Exposing the Global Population Control Agenda (Connecting the Dots: Kissinger, Albright, Hunter Biden, Kamala Harris, National Security Council, The U.N., Parenthood Foundation, The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation & Soros Funding, All Networking)
Human
Life International
Empowering
you to build a pro-life world
Updated
January 3, 2024|Brian Clowes, PhD and Marisa Cantu
https://www.hli.org/resources/the-kissinger-report-nssm-200/
The
United States National Security Council is
the highest decision-making body regarding foreign policy in the United States.
On December 10, 1974, it completed a top-secret document entitled National
Security Study Memorandum or NSSM-200, also called The
Kissinger Report,
since Henry Kissinger was Secretary of State at the time it was written.
The subject of NSSM-200 is “Implications of Worldwide Population Growth for U.S. Security and Overseas Interests.” This document, published shortly after the first major international population conference in Bucharest, was the result of collaboration among the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), the United States Agency for International Development (USAID), and the Departments of State, Defense and Agriculture.
NSSM-200 was made
public when it was declassified and was transferred to the U.S. National
Archives in 1990.
Although
the United States government has issued hundreds of policy papers dealing with
various aspects of American national security since 1974, NSSM-200 continues
to be the foundational document on U.S. government population control. It
therefore continues to represent official United States policy on government
population control and, in fact, is still posted on the USAID website.
NSSM-200 is
critically important to pro-life workers all over the world, because it
completely exposes the unsavory and unethical motivations and methods of the
population control movement. We can use this valuable document to lay bare the
strategies used by unscrupulous governments and “aid” agencies that are used to
bend developing nations to their wills. Their rote denials will be useless in
the face of this evidence.
The
Purpose of The Kissinger Report (NSSM-200)
The
primary purpose of U.S. government population control efforts is to maintain
access to the mineral resources of less-developed countries, or LDCs.
The
Kissinger Report states:
The
U.S. economy will require large and increasing amounts of minerals from abroad,
especially from less developed countries. That fact gives the U.S. enhanced
interest in the political, economic, and social stability of the supplying
countries. Wherever a lessening of population pressures through reduced birth
rates can increase the prospects for such stability, population policy becomes
relevant to resource supplies and to the economic interests of the United
States.
In
order to protect U.S. commercial interests, NSSM-200 cited a number of
factors that could interrupt the smooth flow of materials from LDCs to the
United States, including a large population of anti-imperialist youth whose
numbers must be limited by population control. The document identified 13 nations
by name that would be the primary targets of U.S. government population control
efforts.
Under
the heading “Concentration on key countries” we find:
Assistance
for population moderation should give primary emphasis to the largest and
fastest growing developing countries where there is special U.S. political and
strategic interest. Those countries are: India, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Nigeria,
Mexico, Indonesia, Brazil, the Philippines, Thailand, Egypt, Turkey, Ethiopia
and Columbia [sic].… At the same time, the U.S. will look to the multilateral
agencies, especially the U.N. Fund for Population Activities which already has
projects in over 80 countries to increase population assistance on a broader
basis with increased U.S. contributions. This is desirable in terms of
U.S. interests and necessary in political terms in the United Nations. [emphasis
added]
This
particular form of coercion is evident in this story of Peruvian
women who did not wish to be sterilized. The workers visited one
woman “day and night, day and night” to wear her down to agree to
sterilization. Some food programs leveraged their power, demanding that women
be sterilized or stop receiving food. Women weren’t told about Natural Family
Planning. And many weren’t informed about the dangers of sterilization. Some
women were even sterilized without knowledge or consent.
The population control cartel uses force and coercion in developing countries to push abortion, sterilization and birth control, as well as other evils such as homosexuality and transgenderism.
There
are dozens of examples of this kind of blatant injustice, including the
following:
·
When
Nigeria refused to legalize contraception and homosexuality, the United States
withdrew financial and military aid that would allow it to combat the Islamic
terror group Boko Harem, which has murdered and kidnapped tens of thousands of
people in that nation.1
·
When
Ecuador declined to legalize abortion, the United Nations refused to provide
any aid for it to battle COVID-19, condemning many Ecuadorians to death.2
·
When
Kenyan pro-lifers collected irrefutable evidence that Marie Stopes
International (MSI), one of the largest abortionists in the world, were
committing illegal and dangerous abortions on a vast scale, MSI demanded that
they be either muzzled or jailed.3
·
The
United Nations Population Fund halted food and other aid to millions of
starving Yemenis because the nation refused to legalize abortion.4
·
When
Zambia refused to legalize sodomy, the United States withdrew much-needed
foreign aid to help alleviate the 11% national HIV infection rate and to care
for 250,000 AIDS orphas.5
·
The
Joint United Nations Program on AIDS [UNAIDS] threatened to withdraw all of its
aid from the Caribbean island of St. Lucia unless it approved language
supporting abortion and homosexuality in a political declaration on HIV/AIDS.6
The
powerful population control cartel does not engage in charity at all – instead,
it freely employs thuggery and bullying to enforce its will.
NSSM-200 also
specifically declared that the United States must cover up its population
control activities and avoid charges of imperialism by inducing the United
Nations and
various non-governmental organizations – specifically the Pathfinder Fund, the
International Planned Parenthood Foundation (IPPF) and the
Population Council – to do its dirty work.
Dr.
Alan Guttmacher, one of the most knowledgeable and active population
suppression experts of all time, described this strategy:
My
own feeling is that we’ve got to pull out all the stops and involve the United
Nations…. If you’re going to curb population, it’s extremely important not to
have it done by the “damned Yankee,” but by the UN. Because the thing is, then
it’s not considered genocide. If the United States goes to the black man or the
yellow man and says “slow down your reproductive rate,” we’re immediately
suspected of having ulterior motives to keep the white man dominant in the
world. If you can send in a colorful UN force, you’ve got much better leverage.7
Massive
Human Rights Violations
NSSM-200 has directly
and inevitably encouraged atrocities on an enormous scale in dozens of the
world’s nations. Just four of countless examples are shown below.
China
For
many years, the United States government funded the United Nations Population
Fund (UNFPA). In April 2017, the Trump Administration
finally took the step of ending UNFPA funding.
Why?
One
of the main targets of UNFPA money is the People’s Republic of China (PRC). The
State Department grounded the change of policy in the fact that the agency
“supports, or participates in the management of, a program of coercive abortion
or involuntary sterilization” in China.
While the UNFPA denies it, according to its own documents the UNFPA has donated more than $100 million to China’s population control program, financed a $12 million computer complex specifically to monitor the population program, provided the technical expertise and personnel that trained thousands of Chinese population control officials, and presented China with a United Nations award for the “most outstanding population control program.”
Those
unfamiliar with the countless abuses perpetrated under this program might
consider reading material from 2015-present at the links for the U.S. Congressional
Hearing on China and Population Research Institute (PRI)
for evidence. As the PRI article states, “More children were aborted under the
one-child policy than the entire population of the United States.”
Peru
During
the years 1995 to 1997, over a quarter of a million
Peruvian women were sterilized as part of a program to fulfill
then-president Alberto Fujimori’s family planning goals. Although this campaign
was called the “Voluntary Surgical Contraception Campaign,” many of these
procedures were obviously coerced. In fact, women whose underweight children
were on government food programs were threatened
with the withholding of this food if they refused to be sterilized. Others were
kidnapped from their families and forcibly sterilized.
Uganda
Uganda became the first African country to roll back its adult HIV infection rate, from 21% in 1991 to about 6% in 2004, a 70% decrease. The nation accomplished this amazing feat by changing the behavior of the people and shifting the focus away from condoms.
Recently, Ugandan
adult HIV infection rates have declined to 5.4%. Nevertheless,
Uganda’s initial success in the ’90s proves that abstinence works. The attempt
to undermine Uganda’s proven HIV prevention program is perhaps the most
egregious example of population control ideology trumping science.
India
In
2014, there was renewed international attention on India’s continuing forced
sterilization program after dozens
of women were killed and many more harmed due to the assembly
line procedures being done in grotesquely unsanitary conditions. As
gynecologist Josas Koninoor remarked:
95% of our clients belong to the very poor class. They are responsible for giving birth four or five times. Since they cannot remember to take birth control pills every day, long-acting contraceptives are much better for them…. In order to have a good thing there is always a price to pay. If two or three women die — what’s the problem? The population will be reduced.”8
Outline
of the Population Control Strategy in NSSM-200
NSSM-200 explicitly lays out the detailed strategy by which the United States government aggressively promotes population control in developing nations in order to regulate (or have better access to) the natural resources of these countries.
The following outline shows the elements of this plan, with actual supporting quotes from NSSM-200:
1.
The United States needs widespread access to the mineral resources of
less-developed nations (quote shown above).
2.
The smooth flow of resources to the United States could be jeopardized by
lesser-developed country government action, labor conflicts, sabotage, or civil
disturbances, which are much more likely if population pressure is a factor:
“These types of frustrations are much less likely under conditions of slow or
zero population growth.”
3.
Young people are much more likely to challenge imperialism and the world’s
power structures, so their numbers should be kept down as much as possible:
“These young people can more readily be persuaded to attack the legal
institutions of the government or real property of the ‘establishment,’
‘imperialists,’ multinational corporations, or other–often foreign–influences
blamed for their troubles.”
4.
Therefore, the United States must develop a commitment to government population
control among key LDC leaders, while bypassing the will of their people: “The
U.S. should encourage LDC leaders to take the lead in advancing family planning
and population stabilization both within multilateral organization and through
bilateral contact with other LDCs.”
5.
The critical elements of government population control implementation include:
·
Identifying
the primary targets: “Those countries are: India, Bangladesh, Pakistan,
Nigeria, Mexico, Indonesia, Brazil, the Philippines, Thailand, Egypt, Turkey,
Ethiopia and Colombia.”
·
Enlisting
the aid of as many multilateral population control organizations as possible in
this worldwide project to deflect criticism and charges of imperialism: “The
U.S. will look to the multilateral agencies, especially the U.N. Fund for
Population Activities which already has projects in over 80 countries to
increase population assistance on a broader basis with increased U.S.
contributions.”
·
Recognizing
that “no country has reduced its population growth without resorting to
abortion.”
·
Designing
programs with financial incentives for countries to increase their abortion,
sterilization and contraception-use rates: “Pay women in the LDCs to have
abortions as a method of family planning…. Similarly, there have been some
controversial, but remarkably successful, experiments in India in which
financial incentives, along with other motivational devices, were used to get
large numbers of men to accept vasectomies.”
·
Concentrating
on “indoctrinating” [NSSM-200’s language] the children of LDCs with
anti-natalist propaganda: “Without diminishing in any way the effort to reach
these adults, the obvious increased focus of attention should be to change the
attitudes of the next generation, those who are now in elementary school or
younger.”
·
Designing
and instigating propaganda programs and sex-education curricula intended to
convince couples to have smaller families, regardless of social or cultural
considerations: “The following areas appear to contain significant promise in
effecting fertility declines and are discussed in subsequent sections…
concentrating on the education and indoctrination of the rising generation of
children regarding the desirability of smaller family size.”
·
Investigating
the desirability of mandatory [NSSM-200’s language] population control
programs: “The conclusion of this view is that mandatory programs may be needed
and that we should be considering these possibilities now.”
·
Considering
using coercion in other forms, such as withholding disaster and food aid unless
a targeted LDC implements population control programs: “On what basis should
such food resources then be provided? Would food be considered an instrument of
national power? Will we be forced to make choices as to whom we can reasonably
assist, and if so, should population efforts be a criterion for such
assistance?”
Throughout
the implementation process, the United States must hide its tracks and disguise
its population control programs as altruistic, by using the euphemisms so
well-beloved by all elements of the culture of death:
There
is also the danger that some LDC leaders will see developed country pressures
for family planning as a form of economic or racial imperialism; this could
well create a serious backlash.… The U.S. can help to minimize charges of an
imperialist motivation behind its support of population activities by
repeatedly asserting that such support derives from a concern with:
(a)
The right of the individual couple to determine freely and responsibly the
number and spacing of children and to have information, education, and means to
do so; and
(b)
The fundamental social and economic development of poor countries in which
rapid population growth is both a contributing cause and a consequence of
widespread poverty.
Is
Government Population Control Necessary?
There
is growing
awareness that the world “population explosion” is over or,
indeed, that it never actually materialized in the first place.
When
the population scare began in the late 1960s, the world population was
increasing at a rate of more than 2% per year. It is now increasing at less
than 1% per year, and this rate is expected to
continue to drop due to continuing population control
activities.
The
worldwide application of the strategies recommended in the report has resulted
in regional population growth rates decelerating quickly. This is already
causing severe economic and social problems in Europe, the former Soviet Union,
Japan, Singapore and Hong Kong. Many developing nations are now aging even more
rapidly than the developed world, which foretells even more severe problems for
their relatively underdeveloped economies. The developed nations had the
opportunity to become rich before they became old; if a nation becomes old
first, it will never become rich.
From
the very beginning, the concept of a “population explosion” was an
ideologically motivated false alarm. It was specifically designed to allow rich
nations to pillage the resources of the poorer nations. The resulting push for
population control in developing nations has borne absolutely no positive fruit
in its decades of implementation. In fact, population control ideologies and
programs make it even more difficult to respond to the impending disastrous
worldwide “population implosion.” It is time to begin urging families to have more children,
not fewer, if we are to avoid a worldwide demographic catastrophe.
The first step in such a massive change in policy is, of course, to change our vision and our values. To do this, we must repudiate old ways of thinking and outmoded ways of accomplishing our objectives.
NSSM-200 represents
the worst aspect of the “advanced” nations meddling in the most intimate
affairs of less-developed nations. It strongly reinforces the image of the
“ugly American.” It advocates violating the most precious freedoms and autonomy
of the individuals through coercive family planning programs.
NSSM-200 purports to
show concern for the rights or welfare of individuals and of nations, but it
was conceived from the imperialistic concept that the United States has the
“right” to have unfettered access to the natural resources of developing
nations. The United States and the other nations of the developed world should
be supporting and guiding authentic economic development that allows the people
of each nation to use their resources for their own benefit. This will lead to
an enhancement of human rights worldwide and healthier economies for all.
No
human relationships are closer or more intimate than those found in the family.
Yet, the “developed” world has spent more than 160 billion dollars just since
1990 attempting to control the number of children born to families in
developing nations. This widespread imposition of abortion, sterilization and
birth control is veiled under the deceptive umbrella terms “family planning
services” and “reproductive health.”
All
that the tens of billions of dollars of government population control
expenditures have accomplished is to make hundreds of millions of large poor
families into small poor families.
It
is unfortunately left to our imagination to wonder what might have happened if
these resources had been invested in health and education infrastructure and in
research dedicated to finding peaceful strategies to transition nations from
corrupt governance to truly representative and accountable courts and public
service sectors.
Children
are not an obstacle to development; they are the hope for the future of any
society. People are not the problem – they are the solution.
People
are Not the Problem: Ehrlich was Wrong
A
growing population is not something to be thwarted by government programs.
People are invaluable, and the war
on fertility has spelled future economic and social problems for
the 80 nations that are now below replacement level.
Related: The Myth
of Overpopulation: Unto the Least of These My Brethren
Man’s
life comes from God; it is his gift, his image and imprint, a sharing in his
breath of life. God therefore is the sole Lord of this life: man cannot
do with it as he wills.” (Evangelium
Vitae, 1995. Emphasis added)
Perhaps
the loudest pro-population control advocate in recent memory is Paul Ehrlich.
In the ’60s, his book, The
Population Bomb, sold millions of copies. This book predicted
several things that ended up being grossly incorrect. Ehrlich claimed that 65
million Americans would starve to death in the ’70s, that India was doomed, and
that England would cease to exist by 2000.
Obviously,
he was wrong. There was no mass starvation of Americans, India is growing to be
an economic competitor with Russia and China, and England thrives today.
“Life
is entrusted to man as a treasure which must not be squandered, as a talent
which must be used well. Man must render an account of it to his Master.”
(Evangelium
Vitae, 1995. Emphasis added)
What
Now?
What
can be done by the layman? First, we must realize that we are
in graver danger of living in a depopulated world than in an overpopulated one.
Next, we must vote for politicians and advocate for policies that would protect
the unborn and fertility. Finally, we must entrust it all to Jesus, Mary and
Joseph and pray for their intercession.
Human
Life International continues to fight for the rights of women all around the
world, including the right to live free from sterilization, by lobbying for
pro-life and pro-woman policies.
This
article was originally published in June 2021 by Dr. Brian Clowes and was most
recently updated in January 2024 by Marisa Cantu.
Connecting
the Dots:
Samantha Power was
a senior director for multilateral affairs for the National Security
Council, the United Nations U.S. ambassador for the Barack
Obama administration and a director at the International Rescue
Committee.
Condoleezza Rice was
the senior director for Soviet affairs for the National Security
Council and is an overseer at the International Rescue
Committee.
Bill
& Melinda Gates Foundation was a funder for the International
Rescue Committee, the U.S. Agency for International Development
and the United Nations Population Fund.
Henry
A. Kissinger was an overseer at the International Rescue
Committee and wrote The Kissinger Report.
Elie Wiesel was
an overseer at the International Rescue Committee, a messenger of
peace for the United Nations and an international council member
for the Human Rights Foundation.
ONE Campaign is
a partner at the International Rescue Committee and the United
Nations Foundation.
Michelle Obama was
an advocate for the ONE Campaign.
Howard G. Buffett is a
director at the ONE Campaign and a goodwill ambassador for
the World Food Programme.
Foundation to Promote Open Society was a funder
for the International Rescue Committee.
George Soros was the chairman for
the Foundation to Promote Open Society.
Madeleine K.
Albright was an overseer at the International Rescue Committee,
a member of the National Security Council, an
advisory board member for the Truman National Security Project, and
the president of the Center for National Policy.
R. Hunter Biden is a
director at the Truman National Security Project, a director at
the Center for National Policy, and Joseph R. Biden Jr’s son.
Kamala D. Harris is an
advisory board member for the Truman National Security Project an
advisory board member for the Center for National Policy and
vice president of the Joseph R. Biden Jr administration.
William J. Perry is an
advisory board member for the Truman National Security Project, an
advisory board member for the Center for National Policy and a
director at the Nuclear Threat Initiative (think tank).
Michael Douglas is a
director at the Nuclear Threat Initiative (think tank) and a
friend of George Soros.
Margaret A. Hamburg is the VP
for the Nuclear Threat Initiative (think tank) and was
the commissioner
for the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA).
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace (think tank) was
a funder for the Nuclear Threat Initiative (think tank).
Ted
Turner is a co-chairman for the Nuclear Threat
Initiative (think tank), the chairman for the United Nations
Foundation and the chairman for the Turner Foundation.
Cecile Richards was a grant
overseer for the Turner Foundation, the founder & president of
the America Votes, is the president of the Planned
Parenthood Action Fund and the president of the Planned Parenthood
Federation of America.
Open Society Foundations was a funder for the Planned Parenthood Federation
of America, and the Center for Reproductive Rights.
George Soros is the founder & chairman for the Open
Society Foundations.
Raben Group is the lobby
firm for the Center for Reproductive Rights.
Robert Raben is the president
for the Raben Group, an assistant attorney general at the U.S.
Department of Justice and a director at the American
Constitution Society.
Melody C. Barnes was a
principal at the Raben Group, the domestic policy council, director
for the Barack Obama administration, the EVP for the Center
for American Progress and is Barack Obama’s golf partner.
Open Society Foundations was a funder for the American Constitution
Society and the Center for American Progress.
George Soros is the founder
& chairman for the Open Society Foundations, was the chairman
for the Foundation to Promote Open Society and a supporter for
the Center for American Progress.
Foundation to Promote Open Society was a funder for
the Center for American Progress and the International Rescue
Committee.
Madeleine K.
Albright was the Center for American Progress and a
director at an overseer at the International Rescue Committee.
Bill
& Melinda Gates Foundation was a funder for the International
Rescue Committee, the U.S. Agency for International Development
and the United Nations Population Fund.
Henry
A. Kissinger was an overseer at the International Rescue
Committee and wrote The Kissinger Report.
Elie Wiesel was
an overseer at the International Rescue Committee, a messenger of
peace for the United Nations and an international council member
for the Human Rights Foundation.
ONE Campaign is
a partner at the International Rescue Committee and the United
Nations Foundation.
Michelle Obama was
an advocate for the ONE Campaign.
Howard G. Buffett is a
director at the ONE Campaign and a goodwill ambassador for
the World Food Programme.
ONE Campaign is
a partner at the International Rescue Committee and the United
Nations Foundation.
Samantha Power was
a director at the International Rescue Committee, a senior director
for multilateral affairs for the National Security Council and
the United Nations U.S. ambassador for the Barack
Obama administration.
Condoleezza Rice is
an overseer at the International Rescue Committee and was the
senior director for Soviet affairs for the National Security Council.
Resources:
Past Research
Kissinger’s
1974 Plan for Food Control Genocide (Past Research
on the National Security Council)
Sunday,
November 24, 2013
https://thesteadydrip.blogspot.com/2013/11/kissingers-1974-plan-for-food-control.html
Madeleine
Albright, 1st Female US Secretary of State, Dies at 84 (Connecting Her Dots In
The Soros Network) (Past Research on Madeleine
Albright)
Thursday,
March 24, 2022
https://thesteadydrip.blogspot.com/2022/03/madeleine-albright-1st-female-us.html
Trump
Pledges to Do ‘Whatever Is Necessary’ to ‘Fix’ Venezuela (Past Research on the United Nations Foundation)
Saturday,
May 20, 2017
https://thesteadydrip.blogspot.com/2017/05/trump-pledges-to-do-whatever-is.html
Robert
F. Kennedy Jr. says he wants to eliminate Nutrition Department (Connecting the
Dots: The Kellogg Company, The Albright Stonebridge Group, Hunter Biden, Kamala
Harris, The FDA & Soros Funding, All Networking) (Past
Research on the Nuclear Threat Initiative (think tank))
Monday,
November 18, 2024
https://thesteadydrip.blogspot.com/2024/11/robert-f-kennedy-jr-says-he-wants-to.html
Bernie
Sanders Defends Planned Parenthood Funding After it Sells Aborted Baby Body
Parts (Past Research on Planned Parenthood)
Tuesday,
April 19, 2016
https://thesteadydrip.blogspot.com/2016/04/bernie-sanders-defends-planned.html
Wray
Ouster One Likely Element of Trump's FBI Overhaul (Connecting the Dots: FBI,
CIA, DOJ, Merrick Garland, Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr, Russia Probe,
The Atlantic Council of the United States (think tank), The Carnegie Endowment
for International Peace (think tank) & Soros Funding, All Networking) (Past Research on the Raben Group)
Saturday,
November 16, 2024
https://thesteadydrip.blogspot.com/2024/11/wray-ouster-one-likely-element-of.html
Trump
Picks Ex-congressman Doug Collins for Veterans Affairs Sec (Connecting the
Dots: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Hunter Biden, Kamala Harris, The
Atlantic Council of the United States (think tank) & Soros Funding, All
Networking) (Past Research on the Center for
American Progress)
Thursday,
November 14, 2024
https://thesteadydrip.blogspot.com/2024/11/trump-picks-ex-congressman-doug-collins.htm
No comments:
Post a Comment