BREAKING NEWS ALERT - Pravda Publishes the "OMG" article

The more people who visit Pravda and comment on the article the better, so please spread this far and wide. I am contacting other foreign media.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Here is the Google Alert:


AKA Obama fans: All together now – say OMG!!
By Sam Sewell
Pravda

Did you know that there is a one million dollar reward offered for AKA OBAMA's Hawaiian birth certificate? Hawaiian officials have not validated AKA OBAMA's ...

See all stories on this topic
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Subject: RE: International Attention on the Eligibility Issue

Here is the first installment from Pravda USA


http://english.pravda.ru/opinion/feedback/16-09-2010/114949-obama_fans_OMG-0/


________________________________________


Subject: International Attention on the Eligibility Issue



Many of you will remember Pravda as the leading newspaper of the Soviet Union and an official organ of the Communist Party. Since the collapse of the USSR Pravda has become an independent world wide publication known for exposing the problems inside Russia and causing Russian leaders to be uncomfortable. They also cover political news from around the world.


This morning I received this note from the USA Editor of Pravda. The eligibility issue is finally going to get the international attention it needs.



Dear Sam,


Thank you very much for writing.


We are going to publish your article, but since it is a very lengthy one, it will appear on Pravda English in several parts. If the article proves to be successful, we will post it all the parts of it. The article will be signed as Sam Sewell, USA - please let me know if it's acceptable.


The first part will appear on the main page in Opinion section, please check back to see it and read people's comments.


Kind regards,


Dmitry Sudakov


Pravda.Ru English editor



• AKA Obama fans: All together now – say OMG!!

Opinion » Readers feedback

It isn't hard to imagine the gnawing anxiety that AKA OBAMA lives with, day in and day out. Much has been written about AKA OBAMA's behavior that reminds mental health experts and others of NPD (Narcissistic Personality Disorder.) A frequent manifestation of such a disorder is The Narcissist, as Liar and Con-man

The article to be published is the OMG article that many of you have already read:



Obama “I have nothing to hide but I’m hiding it.”
Or:

AKA Obama Fans: All together now – say OMG!!



by Aristotle the Hun

(AKA - Also Known As: an acronym used to describe suspicious persons who use more than one name)

The Cure for What's Wrong With America!

The words of 2 Chronicles 7:14

"If my people, Who are called by my Name,

Will humble themselves And pray,

And seek my face, and Turn from their Wicked ways,

Then will I hear from Heaven

And will forgive their Sin and will heal Their land."

Meet our family’s newest patriot!

Meet our family’s newest patriot!



After four years of paperwork, Luis, our daughter Annaliese’s husband, was sworn in as an American citizen this morning!


He now knows more about our history than most of us, and is proud to talk about HIS country, the USA!

AKA Obama - The Anti-American President

by Robert James Bidinotto
Conservative author Dinesh D’Souza recently published an insightful, much-discussed article in Forbes, “How Obama Thinks.”



Drawing upon Obama’s writings and history, D’Souza concludes that his policy agenda—so at odds with traditional American values and principles—is rooted chiefly in the anti-colonialist intellectual influence of his Kenyan-born father:

What then is Obama’s dream? We don’t have to speculate because the President tells us himself in his autobiography, Dreams from My Father. According to Obama, his dream is his father’s dream. . . .

[T]o his son, the elder Obama represented a great and noble cause, the cause of anticolonialism. . . . Anticolonialism is the doctrine that rich countries of the West got rich by invading, occupying and looting poor countries of Asia, Africa and South America . . . .

Obama Sr. was an economist, and in 1965 he published an important article in the East Africa Journal called “Problems Facing Our Socialism.” Obama Sr. . . saw state appropriation of wealth as a necessary means to achieve the anticolonial objective of taking resources away from the foreign looters and restoring them to the people of Africa . . . . As he put it, “We need to eliminate power structures that have been built through excessive accumulation so that not only a few individuals shall control a vast magnitude of resources as is the case now.” The senior Obama proposed that the state confiscate private land and raise taxes with no upper limit. In fact, he insisted that “theoretically there is nothing that can stop the government from taxing 100% of income so long as the people get benefits from the government commensurate with their income which is taxed.”

Like father, like son, says D’Souza:

It may seem incredible to suggest that the anticolonial ideology of Barack Obama Sr. is espoused by his son, the President of the United States. That is what I am saying. From a very young age and through his formative years, Obama learned to see America as a force for global domination and destruction. He came to view America’s military as an instrument of neocolonial occupation. He adopted his father’s position that capitalism and free markets are code words for economic plunder. Obama grew to perceive the rich as an oppressive class, a kind of neocolonial power within America. In his worldview, profits are a measure of how effectively you have ripped off the rest of society, and America’s power in the world is a measure of how selfishly it consumes the globe’s resources and how ruthlessly it bullies and dominates the rest of the planet.


D’Souza’s thesis certainly goes a long way toward defining a thread of consistency in the policies and priorities of this president. But “anticolonialism” is a heterogeneous package of economic, political, and—above all—moral ideas that deserves closer inspection.

It is clear that Barack Obama abhors the core founding principles of individual self-responsibility, personal self-realization, and constitutionally protected individual rights, upon which our historically exceptional nation was built. He shares with America’s adversaries the view that our individualist ethos and worldview is selfishly immoral.

Thus, the consistent thrust of his agenda, foreign and domestic, has been to humiliate America as an exceptional nation and to punish its exceptional achievers, by imposing the principle of coercive, egalitarian leveling on the American culture and economy.

Evidence for this objective can be found throughout his life, statements, and career. It is championed in the works of his intellectual mentors: his father, Edward Said, Frantz Fanon, Saul Alinsky; in his personal associations—including the endless procession of anti-American leftists (Wright, Ayers, Jarrett, Jones, et al.) who have pockmarked his life, career, and administration; in his soak-the-rich economic policies; in repeated, blunt declarations from his hand-picked officials, advisers, and spokesmen.

Obama seeks to tax and regulate into leveled oblivion the exceptional achievers in our midst (”spread the wealth around”); to transform formerly competitive, entrepreneurial industries—banks, financial services, medicine, insurance, automobiles, pharmaceuticals, sciences, etc.—into docile, tightly regulated, corporatist public utilities; to accelerate everyone’s dependency on government (e.g., ObamaCare); to undermine, through environmental laws, economic restrictions, and ubiquitous behavioral regulations, the means of individual private travel (the automobile), of individual self-defense (guns), and of individual financial self-sufficiency (independent wealth); to gut America’s ability to defend herself (unilateral military cutbacks, unguarded borders, enabling Islamic radicalism, affording legal rights to terrorists, etc.); to betray vital Western alliances (Britain, Israel); to stop America from operating unilaterally in its own interests (treaties to erode national sovereignty); and to bow—both symbolically and literally—before foreign tyrants.

Connecting these dots and others, we find that they form a vector that points toward an overarching, unifying objective: to humble, even humiliate, exceptional individuals and our exceptional nation, so that arrogant Americans no longer think of themselves and their nation as better than anyone or anyplace else. As Richard Lowry and Ramesh Ponnuru put it:

The president has signaled again and again his unease with traditional American patriotism. As a senator he notoriously made a virtue of not wearing a flag pin. As president he has been unusually detached from American history: When a foreign critic brought up the Bay of Pigs, rather than defend the country’s honor he noted that he was a toddler at the time. And while acknowledging that America has been a force for good, he has all but denied the idea that America is an exceptional nation. Asked whether he believed in American exceptionalism during a European trip last spring, Obama said, “I believe in American exceptionalism, just as I suspect that the Brits believe in British exceptionalism and the Greeks believe in Greek exception­alism.” (Is it just a coincidence that he reached for examples of former hegemons?) . . . .

Obama has frankly and correctly described [his] project as to change the country fundamentally. On those occasions when Obama places himself in the con­text of American history, he identifies himself with the post-Wil­sonian tradition—with, that is, the gradual replacement of the Founders’ design. He seeks to accelerate it.

Indeed. With the possible exception of Woodrow Wilson, Barack Obama is the only American president to truly despise, at the deepest philosophical level, what America uniquely stands for—which is why he stresses that he aims to be a “transformational president.” He has complained that the Framers of the Constitution failed to allow for “redistributive change.” Andrew C. McCarthy summarized Obama’s frustration with constitutional limits on government power:

As Obama sees it, the Warren Court failed to “break free from the essential constraints that were placed by the founding fathers in the Constitution.” The judges instead clung to the hoary construction of the Constitution as “a charter of negative liberties”—one that says only what government “can’t do to you.” For Obama, economic justice demands the positive case: what government “must do on your behalf” (emphasis added).

Fortunately, battered remnants of the United States Constitution still stand in the path of the anti-American president’s agenda of radical “change.” A clear majority in the polls fundamentally oppose the vision he would impose upon them. The president now faces a rising rebellion of millions of Americans, led by the Tea Party movement—a grassroots revolt that he and his media lapdogs have struggled, desperately but unsuccessfully, to defeat.

Barack Obama’s inherited dreams of transforming America from history’s individualist exception into a humbled, ordinary, unexceptional socialist state still remain unrealized. His campaign to vandalize the American legacy can yet be reversed—but only if we retain the will and acquire the intellectual clarity to make our voices heard and our votes counted.

God Bless Pam Geller - Complete coverage on the massive 911 Rally

America Speaks! Historic 911 Rally Draws 40,000



The media pretends these people don't exist. It's criminal.
We will be heard.
 
http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2010/09/historic-911-rally-draws-40000.html

Islam - be sure to read

Islam - be sure to read






This is long, but interesting, if you don’t have time to read the whole thing, go down to the BOLD part at the end and read that. This is already in place in our country, and just a tad scary.







This is a little long but it needs to be read and sent on!





Adapted from Dr. Peter Hammond's book:





Slavery, Terrorism and Islam: The Historical Roots and Contemporary Threat



Islam is not a religion, nor is it a cult. In its fullest form, it is a complete, total,

100% system of life.



Islam has religious, legal, political, economic, social, and military components.

The religious component is a beard for all of the other components.



Islamization begins when there are sufficient Muslims in a country to agitate

for their religious privileges.



When politically correct, tolerant, and culturally diverse societies agree to Muslim

demands for their religious privileges, some of the other components tend to creep

in as well.



Here's how it works:



As long as the Muslim population remains around or under 2% in any given

country, they will be for the most part be regarded as a peace-loving minority,

and not as a threat to other citizens. This is the case in:



United States -- Muslim 0.6%

Australia -- Muslim 1.5%

Canada -- Muslim 1.9%

China -- Muslim 1.8%

Italy -- Muslim 1.5%

Norway -- Muslim 1.8%



At 2% to 5%, they begin to proselytize from other ethnic minorities and

disaffected groups, often with major recruiting from the jails and among

street gangs. This is happening in:



Denmark -- Muslim 2%

Germany -- Muslim 3.7%

United Kingdom -- Muslim 2.7%

Spain -- Muslim 4%

Thailand -- Muslim 4.6%



> From 5% on, they exercise an inordinate influence in proportion to their

percentage of the population. For example, they will push for the

introduction of halal (clean by Islamic standards) food, thereby securing

food preparation jobs for Muslims. They will increase pressure on

supermarket chains to feature halal on their shelves -- along with threats

for failure to comply. This is occurring in:



France -- Muslim 8%

Philippines -- 5%

Sweden -- Muslim 5%

Switzerland -- Muslim 4.3%

The Netherlands -- Muslim 5.5%

Trinidad& Tobago -- Muslim 5.8%



At this point, they will work to get the ruling government to allow them

to rule themselves (within their ghettos) under Sharia, the Islamic Law.

The ultimate goal of Islamists is to establish Sharia law over the entire

world.



When Muslims approach 10% of the population, they tend to increase

lawlessness as a means of complaint about their conditions. In Paris , we

are already seeing car-burnings. Any non-Muslim action offends Islam and

results in uprisings and threats, such as in Amsterdam , with opposition

to Mohammed cartoons and films about Islam. Such tensions are seen

daily, particularly in Muslim sections in:



Guyana -- Muslim 10%

India -- Muslim 13.4%

Israel -- Muslim 16%

Kenya -- Muslim 10%

Russia -- Muslim 15%



After reaching 20%, nations can expect hair-trigger rioting, jihad militia

formations, sporadic killings, and the burnings of Christian churches and

Jewish synagogues, such as in:



Ethiopia -- Muslim 32.8%



At 40%, nations experience widespread massacres, chronic terror attacks,

and ongoing militia warfare, such as in:



Bosnia -- Muslim 40%

Chad -- Muslim 53.1%

Lebanon -- Muslim 59.7%



> From 60%, nations experience unfettered persecution of non-believers of

all other religions (including non-conforming Muslims), sporadic ethnic

cleansing (genocide), use of Sharia Law as a weapon, and Jizya, the tax

placed on infidels, such as in:



Albania -- Muslim 70%

Malaysia -- Muslim 60.4%

Qatar -- Muslim 77.5%

Sudan -- Muslim 70%



After 80%, expect daily intimidation and violent jihad, some State-run

ethnic cleansing, and even some genocide, as these nations drive out the

infidels, and move toward 100% Muslim, such as has been experienced

and in some ways is on-going in:



Bangladesh -- Muslim 83%

Egypt -- Muslim 90%

Gaza -- Muslim 98.7%

Indonesia -- Muslim 86.1%

Iran -- Muslim 98%

Iraq -- Muslim 97%

Jordan -- Muslim 92%

Morocco -- Muslim 98.7%

Pakistan -- Muslim 97%

Palestine -- Muslim 99%

Syria -- Muslim 90%

Tajikistan -- Muslim 90%

Turkey -- Muslim 99.8%

United Arab Emirates -- Muslim 96%



100% will usher in the peace of 'Dar-es-Salaam' -- the Islamic House of

Peace. Here there's supposed to be peace, because everybody is a Muslim,

the Madrasses are the only schools, and the Koran is the only word, such

as in:



Afghanistan -- Muslim 100%

Saudi Arabia -- Muslim 100%

Somalia -- Muslim 100%

Yemen -- Muslim 100%



Unfortunately, peace is never achieved, as in these 100% states the most

radical Muslims intimidate and spew hatred, and satisfy their blood lust

by killing less radical Muslims, for a variety of reasons.



'Before I was nine, I had learned the basic canon of Arab life. It was me

against my brother; me and my brother against our father; my family

against my cousins and the clan; the clan against the tribe; the tribe

against the world, and all of us against the infidel. -- Leon Uris, 'The

Haj'



It is important to understand that in some countries, with well under

100% Muslim populations, such as France, the minority Muslim populations

live in ghettos, within which they are 100% Muslim, and within which

they live by Sharia Law. The national police do not even enter these

ghettos. There are no national courts, nor schools, nor non-Muslim

religious facilities. In such situations, Muslims do not integrate into

the community at large. The children attend madrasses. They learn only

the Koran. To even associate with an infidel is a crime punishable with

death. Therefore, in some areas of certain nations, Muslim Imams and

extremists exercise more power than the national average would indicate.



Today's 1.5 billion Muslims make up 22% of the world's population. But

their birth rates dwarf the birth rates of Christians, Hindus, Buddhists,

Jews, and all other believers. Muslims will exceed 50% of the world's

population by the end of this century.



Well, boys and girls, today we are letting the fox guard the henhouse.

The wolves will be herding the sheep!



Obama appoints two devout Muslims to Homeland Security posts.

Doesn't this make you feel safer already?



Obama and Janet Napolitano appoint Arif Alikhan, a devout Muslim,

as Assistant Secretary for Policy Development.



DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano swore in Kareem Shora, a devout

Muslim who was born in Damascus, Syria, as ADC National Executive

Director as a member of the Homeland Security Advisory Council (HSAC).



NOTE: Has anyone ever heard a new government official being identified

as a devout Catholic, a devout Jew or a devout Protestant...? Just

wondering.



Devout Muslims being appointed to critical Homeland Security positions?

Doesn't this make you feel safer already??



That should make the US ' homeland much safer, huh!! Was it not

"Devout Muslim men" that flew planes into U.S. buildings 8 years ago?



Was it not a Devout Muslim who killed 13 at Fort Hood ?



Also: This is very interesting and we all need to read it from start to

finish. Maybe this is why our American Muslims are so quiet and not

speaking out about any atrocities. Can a good Muslim be a good American?

This question was forwarded to a friend who worked in Saudi Arabia for

20 years. The following is his reply:



Theologically -- no . . . Because his allegiance is to Allah, The moon God

of Arabia

Religiously – no… Because no other religion is accepted by His Allah

except Islam (Quran, 2:256)(Koran)

Scripturally - no… Because his allegiance is to the five Pillars of Islam

and the Quran.

Geographically – no… Because his allegiance is to Mecca , to which he

turns in prayer five times a day.

Socially - no… Because his allegiance to Islam forbids him to make friends

with Christians or Jews..

Politically - no…Because he must submit to the mullahs (spiritual leaders),

who teach annihilation of Israel and destruction of America , the great Satan.

Domestically - no… Because he is instructed to marry four Women and beat

and scourge his wife when she disobeys him (Quran 4:34)

Intellectually - no… Because he cannot accept the American Constitution

since it is based on Biblical principles and he believes the Bible to be

corrupt.

Philosophically - no… Because Islam, Muhammad, and the Quran do not

allow freedom of religion and expression.. Democracy and Islam cannot

co-exist. Every Muslim government is either dictatorial or autocratic.

Spiritually - no… Because when we declare 'one nation under God,' the

Christian's God is loving and kind, while Allah is NEVER referred to

as Heavenly father, nor is he ever called love in The Quran's 99 excellent names.



Therefore, after much study and deliberation...perhaps we should be very

suspicious of ALL MUSLIMS in this country. -- They obviously cannot

be both 'good' Muslims and good Americans.



Call it what you wish, it's still the truth. You had better believe it. The more

who understand this, the better it will be for our country and our future. The

religious war is bigger than we know or understand.



Can a muslim be a good soldier??? Army Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan, opened

fire at Ft. Hood and Killed 13. He is a good Muslim!!!



Footnote: The Muslims have said they will destroy us from within.

SO FREEDOM IS NOT FREE.



THE MARINES WANT THIS TO ROLL ALL OVER THE U.S.

From my friend, Ali - Hail to Pastor Terry Jones

http://www.faithfreedom.org/articles/op-ed/hail-to-pastor-terry-jones/

Hail to Pastor Terry Jones


Although the Florida Pastor Terry Jones who said he would burn the Quran on the anniversary of 9/11 has been maligned by many, including the conservatives and those who ought to know better, he is indeed a hero. What he has done is absolutely phenomenal, for which he should be hailed and praised.



Pastor Jones has once again highlighted that ordianry Muslims would not hesitate to kill innocent people.



Musri, the president of the Islamic Society of Central Florida that met with Jones and promised to move the Ground Zero Cordoba House to a different location, if the Pasto agreed to not burn the Quran, said to the reporters, ”We are committed to dissolving the situation here and there. I want to thank Pastor Jones for his courage and his willingness to take these serious events that are unfolding, to take into consideration the safety of our troops across the world, the safety of all Americans, traveling or doing business abroad, and to also consider the safety of all people, and to step back from his position and to be in line with Scripture to love your neighbor as yourself.”



This is a clear admission that Muslims would kill innocent people if they feel their religion is insulted. Would the followers of any other religion do such thing?



Right after 9/11 many Americans went out of their way to protect Muslims living in America fearing someone may want to take revenge on them. On the other hand Muslims burn churches; they kill nuns and priests and ordinary Christians in Turkey, Nigeria, Pakistan, and all over the world and no one thinks of retaliating against other Muslims. Only Muslims are capable of such thing. Doesn’t this tell us about what kind of people Muslims are?



Another victory is that this episode has brought to the public attention the evilness of the Quran. This book is full of violent passages and evil teachings. Mein Kamph in comparison to the Quran is a benign. This episode has brought the discussion of Islam to the forefront. It once again has reminded the world that Islam is not compatible with anything decent or civilized. Islam is of the Devil, as Jones has correctly named his book. The only way to discredit the Quran is to discuss it publicly. And here is our chance.



Another thing the world leaned about this episode is that Muslims cannot be trusted, that their words, their promises, handshakes and treaties mean nothing.



Imam Musri met with Pastor Jones and engaging in the Islamic institution of taqiyah deceived him. Jones has said he came away from the meeting with Musri on Thursday with the understanding that the mosque would be moved if he canceled the Quran-burning, with witnesses present. But Musri told the Orlando Sentinel on Friday that promise was never made.



Highlighting these to the world is of utmost importance. Deceiving the unbelievers is part of the Islamic faith. Muslims are engaged in jihad to spread their faith. Jihad has two dimensions: terror and deception. These two are integral parts of Jihad. Muhammad said, war is deception and victory is through terror.



This episode brought to the public attention the knowledge that ordinary Muslims are murderers, that they are untrustworthy and deceitful and that their holy book is a manual of terror and violence.



This is a major victory for those of us in the forefront of the fight against Islamimzation of the world. Islam cannot be demolished through warfare, but it can be through debate. Ignorance is darkness. We cannot destroy darkness with the sword. Darkness will vanquish with light. Knowledge is light and Pastor Jones should be hailed for bringing the subject of Islam to the forefront. Now people all over the world are debating. The subject of debate must be the content of the Quran. The question is not whether it should be burned or not, but whether such a book has any place in a civilized world.



We need debates like this. We need to discuss the fact that Muslims will not shy murdering innocent people at a drop of a hat. Who else but a Muslim would murder and innocent person because someone else does something that he interprets as insulting?



Islamic savagery, Islamic deception, and the violet teachings of the Quran have been highlighted once again. Jones has to be lauded for that. He also has to be praised for not burning the Quran. Burning the Quran would have put in danger the lives of many people. The Quran should not be burned. It should be studied and debated. We must ask Muslims to explain their holy book and passages such as these.



3:151: We will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve,



8:12: I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve. Therefore strike off their heads and strike off every fingertip of them.



2:191: And slay them wherever ye catch them



2:193: And fight them on until there is no more fitnah (opposition, discord, sedition)



2:216: Fighting is prescribed for you, and ye dislike it. But it is possible that ye dislike a thing which is good for you?



3:28: Let not the believers take for friends or helpers Unbelievers rather than believers: if any do that, in nothing will there be help from Allah.



The above is only a token. Muslims will not integrate into our societies. They will never accept our way of life or become our friends as long as they hold these verses sacred.



Jones did two very right things. He talked about burning the Quran, which generated this discussion, but he did not do it and hence he put no one’s life in peril. Of course his own life is very much in danger now. He can be killed so others take a lesson and dare not to insult Isalm. I pray for his safety.



Nonetheless, this is major victory for those of us in the fight against Islam. It is deplorable that those who claim to defend democracy and freedom have failed to see it and instead have chosen to berate Jones.