WEAKNESS INVITES AGGRESSION To the degree that our leaders are weak we
are more likely to be attacked. Obama is
weaker than Carter and is wearing a “KICK ME” sign for all the world to see.
Because the “diplomacy” the State Department
leans toward placating evil doers they are responsible for more deaths than the
military
Swift and deadly saves more lives than
cautious and diplomatic
Had the Gatling gun been available and used atBull
Run might we have saved 620,000 lives in the civil war?
Had the atomic bomb been available and used afterPearl
Harbor or the invasion of Poland
If we randomly pumped a few 9mm rounds into the trunks of cars crossing the Mexican border could we have saved thousands of Mexican lives lost in the desert?
Is the time to use tactical nukes now, rather than later, and would we save lives by doing so?
You get the idea. I am beginning to think that being “civilized” and “diplomatic” is a very costly way to deal with things. Being civilized and diplomatic kills people. We usually apply a solution that works only after we have tried everything else. Maybe the most humane strategy is to be swift and deadly at the first sign of violence, or in the case illegality, be swift and just.
Because we are civilized we are easy targets for the uncivilized. Is there a major flaw in my reasoning that I don’t see? Or as O"Rielly says, "Tell me where I'm wrong."
Had the Gatling gun been available and used at
Had the atomic bomb been available and used after
If we randomly pumped a few 9mm rounds into the trunks of cars crossing the Mexican border could we have saved thousands of Mexican lives lost in the desert?
Is the time to use tactical nukes now, rather than later, and would we save lives by doing so?
Please make the distinction for tactical nukes.
You get the idea. I am beginning to think that being “civilized” and “diplomatic” is a very costly way to deal with things. Being civilized and diplomatic kills people. We usually apply a solution that works only after we have tried everything else. Maybe the most humane strategy is to be swift and deadly at the first sign of violence, or in the case illegality, be swift and just.
Because we are civilized we are easy targets for the uncivilized. Is there a major flaw in my reasoning that I don’t see? Or as O"Rielly says, "Tell me where I'm wrong."
Quoting President Ronald Reagan:
“We maintain our strength in order to deter and defend against aggression — to preserve freedom and peace. Since the dawn of the atomic age, we’ve sought to reduce the risk of war by maintaining a strong deterrent and by seeking genuine arms control. ‘Deterrence’ means simply this: making sure any adversary who thinks about attacking the United States, or our allies, or our vital interests, concludes that the risks to him outweigh any potential gains. Once he understands that, he won’t attack. We maintain the peace through our strength; weakness only invites aggression.”
No comments:
Post a Comment