An Unacknowledged Letter to My Representatives in the Florida
Legislature
On April 28, 2015, I sent the following (lightly
redacted) letter via email to my representative in the Florida Senate:
Dear
Senator [XXX]:
I've
been registered as a Republican in [XXX] County ever since that day in July
2001 when I also surrendered my Tennessee driver's license in order to obtain
my Florida license. Until 2010 when I "retired," I regularly voted in
November general elections via absentee ballot from Taiwan, where I taught in
colleges and universities for 24 academic years, returning to the US for each
intervening summer vacation. I take my privilege and responsibility as a voter
very seriously.
Each
time I review the red-and-blue maps illustrating the distribution of popular
votes in the 2012 Presidential election, I bemoan the fact that there is so
little blue on them--almost entirely in densely populated urban areas. Yet
Barack Hussein Obama "won"-- again. There is abundant evidence
of widespread fraud in the 2012 Presidential election, but I'll reserve my
remarks on that issue to a separate communication.
I
wish to enthusiastically encourage and literally BEG the Florida
Legislature--while the GOP is still in the majority--to alter the manner in
which electoral votes are formally cast in this "purple" swing-state.
Instead of automatically, knee-jerkingly allowing all of Florida's 29 electoral
votes to go to whichever party apparently wins the most popular votes, it would
be much more representative of the actual will of the people to require 27 of
those votes to be cast in accordance with the majority will of each respective
U.S. Congressional District within the state. Then, allow only the two at-large
votes to be cast in accordance with the winner of the majority of the popular
votes statewide.
Article
II, Section 1, Paragraph 2 of the U.S. Constitution states: "Each State
shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number
of Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which
the State may be entitled in the Congress: but no Senator or Representative, or
Person holding an Office of Trust or Profit under the United States, shall be
appointed an Elector." Paragraph 3 of this Section was changed by the
Twelfth Amendment in 1951; and Paragraph 6, by the Twenty-Fifth Amendment in
1967. However, neither of the aforementioned amendments altered the manner in
which Electors are chosen, i.e., "as the Legislature...may direct."
States do not have to continue doing Presidential elections in a manner that
has developed by mere tradition--unless the various Legislatures are truly
content with their respective outcomes. Does any trace of vigorous life remain
in the Tenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution?
If
I have my figures correct, only three States in the U.S. have more votes than
Florida in the Electoral College. Imagine the "domino effect" that
Florida could initiate nationwide by changing its electoral votes to a [U.S.
Congressional] district-by-district distribution instead of the now-traditional
[popular-vote] winner-takes-all approach to what has unfortunately become a
mere formality. A district-by-district arrangement would be a more accurate
representation of the true will of the people and would make fraud more
difficult to accomplish. [Fourth U.S. President] James Madison, the principal
author of the U.S. Constitution, and his fellow Founders were not simpletons;
rather, they were wise and well-educated patriots who did not devise
unnecessary formalities or vestigial appendages.
I'm
just a little (soon-to-be) 69-year-old lady who loves the United States of
America immensely, and I cringe at the treasonous corruption spewing forth from
Washington, D.C. I am following several national issues closely. Unfortunately,
I probably have not paid enough attention to state and local issues here in
Florida. I'll try to do better henceforth.
I'd
very much appreciate your careful consideration of my Constitutional
suggestion. I will also be sending this suggestion to Rep. XXX and (perhaps) to
other GOP members of the Florida Legislature. To make such a suggestion to the
Democrats would be a waste of my time and energy, I think.
And what kind of response did I receive? Crickets….Not
one word--not even a form letter!
I’ve been on this senator’s email list for more
than two years and have received newsletters regularly from the same address to
which I sent the above remarks. My message did NOT bounce back; therefore, I
must conclude than Some Entity—human, robot, or whatever—received my epistle
and stuffed it somewhere.
On June 5 I sent my letter again, prefaced by
the following paragraph:
Dear
Senator XXX:
I
have NOT received your reply to my email of April 28, 2015 (quoted below).
Subsequent to the date of original transmission, an article on the same topic
was published on the American Thinker
website on May 11: “Breaking the Democrats' Electoral College Blue Wall”
(by Richard Baehr, @http://www.americanthinker[dot]com/articles/2015/05/breaking_the_democrats_electoral_college_blue_wall.html).
. . .
Continuing to hear nothing but the deafening
silence of crickets, I emailed the following (lightly redacted) note to my
representative in the Florida House:
Dear Rep. XXX:
Only a few days prior to May 22, 2015 (the date on which
I received a copy of the May 21 edition of your [“XXX Report”] from
[XXX]@myfloridahouse[dot]gov), I used the form at your website to send you
a brief letter. Unfortunately, I did not retain a copy of the exact text
because I actually believed what I was told on the form, i.e., that I
would receive a copy of my message via email; however, I did not receive that
promised copy).
Obviously, my message was received by someone on your
staff—otherwise [your staff member] would not have known my email address.
I tried to send you the same message that I had sent to
Sen. XXX on 4/28/2015 at 12:35 am; however, I still have not received a
reply to that message from either of you. Below is the text of my original
message, plus a citation of an article that was not published until
after the original message was sent. . . .
And what have I received from that member of the Florida House of
Representatives? Only a couple of newsletters prepared for a mailing list.
Hello, hello….Are there any Republican-registered Floridians
reading The Steady Drip blog? If so,
what do you think of this silent
treatment I have received?
I must add, by way of full disclosure, that I have always
considered myself merely a Reluctant Republican at best.
With the notable exception of the 1980 and 1984 elections (in which I was
actually FOR the GOP candidate), I have consistently voted AGAINST all Democrat
candidates for president by doing one of the following as I marked my
respective ballots:
·
“for” a third-party candidate (who has less of a chance than an
ice cube in Hades); OR
·
“for” an Elite Establishment RINO, while holding my nose as I
darken the little oval next to the respective names!
I’m weary of this wretched ritual; hence, the Republican Party
will NEVER receive even one penny from me until a big turnaround occurs! (I’m
not holding my breath.)
Furthermore, I still have a bone stuck in my craw from the 2012
Florida Republican Primary: Although Mitt Romney received only 46.4% of the
votes [http://elections.nytimes.com/2012/primaries/states/florida], he received
100% of the state’s delegate votes at the Republican National Convention. I was
among the 53.6% of FL Republican voters who preferred another candidate, but we
had no voice at the Convention. Analogous to my aforementioned suggestion
concerning the distribution of this State’s Electoral College votes, I think
that the Florida Republican Party should allocate the delegates' National
Convention votes proportionally, in accordance with the votes each candidate
receives in the primary election. In my opinion, any other scheme is
unrepresentative.
Is anyone listening to my little voice (besides God and the NSA).
. .?
Cheryl J.
Rutledge, Ph.D.
Musician, Retired
Educator, Editor
www.AcademicEnglishEditing-DrRutledge.com
No comments:
Post a Comment