Tell Your U.S.
Senators and Representative to Oppose Gun Control
Tuesday, August 13, 2019
In the wake of two recent criminal mass attacks, a number
of gun control proposals have begun to circulate in our nation’s capital. None
of these proposals would have prevented either of last weekend’s tragedies, but
they all would restrict the rights of law-abiding gun owners.
“Universal” Background Checks Won’t Stop Mass Shootings
Every perpetrator of high-profile mass shootings has
either passed a background check or acquired a firearm in a way that would be
unaffected by a universal background check (either through theft or the use of
a “straw purchaser”).
"Universal" Background Checks Do Not Stop
Criminals
According to the Department of Justice (DOJ), 75 percent
of criminals in state and federal prison who had possessed a firearm during
their offense acquired the firearm through theft, “Off the street/underground
market,” or “from a family member or friend, or as a gift.” Less than one
percent got firearms from dealers or non-dealers at gun shows.
Criminals defeat the background check system by getting
guns through straw purchasers. ATF has reported, “[t]he most frequent type of
trafficking channel identified in ATF investigations is straw purchasing from
federally licensed firearms dealers. Nearly 50 percent....”
In a 2018 study, researchers at the Bloomberg School of
Public Health and the UC Davis School of Medicine found that comprehensive
background checks and prohibitions based on violent misdemeanors “were not
associated with changes in firearm suicide or homicide.”
“Universal” Background Checks Are Not as Universally
Popular as Advocates Claim
Despite claims of the near universal popularity of
“universal” background checks, these proposals have not been nearly as popular
as claimed when presented to voters. In 2016, Maine and Nevada both had
“universal” background check initiatives on the ballot.
Despite being outspent by Bloomberg-backed gun control
groups by $5.3 million to $1.2 million, Mainers defeated the initiative by 3.6
percentage points.
In Nevada, where Bloomberg-backed groups spent almost $19
million in support of the initiative versus less than seven million spent
against, the initiative passed by less than one percentage point.
Banning “Assault Weapons” Isn’t the Answer Either
FBI data shows that four times as many individuals are
killed with "knives or cutting instruments," than with rifles of any
kind. The data also shows that rifles were listed as being used in fewer
homicides than "blunt objects (clubs, hammers, etc.)" or
"personal weapons (hands, fists, feet, etc.)."
FBI data shows that four times as many individuals are
killed with "knives or cutting instruments," than with rifles of any
kind. The data also shows that rifles were listed as being used in fewer
homicides than "blunt objects (clubs, hammers, etc.)" or
"personal weapons (hands, fists, feet, etc.)."
A 1997 Department of Justice-funded study of the 1994
“assault weapons” ban determined that “At best, the assault weapons ban can
have only a limited effect on total gun murders because the banned weapons and
magazines were never involved in more than a modest fraction of all gun
murders.”
A 2004 follow-up Department of Justice-funded study
determined that “the ban’s effects on gun violence are likely to be small at
best and perhaps too small for reliable measurement.” Presented with the
overwhelming evidence of the ban’s inefficacy, Congress did not renew it.
In 2018, a RAND Corporation study found no conclusive
evidence that such bans have an effect on mass shootings or violent crime.
The AR-15 is the most popular rifle in the U.S. The
immense popularity of the AR-15 has come about at a time when Americans cite
self-defense as their primary reason for owning a gun.
The effectiveness of the commonly-owned semi-automatic
rifle in defense of self and others was illustrated in 2017 during an attack on
a church in Sutherland Springs, Texas. Upon learning of the attack, resident
Stephen Willeford retrieved his AR-15 rifle and shot and wounded the gunman.
Since 2017, other Armed Citizens have used commonly-owned semi-automatic
firearms to thwart an armed robbery in Texas, stop a trio of home invaders in
Oklahoma, and halt a stabbing attack in Illinois.
Now Is the Time To Act
Please contact your Senators and Representative TODAY
and urge them to oppose ineffective gun control measures that won’t make us any
safer but will infringe on the rights of law-abiding gun owners. You can
use this link to send them an email or call the Capitol Switchboard at (202)
224-3121.
No comments:
Post a Comment