Wednesday, February 29, 2012


SHOCK AND ODD –Along with previous evidence proving the image of Obama’s alleged 1961 “Certificate of Live Birth” posted on the internet in April, 2011 was digitally fabricated, we reveal powerful new evidence which shows that data contained on the document contradicts Obama’s birth narrative and vital statistical accounting methods used at the alleged time of his birth. Vast disparities between the natal information appearing in the image and the standard methods used by federal and municipal governments to code, identify and report the contents of U.S. vital records prove that Obama’s alleged Hawaiian birth record was assembled to intentionally obscure the truth about his natal biography.By Penbrook Johannson and Dan Crosby
NEW YORK, NY – An intensive examination of the contents of Obama’s alleged 1961 “Certificate of Live Birth” image by the most respected experts in vital records accounting and identity investigation reveals that much of the contrived information about his alleged Hawaiian birth simply renders his Natural-born status impossible.
Rest of article:

Will Cold Case Posse clear Obama or confirm allegations?

Will Cold Case Posse clear Obama or confirm allegations?

 ‘When I have a press conference, I talk about something’

PHOENIX – Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio will be holding a long-awaited press conference at 1 p.m. on March 1 to reveal the preliminary findings of his Cold Case Posse’s investigation into President Barack Obama’s birth certificate, other documents and background information pertinent to his eligibility to be president.

After being petitioned last year by approximately 250 citizens to look into what numerous experts claim is a fraudulently created birth certificate, Arpaio decided to have his Cold Case Posse to look into the allegations about Obama’s background, fraudulently created documents and use of a Connecticut-issued Social Security number, which resulted in a Social Security number mismatch notice when a Seattle woman ran Obama’s information through E-Verify.

\By Linda Bentley

Maricopa County Crime Examiner

Linda Bentley is an award-winning investigative reporter for Sonoran News in Cave Creek, Ariz. As a transplant from New York, Chicago, Los Angeles...

Continue reading on Will Cold Case Posse clear Obama or confirm allegations? - Phoenix Crime |

Monday, February 27, 2012

OBAMA - How to Stop Him

How to Stop Him
Posted by By at 28 February, at 01 : 58 AM Print
How to Stop Him
This is designed for people who have not yet been extensively exposed to eligibility issues and the ballot challenge approach. Try it out on people and let us know how it works.

People who have been really paying attention have seen very poor results of the “Obama ” “Presidency.” His economic, security, energy, education, health care and social policies have been wreaking havoc upon this country. He has committed numerous impeachable crimes, not being acted upon. If you disagree, then save your time and don’t read this. Some people are putting all their hopes for ousting him on the upcoming election. We’re not at all sure that is a foolproof remedy. In fact, he is now ahead in polls, if those can believed.
We have another way to throw roadblocks in his path. We tried to beat him in the last election, sued him on eligibility grounds in dozens of Federal Courts. They wouldn’t even give us “standing.” We tried the DoD, FBI, CIA, NSIA, Electoral College, Grand Juries, Prosecutors, Attorneys General.
Frankly, we’re worried that the weak GOP candidates (although they are all MUCH better than “Obama”), manipulated media, electoral fraud, phony economic statistics and massive handouts will win him another term– IF we don’t do something about it.

One of our approaches:

So, what is it? Because the federal courts won’t give us standing, we investigated and found that most Secretaries of State and state courts MUST give us standing for ballot challenges.

What are we challenging on the ballot? His Constitutional eligibility. This is not about some elusive Kenyan birth certificate, but whether he meets Article II Section 1 Clause 5 of our Constitution. It turns out he doesn’t, but the reasons take a little study. Try here:

Here’s a good summary:

There is much more, but that can get you started. Please check http://obamaballotchallenge for more on what is going on in about 24 states now to help stop him. We only need to get 1 or 2 states to stop him in his tracks. Even if we get none, but just expose his seamy past and ineligibility, it can inflict mortal damage to his campaign. Would you like to help us do the inflicting?
If so, help us with this project and others check the site):…

You can also volunteer to do publicity, research, fundraising.
We recruited a top notch attorney to help us, the Founder of Judicial Watch and Freedom Watch, the only one to ever successfully sue a sitting president, a former Federal Prosecutor. But we need your help. The “California 7″ have already filed a complaint:…

… but need help raising money to get our attorney on this case– pronto. He’s already working on another one in Florida. Those two states would doom Obama’s campaign– and there are many others in play. Why haven’t you heard about this via MSM? Good question. VERY good question.
By the way, are you aware that Sheriff Joe Arpaio in Arizona has been conducting the ONLY official investigation on this for the last five months, with a team of nearly 3000 volunteer people, including skilled professionals? Didn’t think so. Are you aware that he is conducting a press conference of the findings to date this Thursday? Thought not. Check it out Thursday– LIVE! Spread the word …..

Born in the U.S.A.? Naples man says it doesn't matter

Born in the U.S.A.? Naples man says it doesn't matter

This isn't your Kenyan-born father's birther suit.

A Naples man is taking a lead role in an effort to have President Barack Obama declared ineligible for the presidency based on his lineage.

But unlike the so-called birthers, who've been trying to prove the president wasn't born in the U.S., Sam Sewell doesn't focus on where Obama was born. For that matter, he doesn't really focus on Obama.

The crux of the argument made by Sewell and others is that Article II of the U.S. Constitution requires the president to be a "natural born" U.S. citizen. While the Constitution doesn't define the term "natural born citizen," Sewell forwards the case that U.S. immigration authorities and others have said it as a person with two parents who are citizens of the United States.

Since Obama's father was Kenyan, the president is not a natural born citizen, Sewell contends. "My position is that if he was born on the Capitol steps he would still not be eligible, because he only had one American parent," said Sewell, Florida coordinator for

The theory has had a hard time gaining traction, in part because it could eliminate potential Republican candidates for president as well, Sewell believes. Neither Sen. Marco Rubio of Florida nor Gov. Bobby Jindal of Louisiana, both considered raising stars in the party, would qualify as natural born citizens under the criteria Sewell sets out.

"I'm trying not to make it relevant just to Mr. Obama," Sewell says. "My position is it is more of a Constitutional issue."

To bolster that position, Sewell cites case law, including Supreme Court cases drawing distinctions between "native citizens" and "natural born citizens," regulations of both the immigration and state departments and even the Federalist Papers written in support of the U.S. Constitution at its drafting.

He has helped raise money for a lawsuit filed in state court in Tallahassee by Michael Voeltz seeking to have Obama declared ineligible for the Florida ballot later this year. There are similar lawsuits in 20 states, said Sewell, who with his wife, Bunny, runs a counseling service in Naples.

Ironically, in 2008 Democrats in the U.S. Senate sponsored and passed a resolution stating that John McCain, who was born on a military base outside the United States, was eligible to run for president. It made multiple references to his American parents. "What's interesting here is that Sen. (Patrick) Leahy, the chairman of the Senate Judiciary (Committee), confirms that a "natural born citizen" is the child of American citizen parents. Parents _ that's two. That's both parents," Sewell writes in his analysis of the issue. Then-U.S. Sen. Barack Obama co-sponsored that Senate resolution.

Trying to make the case that this is a Constitutional matter, not a political one, is difficult, Sewell says. Obama supporters dismiss the argument that their man isn't qualified to be president. Obama opponents don't want to hear anything that doesn't target him specifically. "People keep misunderstanding my intentions. The Constitution has been under attack for a long time. You can't believe how irate the Marco Rubio fans are," Sewell said.

Sewell, a member of Mensa, is smart enough to know others will take issue with his arguments. That's why cases like the one filed in Tallahassee are important, to get a court, preferably the Supreme Court, to rule directly on the points.

"All of these (interpretations) are the opinions of analysts. This is not a settled issue at all," he said.
# # # #

Sam Sewell is the Obama Ballot Challenge Project Manager for Florida

Most of you know that Sam has been working to expose AKA Obama since  before the 2008 election.  Sam is elated that Mr. Klayman has become a member of the team!  Sam has made sure Florida already has $5,000 seed money toward our goal.  Dig deep folks! 

Bank accounts have been established for this epic legal battle.  Progress in fundraising and in the legal arena will be covered in detail at the website, including live video broadcasting by Article II SuperPAC

Why we need your assistance immediately  - Click here to Donate 


Write a check for $25,000, or for any amount you can,
but PLEASE do it today.
All Major Credit Cards Accepted, even checks
Cantact Sam personally at

Orly Taitz Attempt to Sabotage the Obama Ballot Challenge - Full Text of Response to Orly's Skulduggery

Orly Taitz Attempt to Sabotage the Obama Ballot Challenge - Full Text of  Response to Orly's Skulduggery

Ms. Taitz:

As we previously stated, you have made multiple defamatory statements about Larry Klayman and some supporters, including us, causing severe harm. We supported you for years, because you were about the only game in town, after Apuzzo and Donofrio concluded that the federal courts would not hear any argument, no matter how logical, how grounded in fact and law.

Now, there are many ballot challenges granted instant “standing” and new attorneys are joining the fight. Obama State Ballot Challenge has helped to focus attention on the challenges and facilitate activity. We do not appreciate your non-productive infighting with other patriots in the movement. In fact, you are actively and maliciously attempting to hurt our efforts, in a manner nearly indistinguishable from that of the “Obama” forces. We know that they are enjoying sitting back and watching you do their work for them.

We had stayed quiet and counseled others not to get involved in the fray with you. George tried speaking to you twice earlier and again on 2/23/12, but, you would not even allow him to complete a sentence without interrupting. But, you have crossed into libelous action, so it has come to this and now we must reluctantly speak out. It’s bad enough that you routinely attack movement patriots, but now you are damaging the efforts of one of the finest attorneys in the nation. And that is unacceptable. Unlike others you have bulldozed, we will not be so passive, especially since you have ignored letters from our attorney.

You have little or no idea what you are even talking about, flinging around allegations, slyly implying misconduct and did not make a competent, good faith effort to ascertain the truth. In any case, it is none of your business how we conduct our campaigns, since we are complying with all laws and answer any legitimate questions to donors and patriot allies. We are writing this only to document your offenses and inform the public of what is really going on.

It is obvious that you feel threatened, are jealous of any other activity in the eligibility movement, are fearful of any “competition” and believe that a dollar contributed anywhere else but to you is a dollar stolen from you.

We specifically reference some of your inflammatory, defamatory, misleading and fallacious blog postings. It is quite clear that you have an “agenda” to discredit Mr. Klayman and us. Our response to the postings is below and we have also marked up some of them in Appendix A:

- It seems as though we committed the unforgivable sin of helping to raise money for the Hatfield/Swensson Atlanta challenge and publicity/education activities. After that, you, who we were on excellent terms with, became an even worse enemy than “Obama.” More recently, we started fundraising for Larry Klayman’s planned work. The attacks only increased.

- All of your absurd “concerns” and inaccurate statements could have been avoided, simply by calling and asking before recklessly writing in your blog. Your failure to exercise due diligence prior to posting falsehoods, incomplete and one- sided information, has resulted in creating a highly misleading impression that we are dishonest, possibly taking money and failing to use it as advertised—all untrue. You also dredged up and presented only negative statements about Larry Klayman, including various defamatory statements which hold him in a false light. For instance, Klayman’s PA law license expired. He has not done any work there in two decades. He was not subjected to any disciplinary actions there. He has not been convicted of any crime and can enter cases in California pro hac vice, as you know.

- Article II PAC is not involved in collecting money for legal defense. Pamela Barnett and George Miller are no longer with Article II SuperPAC or Article II Legal Defense Fund, but we maintain a strategic alliance, since we have closely aligned goals, but different approaches and activities.

- Pamela Barnett, George Miller and Sam Sewell have never taken a penny from Article II PAC, Article II Legal Fund, or any other similar fundraising efforts. We have only paid in. I’m not aware that others you have named have taken any money either, except for a few who had legitimate expense reimbursements for travel, living and assigned activities, you know, like you take. I am informed by the Treasurer that none of that came out of the legal fund.

- has not collected any money at all, although we have heavily promoted multiple such campaigns for others, such as Kerchner, Swensson/Hatfield, Klayman, Arpaio, you, etc.

- Klayman has never been associated with the Article II SuperPAC, but we were/are still using the Article II Legal Defense Fund to raise money for his ballot challenge efforts.

- Article II Legal Defense Fund will be sending funds to Klayman.

- RE: Taitz statement: The question is: who is lying? Was Klayman paid or not? If he was paid, than he needs to refund the donors, as he did not file law suits as he was supposed to.

No one is lying except you- or at least badly misleading unsuspecting readers of your blog. Klayman received only partial payment of his $25K retainer, but only after he had already started work on his own initiative, without the promised retainer. He should be praised, not vilified.

- We have raised funds from other sources. We have not yet received any funds from Article II Legal Defense fund.

- The 96 hour deadline you spoke of was in our initial ads, which was in fact required to enable us to engage Klayman in sufficient time to file an initial complaint. We didn’t raise the full amount in time, but were successful in getting him to graciously start some work anyway, the same day that a citizen filed a complaint, who has subsequently worked with Larry to begin modifying it to incorporate improvements. Klayman is planning strategy, researching statutes and looking for appropriate jurisdictions to file additional complaints in.

- For you to make a leap of logic that we are somehow defrauding donors, because Klayman wasn’t able to research, write and file a complaint in the four or so hours he worked before a citizen complaint was filed on 2/16 without his input– is beyond ridiculous, but quite typical of your communications style and “logic.”

- Your comment that Klayman does not have a CA license is largely irrelevant and seems designed to imply that he cannot mount any efforts here in CA. As you know, he can enter cases in California pro hac vice, and lawyers that practice nationally do so on a routine basis. No one can be licensed in all 50 states and that is why all courts allow attorneys to enter cases pro hac vice.

- Larry, the founder of Judicial Watch, has stated publicly that he left it to run for a Florida U.S. Senate seat. At least he had the good sense to focus on one thing. Running for the Senate, if seriously, is a full-time job.

- We have already explained Klayman’s response to the child support issue, grounded in law and fact, unlike your one sided presentation, which inaccurately portrayed him as a deadbeat Dad. You did not give Klayman or us any chance to respond to your misleading assertions about him and others before that on other matters, repeatedly since January. You routinely censor our postings on your site, so we have ceased trying.

- Klayman has never been convicted of anything. He has not had a license suspended or revoked. He is following the law.

- It is interesting that “Constance Ruffley” of Judicial Watch went out of her way to attend your presentation, switching topics to comment on Klayman’s involvement in the “birther” suits and his personal life (which is none of her or your business), since Judicial Watch completely blew us off when we approached them about helping. You seem to place a lot of weight on words of an office clerk with an agenda.

- The fact that multiple Article II Legal Fund ads run on and an Obama Ballot Challenge ad runs on Art2 SuperPAC does not mean that we are each members of the other. We left to focus on the Ballot Challenges, while Article II SuperPAC will focus mainly on education and publicity on….. Article II issues. So, there is obviously potential synergy, but different missions.

- Your seemingly obsessive interest in Klayman is fascinating. It seems that you are focused on attacking Klayman and impeding his mission, when you should instead be focused on building the movement and cooperating.

- What results have you achieved in four years of taking OPM (Other peoples’ money)? All these misstatements, if not lies, or deliberate shading of the truth, are at the very least the result of your fact-finding incompetence, or a deliberate attempt to mislead your readers, not a good attribute in an attorney.

- We can’t tell people who to support, but will only say that there are now multiple attorneys working on cases, mostly ballot challenges. We advise our readers to check their track records, qualifications and achievements before making their choices. It is not Larry’s fault that we only started working with him recently and haven’t raised the agreed upon money yet. This is more attributable to a late start and justifiable disappointment of people in the legal process, especially after the initial Georgia defeat and others before that.

- Now, we must deal with an attorney (you) seemingly intent upon sabotaging the efforts of a genuine American patriot and outstanding achiever, instead of warmly welcoming him and cooperating. The Larry Klayman projects are in progress. Same is true of the Kerchner, Hatfield/Swenson and Irion efforts. And yours. The more the merrier. You know we also promoted you vigorously, but find that far more difficult now, when you keep attacking us and others.

- You need to quickly make amends by not only deleting all inaccurate and misleading material, but by posting on your blog and sending full and unqualified retractions out immediately to all of your lists. As our attorney wrote you, you have caused ongoing and severe harm. So it would behoove you and be in your best interests to commence corrective actions immediately, rather than compounding and extending your offenses. Our group has nothing to apologize for, except not raising money fast enough. We are open for business and on the cases!

Pamela Barnett, Director
George Miller, Communications


The food stamp program, part of the Department of Agriculture, is pleased to be distributing the greatest amount of food stamps ever.

Meanwhile, the Park Service, a part of the Department of the Interior, asks us to "Please Do Not Feed the Animals" because the animals may grow dependent and not learn to take care of themselves.

The Chart Barack Obama Doesn’t Want America To Know About

The Chart Barack Obama Doesn’t Want America To Know About
by Ulsterman on February 24, 2012  
While the Obama administration and the mainstream media attempt to paint America as enjoying a current economic recovery – the facts tell a very different story. After some 5 TRILLION dollars in deficit spending, job growth remains as stagnant as ever under the yoke of the Obama presidency:

There are a couple of interesting observations to be made from the above graphic from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. One, the steep decline in American jobs correlates to when the Democrats took over control of Congress. Coincidence? Perhaps. But then recall that Barack Obama begins his presidency in 2009 and the decline very much continues well into 2010 where it at least flatlines. 2010 was when Republicans then took control of the House of Representatives and gained a number of seats in the Senate – which the Democrats still control.

$5 TRILLION in lost taxpayer deficit dollars is quite a sum for what that chart reflects – stagnant job growth. Millions who remain unemployed. Millions more who have dropped out of even trying to find work and are therefor not even being counted in the unemployment figures.

For a bit of contrast check out this comparative chart detailing the Reagan recovery vs the Obama recovery. One president charged ahead with plans to greatly reduce taxes, lessen regulations, and pushes to increase domestic energy production in the United States. The other president – Barack Obama, called for more taxes, more regulation, and has fought increasing domestic energy production at every opportunity – such as his shutting down of the much-needed Keystone pipeline:
The truth is clear - the Obama presidency has been a near-complete disaster for working Americans. This might explain a term growing in popularity of late – “ABO” - Anybody But Obama in 2012…

Saturday, February 25, 2012

AKA Obama - How does he get away with this?

How does he get away with this?

Posted by radiopatriot in American Spirit

I have no doubt whatsoever that public knowledge of the following has to occasionally make Obama nervous and apprehensive, smoking butts like a chimney.  Perhaps that’s why he’s rumored to be kept sedated.  Xanax, anyone? Prove me wrong.
Obama spends million of tax payer dollars to defend himself against all comers in at least two dozen lawsuits demanding to see his records.  So far, no court in America will hear the case on its merits. Prove me wrong.
Like pimps, his handlers keep their money-maker Obama under their control, toe-ing the line with tried and true drugs of choice: ego, power, perks, male lovers, and crack cocaine. Prove me wrong.

The “community organizer” and his “wife” have never had it so good.  Vacay, anyone? Taxpayer-underwritten campaign trips? Millions of dollars for Madame Michelle’s entourage of make up artists and courtesans?  Private schools for their spawn?

What ever it takes to keep their boy and his beard sweet.
The stick.  His handlers know ALL his dirty little secrets.  After all, they’re the ones who picked and groomed him for the job.  Obama must live every day of his life in a prison of apprehension, knowing they can and will blow his cover and bury him if they want to.  Knowing that as long as he does what his Blackberry tells him, he’s home free for another day.  And just as added insurance, his putative wife Michelle is paid in perks to hover close by, making sure he doesn’t screw up the deal. You could say agent Michelle’s earning her “compensation” as Obama’s “bodyguard”, his "minder".  Prove me wrong.

So with assurances from his handlers, their handmaidens in the media, and members of Congress (including your representatives and mine) that they will keep his secrets, close their eyes, ignore his Constitutional ineligibility, have his back, and protect him from scrutiny or accountability, Barack Hussein Obama, son of a Kenyan Muslim, has nothing to worry about. After all, since the 2008 campaign, he’s been untouched, and untouchable, hasn’t he?

Not only do Obama’s handlers control the propaganda, they’ll sic the U.S. Federal agencies, including the IRS, DoJ, DHS, HHS, and the entire judicial system on anyone or any group that threatens their puppet agent in the White House.  Their army of jackbooted union and New Black Panther thugs will utterly destroy you if they perceive you to be a threat to their mission. Welcome to 1938.

The Marxist machine has made sure the 2012 election will tilt in his favor. They’ve dredged up the dead to secure and stuff the ballot boxes, assuring themselves another four years with Teleprompter Boy at the helm to polish off what they’ve been working at for decades — the systematic dismantling and utter destruction of our Republic, delivering us into their vision of a socialist utopia. Mordor. Prove me wrong.

Meanwhile, cluck, cluck, cluck…

They’re counting on us chickens, the dumb-clucks, to keep pecking at our corn, i.e. the misinformation the propaganda media feeds us. Keepin’ em dumb on the farm, as it were.  They will use any and all weapons in their arsenal to destroy those of us who are cognizant — the tea party movement, for example. Their accomplices in Congress will enable them to destroy the means by which “we the people” keep each other informed, connected, and educated — the Internet. Prove me wrong.

Is it hopeless for us? Is there any recourse for us? Those with clarity of vision say there is, but we must act fast.  This Patriot says the country is like an airplane on course for a spectacular crash and the time for Americans to act is NOW while we can still control the unavoidable, painful, crushing impact that’s coming:

A federal tax strike. Stop paying federal taxes.  Stop feeding the beast.
Look to Poland’s Solidarity movement. Work stoppage. Strike. Paralyze the system.
Get our troops out of the Middle East. Then, in an act of charity for freedom lovers worldwide, turn their cities into glass, one by one, until they understand that Islam/Sharia will not gain a foothold here or anywhere else.

Barack Hussein Obama’s Impressive List of Accomplishments – Please feel free to prove me wrong. PROVE ME WRONG.

        • First President to apply for college aid as a foreign student, then deny he was a foreigner.
        • First President to have a social security number from a state he has never lived in.
        • First President to preside over a cut to the credit-rating of the United States .
        • First President to violate the War Powers Act.
        • First President to be held in contempt of court for illegally obstructing oil drilling in the Gulf of Mexico .
        • First President to defy a Federal Judge’s court order to cease implementing the Health Care Reform Law.
        • First President to require all Americans to purchase a product from a third party.
        • First President to spend a trillion dollars on ‘shovel-ready’ jobs when there was no such thing as ‘shovel-ready’ jobs.
        • First President to abrogate bankruptcy law to turn over control of companies to his union supporters.
        • First President to by-pass Congress and implement the Dream Act through executive fiat.
        • First President to order a secret amnesty program that stopped the deportation of illegal immigrants across the U.S., including those with criminal convictions.
        • First President to demand a company hand-over $20 billion to one of his political appointees.
        • First President to terminate America’s ability to put a man in space-defunded NASA.
        • First President to have a law signed by an auto-pen without being present.
        • First President to arbitrarily declare an existing law unconstitutional and refuse to enforce it.
        • First President to threaten insurance companies if they publicly spoke-out on the reasons for their rate increases.
        • First President to tell a major manufacturing company (Boeing) in which State they are allowed to locate a factory.
        • First President to file lawsuits against the states he swore an oath to protect (AZ, WI, OH, IN).
        • First President to withdraw an existing coal permit that had been properly issued years ago.
        • First President to fire an inspector general of Ameri-corps for catching one of his friends in a corruption case.
        • First President to appoint 45 czars to replace elected officials in his office.
        • First President to golf  73 separate times in his first two and a half years in office, 90 to date & counting.
        • First President to hide his medical, educational and travel records.
        • First President to win a Nobel Peace Prize for doing NOTHING to earn it.
        • First President to not know how to properly pronounce Navy ‘corpsman’.
        • First President to go on multiple global ‘apology tours’-including bowing to foreign rulers.
        • First President to go on 17 lavish vacations, including date nights and Wednesday evening White House parties for his friends; paid for by the taxpayer.
        • First President to say that America was not a Christian nation.
        • First President to have 22 personal servants (taxpayer funded) just for his wife.
        • First President to keep a dog trainer on retainer for $102,000 a year at taxpayer expense.

Obamacare, gone - Yes, it can happen.

The significance of the eligibility issue is what happens if we are right.  If Obama was never eligible to serve as President, everything he did is void.  Two Supreme Court Justices, gone.  A host of Federal Judges, gone.  Every bill he signed, gone. Obamacare, gone. 

Joseph Farah looks forward to results of 1st official Obama probe

Do you care about the Constitution?

Or is it just an archaic old document that needs to be amended by fiat, by osmosis, by media consensus?

That’s really what the much-maligned eligibility debate is all about.
It’s bigger even than the person of Barack Obama – and whether or not his occupancy of the White House is legitimate.

It’s a debate that needs to be waged seriously and vigorously for the future of the country.
At its core, it’s really quite simple: Does Article II, Section 1 of the Constitution dealing with who can serve as president of the United States simply mean that any citizen age 35 or older is eligible? If so, why did the founders use a different term altogether – “natural born citizen”? What is a “natural born citizen”? Is it anyone born in the United States? If so, why have candidates born outside the United States been deemed eligible? Do we owe it to America’s future to go back in history to determine what that term actually means?

To believe what the Big Media have reported on this issue is to believe “citizen” and “natural born citizen” is a distinction without a difference.
But it’s even worse than that.

Since 2008, the Big Media have almost unanimously not only blacked out any intelligent debate or discussion of the issue, but have also strongly suggested that anyone who does is some kind of a conspiracy theorist.

All that may be about to change.

Late last year, the first official law-enforcement investigation of the facts surrounding Obama’s claims to legitimacy was launched, by Arizona Sheriff Joe Arpaio.

Until now, as hard as it may be to believe, no official vetting of Obama’s credentials has been done – not by the 50 secretaries of state who oversee elections, not by the Federal Elections Commission that administers the nation’s elections laws, not by the Electoral College, not by any judge in America, not by Congress, not by anyone.

On March 1, a very independent law-enforcement official, with no ax to grind, will release the findings of his “Cold Case Posse,” which has been investigating the many anomalies concerning Obama’s claims – from what he purports to be his Hawaiian birth certificate to his life story.
Of one thing we can be sure: Sheriff Joe is not going to whitewash the facts.

Long ago I suggested that no judge in America would ever challenge the authenticity of a sitting president – no matter how shrouded in mystery might be his history.
I was right about that.

I was more hopeful that state legislatures might take the matter seriously and, at the very least, pass laws to avert controversies like this in the future by ensuring that before ballot position of candidates is official credentials would be required.

Do you believe that in the USA in the 21st century you may need identification to vote but not to seek high office?

That needs to change if America is to continue as a nation under the rule of law.
I don’t know for certain what Arpaio’s “Cold Case Posse” has found, but I strongly believe it could be a game-changer. If I’m right, will the Big Media that have stifled free-and-open debate and unimpeded rational discourse on the subject bother to cover it? If a tree falls in the forest and there is no one to hear it, does it make any sound?

To ensure that there will be no media blackout of Sheriff Joe’s press conference on March 1, I have directed WND, the one news agency that has consistently and relentlessly – and against all odds – covered this story from the beginning, to live-stream to the world what is said and offered by the only official law-enforcement investigation ever to examine these issues.

I hope you will experience this potentially historic event with us – and spread the word to your friends far and wide.
# # # #
Sam Sewell is the Obama Ballot Challenge Project Manager for Florida
Most of you know that Sam has been working to expose AKA Obama since  before the 2008 election.  Sam is elated that Mr. Klayman has become a member of the team!  Sam has made sure Florida already has $5,000 seed money toward our goal.  Dig deep folks! 
Bank accounts have been established for this epic legal battle.  Progress in fundraising and in the legal arena will be covered in detail at the website, including live video broadcasting by Article II SuperPAC
Why we need your assistance immediately  - Click here to Donate 
Write a check for $25,000, or for any amount you can,
but PLEASE do it today.
All Major Credit Cards Accepted, even checks

SPECIAL REPORT: County Sheriffs Push Back Against Feds

This has gone way past the issue of Obama being a natural born citizen. It’s now about the multiple high crimes and misdemeanors committed by the current occupant at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue and how he may be brought to justice. Peace officers represent the last line in the sand when members of Congress have repeatedly failed to honor the oaths they swore to uphold the Constitution from all enemies foreign and domestic. To add additional fuel to this movement,Sheriff Joe’s Cold Case Posse will be releasing their findings on live stream video here.

Barack Obama - Is He or Is He Not? - Ineligibility Issue

Barack Obama

Is He or Is He Not?

How March 1st Could Crumble Obama's Presidency
by I.M. Citizen
Friday, February 24, 2012
It has been a raging controversy for some four years, a very long time in this 24/7 news-cycle world. It has included software experts, politicians, private investigators, judges, attorneys, a pastor, a billionaire, the president and a sheriff, just to name a few. It's not often a controversy can boast such a cast. And on March 1, 2012, it is a lock that the cast will grow and so will the headlines. If you haven't heard, next Thursday is the day that Arizona Sheriff Joe Arpaio will hold a press conference to disclose the findings of his office's official investigation into the authenticity of President Obama's birth certificate. What can I say, “it's baaaack”.
But before you roll your eyes, sigh and look to click another headline, allow me a few more precious moments of your time.
Last spring, when Donald Trump pretended he was going to join the election campaign I followed the shenanigans. It was classic Trump and for his ability to generate headlines and for his "outlaw" candidness, he is a favorite of mine. Obama, not so much. So, I confess, when Trump called for Obama to release his birth certificate, I watched, not so much for the birth certificate, as I'm no "birther", but for the "squirm factor." And to see Obama cave to Trump's demand, based on an obvious ruse, was special. Come on, we've been listening to the supreme ruler tell us what to do and how to do it, while he does what he wants, when he wants, for a long time now. It was overdue. So when The Donald got in his face and started snorting, we were able to see the flaws in Obama's facade and in a perverse way, that spectacle cracked a "take that" nugget locked up deep inside me. The Donald snorted, the supreme ruler folded and the country was a better place for a few days.
Anyway, at that point, I thought the issue was finished. Silly me. So when I read that Sheriff Arpaio was holding a press conference based upon findings from a year long investigation, I thought I'd better bone up on the details so that, come Thursday’s main event, I wouldn't be caught off guard. It turns out, there's quite a bit more to this birth certificate thing than most know, certainly more than I did.
From what I've been able to uncover, we have Hillary Clinton, her supporters more specifically, to thank for this soap opera. During her prolonged and nasty campaign against the supreme ruler during the democratic primaries, questions regarding his citizenship first hit the papers. Issues raised were his place of birth (America? Kenya?), his middle name (Muhammad rather than Hussein), his given first name (Barry? Barack?) and his religion. Now, only the absurdly naive wouldn't acknowledge that this was Clinton supporters mucking it up in hopes of rocking the Obama campaign. In June of 2008, The Review, apparently not absurdly naive, called for Obama to release his birth certificate to put an end to this distraction, so we could all get back to the thrill of watching Hillary and Obama slice and dice each other on national television. Fair enough. I mean, what's the big deal? It's a silly issue that can be done away with in a heartbeat. It's easy, just release the birth certificate, show the social security card and flash the ID. I have to do this routinely, for a hell of a lot less than the presidency, don't you?
Well, the supreme ruler, based on his advanced mental prowess, no doubt, decided to start a website. Primitive from a web designer's perspective, Fight The Smears, posted Obama's Certification of Live Birth (the short form birth certificate). And there the tale should have ended. Not.
It didn't take long for the American public to go to work on the posted certificate and shortly after, critics began to raise questions regarding its authenticity. Why, for instance, did it not have a State Seal on it? At this point, because the American people were now involved, the Democratic party circled the wagons, and had every prominent Democrat from Boston to Hawaii issue a statement regarding the legitimacy of Obama’s short form. In addition to being experts on what is best for you, they're document experts too, don't you know. Unsatisfied, calls from the people went out for the release of Obama's long form certificate.
In 2009, CNN announced that, based upon their research, Hawaii had destroyed all paper birth records in 2001. Obama's long form birth certificate no longer existed, therefore the short copy is the official copy. And it is here, for me and probably most of you, that the book on the supreme ruler's past was closed. Mostly.
Enter James David Manning and Orly Taitz.
Manning is chief pastor at the ATLAH World Missionary Church in New York City. Although a pastor, this man of faith is no angel, having done some stints in the pokey for burglary, robbery, larceny, criminal possession of a weapon, and other charges as a young energetic lad. He came into the public spotlight during this time with very harsh criticisms of the Democratic Party, American black culture and Obama's background, or lack thereof.
Taitz is an attorney for hire, and like all lawyers for hire, she benefits as much from headlines as she does fees. She has her own website ( complete with Hollywood-style photos and a donation button, naturally. Taitz has been involved with a string of cases that range from zany to zany. Her briefing and courtroom skills have been called into question and she has been sanctioned for attorney misconduct (slapped for $20,000 as well). She is also the poster-girl for the "birther" cause, as her website clearly points out.
Using secret connections and private investigators throughout the country, Taitz has compiled information that includes:
Obama has numerous Social Security Numbers
His passport is invalid and the person cooperating with the FBI regarding this matter was shot in the head
There is a Kenya birth certificate with the name "Barack Obama" and it is authentic
Obama, or his cronies have threatened her life
Obama, using FEMA, is building internment camps for "Anti-Obama dissidents"
Osama bin Laden was killed years ago, kept in the freezer, and thawed in perfect timing for his death to be announced to divert attention from one of her Obama citizenship court cases
Needless to say, these two, Manning and Taitz, injected lightening bolts into the "birther" movement. Things begin to accelerate from here.
From 2008 to 2011 Keyes vs. Bowen; Lightfoot vs. Bowen; Barnett vs. Obama; Cook vs. Good and a string of other suits (9 or 10) are filed by Taitz with Obama's citizenship directly or indirectly involved. That's a lot of suits in a short period of time. What's a supreme ruler to do?
Apparently feeling a little heat, on April 22, 2011, Obama writes the Hawaii Department of Health, and demands his long form certificate be released. Of course, they write back saying they can't because it was destroyed in 2001 like CNN announced, right? Wrong.
On April 25, 2011, the request is approved, and on April 27, White House staffers give reporters a copy of the certificate, and post it on the White House website. And there our story concludes. Nope, not quite yet.
As before, the American public goes to work. Software geeks and professional graphic illustrators, compositors and the like download the online certificate and have at it. The very same day of it's posting, shouters come forth claiming it's fake. And not even a good at that. It is not one document, they claim, it is many fragmented documents, layered one on top of another, to give the illusion of a complete document. It works like this. A blank birth certificate serves as the base. Have on hand 5 or 6 real birth certificates. Remove via a computer, particular information from birth certificate #1 and place it on the blank one. Remove different information from birth certificate #2 and place it onto the base certificate. Think of a movie, the cops looking for the bad guy take his picture and add a beard, and then long-hair, then change the eyes from brown to blue. Same principle here. Fill in all the information on your blank birth certificate and you end up with a new birth certificate with random information taken from other existing certificates. Presto, who ever you want, was born when you want and where you want. The problem is, as I mentioned, the workmanship was poor and our geek-squad heroes spotted the shoddy work immediately. Further, different experts from different parts of the country all point out the same errors.
And that brings us to Arizona Sheriff Joe Arpaio. Remember him? The press conference?
Now Joe, "America's Toughest Sheriff", is a man's man, a Sheriff's Sheriff. You know him. He's been on television, not just press conferences, but reality shows, too. He's the guy that banned inmates from possessing Playboy magazine, so he's tough on convicts. He instituted female chain-gangs as well as tent-city. He also sells pink boxer-shorts with "Go Joe" on them. I kid you not. We're talking a Maricopa County legend here.
Anyway, big Joe is a pistol and he's got an ax to grind. Turns out, he's a closet "birther", and when our supreme ruler caught a sniff of that, he ordered the DOJ to start leaning on Joe. Suddenly, claims of racial profiling, misuse of funds, abuse of power and unconstitutional jail conditions started surfacing. These accusations came fast and furious, all within 2010 and 2011. Unapologetic, big Joe stood tall and claimed the accusations were rubbish. Nothing more, the man in pink claimed, than a smear campaign against him by Obama, based on the fact that he had initiated an investigation into the status of Obama's legal residence.
And here we find ourselves. The investigation is complete. The results are in. And we sit, waiting like dogs at the dinner table for scraps of information to fall on the floor. Is the supreme leader an American? Or was he born in Kenya? Is the birth certificate real? Fake? Is his name Barack or Barry? Oh, my, Thursday seems so far away.
But I can make it, though, because during my exhaustive research into this crazy tale, I encountered some things I need to consider. So should you. For instance, why did CNN claim their investigation concluded there were no more paper birth certificates and then, suddenly, Obama is able to order one up? And what of publicity hound attorney, Taitz? She submitted as court evidence in one of her cases, numerous Social Security Numbers have been assigned to Obama. And what about the death threats, or the guy shot in the head? Why did the short certificate of Obama's have no State Seal on it? Why is the long certificate layered and able to be dismantled by graphics folks? Is it so hard to believe it may have been faked? Haven't counterfeiters been doing the same thing for centuries? And what about the miss-matched text? I'm no expert but they looked like miss-matches to me. And why are there videos of Obama and his wife stating during different speeches that his home country is not America? And there is actually a little more to consider.
I don't watch the news 24/7, I can't. I know you can't either. But I feel I keep up on current events and because of this I'm forced to ask this question. Why, three years into his ruler-ship, haven't we seen anyone from Obama's past? Think about it. I've seen no interviews given by childhood friends, for instance. Have you? There's no stories of him saving someone from getting hit by a car or running a lemonade stand at the top of the street. There's no neighborhood bully telling us how many times he beat him up. How can this be? What about college? He went to Columbia. Allegedly. Why can't these records be accessed? Are they sealed? If they are, why? I've seen no one come forward, roommate, classmate, pickup basketball buddy, no one. There's no professors saying he was a good student, or a bad one. Nobody. How can this be? I'm sorry but even the most insignificant dolt has somebody that remembers him. This is the President of the United States. It's the ultimate bar-stool story, "yeah, him and me, we're like this".
I don't know where you stand, but I tend to believe in the cliché, “Where there's smoke, there's fire”, and there seems to be some smoke here. What about old girlfriends? There's no one willing to sell lurid tales of his sexual exploits for book deals? I mean, Herman Cain was just a Republican primary candidate and we had numerous gold-diggers paraded in front of us. Here, we have the supreme ruler with no former acquaintances ready to exploit the opportunity, no hangers-on, no one looking for their 15 minutes? How can it be that not one soul is prepared to bare all for the big bucks? I find that very odd. Creepy odd. Manchurian Candidate odd.
Perhaps the press conference on Thursday, March 1st, will shed some light on this. Maybe big Joe has unearthed information about Obama's background and will confirm that Barack Obama is Barack Obama. But what if he doesn't? What if big Joe announces he's found more faulty information, more contradictions? What if he says his investigation raises more questions than it answers? We're in an election year. Too much creepy information could scare voters and crumble Obama's presidency.
Oh god, Thursday is so far away.


WASHINGTON, D.C., July 14, 2009 — Physicians and nurses are as likely as members of the general public to use dietary supplements and most physicians and nurses recommend supplements to their patients (1), says a new study published in Nutrition Journal, a peer-reviewed, on-line journal that focuses on the field of human nutrition. The study, which utilized data from the “Life…supplemented” Healthcare Professionals (HCP) Impact Study, found that 72 percent of physicians and 89 percent of nurses used dietary supplements and that 79 percent of physicians and 82 percent of nurses said that they recommend dietary supplements to their patients.
“Health professionals including physicians and nurses are just as interested in healthy lifestyles as members of the general public and are just as likely to benefit from rational supplementation,” the authors—Annette Dickinson, Ph.D., consultant and past president of the Council for Responsible Nutrition; Andrew Shao, Ph.D., vice president, scientific and regulatory affairs, Council for Responsible Nutrition; and Nicolas Boyon, senior vice president, Ipsos Public Affairs, who conducted the HCP Study—state in the article.
The study found that the dietary supplement product most commonly used was the multivitamin, with or without minerals. Vitamins and other minerals most commonly used by both physicians and nurses after multivitamins included vitamin C, a B vitamin complex, vitamin D, vitamin E and calcium. However, physicians and nurses seemed to differ slightly on the non-vitamin and mineral products they used most often—physicians reported higher usages of green tea, fish oil, glucosamine, soy, flax seed and chondroitin (in that order) while nurses tended to use green tea, fish oil, echinacea, glucosamine and flax seed, respectively.
Overall health and wellness is the biggest motivator for taking dietary supplements, according to 40 percent of physicians and 48 percent of nurses who take supplements. However, more than two-thirds cited multiple motivations, including bone health, flu or colds, heart health, immune health, joint health, energy and musculoskeletal pain. Most physicians and nurses cite similar reasons for recommending dietary supplements to their patients, with the most common reason being for overall health and wellness (41 percent of physicians who recommend supplements and 62 percent of nurses who do), followed by bone health, joint health, flu or colds, heart health, immune health, musculoskeletal pain, and energy. Over three-quarters (75 percent of physicians and 79 percent of nurses) also indicated that they would be interested in Continuing Medical Education regarding dietary supplements.
This latest survey adds to the growing body of published data suggesting that healthcare professionals are among the highest users of supplements. For example, in a survey of women physicians, it was reported that 64 percent used vitamin or mineral supplements at least occasionally and 47 percent of the women used a vitamin or mineral supplement at least 5 days a week. (2)
“It may appear surprising that physicians and nurses are as likely as the general population to be using dietary supplements, given the negative views sometimes expressed editorially in medical journals,” the authors conclude. “Physicians and nurses, as well as lay consumers, are exposed to these divergent views and must make their own decisions regarding their personal approach to wellness. The majority opt to use dietary supplements.”

1 Dickinson A, Boyon N, Shao A. Physicians and nurses use and recommend dietary supplements: report of a survey. Nutrition Journal 2009, 8:29 doi:10.1186/1475-2891-8-29.
2 Frank E, Bendich A, Denniston M. Use of vitamin-mineral supplements by female physicians in the United States. Am J Clin Nutr 2000;72:969-975.

Note to Editor: The Council for Responsible Nutrition (CRN), founded in 1973, is a Washington, D.C.-based trade association representing dietary supplement manufacturers and ingredient suppliers. In addition to complying with a host of federal and state regulations governing dietary supplements, CRN members also agree to adhere to voluntary guidelines for manufacturing, marketing and CRN’s Code of Ethics. Visit

Sheriff Arpaio Press Conference Will Be Livestreamed March 1

Sheriff Arpaio Press Conference Will Be Livestreamed

Phoenix, Ariz – Article II Super PAC is joining World Net Daily (WND) and the Western Center for Journalism to live stream the Maricopa County Cold Case Posse Investigative Report of Barack H. Obama initiated following a request from Tea Party members from Surprise, Arizona. The Maricopa County Cold Case Posse is made up of retired career law enforcement officials, legal professionals and skilled investigators.

The seven month long investigative report will be released to the public on March 1, 2012 and Vattelevision, Article II Super PAC’s communication team, will be working with WND to bring it “live” to the citizens throughout America and the world.

WND will be providing an Executive Summary of the report and to be certain to receive it we encourage people to go to WND and sign up.

Helen Tansey, Director of Article II Super PAC said “We are thrilled to be joining WND, the leading alternative news source who has stayed on top of this story and kept all of us readers informed since the investigation first launched.”

Tansey went onto say “no official source ever vetted Obama prior to the 2008 election, but just a mere political party. Well, that’s not good enough. The people deserve to know those who are seeking access to our ballots meet the qualifications laid out under Article II of the US Constitution, and for the first time an official law enforcement entity is doing what should have been done long ago.”

The time of the press conference on March 1, 2012 will be announced by WND when finalized.

The live-stream can be watched live online at WND, Western Center for Journalism and Article II Super PAC.

Live-stream can be accessed at the following links:

Helen Tansey


Article II Super PAC