You Know Those
Studies That Say Conservatives Are More Authoritarian Than Leftists? They’re
Basically Garbage.
ByBen Shapiro
@benshapiro
July 16, 2018
You’ve undoubtedly seen those preening headlines from
major outlets about how conservatives are more “authoritarian” by nature than
Leftists. See, for example, here and here and here and here and here and here. But it turns
out that this is nonsense. Such studies are generally vague and deliberately
constructed to make it appear that conservatives are more “authoritarian” than
Leftists. In reality, authoritarian personality types exist across the
political spectrum. All you have to do is change the incentive structure in the
questions, and you’ll suddenly find Leftists who hate freedom and conservatives
who love it.
Jesse Singal of New York Magazine has a long and worthwhile piece
about the scientific flaws in the authoritarian modeling. But the concept
itself goes back to the Frankfurt School, members of which argued that
Americans were members of an “authoritarian” mold since they didn’t agree with
Marxist precepts about redistribution of wealth. Thus, for example, Erich Fromm
argued that fascism would rise in the United States thanks to its devotion to
capitalism — and that capitalism sprang from social structures that had urged “compulsive
conforming in the process of which the isolated individual becomes an
automaton,” breeding “authoritarian character.”
Leftists in science took the bait and began constructing
clearly flawed studies to support this dubious and self-flattering conclusion.
As Singal writes:
These scales, in short, are all too often structured in a
way in which respondents’ tendencies toward dogmatism or close-mindedness or
intolerance are ascertained by asking them about issues that are politicized.
And while social and political psychologists have sometimes asked about
rigidity in ways designed to tap liberal ideas — the famed authoritarianism
researcher Bob Altemeyer, for example, did publish a left-wing authoritarianism
scale — this has been the exception rather than the norm.
Thus, when you encounter an “authoritarian” quiz online,
it will likely bear questions that ask whether you want flag burning banned —
but none on whether you want hate speech banned, for example. When studies were
constructed to reverse the politics of the original studies — surprise,
surprise! — the results were reversed:
As it turned out, these tweaks affected which group responded
more “dogmatically” a great deal. Liberals scored as more dogmatic than
conservatives when it came to their agreement with sentiments like “When it
comes to stopping global warming, it is better to be a dead hero than a live
coward” and “A person who thinks primarily of his/her own happiness, and in so
doing disregards the health of the environment (for example, trees and other
animals), is beneath contempt,” while conservatives, by contrast, scored higher
than liberals on items tuned in the opposite political direction. (In fact,
there was little difference between how conservatives scored on the original
scale and the tweaked-to-be-more-explicitly-conservative version, lending
credence to the claim that the original scale was biased in a direction that
captured more conservative than liberal dogmatism.) “By making only small
adjustments to a popularly used dogmatism scale, results show that liberals can
be significantly more dogmatic if a liberal domain is made salient,” explained
the authors.
Confirmation bias has allowed too many members of the
Left to ignore embarrassing scientific reversals like this one from 2016,
when a study suggesting that conservatives were psychotic was actually
recalibrated to show the reverse.
Yet virtually every political science course continues to
carry nonsense about how conservatives are only conservative because they like
authority.
No comments:
Post a Comment