Saturday, May 15, 2010

AKA Obama COLB Filed But Never Accepted - Click Image For Full View


http://www.scribd.com/doc/31271319/Obama-s-CERTIFICATION-of-Live-Birth-form-reveals-Birth-Registration-FILED-but-never-fully-ACCEPTED

Obama's 'CERTIFICATION of Live Birth' form reveals his Birth Registration was FILED in 1961 but was never fully ACCEPTED by the Hawaiian State Registrar's Office.


See the lower left corner of Obama's CERTIFICATION of Live Birth form and the same corner on the other two examples. This indicates there was insufficient evidence back in 1961 to complete the birth registration process.


Hawaii is covering this up for political reasons to protect Obama. Only they know the ultimate reasons they are all willing to commit Misprision of Felony at this point in time given the mounting evidence that Obama was not physically born in Hawaii. Obama may have amended his record since 1961 to try to reinforce and cover up the original fraudulent filing. But his online COLB clearly shows that when it was FILED it was never finally ACCEPTED. This is a national disgrace that our entire system of laws including the Constitution and all legal records are being subverted and subordinated to cover up for Obama's continued fraud on the nation as to his true legal identity. What is so important about this one man that Hawaii is willing to see the nation destroyed by his corruption and lies from birth by his family and continued on all his life by Obama. The man is a grifter and conman. See this catalog of evidence that shows by the preponderance of the evidence that Hawaii and the nation are the victims of birth registration fraud by Obama's family in 1961: http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/05/catalog-of-evidence-concerned-americans.html

CDR Charles KerchnerLehigh Valley, Pennsylvaniahttp://puzo1.blogspot.com/ http://www.protectourliberty.org/
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
As previously reported HERE, HERE, HERE, and HERE. Obama's campaign posted 4 different images of a Certification of Live Birth on the Internet. Several document and computer image experts have deemed the Obama COLB(s) as fakes. If you have not yet researched the Obama COLB then this report from the Post & Email will explain it point by point.
Via the Post & Email; - Obama’s Forged “Certification of Live Birth”: The Evidence - DID FACTCHECK PROVIDE THE LINK BETWEEN THE OBAMA CAMPAIGN AND THE 2008 PASSPORT FILE BREACHES? ...must read report HERE. ...and HERE & HERE & HERE.Before you go there check out the 4 different Obama COLBs posted online by Obama's campaign. Also, if you missed it, meet the only 2 people to examine the Factcheck.org COLB(s), and one of them wasn't Bill O'Reilly;1) Daily Kos COLB; http://palabre.files.wordpress.com/2009/09/bo_birth_certificate-kos.jpg 2) Fight the Smears COLB; http://www.fightthesmears.com/images/28.jpg 3) Factcheck.org COLB with seal; http://www.factcheck.org/UploadedFiles/birth_certificate_5.jpg 4) Factcheck.org COLB without seal; http://www.factcheck.org/UploadedFiles/birth_certificate_3.jpg Everyone must view all the research compiled at this site; http://nobarack08.wordpress.com/ Flashback from the Right Side of Life; Meet the only 2 people to ever "examine" Obama's SHORT-FORM COLB's. The two FactCheck.org employees who were granted access to Obama’s bogus Certification of Live Birth (COLB) are NOT document examiners or experts. Joe Miller has a Ph. D. in Political Philosophy — so he’s a political operative — while Jess Henig has an M.A. in English Literature — I’m not sure her dye-job is a political or esthetic statement.They are a couple of partisan Obots — just what you’d expect — Jess took the photos presented on their webpage and did all of the writing, while Bob basically held the COLB open for Jess to photograph — suitable work for a Ph. D.Those two are completely unqualified to perform any kind of forensic examination of any document, and FactCheck.org knows it — and so do Henig and Miller.FactCheck does say their, “representatives got a chance to spend some time with the ‘birth certificate,’ and we can attest to the fact that it is real and three-dimensional and resides at the Obama headquarters in Chicago.” In my mind, that clearly shows they were working with and for the Obama Campaign and that Obama and his people are involved in this lie. Much more HERE.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The idiots I have to put up with!
"So Patricia Decosta was issued a State of Hawaii Certificate of Live Birth in 1930?Pretty impressive considering they didn't become a state until 1959. "
People werre born in Hawaii before 1959. Didn't it occur to you that after 1959 the State of Hawaii would issue a COLB of that 1930 birth?
Please note that the person born in 1930 had a COLB printed on a form revised in November of 2001.
Geez! Obots are so stupid.
Think before you post. You will look less foolish tnat way.

5 comments:

George Hall said...

Hawaii wasn;t a state in 1930, how did they issue an official record in 1930?

Aristotle The Hun said...

Think! You are a college graduate. Think!

People were born in Hawaii before it became a state.

The birth happened in 1930. The COLB was issued after statehood.

Aristotle The Hun said...

Please note that the person born in 1930 had a COLB printed on a form revised in November of 2001.

Geez! Obots are so stupid.

MichaelN said...

Here's what it seems might have happened for Fukino to change her ambiguous & deliberately misleading statement from 'I have seen the vital records' to 'have personally seen and verified that the Hawaii State Department of Health has Sen. Obama’s original birth certificate on record"
Hawaiian Revised Statutes.

[§338-17.8] Certificates for children born out of State. (a) Upon application of an adult or the legal parents of a minor child, the director of health shall issue a birth certificate for such adult or minor, provided that proof has been submitted to the director of health that the legal parents of such individual while living without the Territory or State of Hawaii had declared the Territory or State of Hawaii as their legal residence for at least one year immediately preceding the birth or adoption of such child.

(b) Proof of legal residency shall be submitted to the director of health in any manner that the director shall deem appropriate. The director of health may also adopt any rules pursuant to chapter 91 that he or she may deem necessary or proper to prevent fraudulent applications for birth certificates and to require any further information or proof of events necessary for completion of a birth certificate.

(c) The fee for each application for registration shall be established by rule adopted pursuant to chapter 91. [L 1982, c 182, §1]

Yes I know it was enacted in 1982.

Consider that Obama was not issued a Hawaiian BC from day one, granny may have lodged her statement claiming home birth in Hawaii and it got filed, and subsequently a newspaper listing entry was generated.

So it was 'filed', but not 'approved', waiting some form of verification that quite possibly was not forth-coming.

Later down the track Obama finds a need to have some form of evidence of Hawaiian birth, so he gets issued the COLB still marked as 'filed' but still no 'approved', this suffices for the time being, hence Fukino's ambiguous first statement 'vital records' and NOT 'birth certificate' at THAT TIME.

With the presidential election looming, Obama goes to Hawaii and applies for a birth certificate to be issued under 338-17.8

All he needs to 'prove' is that 'that the legal parents' 'had declared the Territory or State of Hawaii as their legal residence for at least one year immediately preceding the birth or adoption of such child'.

So granny signs an affidavit attesting to Obama's parents' residency requirements & granny had CONNECTIONS from way back.

Granny as the astute banker, etc that she was, had a high degree of credibility & trustworthiness in Hawaii.

HDoH accepts granny's affidavit as 'good enough for me', so Obama gets his application in the system for issuance of a 'real' BC, hence Fukino came out with her follow-up statement where she could safely say 'birth certificate on file'

So the 'birth certificate' may have been issued on the sole affidavit of granny, and Obama may very well have been born 'out of state', and to a British subject to boot.

It is also highly possible that Obama refuses to produce this BC for scrutiny, because it will have notations revealing the basis of it's issue.

Sam Sewell said...

I don’t doubt that Dr. Fukino is accurately reporting that the document she saw says that AKA Obama was indeed born in Hawaii.

“Laws of the Territory of Hawaii ACT 96 To Provide For The Issuance Of Certificates Of Hawaiian Birth was in effect from 1911 until 1972 and allowed someone who was born outside the Hawaiian Islands to be registered as though he were born in Hawaii. Under that law, someone simply would have presented herself to the Hawaiian authorities and declared that the child was born in Hawaii. The person could have sworn under oath and presented witnesses and other evidence. If the authorities accepted it, that was the end of it. All a person had to do was file a false statement and Hawaii took them at their word.

One could not just say "My kid was born in Des Moines but I want him to have a Hawaiian birth record". But if you lied no investigation was conducted to validate your claim and the Hawaiian birth record was issued no questions asked.

Knowledge of this practice was wide spread and there are probably thousands of people who obtained Hawaiian birth records between 1911 and 1972 through the process of affidavits and witnesses rather than hospitals and delivery doctors not the least of these was the president of the first Chinese republic. Sun Yat-sen was born to a peasant family in the village of Cuiheng, China, but he had a Hawaiian birth certificate and was officially a citizen of the United States. The wording on Sun Yat-sen’s Hawaiian birth certificate reveals that at age 18 he “made application for a Certificate of Birth. And that it appears from his affidavit and the evidence submitted by witnesses that he was born in the Hawaiian Islands.” Appears? It also appears that AKA Obama was born in Hawaii. Does the AKA Obama birth certificate on file with the State of Hawaii have language similar to the birth certificate of SunYat-sen?

The only way to know where AKA OBAMA was actually born is to view AKA OBAMA's original birth certificate on file in Hawaii to see what kind of birth certificate it is, and to examine what corroborating evidence supports what it says about AKA OBAMA's alleged place of birth. If the birth was in a hospital, as AKA OBAMA has maintained, such evidence would be the name of the hospital and the name and signature of the doctor who delivered him.”

http://thesteadydrip.blogspot.com/2009/04/aka-obama-fans-all-together-now-say-omg.html