The Peril of
Politicized Antisemitism
Breaking Israel News
Latest News Biblical Perspective
By Caroline Glick June 28, 2018 , 9:00 am
A Google search of the terms “Trump Nazi,” brings up
70,900,000 results.
There are a number of distressing aspects to this state
of affairs. First and foremost, it is pure libel to call US President Donald
Trump a Nazi.
His daughter Ivanka is Jewish. His daughter-in-law is
Jewish. Half his grandchildren are Jewish and his non-Jewish ex-daughter-in-law
is half Jewish. How many Nazis have Hanukka celebrations in their homes
starring their Jewish grandchildren?
Beyond his Jewish immediate family, Trump has shown
extraordinary friendship to the Jewish state. It isn’t simply that Trump kept
the promise none if his predecessors kept and moved the US Embassy to
Jerusalem, although that would have sufficed to prove his friendship.
Trump shows his friendship and respect for Israel every
single day.
Last week he agreed to sell Israel mid-air refueling
planes. His predecessor, Barack Obama, refused to sell Israel the aircraft in
order to protect Iran’s nuclear sites from Israeli air strikes. Trump agreed to
sell them to enable such Israeli strikes in the event they become necessary.
This week, Trump approved UN Ambassador Nikki Haley and
Secretary of State Mike Pompeo’s determination that the US should withdraw from
the institutionally antisemitic UN Human Rights Council. The Obama
administration joined the council claiming it would use its membership to
influence the council for the better and proceeded to legitimize council’s
anti-Jewish witch hunt for eight years.
The people of Israel recognize Trump’s friendship. Nearly
80% of Israelis view him as a friend. So what explains the 70,900,000 results
to the “Trump Nazi” Google search?
One answer came this week with the media outcry over the
US government policy of separating illegal immigrant minors from their illegal
immigrant parents.
The policy is cruel. Indeed, recognizing its cruelty,
Trump signed an executive order banning the practice. But the policy isn’t new.
This was the Obama administration’s policy following a court order prohibiting
children from joining their parents in detention.
Rather than soberly acknowledge that law enforcement,
including immigration law is often a cruel business and recognize that to
remain a state of laws sometimes authorities undertake difficult and harsh
actions, the anti-Trump media ignored reality and went straight for the kill.
David Remnick, Frank Bruni and countless others didn’t care that the Obama
administration separated children from their parents, placed them in cages and
wrapped them in aluminum foil.
As far as they are concerned, the continuation of the
same cruel policy under Trump is proof that Trump is a Nazi.
Gen. Michael Hayden, the former director of the NSA and
the CIA posted a photo of the entrance to Auschwitz on his Twitter feed with a
caption “Other governments have separated mothers and children.”
As much as Hayden and his comrades hate Trump, by
claiming that enforcing laws of Congress is Nazi behavior, they are demonizing
the US and engaging in rank antisemitism. Mexican children separated from their
parents because they broke properly constituted laws of a liberal republic are
not the moral equivalent of the million Jewish children murdered by the Nazis
for the “crime” of breathing while Jewish. Congress is not the Reichstag. And
the Rio Grande is not Auschwitz.
Hayden and his comrades are not idiots. So why are they
making these unhinged, libelous claims? The answer is that their actions are
part of a wider move by Democrats to politicize antisemitism.
Much has been made of the fact that support for Israel is
becoming a partisan issue. Whereas Republicans are almost unanimous in support
for the US alliance with Israel, support among Democrats is flagging and
becoming a minority view on the rapidly growing far Left.
What has gone largely unmentioned is that antisemitism is
also becoming a partisan issue. As their party becomes more hostile to Israel,
Democrats are increasingly highlighting the neo-Nazi elements at the fringe of
the Republican Party as a means of implicating the entire Republican Party –
led by Trump – as antisemitic and dangerous.
At the same time, even as leading members of the
Democratic Party like Keith Ellison and luminaries like Linda Sarsour openly espouse
anti-Jewish sentiments and propagate antisemitic conspiracy theories, Democrats
ignore, whitewash, deny and minimize the significance of the swelling chorus of
antisemitism within their ranks.
Compare the responses of Democrats and Republicans to the
appearance of antisemites on their ballots.
In the current election cycle, three white supremacists
have sought office as Republican candidates. Arthur Jones, a 70-year-old white
supremacist Nazi, running for Congress in Illinois’s 3rd Congressional district
ran a stealth campaign for the safe Democratic seat. He quietly collected the
requisite signatures to file his papers with the state election commission,
blindsiding the GOP, which had not planned to field a candidate to run against
incumbent Dan Lipinski who has won the last seven elections by a 70-30 margin.
In response to Jones’s maneuver, the state and national
GOP condemned and disavowed him in the harshest terms. The state party
announced it would field an independent candidate to run in the general
election against Jones and Lipinski.
Then there is Patrick Little. Little, another Nazi, ran
in California’s open primary for Senate as a Republican. Ten other Republicans
also ran. In one poll, which included Little and one other Republican candidate
only, he was the top ranked Republican candidate in the open Senate race
against Democratic incumbent Diane Feinstein.
Rather than acknowledge the poll’s statistical
insignificance, the Forward, Newsweek and Yahoo news ran stories about Little
and the poll claiming that it proved that empowered by Trump, Nazis are taking
over the Republican Party. The fact that the California GOP forcibly removed
Little from their state convention was barely reported in the national media.
Paul Nehlen, a Democratic candidate for Congress in House
Speaker Paul Ryan’s district was supported by many conservatives until last
December when it came out that he is a white supremacist. As soon as his
positions – which he had deliberately hidden – were revealed, every major and
minor conservative media outlet and politician condemned him.
But that hasn’t stopped CNN from waging a campaign
against Virginia Republican Senate nominee Corey Stewart for having endorsed
Nehlen a month before his positions were publicized. Stewart unconditionally
condemned Nehlen once his anti-Jewish bigotry was exposed.
In the Democratic tent itself, things are a bit
different.
Rising stars in the Democratic Party, including Rep.
Ellison and Women’s March leaders Tamika Mallory and Linda Sarsour along with
the Congressional Black Caucus embrace Louis Farrakhan, and defend his
notorious, virulent hatred of Jews. They demonize Israel and its Jewish
supporters.
Far from being attacked or otherwise denounced for their
actions, these Democrats are advanced and promoted. Ellison is the
vice-chairman of the Democratic National Committee. Mallory and Sarsour, Maxine
Waters and other members of the CBC are feted by party leaders including
Senators Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren.
Democratic Jews have to date refused to mobilize to oppose them in any significant way. Indeed, in some cases they support antisemites.
Democratic Jews have to date refused to mobilize to oppose them in any significant way. Indeed, in some cases they support antisemites.
Take the Jewish community of Charlottesville, Virginia’s
reaction to the Congressional candidacy of Democrat Leslie Cockburn. Cockburn
is the co-author, with her husband, Andrew Cockburn, of the 1991 book, Dangerous
Liaison: The Inside Story of the US-Israeli Covert Relationship.
The New York Times review of the book said, “Their book, supposedly a history of the secret ties between Israel and the United States, is largely dedicated to Israel-bashing for its own sake. Its first message is that win or lose, smart or dumb, right or wrong, suave or boorish, Israelis are a menace. The second is that the Israeli-American connection is somewhere behind just about everything that ails us.”
The New York Times review of the book said, “Their book, supposedly a history of the secret ties between Israel and the United States, is largely dedicated to Israel-bashing for its own sake. Its first message is that win or lose, smart or dumb, right or wrong, suave or boorish, Israelis are a menace. The second is that the Israeli-American connection is somewhere behind just about everything that ails us.”
Rather than excoriate Cockburn for her history of
propagating antisemitic conspiracy theories, the Washington Jewish Week wrote
an empathetic article about her quest to have an open exchange with the Jewish
community in her district. One member of the Jewish community who was prominently
cited as an authority on her outreach to the community, noted approvingly that
in a meeting with Jewish constituents Cockburn “pointed out that her views on
Israel align with J Street.”
New York Times reporter and author Jonathan Weisman
epitomizes the Democrats’ simultaneous promotion of leftist antisemitism and
castigation of the Republicans as the new Nazi party. During the 2015 battle
over the Obama administration’s nuclear deal with Iran, Weisman, who is Jewish,
co-authored an article singling out by name the Jewish members of Congress who
opposed the deal. In other words, he engaged in antisemitism to demonize Jewish
opponents of the Obama administration’s anti-Israel policy of empowering Iran.
In 2017 Weisman wrote a widely cited book, (((Semitism))): Being
Jewish in America in the Age of Trump.
Weisman’s basic argument in his book is that Trump’s
populism empowers far-Right antisemites and so threatens the Jewish community
in the US.
It isn’t that antisemitism on the far Right is nothing to
be concerned about it. To the contrary. There is great reason to be concerned,
even alarmed by the Jew-hating rhetoric emanating from the far Right. To their
credit, cognizant of the danger, Republican leaders, including Trump have
consistently condemned and marginalized these voices and actors in their party.
There is also reason to be concerned with left-wing
antisemitism, including when it takes the form of a New York Times journalist
singling out for rebuke Jewish members of Congress who oppose an anti-Israel
policy. Left-wing antisemitism should be should be fought without prejudice
even when it is being propagated by minority groups. Farrakhan should not get a
pass, nor should his African-American supporters.
Because the US has a two-party system, marginal forces
always seek to use the machinery of the large parties to advance their
positions and causes. As a consequence, it is not surprising that antisemites
on the Right seek to penetrate the GOP. And it isn’t surprising that their
leftist counterparts are seeking to take over the Democratic Party. But again,
while the state and national Republican Party condemns and disowns antisemites,
the Democrats woo them for their votes and political support and elect them to
office. And as they do these things, they libel the Republican Party and Trump
accusing them of Nazi sympathies and goals.
It is hard to see a happy end to the story. By attacking
Trump, the most pro-Jewish president in living memory, as a Nazi, while
ignoring the dangers of the growing power and numbers of antisemites in their
own party, Jewish Democrats are doing themselves no favors. So long as Jewish
Democrats go along with the rise of antisemitic forces in their party on the
one hand, and assault the Republicans as Nazis on the other, the situation will
only get more dangerous for them and for the Jewish community in the US as a
whole.
