Wednesday, November 30, 2011

Supreme Court and Obama: Go Chief Justice John Roberts !

Supreme Court and Obama: Go Chief Justice John Roberts !

Our Dictator May Be In Deep Trouble...with Chief Justice John Roberts, U.S. Supreme Court.
According to sources who watch the inner workings of the federal government, a smack-down of Barack Obama by the U.S. Supreme Court may be inevitable.
Ever since Obama assumed the office of President, critics have hammered him on a number of Constitutional issues. Critics have complained that much, if not all of Obama's major initiatives run headlong into Constitutional roadblocks on the power of the federal government. Obama certainly did not help himself in the eyes of the Court when he used the venue of the State of the Union address early in the year to publicly flog the Court over its ruling that the First Amendment grants the right to various organizations to run political ads during the time of an election.
The tongue-lashing clearly did not sit well with the Court, as demonstrated by Justice Sam Alito, who publicly shook his head and stated under his breath, 'That's not true,' when Obama told a flat-out lie concerning the Court's ruling.
As it has turned out, this was a watershed moment in the relationship between the executive and the judicial branches of the federal government. Obama publicly declared war on the court , even as he blatantly continued to propose legislation that flies in the face of every known Constitutional principle upon which this nation has stood for over 200 years.
Obama has even identified Chief Justice John Roberts as his number one enemy, that is, apart from Fox News and Rush Limbaugh, Beck, Hannity, and so on... And it is no accident that the one swing-vote on the court, Justice Anthony Kennedy, stated recently that he has no intention of retiring until 'Obama is gone.' Apparently, the Court has had enough.
The Roberts Court has signaled, in a very subtle manner, of course, that it intends to address the issues about which Obama critics have been screaming to high heaven. A ruling against Obama on any one of these important issues could potentially cripple the Administration. Such a thing would be long overdue.
First, there is ObamaCare, which violates the Constitutional principle barring the federal government from forcing citizens to purchase something. And no, this is not the same thing as states requiring drivers to purchase car insurance, as some of the intellectually-impaired claim. The Constitution limits FEDERAL government, not state governments, from such things, and further, not everyone has to drive, and thus, a citizen could opt not to purchase car insurance by simply deciding not to drive a vehicle. In the ObamaCare world, however, no citizen can 'opt out.'
Second, sources state that the Roberts court has quietly accepted information concerning discrepancies in Obama's history that raise serious questions about his eligibility for the office of President. The charge goes far beyond the birth certificate issue. This information involves possible fraudulent use of a Social Security number in Connecticut, while Obama was a high school student in Hawaii, double citizenship, natural born...and others.
And that is only the tip of the iceberg.
Third, several cases involving possible criminal activity, conflicts of interest, and pay-for-play cronyism could potentially land many Administration officials, if not Obama himself, in hot water with the Court. Frankly, in the years this writer has observed politics, nothing comes close to comparing with the rampant corruption of this Administration, not even during the Nixon years. Nixon and the Watergate conspirators look like choirboys compared to the jokers that populate this Administration.
In addition, the Court will eventually be forced to rule on the dreadful decision of the Obama DOJ suing the state of Arizona. That, too, could send the Obama doctrine of open borders to an early grave, given that the Administration refuses to enforce federal law on illegal aliens.
And finally, the biggie that could potentially send the entire house of cards tumbling in a free-fall is the latest revelation concerning the Obama-Holder Department of Justice and its refusal to pursue the New Black Panther Party. The group was caught on tape committing felonies by attempting to intimidate Caucasian voters into staying away from the polls. A whistle-blower who resigned from the DOJ is now charging Holder with the deliberate refusal to pursue cases against Blacks, particularly those who are involved in radical hate-groups, such as the New Black Panthers, who have been caught on tape calling for the murder of white people and their babies. This one is a biggie that could send the entire Administration crumbling--that is, if the Justices have the guts to draw a line in the sand at the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. And also the ATF and DOJ and the gun sales under Fast and Furious.

Obama Ineligible - Action Items from Birther Summit

We hope to have a number of ACTION ITEMS up tonight at

Be sure to check them out and start encouraging everyone you know to start doing something everyday to keep the pressure on and help spread the word. We especially need volunteers on the ground in New Hampshire!

Please spread the word!!!!! Please get involved.

Gary M. Wilmott

GINGRICH - Without question, the smartest man in the room.

Without question, the smartest man in the room.  Watch the other candidates seemingly looking at him in awe when he is answering the questions with specifics, historical context as well as current application to fix our Countries many/many issues and problems.

He definitely has some baggage, both personal and professional, but when you look at his accomplishments: 1) Balanced the Budget, 2)gaining Republican Control of the House, when he was the Minority Leader, after 40 or 50 years of Democrat control (think Great Society Programs in the Sixties  by the Democrats and what that has done to our Country in terms of individual responsibility, accountability etc) 3)Welfare reform approved (The Media conveniently forgets to mention Clinton vetoed twice before approving when he knew he would be overridden by a 2/3rds majority in Congress)

He answers every question and there are no hesitations. Be sure to notice how 'rude' the reporters ask the questions to him too.
He probably knows more about the government, etc. than anyone currently running for President, including the current president. Not just probably but he does..!!!!!!!!

Definitely take the time to watch his answers to questions from last weeks debate.  Particularly if you missed the debate. 

Please, please take the time to review the video in this URL:

NH Ballot Law Commission holding unlawful hearings to decide Obama's eligibility for Presidency

Double Click Video For Full Screen

Tuesday, November 29, 2011


By Dwight Kehoe
November 29, 2011

Dear Sean,
I'm going to start this letter with the typical "I'm a big fan" comment that so many of the seminar callers on the left use in order to get your guard down.

In my case, its not a ploy, but the truth.  Years ago, before I retired and needed to get up early for work, I would, several times a week, stay up to hear your late night radio show.  Back when the beloved Marty and the bawdy Carpet Kitten used to call.

Now, to get down to business and the purpose of this letter.  While I still think you are a superb and entertaining talk show host I have begun to question where your allegiances lie.

I know what you claim and I have heard your spiel, about not being a "Republican" and that you are registered as a Conservative. You've said it, we've heard it. It rings true no more.  More and more, you should become aware, your listeners are coming to the realization that repetition does not represent certification. Its a great tool of the left, but for you Sean, its not cutting it. Talk is cheap, actions prevail.

As an observer and participant in the flow of information, there appears to be no other person or commentator who represents the GOP talking points, better than you.  Having said that, it is important for you to understand that I too support the Republican ideology, but I have become more and more disenchanted with GOP political operatives and agenda.

They (GOP) continue to espouse support for grass roots organizations and conservative view points while working methodically and maliciously behind the scenes to undermine those they have not anointed.  And you Sean, are their loudest and most ardent mouth piece, despite your claims to the contrary.

The most egregious thing that you continue to do, is put that GOP operative and "muck-slinger" Karl Rove on both your radio and TV shows.  He represents himself, and you attest to it,  as an objective political analyst, when by now, you must know, as most of your audience does, that his viewpoints are carefully manipulated in support of the Republican elite to which he is indeed a full member.

During the Senate races last year, the GOP and Rove wanted their RINO friend to win the US Senate Primary in Delaware and when he lost, Rove and the Republican Party did everything they could do to see that the Democrat won the general election.  There can be no excuse for that and there is no forgiving it.  Rove was the attack dog for the "spiteful" GOP and you Sean, have been and continue to be the conduit for their agenda.

Moving on to this primary season, its clear to anyone that the GOP has promised Mitt Romney the nomination and they are doing everything they can to see that, systematically, each of his rivals are destroyed.

Romney was forced out after that fiasco of primary voter manipulation took place down in Florida in the 2008 Republican primary. It was evident that the GOP had at that time, promised the nomination to McCain. It was his turn.  Romney dropped out of that race, way too soon.  Only a fool would not see that he was promised the "next turn" if he would be a good little Republican and get out of the way.  And he did.  Now, despite the pretense of allowing the Republican voters to select their nominee, Karl Rove and the GOP, with the help of Sean Hannity, clandestinely are in full subversion mode to get the "promised one" the nomination.

Bring Rove on your show, introduce him for what he is, a functioning operative of the National Republican Party, rather than the objective viewer of the process, then at least you will be honest with your viewers and yourself.

In closing, at this point, for me its way too late for Mr. Rove.  Regardless of how he is presented, I will immediately turn off whatever show he is scheduled to appear.

Dwight Kehoe
November 29, 2011

This letter will be posted on several websites and emailed to TPATH readers as an "Open Letter"

The birthers press on

The birthers press on
By Peter Lemiska

In a belated response to the birther movement, earlier this year the White House released Barack Obama's "long form" birth certificate. Everyone believed it would finally silence the birthers; and it did — for a while. But since then, various independent researchers, as well as experts in graphics, computer software, and scanning equipment, have examined the document and now allege that it shows signs of tampering.

Since all of the countless lawsuits challenging Obama's eligibility have been rebuffed by the courts, the birthers have set out on a new strategy. Arguing that Obama used fraudulent documents to establish his eligibility for the presidency in 2008, they are attempting to exclude his name from state election ballots for 2012.

Last Friday, Dr. Orly Taitz, a controversial attorney leading the charge in this effort, appeared before the New Hampshire Ballot Law Commission to argue her case. The predictable decision came immediately. BLC Chairman, Brad Cook, proclaimed that "Our jurisdiction is to decide if a candidate on the ballot has properly filed and has been properly placed on the ballot." Case closed, Obama's name remains on the ballot. With all due respect to New Hampshire's BLC, we have to wonder if the state really needs an entire commission just to determine if a ballot was properly filed. Shouldn't it have the additional responsibility of verifying the eligibility of a candidate, especially when serious questions are raised about possible fraud? At the very least, shouldn't the Attorney General or some law enforcement agency be tasked to investigate the charges?

And there certainly are legitimate questions that would be investigated if the accused were anyone but the President. Why, as Taitz and others have reported, has Barack H. Obama apparently used a Connecticut-issued Social Security number, if he has never had ties to that state? Why are there several other Social Security numbers associated with his name? Why has Obama fought so strenuously to conceal the original birth certificate, only to suddenly produce the document — a document of questionable veracity?

Critics of the birthers love to ridicule them as conspiracy nuts. While a few of them may be absolutely convinced that Barack Obama was born in a remote Kenyan village, many bright, honorable and reputable people do share with them serious questions about Obama's birth certificate, and his murky background.

At the other end of the spectrum are those who instinctively reject even the most compelling evidence of any scandal that might hurt Obama's presidency. To cling to their unshakable belief, they also have to reject some well-established facts. Document fraud and identity theft are real problems in this country. The Center for Immigration Studies suggests that as many as 75% of working-age illegal aliens use fraudulent Social Security cards to obtain employment. Those fierce Obama loyalists dismiss even the suggestion that Obama's birth certificate may have been altered. When they cannot explain away any supporting evidence, they resort to ridicule. But it's not just a matter of defending their belief system. The whole issue of constitutional eligibility is simply inconsequential to them.

Yet for others, the questions remain.

Considering the availability of high-quality forged documents, is it at least possible that Obama's birth certificate could have been altered? In view of the absence of verification procedures by the various election committees, is it possible that candidate Obama was not properly vetted in 2008? And considering the power of the president, and his doting press, would it not be possible to conceal from the American people any skeletons that might be rattling in Obama's closet?

The birthers point to a mountain of evidence to substantiate their claims. All of it has been challenged by Obama supporters. And while those who take the time to research the claims and rebuttals with an open mind may not be convinced that Obama was born abroad, they might walk away with an unsettling feeling, a nagging suspicion about his past, his credentials, and even his eligibility, or at least suitability, for the office he holds.

The President wields tremendous power, and like Chairman Cook, none of the politicians or judges beseeched by the birthers has shown any interest in pursuing their allegations, no matter how serious or well-substantiated. In the end, we will likely never know what is hidden in Obama's background. But his piecemeal release of selected documents of questionable authenticity only casts more doubt on his past and continues to fuel the birther movement. Considering his current standing in the polls, it's impact on the 2012 elections could be decisive.

As for Cook's dismissive response to the issue, New Hampshire might think about a new state motto. Instead of "Live free or die," the legislators might consider "Let sleeping dogs lie."

© Peter Lemiska

And bring a bar of soap and a hose!

The Picture MSN, CNN, CBS, NBC & MSNBC don't want you to See
Yeah, that's a scumbag Wall Street protester “crapping” on the AMERICAN FLAG!

Most Americans are not politically aware.

While they can name all 5 finalists on American Idol, they cannot name their Congressman.

It’s nice they have priorities. And it explains how we have the morons we have governing us in Washington presently. The Tea Party movement came out of nowhere to stand up and speak out against out-of-control government spending. While the Tea Party has been vilified by liberals and the Democrat party, it has continued to grow in strength.

Leftists have used everything from Alinsky tactics to lying to name calling to the total use of the mainstream media to destroy the Tea Party. But they underestimated the patriotism of the producers in America who support the Constitution and believe in capitalism.

Many of the American Idol experts sit idly by listening to Chris Matthews and Katie Couric disparage the Tea Party movement. They had nothing to compare the movement to. All of that changed when the Occupy Wall Street circus came to New York and spread quickly across the country.

Like an infection. Small bands of idiots with stupid signs printed by unions spouting lunacy have littered and “crapped” across the formerly pristine parks they now infest in dozens of American cities.

What a stark difference from the Tea Party movement! 

Patriots holding American flags have orderly events with poignant messages about liberty and freedom and then leave in an orderly fashion. 

Contrast that with the Occupy Wall Street miscreants!

Arrests, police being assaulted, rapes, flag burnings, pro-communist chanting, garbage, crapping in the streets and parks, incessant drumming, filth, profanity and lots and lots of losers who still don’t really know why they’re there!

Americans now clearly have a choice of what political ideology they want to support. On the one side, they can support hard working, law-abiding, patriots who pay this nation’s bills or they can support the moochers who don’t bathe while calling for killing the rich…whoever they are…and socialism!

What does this say? It says that Obama and the Democrat Party supports this group of leftist wasteoids while lying about tax paying, productive Americans in the Tea Party!  It says the Democrat party must go away until it can return to the political scene as a serious, pro-American party instead of a party more aligned with America’s enemies!

Thank you George Soros and labor unions! You have exposed the idiocy of socialism once again and the stupidity of the people who call for it.  Stalin used to call these people “useful idiots.” Angry White Dude calls them “useless idiots!” And the best thing that ever happened to the Tea Party movement and America !
Look hard, America, at what your liberal schools and government have created!
And bring a bar of soap and a hose!

Click on link below for more:

Award Winning Quote!

"Witnessing the Republicans and the Democrats bicker over the U.S. debt is like watching two drunks argue over a bar bill on theTitanic."

What award?  The Aristotle The Hun Seal of Approval

Monday, November 28, 2011

Response to New Hampshire Representative by George Miller

Mr. Sewell,

Maybe we should remove this restriction on those running for president being born here.  I think of many who might of made fine, even great presidents.  Like Alexander Hamilton, a founding father, could not run.  Maybe its time to do away with this nativist-inspired prohibition?


Hon. Steven W Lindsey
state rep
Keene , NH

Rep Lindsey:

Some surprising things have come from you by email in recent days.

I assume that we both came from the NorthEast, both were raised as Americans in patriotic households, yet have surprisingly different perspectives.

To begin with, people who agree with the founders and their concern for the undivided loyalty of  the chief executive to the United States were not "nativists," nor are we, for agreeing with them. The behavior and priorities of "Resident" "Obama" are living proof of the founders' wisdom. I have NEVER seen such an anti-American in the White House, not even Carter, who I'm ashamed to say I voted for in 1976 (but not 1980).

Evidently, Rev. Wright, Rezko, Ayers, Marshall-Davis, Jarrett, "Obama's" views on the Constitution, complete lack of vetting data, lack of eligibility proof, records in the US and State Senate, "spread the wealth," "a civilian force as large and well-funded as the DoD," "a fundamental transformation" of the U.S., etc. were not enough to dissuade you and others from supporting him.

His subsequent record in office is stunningly bad.  His conduct and statements only underline the  wisdom of the founders in establishing Article II Section 1 Clause 5 of our Constitution.

Regarding the pool of candidates, it's deep enough that every single one of the top eight GOP candidates and several of the minor ones, would each be an infinite improvement over what we have now.  In any case, with 310 million people in our nation, we should be able to dig up ample qualified and eligible candidates, without having to scrounge the dregs, as we did in 2008 and teh Democrats so far seem intent upon doing in 2012.  If you don't like the eligibility requirements, then by all means sponsor and have ratified a Constitutional amendment. There's a reason that the founders made that so hard to do. But don't just flout them and try to stonewall us. NOT THIS TIME.

I must say that I was initially skeptical when I heard all the rumors about Obama. I sifted through and researched them, finding that many were untrue, but:

- He has not proven his eligibility to this day.
- In fact, it appears that his father who was never a citizen means that "Obama" is not himself a natural born citizen, per the Minor Vs. Happersett ruling and many other things in law and the founders' deliberations and statements.  There's a reason that his team is hiding further evidence and maneuvering to avoid a Congressional hearing, or further discovery and an actual court ruling on the abundant evidence against him.
- He has provided multiple altered/forged documents and stolen identity data. This is not conjecture, It is documented, sworn to, proven. Read the evidence, if you haven't already.  No, I don't know why he was never officially vetted.

Regarding the Ballot Law Commission:
1. Commission refused to consider strong, documented evidence, which it is obligated to under section 655 of NH’s own nomination­s law.
2. Commission said it only needs to verify application­ received and $1000 paid. See above.
3. Commission said it cannot rule on eligibilit­y of candidates­, but has already done so before.
4. Commission was investigat­ed and found to be illegally constitute­d, wrong number of members, wrong ratio of Dems vs Republican­s. misconduct of members in violation of NH law.
5. Accordingl­y, re-hearing requested on points of law, flagrant violation of commission rules. It will be elevated to NH Supreme Court, if not resolved at Commission­/Secy of State level- which will affect general election and raise enormous negative publicity for NH officials and “Obama.”see obamaballo­tchallenge­.com

The  illegal composition and actions of the Ballot Law Commission and nonfeasance/malfeasance of the NH legislature, Secretary of State and Attorney-General, are shocking and even pathetic. Do you know what misprision of felony is, sir? I urge you to remember your oath and duties.

Only a natural born citizen can legally be President of the USA. “Obama” is not one.

George Miller



Posted by: Dean C. Haskins This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
Posted: November 28, 2011
© 2011 The Birther Summit
Download a PDF
dean_honolulu_dhsWhat started out on October 24 as a one-week investigative trip to Honolulu, turned into a 4 ½ week expedition! After working for two weeks in Honolulu, I started my trek back home to Virginia, only to have my itinerary changed, causing me to ditch the rest of that flight once I reached my first layover in Phoenix. As was already reported, I spent the next several days in meetings in Phoenix, San Antonio, Houston, and Austin, and was able to share a lot of information with many good people who were both highly interested in, and very supportive of, our efforts.
During that time in Texas, we became aware of some "loose ends" in Hawaii that needed some immediate attention, and decided that, as long as I was already on the road, it made more sense for me to return to Honolulu, rather than heading home. Although it initially looked like I wouldn't make it home for Thanksgiving, the work that needed to be done in Hawaii was actually finished on Tuesday, November 22, allowing us to start the final journey home on Wednesday afternoon, and I finally arrived back in Virginia the afternoon of Thanksgiving Day.
I have read a number of comments on websites urging The Birther Summit to reveal the specific details of the work we have been doing in Hawaii, and I thoroughly understand everyone's urgent desire to know what we uncovered. However, after investing so much time, energy, and resources, and knowing the delicacy of some of the factors involved, risking what we've done, simply so that everyone can know the facts immediately would not only be foolish, it could also end up destroying every bit of our efforts. I hope everyone will be patient and know that, at the minute we are assured that sharing the information will not jeopardize it in any way, we will give an immediate and thorough report.dean_trump_waikiki
During this trip, I became aware of the fiasco that occurred in New Hampshire, and I would like to personally commend Orly Taitz and several other patriots who have taken on the vital task of exposing the vast levels of political corruption that exist there. Many efforts are still underway on that front, and I am proud to be a part of such a passionate, truth-shining group! It is apparent that our national media has made the legitimate issues surrounding the fraud that has been perpetrated upon this nation appear to be vastly toxic, but the level of dishonesty and hubris that is still being displayed by those who falsely tout themselves as caring anything about our Constitution is a daily offense to those of us who continue to shine the light of truth into the dark crevices of their deceptive ways. We still have a long, hard road ahead of us, but at the end of it, these corrupt political creatures should be relieved of any possible life in the public arena, and should never again garner even a grain of the public trust!
Ultimately, the truth must prevail for this country to survive, and I know there are countless patriots across this country who, like me, will work daily to see justice done, and the guilty exposed and rightfully charged, tried, and sentenced for the inestimable damage they have done to our land. Our government must be returned to the people, and those responsible for the abrogation of our Constitution punished.
Now that I have had a few days back at home to rest and recover from such a hectic trip, I have realized the true length of this past trip—I completely missed the breath-taking beauty of the leaves changing here in Virginia. I will look forward to seeing that once again next year, and it will be that much better because the current fraud in the White House will be well on his way to being nothing more than a scandalous footnote in the annals of American history.
If you would like more information about the Birther Summit, please visit our website often at or contact Dean Haskins at This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it .

Sunday, November 27, 2011



In 2008, the DNC certified an ineligible candidate, Barack Obama, and thus defrauded the American people. This was a violation of basic voter’s rights and Obama’s subsequent usurpation constitutes the greatest crime ever perpetrated against the American people.  Our so-called “representatives” in government, the courts and the media were brazenly complicit and to this day they continue to cover up a crime so egregious that it threatens the founding principles upon which this country was based. 

All voters have an absolute right to be allowed to vote for a competent and legitimate candidate.  We cannot and we must not allow this to happen again.  Obama is running for “re-election” in 2012, despite the fact that he is not a natural born citizen under Article II of the Constitution. 

If you want to make a difference and help get Obama off the NH ballot or at least send a message and significantly impact his vote count on January 10, then go to the New Hampshire site and be part of this historic grassroots effort to educate the New Hampshire voters and help take back our country. We must ensure that we never again allow any illegitimate and ineligible candidates to be on any ballot, let alone usurp the presidency of the United States.



PLEASE EMAIL US AT if you wish to help.
Gary M. Wilmott



Obama Eligibility - Message sent to all New Hampshire politicians

Hat tip to Bob:


By the way, doesn't that then make Mr. Obama one of the very first rightful "birthers"?

 Obama has released digital images of the documents to the internet only .   

Too many people think Obama has released the two versions properly in traditional paper format to some controlling legal authority.  He has not.

THERE HAVE ONLY BEEN TWO DOCUMENTS ALLEGEDLY RELEASED BY MR. OBAMA'S PEOPLE AND BOTH ARE INVALID. The first one, first claimed to be "THE birth certificate", is actually an alleged  "Certification of Live Birth".   Regardless, it is INVALID per the bottom line of that document...or can anyone tell us all THAT document's REQUIRED identification number?  Of course not.

And the recent one, is also INVALID because it is NOT certified, as required, to be "a true and accurate copy of Mr. Obama's original, typewritten birth certificate".

Do notice that I made NO mention of any "forensic forgery" issues or that the word "THE" in that required certification statement is spelled as "TXE"..

Personally, therefore, I make no accusation either way as I do not know whether Mr. Obama is eligible or not.  Do you?  Do any of the GOP candidates? If so, that proof...either way...should be released now.
Thank you.

Now a little more assertively!

51 Bullet-Pointed Facts That Dispute Barack Obama's Identity & Eligibility to be President!

Do you really think AKA Obama would have won the election if all the things he is hiding were made known?

Do you really think AKA Obama will be able to finish his first term if all the things he is hiding are made known?

Why aren’t the polls on the birth certificate issue 100% in favor of AKA Obama practicing the virtue of full disclosure?  It makes sense that supporters of AKA Obama would want the issue settled along with everyone else.  I guess there is a significant portion of the population who are opposed to releasing AKA Obama’s history because they are afraid of what it will reveal.  I would conclude that those opposed to releasing all of Obama’s history are frightened of the truth just like AKA Obama.

If you are not suspicious of a man who hides his history I have a bridge in the desert I want to sell you.

If you are unwilling to call for an investigation of a man who attempts to sell you a bridge in the desert I have some beach front property in Florida at the intersection of I75 and Florida # 29 that I want you to buy.

If you place a down payment on a contract for the bridge in the desert and the beach front property in the swamp I would conclude that you voted for Obama.

Obama will be exposed
Don’t get caught on the wrong side of this issue

Some conservatives derisively dismiss anyone who supports the eligibility issue as a “birther.”   Some Obot PSYOPS agents say the same thing.  Do you know the difference?
# # # # # # # # #
I suggest you write your own message to the NH politicians.  Send me an email at and I will send you the email addresses.

"Newt scores a major endorsement."

Newt Gingrich’s improbably comeback in the Presidential race has taken another interesting turn as he has scored what must be considered one of the most significant endorsements in New Hampshire.

From CNS News:

New Hampshire's largest newspaper on Sunday endorsed former House Speaker Newt Gingrich in the 2012 GOP presidential race, signaling that rival Mitt Romney isn't the universal favorite and potentially resetting the contest before the state's lead-off primary Jan. 10.

"We are in critical need of the innovative, forward-looking strategy and positive leadership that Gingrich has shown he is capable of providing," The New Hampshire Union Leader said in its front-page editorial, which was as much a promotion of Gingrich as a discreet rebuke of Romney.

"We don't back candidates based on popularity polls or big-shot backers. We look for conservatives of courage and conviction who are independent-minded, grounded in their core beliefs about this nation and its people, and best equipped for the job," the editorial said.

Romney enjoys a solid leads in New Hampshire polls and remains at the front of the pack nationally. A poll released last week showed him with 42 percent support among likely Republican primary voters in New Hampshire. Gingrich followed with 15 percent in the WMUR-University of New Hampshire Granite State poll.

Rep. Ron Paul of Texas posted 12 percent support and former Utah Gov. John Huntsman found 8 percent support in that survey.
Those numbers could shift based on the backing of The Union Leader, a newspaper with a conservative editorial page that proudly works to influence elections, from school boards to the White House, in the politically savvy state.

The value of this endorsement cannot be understated.  New Hampshire is all but Mitt Romney’s home state.  In fact, he owns a house in New Hampshire.  He made a major effort to reach out to the Union Leader to secure the endorsement. 

New Hampshire is a must win state for Romney.  If Gingrich wins Iowa and then turns around a week later and wins New Hampshire, which is considered home turf for the Romney campaign, Romney will be on the ropes.  He has almost no chance in South Carolina.  If Gingrich comes out of the first three primaries with wins, the race will be over.

Romney knows exactly what this means.   While Gingrich has been very diligent in not attacking other Republicans, do not expect Romney to show him the same courtesy. 

We are 37 days away from the Iowa caucuses and 44 days away from the New Hampshire primaries. 

Hang on folks, the ride is about to get very interesting.

Friday, November 25, 2011








Wednesday, November 23, 2011

A brilliant idea

Last night, we had the eleventh Republican Presidential Debate.  They are fun but is debate fatigue setting in?  Regardless, there was one really great idea offered at the debate last night.  It was said, almost in passing, yet it is a brilliant idea.

Who had the idea and what was the idea?

The idea came from Newt Gingrich.  The idea was in response to a question about what to do about Iran’s nuclear ambitions.  It is impossible to tell whether Gingrich was just speaking off the cuff or if this is an idea he and his campaign staff had been working on for a while. 

The idea is simple.

Drill as much American oil as we can and crash the international price of oil. 

What would happen if we crashed the price of oil?

For starters Iran would lose its major source of income.  So would Saudi Arabia and most of the Persian Gulf.  So would Venezuela.  So far no down side there.

Those nations make a lot of money off of the oil that is sold in the international markets.  Some of that money they use to cause problems for the United States.   By crashing the international oil price, we would cripple them economically. 

When Newt made the comment, he only talked about it briefly, in terms of bringing Iran to heel and stopping Iran from building the bomb.  But what are the other benefits of crashing the international oil market?

It would be an immediate stimulus to America.  Not only would more Americans be working in the oil industry and the industries that support oil, but it would create a ripple effect through out the economy.  

Gas prices would fall radically. 

What would that mean?  For starters, it would mean more money in the pockets of Americans to spend.  If gas fell to a dollar a gallon or less that would free up a huge amount of American money.  Goods all across the economy would suddenly become cheaper because the fuel costs for delivery of those products would drop.

This would be an incredible stimulus.  This would help bring this country out of the Obama depression.

Could this be done?


Does anyone remember the summer of 2008?   Gas prices hit $4.50 a gallon and in some places were even higher.  George W. Bush announced he was revoking the executive order prohibiting off shore drilling.  Bush’s act was mostly symbolic.   For the ban on offshore drilling to be really repealed, congress would also have to repeal a couple of laws. 

Bush’s one act worked.  By the time Bush left office six months later, gas prices had fallen to $1.60 a gallon.   What was Obama’s first act as President?  He reinstated the ban on off shore drilling and now we have $3.50 a gallon gas.

We could do this today, except for the fact that Obama and the Party of Treason do not want America to succeed.  They do not want to see an economic recovery.   They want to see the American economy languishing.  They want to see America, not as a great power but just another country with a failing economy, dependent on the rest of the world.

If we needed any reason to get rid of Obama and the Party of Treason, this is it.  We need a President that loves America and wants to see America as the greatest nation in the world.  We need a President who will work for America instead of against America.

In short, we need almost anyone but Barack Obama.

The day the Democrats took over

The day the Democrats took over was not January 22nd 2009, it was actually January 3rd 2007, the day the Democrats took over the House of Representatives and the Senate, at the very start of the 110th Congress.
The Democratic Party controlled a majority in both chambers for the first time since the end of the 103rd Congress in 1995.

For those who are listening to the liberals propagating the fallacy that everything is "Bush's Fault", think about this:
January 3rd, 2007, the day the Democrats took over the Senate and the Congress:The DOW Jones closed at 12,621.77
The GDP for the previous quarter was 3.5%
The Unemployment rate was 4.6%
George Bush's Economic policies SET A RECORD of 52 STRAIGHT MONTHS of JOB CREATION!
Remember that day...
January 3rd, 2007 was the day that
Barney Frank took over the House Financial Services Committee and Chris Dodd took over the Senate Banking Committee.The economic meltdown that happened 15 months later was in what part of the economy?

BANKING AND FINANCIAL SERVICES!THANK YOU DEMOCRATS (especially Barney ) for taking us from 13,000 DOW, 3.5 GDP and 4.6% this CRISIS by (among MANY other things) dumping 5-6 TRILLION Dollars of toxic loans on the economy from YOUR Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac FIASCOES!

(BTW: Bush asked Congress 17 times to stop Fannie & Freddie - starting in 2001 because it was financially risky for the US economy). Barney blocked it and called it a "Chicken Little Philosophy" (and the sky did fall!)

And who took the THIRD highest pay-off from Fannie Mae AND Freddie Mac? OBAMA

And who fought against reform of Fannie and Freddie?
OBAMA and the Democrat Congress, especially
So when someone tries to blame Bush...

Bush may have been in the car but the Democrats were in charge of the gas pedal and steering wheel they were driving the economy into the ditch.

Budgets do not come from the White House. They come from Congress and the party that controlled Congress since January 2007 is the Democratic Party.
Furthermore, the Democrats controlled the budget process for 2008 & 2009 as well as 2010 & 2011.

In that first year, they had to contend with George Bush, which caused them to compromise on spending, when Bush somewhat belatedly got tough on spending increases.

For 2009 though, Nancy Pelosi & Harry Reid bypassed George Bush entirely, passing continuing resolutions to keep government running until Barack Obama could take office. At that time, they passed a massive omnibus spending bill to complete the 2009 budget.

And where was Barack Obama during this time? He was a member of that very Congress that passed all of these massive spending bills, and he signed the omnibus bill as President to complete 2009. Let's remember what the deficits looked like during that period:

If the Democrats inherited any deficit, it was the 2007 deficit, the last of the Republican budgets. That deficit was the lowest in five years, and the fourth straight decline in deficit spending. After that, Democrats in Congress took control of spending, and that includes Barack Obama, who voted for the budgets.

If Obama inherited anything, he inherited it from himself.

In a nutshell, what Obama is saying is "I inherited a deficit that I voted for,
And then I voted to expand that deficit four-fold since January 20th."

"The problems we face today exist because the people who work for a living are outnumbered by those who vote for a living."

Tuesday, November 22, 2011

New Hampshire could use a motto makeover

New Hampshire could use a motto makeover

After filing an 85-page page complaint, providing proof of fraud with respect to Barack Obama’s forged birth certificate and his use of a Connecticut-issued Social Security number not assigned to him, Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq., the Southern California dentist and attorney who provided the same documentation to Maricopa County Sherrif Joe Arpaio earlier this month, flew to New Hampshire to appear before the Ballot Law Commission last Friday to request Obama be removed from the New Hampshire Primary Election ballot.
According to the New Hampshire Department of Justice’s website, The attorney general enforces New Hampshire’s election laws, as well as certain federal voting rights.
The website states: “For Federal complaints, the attorney general's office has a duty to resolve the complaint within ninety days of receipt of the written complaint or to provide the complainant with the opportunity to bring the complaint before the Ballot Law Commission, which must then resolve the complaint within sixty days.”
A crowd of about 100 people attended the Nov. 18 hearing, requiring an adjoining area room be opened up to accommodate them.
A video taken by an attendee was immediately made available following the hearing.
Testimony provided before the commission by the assistant secretary of state, as questioned by the assistant attorney general, indicated the process simply requires a candidate to file the requisite paperwork and pay a $1,000 fee.
During questioning, the assistant secretary of state said Vice President Joe Biden filed the paperwork along with a check for $1,000. And, she said, if the paperwork is filled out correctly and the fee is paid, the candidate is placed on the ballot, unless a complaint is filed.
During cross examination, Taitz asked the assistant secretary of state what she does with the complaints, to which the assistant secretary of state responded they are referred to the attorney general’s office.
Taitz asked the assistant attorney general what their office does with complaints, “sweep them under the carpet?”
Taitz told them she was born in the Soviet Union and asked if she were to lie on her candidacy form and pay the $1,000 fee, would she be able to appear on the ballot.
The assistant secretary of state indicated she would, “unless there was a complaint.”
Considering Taitz had filed an 85-page complaint regarding Obama’s lack of eligibility, complete with documented evidence and sworn affidavits, New Hampshire has apparently decided to employ a double standard.
Despite the attorney general’s website emphasizing it has a “duty” to resolve such complaints, the commission ultimately decided it has no jurisdiction over the matter.
Section 655:17-b Declaration of Intent; Presidential Candidates Who File Nomination Papers, of New Hampshire Statutes states:
“I. Declarations of intent for each candidate for president who seeks nomination by nomination papers shall be in the form provided in paragraph II. Declarations of intent required by this section shall be filed with the secretary of state, signed by the candidate, and notarized by a notary public.
“II.  I, _________, swear under penalties of perjury that I am qualified to be a candidate for president of the United States pursuant to article II, section 1, clause 4 of the United States Constitution, which states, ‘No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that office who shall not have attained to the age of thirty-five years, and been fourteen years a resident within the United States.’  I further declare that I am domiciled in the city (or town or unincorporated place) of _____, county of ____, state of ____, and am a qualified voter therein; that I intend to be a candidate for the office of president to be chosen at the general election to be held on the ____ day of ____; and I intend to file nomination papers by the deadline established under RSA 655:43.  I further declare that, if qualified as a candidate for said office, I shall not withdraw; and that, if elected, I shall be qualified for and shall assume the duties of said office.”
Even though the birth certificate produced by Obama has been deemed a forgery, Obama, by his own admission, does not meet the qualifications as a natural born citizen, since Obama’s father, Barack Hussein Obama, Sr. was a British subject at the time of Obama’s birth and was neither a citizen nor resident alien.
He has also produced a fraudulently created Selective Service System registration in 2008, since failure to register by the time he turned 26 would forever have precluded Obama from holding a job with the executive branch of the federal government.
The falsified registration also confirmed Obama’s official use of the same Connecticut-issued Social Security number that was not only not assigned to him, but produced a SSN mismatch letter when run through the federal E-Verify system to check Obama’s eligibility to work in this country.
New Hampshire, which became the ninth state on June 21, 1788, and was the birthplace of our 14th President Franklin Pierce in 1804, has one of the more memorable state mottos, “Live Free or Die.”
The motto, originally written as a toast by General John Stark on July 31, 1809, was adopted as the state motto by the legislature in 1945 and incorporated into the state emblem.
Stark, considered the state’s “most distinguished hero of the Revolutionary War,” sent what became the state motto as part of a volunteer toast to his wartime comrades in 1809 as he declined an invitation to a 32nd anniversary reunion of the 1777 Battle of Bennington in Vermont, due to poor health.
The toast in full, stated, “Live Free Or Die; Death Is Not The Worst Of Evils.”
The following year, Stark received a similar invitation, which he also declined, stating, “The toast, sir, which you sent us in 1809 will continue to vibrate with unceasing pleasure in our ears, ‘Live Free Or Die; Death Is Not The Worst Of Evils.’”
New Hampshire adopted its 10th official state song, “Live Free or Die” by Barry Palmer in 2007, while its motto seems to ring hollow.
On Nov. 19, to commemorate the Ballot Law Commission’s decision to do nothing about Taitz’s complaint, Julianna Smoot, Deputy Campaign Manager for, posted “Release the Mugs,” stating: “Yesterday, four Republicans in the New Hampshire State House allowed a hearing requested by Orly Taitz, the notorious dentist-lawyer-birther who wants President Obama officially removed from the state's primary ballot.
“So in honor of conspiracy theorists everywhere, we're re-releasing the campaign's limited-edition ‘Made in the USA’ mugs.
“There's clearly nothing we can do to satisfy this crowd — or anyone else who insists on wasting time and energy on nonsense like this.”

Monday, November 21, 2011

Liberal Land: Where The Thinking Is Illogical And Bizarre

Liberal Land: Where The Thinking Is Illogical And Bizarre

'Alice in Wonderland" was written by a professor who also wrote a book on symbolic logic. So it is not surprising that Alice encountered not only strange behavior in Wonderland, but also strange and illogical reasoning — of a sort too often found in the real world, and which a logician would be very much aware of.
If Alice could visit the world of liberal rhetoric and assumptions today, she might find similarly illogical and bizarre thinking. But people suffering in the current economy might not find it nearly as entertaining as "Alice in Wonderland."
Perhaps the most remarkable feature of the world envisioned by today's liberals is that it is a world where other people just passively accept whatever "change" liberals impose. In the world of Liberal Land, you can just take for granted all the benefits of the existing society, and then simply tack on your new, wonderful ideas that will make things better.
For example, if the economy is going along well and you happen to take a notion that there ought to be more home ownership, especially among the poor and minorities, then you simply have the government decree that lenders have to lend to more low-income people and minorities who want mortgages, ending finicky mortgage standards about down payments, income and credit histories.
Elites Choose
That sounds like a fine idea in the world of Liberal Land. Unfortunately, in the ugly world of reality, it turned out to be a financial disaster, from which the economy has still not yet recovered. Nor have the poor and minorities.
Apparently you cannot just tack on your pet notions to whatever already exists, without repercussions spreading throughout the whole economy. That's what happens in the ugly world of reality, as distinguished from the beautiful world of Liberal Land.
The strange and bizarre characters found in "Alice in Wonderland" have counterparts in the political vision of Liberal Land today. Among the most interesting of these characters are those elites who are convinced that they are so much smarter than the rest of us that they feel both a right and a duty to take all sorts of decisions out of our incompetent hands — for our own good.
In San Francisco, which is Liberal Land personified, there have been attempts to ban the circumcision of newborn baby boys. Fortunately, that was nipped in the bud. But it shows how widely the self-anointed saviors of Liberal Land feel entitled to take decisions out of the hands of mere ordinary citizens.



Posted by: Dean C. Haskins This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
Posted: November 21, 2011
© 2011 The Birther Summit
What started out four weeks ago as a one-week trip to Honolulu for our Executive Director, Dean Haskins, is now in its fifth week, as the many issues surrounding Barack Obama's ineligibility to be president have been shared with numerous people in Hawaii, Arizona, and Texas. Since details of the two-week investigation in Honolulu must still be withheld on the advice of counsel, we want to note two contacts that were made last week in Texas.
dean_at_bradys_officeOn Thursday, Dean attended a meeting at the office of Congressman Kevin Brady in Conroe with a group of patriots who were voicing their concerns to the Congressman's District Director about the current fiscal problems our country faces—problems that are being compounded by a reckless Congress. At the end of the meeting, Dean identified himself as our Executive Director, and said to the Congressman's District Director, "Because Congress has refused to do its job, I want to let Congressman Brady know that ordinary American citizens are doing it for them, and the evidence that continues to mount will eventually demonstrate to the American people that Congress has been woefully derelict in its duty." As he spoke, several of the people who attended the meeting gathered around him, asked many questions, and showed strong support for the efforts of The Birther Summit.
After Dean's informational session in the Congressman's office, he was asked to participate in an impromptu interview for a Texas state-level Republican blog.
Then, on Friday, Dean traveled to Austin, where he hand-delivered a package of information to Texas Attorney General Gregdean_at_abbotts_office Abbott's office. Since our investigation produced conflicting information from the office of the Attorney General of Hawaii (more specifically, from Deputy Attorney General Jill Nagamine), Dean has supplied Attorney General Abbott with the specific details of the investigation, and has asked for his direction in how the conflicting information from Hawaii Attorney General David Louie's office should be handled. The representative from Attorney General Abbott's office thanked Dean for bringing the information to the attention of Texas' Attorney General, and assured him that it would be reviewed.
If all goes as planned, Dean should be able to return home to Virginia sometime late this week, most likely after Thanksgiving, as there is still much work he must do this week. We know that he is looking forward to being able to see his wife and family, as it will have been nearly five weeks he has been away from home when he finally returns. Once home, he will not only share where he spent the final week of this trip, but he also plans to prepare a narrative of his investigative work in Honolulu, which will include photographic and video documentation, and will include a thorough analysis of the evidence that has already been prepared for counsel.
Of being away from his wife and family on Thanksgiving Day, Dean stated, "I guess it's just the price that will have to be paid. Let's get this criminal out of the White House, and then we'll all have reason to give thanks!"
If you would like more information about the Birther Summit, please visit our website often at or contact Dean Haskins at This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it .