproval index favors Obama when’s analysis is applied.
The website says there is Democratic bias in polling because of over-sampling Democrats based on voter exit polls in the 2008 presidential election, when enthusiasm for a then relatively unknown but charismatic presidential candidate boosted Democratic Party voter registration and turnout to historic levels.
Race beginning to look a lot like 1980? What might Ronald Reagan’s victory path mean?
Source: LV = Likely Voters, RV=Registered Voters, MoE=Margin of Error
Republicans have complained that the establishment media’s voter-turnout models can serve a partisan purpose by presenting margins that keep discouraged Republican voters at home thinking the election is already lost.
Signs Obama losing
Despite the establishment media narrative that the Romney campaign is behind and in disarray, there are abundant signs the Obama campaign is behind and scrambling not to lose further ground:
  • On Saturday, Obama campaign manager Jim Messina insisted to reporters that despite national polls showing Romney and Obama locked in a tie, Obama is still winning.
  • WND reported last week Obama’s chief financier, Penny Pritzker, has entered the Hawaii housing market to buy a retirement home for the president and his family that will be available not in 2016, but in January 2013.
  • On the eve of the opening session of the General Assembly, the Obama administration’s Middle Eastern policy appears to be imploding in the wake of the murder of U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens in an attack that intelligence sources believe was coordinated by jihadists tied to al-Qaida. The administration, nevertheless, insisted the attack was a response to an anti-Muslim movie trailer produced in the U.S.
  • Initial jobless claims for the week ending Sept. 15 were a seasonally adjusted 382,000, exceeding forecasts of 375,000, suggesting no improvement in the percentage of Americans unemployed could be anticipated before the November election, as reported by Wall Street Journal Market Watch.
  • Politico has reported that in the latest Politico-George Washington University Battleground Poll with middle-class families, which constitute approximately 54 percent of the electorate and usually split their vote between Democratic and Republican candidates, Romney holds a 14-point advantage, 55 percent to 41 percent.

Monday, September 24, 2012

Keep Banging the "Ineligibility" Drum!

I created the article below with five paragraphs each with links to the full article.  This is handy for forums,  blog posts, and those newspapers with public feedback capability.  You just need to select a paragraph and paste it into the discussion you are having.  THIS CAN BE A BIG HELP!!!

Here is some of the evidence that the ineligibility movement has been victorious, in spite of all the obstacles erected by “officialdom” and Obama supporters:
·       The issue is still here!  That is a victory of persistence over corruption!   Before the 2008 election the pioneers of the Ineligibility Movement began writing articles and filing legal papers.  Attorney Phillip Berg filed a complaint in federal district court on August 21, 2008, against Democratic Party presidential nominee Senator Barack Obama, the Democratic National Committee and the Federal Election Commission, alleging that Obama was born in Mombasa, Kenya and that the "Certification of Live Birth" on Obama's website is a forgery. The main value of what is being done is to expose the corruption of “Obama” and his enablers, and publicize it as widely as possible.  Your help is needed for the latter, since the media and officials want this news buried deeply.  Keep up the good work with emails, forums and web sites. In spite of all of the efforts to crush the ineligibility issue, it is very much alive and thriving, and there are still many legal cases that are active.  A clear victory for the birthers!
Evidence Obama Ineligibility Movement is Winning

·       Because of the unresponsiveness of the ruling elite to the ineligibility issue, the national consciousness has become aware that the media, the courts, and the politicians are corrupt beyond redemption.  A paradigm shift is happening.  The national political perception is no longer one political party against the other, but the ruling elite vs. the citizens.  Have you read the Declaration of Independence recently?  Many of the complaints our founding fathers voiced against the tyranny of King George are now being seen as present in the tyranny of the political and media ruling elite against today’s citizens.  That is a victory of awareness.  Another clear Victory!

Evidence Obama Ineligibility Movement is Winning

·       Millions of dollars have been spent by Obama and the Democratic Party to keep secrets from the citizens, stamp out the ineligibility movement, and defend against lawsuits.  If it were not for the ineligibility movement, all that money would be available to help reelect Obama.  The courageous patriots of the first American Revolution were mostly volunteers and were a small force compared to the British Empire.  They knew that attacking the enemy’s resources was often a more effective tactic than attacking their army.  Likewise the ineligibility movement has been very effective in depleting Obama’s resources.  In the Korean War the F-86 Sabre Jet had a ten to one kill ratio over the MIGs.  Dollar for dollar, the ineligibility movement has a higher kill ratio than the F-86.  For every dollar we spend, they spend thousands.  This is an economic victory.  Keep that in mind when making contributions to Florida Ballot Challenge.  To my thinking, contributing to the ineligibility movement is the most efficient dollar value for a patriotic contribution.  Every dollar you send us takes thousands of dollars out of Obama’s corrupt treasure chest.  This is again a clear Victory!

Evidence Obama Ineligibility Movement is Winning

Many of the national opinion polls show that a large segment of the citizens still have questions about Obama’s questionable history, and they still want answers!  In a July 2012 poll 45% of the general public and 69% of Republicans have doubts about Obama’s birthplace.  Many voters have been influenced away from voting for Obama because of the obvious cover up of Obama’s past.  Just type these search words into Google and see for yourself: obama eligible poll.  The ineligibility movement has educated the voters beyond the circumstances of Obama’s birth and the citizenship of his father.  Now people are aware that Obama’s history of education, medical history, travel and passport history, the history of his parent’s marriage and divorce, adoption records, the records of the Illinois bar, Illinois State Senate records, his beliefs, past associates, personal behavior and many other mysteries still remain unresolved.  The uncertainty created by Obama’s cover up will significantly affect voting outcome.  Most presidential elections are decided by a very narrow margin. Given that about half the American people are uncertain about Obama’s history, the 2012 vote will be more influenced by the ineligibility movement than any demographic group.  That is a victory of the think for themselves” citizens over the ambiguous cover ups offered by the ruling elite!  Yet another clear victory for the birthers!

·      Evidence Obama Ineligibility Movement is Winning
I have a question for my readers.  If the ineligibility movement was not scoring significant victories why would the Democratic Party and Obama’s supporters be trying so hard to silence the issue?  Why not encourage the legal establishment to rule on the evidence and the law, rather than avoiding the facts?  Why not encourage the Supreme Court to rule, rather than evade?  Why not encourage a public open discussion of the ineligibility issue?  Why not have public debates on national television?  Why not release the many documents that reveal Obama’s history?  Why not give millions of citizens the information they want?  Or, why not simply ignore it?  Why indeed?  I know why.  The “birthers” are winning and Obama can’t afford to give them any more ammunition!

We desperately need to raise money for expenses of this project.  I just emptied our bank account for appeal expenses.

Donate to Florida Ballot Challenges!
or send a check to:
Constitution Action Fund
10202 Vanderbilt Drive
Naples, FL 34108
Are you interested in being a plaintiff?  We have developed a "Do It Yourself Ballot Challenge Kit" that is useable in many states and is available at:

Florida Democrat Still Pushing Courts to Prove Obama’s Eligibility

Florida Democrat Still Pushing Courts to Prove Obama’s Eligibility

Godfather Politics
Florida Democrat Still Pushing Courts to Prove Obama’s Eligibility
read appeal:
1ST DCA Case No.: 1D12-3489
L.T. No.: 2012-CA-00467

Obama gavel

Anatomy of a Florida Ballot Challenge

Florida Ballot Challenge News

Donate to case expenses!

Donate to Florida Ballot Challenges!
or send a check to:
Constitution Action Fund
10202 Vanderbilt Drive
Naples, FL 34108
Are you interested in being a plaintiff?  We have developed a "Do It Yourself Ballot Challenge Kit" that is useable in many states and is available at:

Sunday, September 23, 2012



Exclusive Report by Pixel Patriot
September 23, 2012

The Judiciary and government agencies comprising the National Security apparatus of the United States including the FBI and the NSA know that Barack Obama is not a Natural Born Citizen and therefore not eligible to be President. They also know that not being a Natural Born Citizen is a threat to national security. Why he has been allowed to usurp the Office of the Presidency of the United States by our nation’s national security apparatus has yet to be determined.

Now, newly discovered evidence proves all three branches of our government are complicit in compromising our national security by allowing the Constitution to be subverted.



Catholic Church anti-socialism and anti- Obama

Talking to your future self - Obama failed expectations!

Saturday, September 22, 2012

Incompetence Will Out - Aaron Cantor USAF (ret)

Many excuses have been made as to why Obama is rejected by so many Americans; racism, he's a Muslin, he's a socialist etc.  But he is just plain incompetent and inexperienced.  

Aaron Cantor USAF (ret)
President Obama has been forced to reassess his view of what caused the attack in Benghazi, Libya that killed US Ambassador Christopher Stevens, raising questions about whether the White House has a solid grasp on the underpinnings of the angry convulsions rocking the Middle East and the impact of the so-called “Cairo doctrine” laid out by Obama shortly after he took office in 2009.
I fail to see what is so difficult to figure out, as to whether Obama has a firm grasp on the situation or not.
It is obvious even to a first grader; Obama is not capable of finding his own ass with a map and a flashlight.
The man is an incompetent dunce masquerading as a supposedly well educated lawyer etc. etc.
I say masquerading, because to date no one has seen a transcript that can prove that he even went to college, and we haven’t even gotten to the other missing records that this phony has yet to produce to even prove who he is.
What is simply amazing to me is the fact that so many idiots in black robes just toss it off and blandly pronounce that he is kosher from the get go, when they, as well as We the People, know he damned well is NOT.
Those Judges, as well as the Congress and the Senate belong in a jail cell for Misprision of Felony Treason, and Bill and Hillary Clinton belong there too for the same reasons, and a lot more in their case.
It is simply amazing that everyone in D.C. knows this guy is a charlatan yet they all close ranks around this bum and protect him like he is some kind of a saint.
Thank G-d in heaven above I am not a Democrat, as I wouldn’t have nerve enough to admit it in public.
Larry Klayman of Judicial watch has to sue to try and get right of discovery in court to get at this bums records, which he has spent over $2 million dollars to keep secret, and LT Col Terry Lakin was denied his basic right of discovery and was not even allowed to put on a defense at trial, as according to the military judge, discovery might bring forth things that could prove embarrassing to the President (if that is what you want to call the phony bastard), who cares if it is embarrassing to the idiot in chief, he embarrasses himself almost every time he opens his mouth.
I wonder if he ever learned to pronounce Corpsman correctly; you know Barry, the word where the P and the S are silent? (BTW Barry, the word refers to a Navy Medic not a dead body), you would think that a brilliant supposed law professor would have a better command of the English language.
Perhaps you should hire one more White House step and fetchit (for some ridiculously overblown salary) whose sole job would be to look up words that you are not sure of.
Let’s face it Barry, your middle name should be Treason not Hussein, as every action you have taken since day one has been to destroy this country, I say since day one because raising your hand and taking the oath of office when you knew you were ineligible to do so, was an act of treason and therefore every piece of paper you have signed since then were also individual acts of treason.

Florida Dem asks for 'discovery' into Obama eligibility

A Florida Democrat who went to court to determine whether Barack Obama is qualified for the office of president is asking the First District Court of Appeal there to order legal “discovery” in the case, a process in which each side examines evidence held by the other.
“Appellant submitted multiple sworn affidavits setting forth the fraudulent nature of Appellee Obama’s birth certificate and other identifying documents,” said the appeal of a decision by Judge Terry Lewis, who said Obama is eligible and the case shouldn’t go forward.
The arguments were filed by attorney Larry Klayman, founder of both Judicial Watch and Freedom Watch, who is being assisted in the case by a special Constitution Action fund. The case is on behalf of Michael Voeltz, a registered member of the Democratic Party of Florida.
“Appellee Obama conspicuously offered no evidence to the contrary and instead asked for a stay of discovery in order to avoid a proper determination of his citizenship. With only appellant’s affidavits in front of him as no contra-affidavits were put forth by appellee Obama, Judge Lewis ignored this sworn evidence and incorrectly determined that appellee Obama was a natural born citizen,” the filing explains.
It continues: “A question of fact such as this cannot be determined without the parties having been given the opportunity to take discovery. Appellant was not permitted to investigate through discovery or even observe the underlying documents that allegedly establish appellee Obama’s natural born citizenship.
“If appellee Obama was born outside of the United States then he is not a natural born citizen, or even a citizen. In addition to being born within the United States, as noted above, a natural born citizen must be born to two U.S. citizen parents. If it is shown through discovery that Barack H. Obama Sr., appellee Obama’s father, was not a U.S. citizen at the time of appellee Obama’s birth, then appellee Obama is clearly not a natural born citizen as required by the U.S. Constitution.”
The case seeks to exclude Obama from the 2012 ballot. Klayman and Voeltz claim that Obama is not a natural born citizen as required by Article 2, Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution, because he was born a British subject.
The case cited the evidence produced by Arizona Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s special investigative unit, which has asserted that the birth documentation from Hawaii that Obama claimed was “proof positive” of his Hawaiian birth is not real.
As WND reported, Voeltz, a voter and taxpayer in Broward County, challenged Obama’s eligibility, arguing that the “natural born citizen” clause was rightly understood in historical context to mean a child not only born in the U.S., but born to two American-citizen parents, so as not to have divided loyalties. Obama, however, readily admits to being born a dual citizen because of his father’s British citizenship.
But Lewis rejected the evidence before him and ruled that Obama is eligible.
“The United States Supreme Court has concluded that ‘every person born in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, becomes at once a citizen of the United States,’” Lewis wrote.
Not exactly, Klayman explained.
“The judge equated being a ‘citizen’ with a ‘natural born citizen’ and cited no authority to conclude the two terms are the same,” Klayman said. “He quotes other state’s cases, where judges reached that conclusion, but that’s not precedent for him. What other courts said in lower cases means nothing to him.”
Lewis also said the case had to be dismissed because Obama, the only candidate offered by the Democratic Party, actually was not “nominated” as a candidate for president because at that time the nominating convention had not been held.
Lewis also said his court lacked jurisdiction in the case.
Klayman argued in the appeal brief that Lewis is wrong on several counts.
“Lewis’ ruling bars any elector contest of eligibility in a presidential primary, or in any unopposed primary, and is clearly contrary to the plain wording of the well crafted and crystal clear Florida statutes,” he wrote. “Appellant rightfully has standing, and the judiciary is obliged to make a determination as to eligibility of ‘any candidate,’ including presidential candidates.”
He continued: “By his own birth story, well told, he is not an eligible natural born citizen, due to foreign citizenship at birth. Appellant also asks for a determination of current citizenship that would require examination of all of Mr. Obama’s passport and other relevant records.
“If it is found that Barack Obama Sr. is indeed the father of Barack H. Obama II, then appellant also seeks an injunction, preventing the placement of the name Barack H. Obama on the Florida General Election Ballot by order of the Florida judiciary, since he would not be an eligible natural born citizen.”

Friday, September 21, 2012

Romney campaign question/answer - creative speculation

Romney campaign question/answer
 creative speculation

During a recent Romney campaign stop, a heckler from the audience hollered, "Hey Mitt Witt, where are you hiding your tax returns?”

Governor Romney politely responded, "I've found a very secure place that I'm certain they won't be found."

The insistent heckler, then shouted, "And just where is that, dummy?"

Governor Romney smiled and said, "They are underneath Obama's Birth Certificate, college records, his immigration status as a student, and his funding sources to pay for college. “

“Which brings us to what should be your next question:

Why are you (and we for that matter) all recognizing this complete unknown as a legitimate candidate for the Office of President – when neither you nor I can state unequivocally that he is:
1.   At least 35 years of age – as is required for the Office (forged Certificates of Live Birth don’t count);
2.   A U.S. Citizen, never mind being a ‘natural born U.S. Citizen’ - as is required for the Office (forged Certificates of Live Birth don’t count);
3.   Qualified to even be employed in government – since forged Selective Service Registration documents don’t qualify one as actually having registered;
4.   Qualified to even be employed in the U.S. – since his stolen CT SS# 042-68-4425 does not even pass the government’s own E-Verify program?”

“Do I hear an echo of that question?  If not, why not.”