Sunday, February 13, 2011

Multicultural SuicidePosted by Alan Caruba on February 13, 2011 at 11:29am

Multicultural Suicide

By Alan Caruba

In his famed poem, Mending Wall, the American poet, Robert Frost chided the rock wall that he and his neighbor would mend each spring, replacing fallen rocks. “He is all pine and I am apple orchard. My apple trees will never get across and eat the cones under his pines, I tell him. He only says, ‘Good fences make good neighbors.’

You can see the Great Wall of China from outer space. It is an astonishing piece of work

Begun in the fifth century B.C. and added to by later dynasties, it succeeded in defending China from invasions by northern tribes. In 1600, it helped the Ming dynasty defend against the Manchu, but when the gates at Shanhaiguan were opened in 1644 by a dissident Ming border general, the Manchus quickly seized Beijing and that was the end of the Ming dynasty.

There has been a growing call for a wall on the U.S. southern border with Mexico. Given the way Mexico has fallen into a state of barbaric anarchy by warring narcotics gangs, including increasing murders of Americans foolish enough to go there, it is a very good idea.

There are currently an estimated twelve million Mexicans and “other” illegal aliens residing in the United States, enjoying many benefits. Instead of aggressively dealing with the problem, the government under several administrations and the current one has opted to offer “amnesty” and grant them a citizenship they have not earned and do not deserve in the context of our laws.

The only thing these amnesties managed to accomplish was to encourage more millions of illegal aliens to cross our borders, to stay on beyond their visas, and to otherwise flout our immigration laws. They are not “undocumented”. They are criminals.

Naturally, when British Prime Minister David Cameron and French President Nicolas Sarkozy recently gave speeches or expressed their opposition to “multiculturalism”, it made news when it turned out they were appalled by the failure of this idiotic concept. Germany’s Chancellor, Angela Merkel, had already expressed that opinion.

There was a time when someone was proudly British, French or German. Today, their distinctive cultures are being hollowed out by waves of immigrants who have no desire to assimilate or adopt the values of their new homelands.

All of which raises the question of why, here in America, you have to “press one” to conduct a conversation in English, Islamic foot baths have been installed in the Kansas City airport, why ‘Islamic immersion’ classes have been inflicted on children in a California school district, there was a demand an Arabic public school in New York and a mosque within sight of Ground Zero, and why government documents are often printed in foreign languages.

The victory over Europe that the Muslims could not achieve by invasion and which ended with the defeat of a Muslim army outside of Vienna on September 11, 1683, has been achieved by a constant flow of immigrants from the Middle East and northern Africa as Europe opened its doors because their indigenous populations failed to reproduce in enough numbers to maintain their economies.

It is a principle of demographics that, as a nation becomes more prosperous its population tends to replace itself more slowly. Birthrates in America across the racial spectrum are in decline, reflecting those in Europe By contrast, places like China and India are where you find a billion or more people.

In 2008 Los Angeles County, population 10.2 million, was where 42% of workers were paid cash and did not pay taxes; 90% of warrants for murder in Los Angeles were for illegal aliens; more than two-thirds of all births were to illegal aliens; nearly 40% of all inmates in California were Mexican nationals who were there illegally; and, nationally, while less than 2% of illegal aliens were picking crops, 37% were on welfare.

These and a mountain of other statistics testify to the failure of the American government to enforce its immigration laws and deter an army of illegal immigrants from invading the nation.

The argument will be raised that America is “a nation of immigrants”, but that was then and this is now. The earlier flow of immigrants from Ireland, Scotland, Italy, Germany and Russia were needed in the 1800s to provide workers for the nation’s industrial base and as farmers for its expanding land mass. And they were white and Christian.

The importation of Afro-Americans as slaves, starting early in America’s history, led to the Civil War, followed by the horrid “Jim Crow” era until the Civil Rights movement in the 1960s. These days they are minority population smaller than Hispanics and, thanks to a variety of liberal welfare programs, are too often a dysfunctional element of American society.

There is an unrelenting tyranny to demographics; the statistical study of migrations and birth rates of peoples throughout the world. Unless Europe and America address it, putting the breaks on further immigration, they are at risk of falling prey to it and failing as a result of it.

England, France and Germany’s leaders have finally begun to speak out about and against it. It may be too late. America refuses to even acknowledge it.

© Alan Caruba, 2011

Why are Republicans not playing the "Birther Card" - American Thinker

The Birther Card

By Cindy Simpson
Hawaii's new governor, Neil Abercrombie, stirred the "birther" pot just before Christmas when he promised to launch an expedition for Obama's long form birth certificate. Chris Matthews reported on the Abercrombie quest, and though calling himself an "enemy of the birthers," surprised us by acknowledging that the advertised short form is indeed a different document than an actual long form certificate and that it should be released.  Matthews' guests on the segment agreed, noting once it was out they could "make even more fun of the birthers." 

But less than a month later, when it was Abercrombie's turn to produce the long form, he turned up empty-handed, and instead offered some ambiguous lines about something "written down" that "actually exists."

Enter a new player to the game: journalist friend of Abercrombie, Mike Evans, on the radio a few days later touting "There is no Barack Obama birth certificate in Hawaii -- absolutely no proof at all that he was born in Hawaii." Evans backtracked after the story went national, saying he "misspoke" and had not conversed personally with Abercrombie, and that this error occurred in only one of the 34 interviews he had done that morning.  Further research, however, found that Evans repeated his misstatement more than once and "appeared to be reading from a script and ad-libbing around it as he read."

In the American Thinker article, "The Birther Trial Balloon," it was speculated that perhaps this entire performance was a sort of media test run to see how the public would react to the non-release of the certificate in advance of Obama's run for 2012 reelection.  Writer Andrew Walden, in the AT article, "Hawaii's Governor Manipulates Birthers," concluded that the spectacle was indeed a production, choreographed however for a different result: "to shift political discussion away from the thumping Obama took in the November midterms" by further ridiculing "birtherism."

Really, though, the debacle did seem more like an episode of The Three Stooges, especially with the timing of one little tidbit reported by CBS News a couple of days later -- that Abercrombie's new Health Director (responsible for the state's vital records) "abruptly quit."  So, until that position is filled, the buck of maintaining Obama's birth certificate has stopped at Abercrombie's desk.  (We can only speculate why, if the former Governor Linda Lingle asked the previous Health Director, Chiyome Fukino, to "go personally view the birth certificate in the birth records of the Department of Health," couldn't Abercrombie authorize himself to do likewise.)

At any rate, it appeared the chips were down for the "birther enemies," so when it was back around the table last week for Chris Matthews' turn, he admitted that Obama has the "new kind" of birth certificate "which is this digital thing printed out" and apparently no long form. (Leaving the rest of us to wonder exactly what this newfangled one was the short version of.) And anyway, according to Matthews, people only ask to see the old-fashioned kind and put Obama under "this kind of assault" because...

Obama has a funny name, and he is black.

Matthews resorted to playing the trump from his standard liberal repertoire -- the race card, and swooped up all the chips while implying that the birthers aren't playing with a full deck and all their fuss is a bunch of "malarkey."

But Matthews isn't the only pundit playing this type of game -- conservative talkers have politely turned a blind eye to the birther story, and instead of dealing us any real investigating or reporting, play silently along and slap the hands of the birthers clamoring for a spot at the table. Birthers, unperturbed with all the eye-rolling and name-calling, stubbornly continue to interrupt the game anyway, and are not, as Matthews lamented, "shamed into non-existence."

Conservative politicians have all been good sports, too, beginning with John McCain, who produced his long-form certificate back in the 2008 race.  McCain was deemed qualified as a "natural born citizen" by Senate Resolution 511 (co-sponsored by Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama), but then meekly folded without a call for Obama to reciprocate.

In his article, "Obama's Republican Guard," Jack Cashill opines that the lack of Republican political response on the birther controversy is due to a conservative media "gone soft," who "instead content themselves with commenting on the news that the mainstream media create."

Cashill didn't allude to racist accusations as a cause for the conservative avoidance of the "birther" issue, but the results of a quick Google search using the terms "birther" with "racism" reveal that the race card is indeed a large part of the story.  The mainstream media leads with that card often, and conservatives' failure to call them out on it comes off as complicity in a game of political correctness, and weakness instead of colorblind sportsmanship. Americans are then unfairly dealt a censored reporting of a serious constitutional issue.

John Boehner, when pressed on the eligibility issue said:  "The state of Hawaii has said that President Obama was born there. That's good enough for me." That's not good enough, though, for a growing swath of the population, unwilling to give these leaders the excuse of a media gone soft, whatever the motivation of that softness. According to World Net Daily, "10 of the United States -- controlling 107 Electoral College votes -- are now considering some type of legislation" that requires presidential candidates to provide proof of constitutional eligibility.

Two of the states' proposed bills contain additional eligibility requirements that trump a long-form birth certificate, even a pricey $100 souvenir version crafted by Hawaii lawmakers.  The Arizona bill requires: "A sworn statement attesting that the candidate has not held dual or multiple citizenship and that the candidate's allegiance is solely to the United States of America."  The Nebraska bill further requires that the candidate attest to three conditions on the day of his birth:  he was subject only to the jurisdiction of the U.S., owed allegiance to no other country, and that both his mother and father were U.S. citizens.

Dual citizenship, a divided allegiance that experts contend the Constitution's framers sought to avoid for the Presidency, is a status created when the country of a child's birth (documented by a birth certificate) and the country of citizenship of the parents are in conflict. Obviously the Arizona and Nebraska legislators concerned themselves with crafting laws supporting the Constitution's finer points of eligibility rather than the sensational search for the missing long form.

Unless Obama pulls out a certificate listing a birth father other than the one Abercrombie remembers seeing him with as a child, or reneges on the assertion on his "Fight the Smears" campaign website that he had, until age 23, foreign citizenship from his Kenyan father, he won't qualify for the ballots in these two states.

So far, the media has focused only on the requirement for the long form and fretted over its assorted details, but once they catch on to these other provisions, the ensuing stir will no doubt require a play of both the racist and xenophobia cards, just as we've seen in the recent immigration reform debate.

Voters are successfully getting the message to their state legislatures:  They need more information to "come to the conclusion of [Obama's] citizenship" than just seeing or hearing the President (Wouldn't we love to ask Robert Gibbs exactly what he meant by "seeing.").

As we near the 2012 elections, the powerful in conservative circles must acknowledge the birther controversy if for no other reason than the political risk of alienating this substantial percentage of voters with doubts as to Obama's constitutional eligibility.

In the American Thinker article, "The Race Game and Obama's Campaign for 2012," Jack Kerwick noted that "race promises to play at least as large a role in the next election as it played in the last presidential race.  Rest assured: it is on this that Barack Obama and his cronies are counting."  Kerwick rightly concludes: "If the GOP wants to prevail in the election of 2012, it is imperative that they muster the will to reckon with its racial subtext."

The GOP must also muster the will to reckon with the mainstream media.  Instead of constantly playing defense by allowing liberals to initiate and control the conversation, Republicans must begin to lead a rational discourse. They do not need to follow suit when the media or Obama and his team attempt to link questions of constitutionality with lack of civility or racism.

Conservatives cannot continue to sidestep the role of race in both its response to the eligibility dilemma and in the upcoming elections. Liberals have shown they aren't reluctant to play the race card in any game.

Page Printed from: http://www.americanthinker.com/2011/02/the_birther_card.html

Saturday, February 12, 2011

Obama's half sister Maya Soetoro, born in Jakarta indonesia, HAS A HAWAII CERTIFICATE OF BIRTH !!

Research help, Please

Besides being the First Sister Maya has a HawaiiaCertification of Live Birth despite be born in Jakarta Indonesia. Supposedly this certificate was used by the Daily Kos to forge an Obama version. Anyone find it odd that Maya, undisputedly born in Indonesia, would have the same type of document as Barack Obama


Did you know? Obama's half sister, born in Indonesia, has a Hawaiian Certification of Live Birth - Orlando Orange County Conservative
 
UPDATE: Found this but would still like a better source and proof that she has a Hawaiian COLB:
I would really like an image of the Hawaiian COLB in Maya's name.

Maya Kassandra Soetoro Obama’s half sister who was born in Indonesia and her birth was later registered in Hawaii. And maybe Obama was born in Kenya and his birth was later registered in Hawaii. Hawaiian law allowed such a practice and Obama and Maya's mother probably knew about this loop hole for giving American citizenship to her children.
The practice of forgein born people obtaining Hawaiian COLB is well established. I want to attribute the practice to Obama's mother specifically. All of the articles about Maya's COLB are about how it was used to make the forged copy of the COLB Obama posted on his "smear" website. I have never seen a copy of Maya's COLB or even proof that it exists. That is what I am looking for.
Also see : Obama one of many foreign born with Hawaiian COLB
http://thesteadydrip.blogspot.com/2008/12/obama-one-of-many-foreign-born-with.html


I found the comment below on this blog: http://restoretheconstitutionalrepublic.org/index.php?topic=2027.msg8075#msg8075


Maya has a Hawaiian COLB even though she was born in Jakarta. I wonder if she has a social security number? Has anyone done any research on her? I wonder if she's naturalized..
Also, this on Maya's personal page: http://www.whosdatedwho.com/celebrities/people/dating/maya-soetoro-ng.htm
This is important information. If it can be nailed down from another source (hopefully more official) that Maya has a the same type of Hawaiian Certificate of Live Birth as Obama even though she was born in Indonesia it proves that the COLB posted by Obama reveals nothing about where he was actually born.
http://beforeitsnews.com/story/411/054/Video:_Barack_Hussein_Obamas_BIRTH_is_NOT_Registered_in_Honolulu,_Hawaii_by_Online_Search_Evidence;_Maya_Soetoros_birth_IS....html

Thursday, February 10, 2011

Florida Governor Rick Scott Issues Proclamation in Support of Marriage

Florida Governor Rick Scott Issues Proclamation in Support of Marriage

Encourages citizens, churches, businesses, organizations

and community leaders to strengthen marriage



“We are thrilled to see Florida recognizing the importance of marriage to the men, women and children of our great state,” said John Stemberger, president of Florida Family Council who also serves as Chairman of the statewide Strong Marriages Florida Coalition. “Governor Rick Scott’s National Marriage Week Proclamation is a strong statement about how the governor views marriage and its importance to the economic well being of this state and to its people.”



National Marriage Week USA, which takes place February 7-14, 2011, is part of an international effort that is beginning to gain momentum around the country as more and more people realize how crucial healthy marriages are to society. Florida joins other states as well as other Foreign Countries to recognize and promote marriage as a great social and public good for individuals and communities.

Governor Scott’s proclamation states, in part, “…A healthy, loving marriage deserves our special respect because it provides irreplaceable personal happiness and creates the safest place for children to flourish and to enjoy the full emotional, moral, educational and financial benefits of both parents…”

The benefits of marriage are legion Social science research has repeatedly shown that married moms and dads raising their children together is the best possible environment for children’s safety and positive physical, mental and emotional development. Married men and women appear to be the greatest wealth-producing entity we have. Marriage benefits minorities economically and reduces the likelihood that women and children will experience poverty.



“The Governor’s proclamation sets Florida apart as a national leader in recognition of marriage as a great good for men, women and children,” said John Stemberger, “In our work with churches and communities around Florida, we champion marriage as the one institution within our society that consistently provides men, women and children with a better life. It builds strong communities and churches. And it is at the core of the basic economic unit of the family.”

“As Governor Scott recognizes in his proclamation,” said Stemberger, “the breakdown of marriage takes a great emotional, physical and financial toll on the well-being of the family. There’s no denying that family breakdown takes a great toll on the financial well-being of the state, as well. Florida taxpayers spend 1.9 billion dollars a year on the costs of family fragmentation as a result of divorce and unwed child bearing. That Florida’s governor recognizes the foundational role marriages plays in our society and economy gives us great hope for his agenda to rebuild Florida’s economy.”

To find out more about National Marriage Week visit http://www.nationalmarriageweekusa.org/. Click HERE
http://flfamily.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/SKMBT_C35311020813150.pdf
to read Governor Rick Scott’s National Marriage Week Proclamation.

Going after VETS concealed Carry Permits

From my brother-in-law:

Redstone is in Huntsville Alabama.
Anyway, It is good to know but there must be a better way...
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
can this be true??


This is interesting. After reading it, I asked if they had noticed that recently we
are always asked these questions when we go to the military health clinic
at Redstone.

Doesn't matter how often we go we are always asked these questions and about
drinking habits. I tell them they just asked those same questions the week before.


Subject: Concealed Carry and OBAMA


From a Vietnam Vet and retired Police Officer:

I had a doctors appointment at the local VA clinic yesterday and found
out something very interesting that I would like to pass along. While
going through triage before seeing the doctor, I was asked at the end of
the exam, three questions:

1. Did I feel stressed?
2. Did I feel threatened?
3. Did I feel like doing harm to anyone?

The nurse then informed me, that if I had answered yes to any of
the questions, I would have lost my concealed carry permit as it would
have gone into my medical records and the VA would have reported it to
Homeland Security.

Looks like they are going after the vets first.

Other gun people, like retired law enforcement, will probably be next.

Then, when they go after the civilians, what argument will they have?
Be forewarned and be aware.

The Obama administration has gone on record as considering veterans
and gun owners potential terrorists.

Whether you are a gun owning veteran or not, you've been warned. If
you know veterans and gun owners, please pass this on to them.

Be very cautious about what you say and to whom you say it.

INTEGRITY:

INTEGRITY: The highest courage is to dare to be ourself in the face of adversity. Choosing ethics over convenience and truth over popularity means there is never a wrong time to do the right thing.

Wednesday, February 9, 2011

Inhofe tells EPA administrator global warming is a 'hoax'...

Inhofe, EPA administrator tackle greenhouse gas regulation

By JIM MYERS World Washington Bureau
Published: 2/9/2011 4:37 PM
Last Modified: 2/9/2011 4:37 PM

WASHINGTON — U.S. Sen. Jim Inhofe on Wednesday not only stood by his famous hoax declaration on global warming, but the Oklahoma Republican somewhat reluctantly tipped his hand on plans to publish a book.

“I won’t tell you what it’s about, but the name of the book is ‘The Hoax,’?” he said during testimony before a House subcommittee.

“I did finish it last week.’’

Inhofe was the lead-off witness at a somewhat contentious and lengthy hearing on a proposal that he and Rep. Fred Upton, R-Mich., chairman of the House Committee on Energy and Commerce, are pushing essentially to kill the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s ability to regulate greenhouse gases.

EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson, the other major attraction at the hearing, testified after Inhofe.

Different sides were drawn years ago on the long-running debate over climate change, its causes and what governments should do or not do to address the issue.

Wednesday’s hearing at the Subcommittee on Energy and Power followed that script.

That included lengthy statements from members of the panel with limited time for witnesses to respond.

Inhofe and House Republicans on the subcommittee focused on what they consider the enormous costs of EPA’s efforts to regulate greenhouse emissions, the jobs that could be lost and the questions that, in their view, continue to surround climate change science.

Science is mixed, Inhofe said, but the economic impact is not.

“In other words, all pain for no climate gain,’’ he said in prepared remarks that he ignored so he could “ramble’’ through his testimony.

Even if one assumes the predictions of more droughts, floods, intense storms and cases of disease are true, Inhofe said, EPA’s expected regulations will not affect that.

Jackson and Democrats on the panel argued the debate over science is over, a consensus by the nation’s leading researches that climate change is occurring and why has been reached, and the U.S. economy can continue to grow while addressing the issue.

Rep. Henry Waxman, D-Calif., the full committee’s ranking member, said the underlying premise of the proposal is that climate change is a hoax, citing Inhofe’s long-held view.

Jackson also urged lawmakers to think of their own role.

“Politicians overruling scientists on a scientific question, that would become part of this committee’s legacy,’’ she said.

Read more from this Tulsa World article at http://www.tulsaworld.com/news/article.aspx?subjectid=13&articleid=20110209_13_0_WASHIN967578