Communist Party
Admits Infiltration & Takeover of Democratic Party!
Jack Hammer October 01, 2015
By: Alex
Newman - TheNewAmerican.com
After
hearing Mr. Obama’s recent speech in which he claimed that slavery and Jim
Crow laws (supported by Democrats) were done in the name of Christ, it’s
impossible for anyone with a brain in their head to still deny that this man is
a Marxist.
Here’s
an excellent article by Alex Newman in which the Communist Party admits taking
over the Democratic Party:
Communist
Party USA boss John Bachtell boasted in a recent column that his
Marxist-Leninist organization, a tentacle of the Soviet regime in America for
decades, “utilizes” the increasingly radical Democratic Party to advance its
totalitarian objectives in the United States. Writing in the Communist Party
propaganda mouthpiece People’s World, Bachtell suggested that, eventually, a
“radical third party” would become a viable option to advance communism in
America. However, for now, he argued, fending off what he calls the
“ultra-right” — essentially anyone to the right of Obama, whom American
communists openly backed in both elections — requires the CPUSA to continue
utilizing the Democrat Party as a “vehicle.”
In
his column, Bachtell, who was selected last year to serve as the national chair
of the Communist Party USA, offers a wide array of arguments for why communists
must continue to work through the Democrat Party. For instance, at least in the
collectivist communist mind, the Democratic Party is “home” to “African
Americans, Latinos, other communities of color, women, most union members,
young people,” as well as various “social and democratic movements.” In
reality, of course, there are plenty of blacks, Hispanics, women, and young
people who boldly reject statism and the extremist Democrats promoting it.
Still,
as many Democrats do, Bachtell lumps unique individuals into “constituencies”
based on arbitrary characteristics such as melanin content, and declares that
the Democratic Party is their “home.” He contrasts that with the GOP and
“extreme right-wing elements” such as pro-lifers, climate realists,
“right-wing” Christians, the Tea Party, social conservatives, and others,
broadly categorized as “ultra-right.” By working with and through the Democrat
Party, Bachtell purports to be building the “broadest anti-ultra right alliance
possible,” even openly welcoming a “section” of what he describes as “monopoly”
capital on Wall Street into the Communist Party war on liberty.
“This
necessarily means working with the Democratic Party,” Bachtell explained,
adding that some on the Left “underestimate the danger” from the Right and
“overestimate” the willingness of “key class and social forces” to leave the
Democratic Party right now. “Second, our objective is not to build the
Democratic Party. At this stage we are about building the broad people’s
movement led by labor that utilizes the vehicle of the Democratic Party to
advance its agenda. We are about building the movements around the issues
roiling wide sections of people that can help shape election contours and
debates.”
Finally,
the Communist Party USA participates in what Bachtell referred to as “coalition
campaigns” that challenge the “Wall Street wing” of the Democrat Party and
“galvanize forces around a progressive agenda, mainly in Democratic primary
elections.” Among other examples, he cited “labor activists, progressives,
socialists and communists who emerge from movements and run as candidates,
backed by broad coalitions.” Having self-declared socialist Senator Bernie
Sanders of Vermont run within the Democrat presidential primary, for instance,
“would help do just this,” he added. Sen. Sanders has said publicly he would
decide by March whether to run for the White House in 2016 as a Democrat.
“If
the CPUSA is to be a mass political party it must be a mass electoral party,
immersed in every aspect of electoral politics and the process toward political
independence,” Bachtell continued, explaining to communist lackeys why they
must continue to support and infiltrate the Democrat Party to advance more
draconian tyranny later on. “Municipal elections are a key arena of battle in
2015…. Clearly, there is an immense amount of electoral activism and movement
building that is laying the foundation for the eventual emergence of a mass
radical third party.” For now, though, the Democrat Party will be “utilized” as
the “vehicle” to advance Communist Party totalitarianism — at least until the
“Right” is totally crushed.
Commenting
on the explosive but hardly surprising admissions, anti-communist analyst
Trevor Loudon, author of The Enemies Within exposing subversion at the highest
levels of power in the United States, noted that much could be learned from
communist strategy. “The Communist Party often upsets less mature Marxist
groups because of their refusal to abandon the Democratic Party, despite not
always getting every item on their agenda immediately,” Loudon explained. “As
an experienced Communist, John Bachtell understands that in spite of
difficulties and disappointments, the Communist Party agenda is far better
served by infiltrating the Democrats than by marching in the streets yelling
revolutionary slogans.”
As
Loudon points out, “the Communist Party and their only marginally less radical
Democratic Socialists of America allies can point to real achievements under
their ‘friend’ Barack Obama.” From ObamaCare and amnesty for illegal immigrants
to the ongoing attacks on the military and restored relations with the
mass-murdering communist dictatorship in Havana, numerous CPUSA goals have been
advanced through the Democrat Party just in recent years. Of course, the
glaring similarities between the positions and policies of the Communist Party
USA, the Democrat Party, and the Obama administration have now become fully
obvious, at least to anyone who cares to look.
In
2004, for example, the CPUSA platform included, among other elements, demands
for “free” healthcare, unrestricted abortion, government-funded education from
pre-kindergarten to college, more federal “job” programs for “minorities,” more
farm subsidies, a higher minimum wage, a ban on “discrimination” against
homosexuals, international treaties to stop “global warming,” and much more.
When compared with the Obama agenda that was unleashed upon America beginning
in 2008 and that continues to be foisted on an outraged America today via
lawless executive decrees — and funding from the GOP Congress — the parallels
are impossible to deny.
In
fact, comparing U.S. policy today to the Ten Planks of the Communist Manifesto
— government education, progressive income taxes, central bank with monopoly on
credit, and much more — key points of the communist agenda have been on the
march in the United States for generations. And unsurprisingly, the Communist
Party’s affinity for advancing its nightmarish vision of total state control
via the Democrat Party goes back decades, too, as summarized and extensively
documented in KeyWiki. In 1972, for instance, then CPUSA boss Gus Hall outlined
the party’s policy to do precisely that.
“Our
electoral policy has for 25 years been expressed in the phrase, ‘the three legs
of a stool.’… The stool was constructed at a time when the Party was under
sharp attack … a reflection of the Party’s response to the difficulties,” he
wrote. “The flexibility was contained in the idea that no one leg of the stool
was the main leg. Depending on the political pressures, one could choose a
particular leg or legs. In fact the concept was built on the idea that when the
other two legs, namely, the Communist Party and the forces of political
independence, got strong enough, then and only then would the stool sit on
three legs. But until that day comes the one operating leg would be the liberal
wing of the Democratic Party.”
More
recently, a 2010 report for the Communist Party’s National Convention was
prepared by members of the Young Communist League USA. “Currently, the
conditions rarely if ever allow us to run open Communists for office,” the
report stated. “When members do run for office, it is within the auspices of
the Democratic Party. Otherwise, we find ourselves supporting progressive (and
in some instances not-so-progressive) Democratic candidates. Despite how much
many of us would love to run comrades for office as Communists, we all agree
that this is how we currently have to function in this political climate.”
In
late 2012, meanwhile, a report delivered at the 14th International Meeting of
Communist and Workers Parties in Beirut, Lebanon, praised Obama and the
advances he had made for the cause. “The Communist Party USA not only welcomes
the reelection of President Barack Obama, but actively engaged in the electoral
campaign for his reelection and for the election of many Democratic Party
congressional candidates,” explained the report, prepared by CPUSA
International Department operative Erwin Marquit. “We regarded the 2012
election as the most important in the United States since 1932, an election
held in the midst of the Great Depression.”
The
CPUSA’s “present strategy,” the report continued, was to “build alliances both
inside and outside the Democratic Party.” After Obama’s re-election in 2012,
the so-called “progressive caucus” in Congress — masterfully exposed in
Loudon’s work — will “be playing an important role in contributing to the
mobilization of mass activity on critical issues to bring pressure on the
Congress and administration to act on them.” The report also openly proclaimed
that “the victory of Obama is a welcome aid for us in our domestic struggles.”
Obama’s political career, of course, began in the home of Communist terrorist
Bill Ayers, whose Weather Underground terror movement in the United States was
backed by Communist mass-murderer Fidel Castro.
In
his comments on Bachtell’s most recent admission, Loudon said Americans have a
lot to learn. In the same manner that the CPUSA has “utilized” the Democrat
Party, constitutionalists who hope to preserve liberty and the Republic
bequeathed to Americans by the Founding Fathers ought to work within the GOP,
Loudon argued. “Bachtell understands that prematurely breaking with the
Democrats, on some quixotic adventure of forming a new leftist third party,
would almost certainly hand the next few elections to the GOP,” Loudon wrote.
“He fears that a revitalized GOP, led by Ted Cruz, or some similar figure,
would roll back most, or all of the Communist Party’s hard fought gains.”
“If
U.S. Constitutionalist conservatives and Tea Party activists can show similar
political discipline and maturity, they will abandon plans for a suicidal third
party agenda — for now,” Loudon wrote. “Instead they will work through the GOP,
as the Communists have through the Democrats. Learn from the opposition.
Utilize the GOP machinery and voting base to build a big Constitutionalist base
inside the GOP. Build your strength, do as the Communists have done, primary
any vulnerable GOP candidates who will not support your Constitutionalist
agenda.”
Loudon
argued that today, less than 1,000 hardcore Communist Party operatives and
their few thousand allies in the Democratic Socialists of America “effectively
dictate Democratic Party policy.” If the far larger constitutionalist and Tea
Party movement could learn from the opposition’s tactics, “they can have a real
shot at restoring the Republic.” In the end, Loudon argued, the battle for
America is not between Democrats and the GOP. Instead, it is between
constitutionalists and communists. If constitutionalists want a chance to win
that battle and preserve liberty, he concluded, understanding and learning from
the opposition is crucial.
The
process of communists using other parties and movements to enslave populations
is hardly new — it works the same from Brazil to South Africa and everywhere in
between. Communism and communist regimes, of course, murdered well over 100
million people in the last century alone, making the “movement” by far the most
murderous and bloodthirsty in the history of humanity. However, as The New
American has documented extensively, there have always been even more sinister
forces operating behind the communists and their legions of useful idiots. If
liberty is to survive, exposing and countering them remains essential.
No comments:
Post a Comment