CLICK TO ENLARGE
2 days ago
Monday, August 3, 2009
Sunday, August 2, 2009
Obama's Kenyan Birth Certificate - Latest 11 PM 080209
XXX XXXXX has been running a series of articles exploring the vagaries of Barack Obama's birth and concealed documentation, and this was the jumping off point of the email which confirmed the claim that Obama was not born in Hawaii, that "Mossad are going with Mombassa" but "Proving Mombassa is not so easy, as NSIS in Nairobi are clamming up tight, as are MI6 in London, who have the original Mombassa file and full details of the birth."
FROM: Wednesday, November 19, 2008
ATTTN BLOGGERS: Obama to be outed by Mossad? - RUMOR VALIDATION OR CONTROL ALERT
Now pay close attention to this:
“Ann filed for Divorce Jan. 20, 1964 (Inauguration Day – what are the odds?), and the date was set by the presiding judge for the trial to commence 30 days after Obama SR would have responded to his notification, sent to Cambridge, Mass (Cambridge – what are the odds? ).
Judge Samuel P. King who granted the divorce – last I heard was retired and alive (for now) in his 90s in Hawaii — MAY or MAY NOT have asked to see the Marriage Certificate. BUT, I bet Judge King asked to see Obama JR’s Birth Certificate to confirm Ann’s claims that Obama SR was in fact the father. That is “standard” policy to have a Birth Certificate in case the mother asks for child support from the father (or Welfare) later after the divorce. Judge King probably told Ann to produce a birth certificate before or at trial, which would have been sometime in mid- to late-February 1964 HAD Obama SR answered his notice that was sent to Cambridge.
When Judge King wrote the order on Jan. 23, he had his clerk notify Obama SR via what’s referred to as a “knock and nail”. That is, the postman leaves the notification on the door for (generally) 10 days and retrieves it after that time passes — signed or unsigned. That order was sent on Jan. 23 via airmail from Hawaii and was probably posted on Obama SR’s door Jan. 27-28.
Obama SR’s notification was unsigned by him and apparently IGNORED — either he didn’t want to accept it OR he was NOT at that location.
However, Judge King granted the divorce to Ann Obama (which changed back to Ann Dunham) exactly 60 days from when the original order was request by Ann by default.
NOW, my guess is that Judge King asked to see Obama JR’s Birth Certificate before he’d be willing to grant the divorce, either at trial or by default on March 20, 1964. Ann probably didn’t have the birth certificate when she filed on Jan 20. That’s when this birth certificate would have been generated — before trial for the 1964 divorce.
Important side note: the Certificate issue date of Feb 17, 1964, is JUST A FEW SHORT MONTHS AFTER KENYA BECAME INDEPENDENT on Dec. 12, 1963. TO THIS DATE, this may be the only certificate on Kenyan file today if British documents were sent to the UK for archiving leading up Kenya becoming an independent nation.
If you note the date on the Certified Copy, it was created by the Registrar in Kenya on Feb. 17, 1964. The Kenyan Birth Certificate would have been issued in the midst of the divorce — AFTER the divorce was filed by Ann in Hawaii on Jan. 20, but BEFORE the divorce was granted by Judge King on March 20.
Furthermore, it’s quite plausible that once Ann actually had this Kenyan birth certificate in her hands, and the divorce was granted on March 20, her attorney, George Kerr, counseled her on Hawaiian birth certificate “loopholes” and told her how to file for a Hawaiian “Certificate of Delayed Birth” to get Welfare or OTHER support for young Obama as a child of a non-supporting foreign national.
As Hawaiian law allows, that CODB could have been “upgraded” later to a “Certificate of Live Birth” in the 60s or 70s, which would then be a “root document” of the shorter “Certification of Live Birth” we see today presented as proof of birth from Barack Hussein Obama II.
I can’t vouch for the veracity of the Kenyan birth certificate itself, not knowing how or from whom Orly obtained the birth certificate (the chain of evidence). It may have been obtained quite surreptitiously from the only filed Kenyan birth certificate record copy requested — likely generated from the 1964 divorce.
It’s QUITE possible that all other copies of this Kenyan birth certificate may have been scrubbed from Kenyan archives, but this one may have survived in a lone Vital Statistics office somewhere in Kenya not known about until now.
HOWEVER — the dates DO “line up” for the Kenyan Birth Certificate to be REAL.”
(posted by Jacqlyn Smith at Citizen Wells blog)
FROM: Wednesday, November 19, 2008
ATTTN BLOGGERS: Obama to be outed by Mossad? - RUMOR VALIDATION OR CONTROL ALERT
Now pay close attention to this:
“Ann filed for Divorce Jan. 20, 1964 (Inauguration Day – what are the odds?), and the date was set by the presiding judge for the trial to commence 30 days after Obama SR would have responded to his notification, sent to Cambridge, Mass (Cambridge – what are the odds? ).
Judge Samuel P. King who granted the divorce – last I heard was retired and alive (for now) in his 90s in Hawaii — MAY or MAY NOT have asked to see the Marriage Certificate. BUT, I bet Judge King asked to see Obama JR’s Birth Certificate to confirm Ann’s claims that Obama SR was in fact the father. That is “standard” policy to have a Birth Certificate in case the mother asks for child support from the father (or Welfare) later after the divorce. Judge King probably told Ann to produce a birth certificate before or at trial, which would have been sometime in mid- to late-February 1964 HAD Obama SR answered his notice that was sent to Cambridge.
When Judge King wrote the order on Jan. 23, he had his clerk notify Obama SR via what’s referred to as a “knock and nail”. That is, the postman leaves the notification on the door for (generally) 10 days and retrieves it after that time passes — signed or unsigned. That order was sent on Jan. 23 via airmail from Hawaii and was probably posted on Obama SR’s door Jan. 27-28.
Obama SR’s notification was unsigned by him and apparently IGNORED — either he didn’t want to accept it OR he was NOT at that location.
However, Judge King granted the divorce to Ann Obama (which changed back to Ann Dunham) exactly 60 days from when the original order was request by Ann by default.
NOW, my guess is that Judge King asked to see Obama JR’s Birth Certificate before he’d be willing to grant the divorce, either at trial or by default on March 20, 1964. Ann probably didn’t have the birth certificate when she filed on Jan 20. That’s when this birth certificate would have been generated — before trial for the 1964 divorce.
Important side note: the Certificate issue date of Feb 17, 1964, is JUST A FEW SHORT MONTHS AFTER KENYA BECAME INDEPENDENT on Dec. 12, 1963. TO THIS DATE, this may be the only certificate on Kenyan file today if British documents were sent to the UK for archiving leading up Kenya becoming an independent nation.
If you note the date on the Certified Copy, it was created by the Registrar in Kenya on Feb. 17, 1964. The Kenyan Birth Certificate would have been issued in the midst of the divorce — AFTER the divorce was filed by Ann in Hawaii on Jan. 20, but BEFORE the divorce was granted by Judge King on March 20.
Furthermore, it’s quite plausible that once Ann actually had this Kenyan birth certificate in her hands, and the divorce was granted on March 20, her attorney, George Kerr, counseled her on Hawaiian birth certificate “loopholes” and told her how to file for a Hawaiian “Certificate of Delayed Birth” to get Welfare or OTHER support for young Obama as a child of a non-supporting foreign national.
As Hawaiian law allows, that CODB could have been “upgraded” later to a “Certificate of Live Birth” in the 60s or 70s, which would then be a “root document” of the shorter “Certification of Live Birth” we see today presented as proof of birth from Barack Hussein Obama II.
I can’t vouch for the veracity of the Kenyan birth certificate itself, not knowing how or from whom Orly obtained the birth certificate (the chain of evidence). It may have been obtained quite surreptitiously from the only filed Kenyan birth certificate record copy requested — likely generated from the 1964 divorce.
It’s QUITE possible that all other copies of this Kenyan birth certificate may have been scrubbed from Kenyan archives, but this one may have survived in a lone Vital Statistics office somewhere in Kenya not known about until now.
HOWEVER — the dates DO “line up” for the Kenyan Birth Certificate to be REAL.”
(posted by Jacqlyn Smith at Citizen Wells blog)
Attempt to vett the Kenyan birth certificate.
You will note that my take on this is verify. Trust and verify doesn't work with an issue with such an extensive history of fraud and forgery.
Obots are now busy using the same arguments about this document that I used to debunk AKA Obama's fraud.
And be sure to see this:
http://lamecherry.blogspot.com/2009/08/what-i-can-tell-you-about-kenyan-obama.html
And another possible explanation:
Warning...Democratic Underground wanting members to create fake BC’s
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x6205189
20. We need to create THOUSANDS of them and ship them all over the fucking place.bury the fuckers in precise fakes, all just a little different from each other.I wanna see heads explode. I wanna see people drooling from the breakdowns.
SEE UPDATE HERE: Obama's Kenyan Birth Certificate - Latest 11 PM 080209
Sent to a Russian friend in England. Named Boris, of course.
Birth Register of this Province, Book 44B, Page 5733.
I have been saying for some time that this record should be in the achieves of the British Empire. Do you have any contacts that could attempt to vett this document?
Now we know exactly where to look :
TOP OF DOCUMENT HERE:
Obots are now busy using the same arguments about this document that I used to debunk AKA Obama's fraud.
And be sure to see this:
http://lamecherry.blogspot.com/2009/08/what-i-can-tell-you-about-kenyan-obama.html
And another possible explanation:
Warning...Democratic Underground wanting members to create fake BC’s
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x6205189
20. We need to create THOUSANDS of them and ship them all over the fucking place.bury the fuckers in precise fakes, all just a little different from each other.I wanna see heads explode. I wanna see people drooling from the breakdowns.
SEE UPDATE HERE: Obama's Kenyan Birth Certificate - Latest 11 PM 080209
Sent to a Russian friend in England. Named Boris, of course.
Birth Register of this Province, Book 44B, Page 5733.
I have been saying for some time that this record should be in the achieves of the British Empire. Do you have any contacts that could attempt to vett this document?
Now we know exactly where to look :
Click images to enlarge:
TOP OF DOCUMENT HERE:
AKA Obama's Kenyan Birth Certificate - For Real This Time?
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=105764Is this really smoking gun of Obama's Kenyan birth?
Attorney files motion for authentication of alleged 1960s certificate from Africa
Posted: August 02, 2009, 11:55 am EasternWASHINGTON – California attorney Orly Taitz, who has filed a number of lawsuits demanding proof of Barack Obama's eligibility to serve as president, has released a copy of what purports to be a Kenyan certification of birth and has filed a new motion in U.S. District Court for its authentication.
Saturday, August 1, 2009
Glenn Beck talked - this man walked - Cloward/Piven
How to Create a Crisis and Steal a Nation
How to Create a Crisis and Steal a Nation
By Aristotle the Hun, The Rev. Big Goon and Good Shepherd Sam
Note: It will quickly be obvious to the reader why details have been obscured, omitted or fictionalized in this narrative of events that began nearly forty years ago.
How to Create a Crisis and Steal a Nation
By Aristotle the Hun, The Rev. Big Goon and Good Shepherd Sam
Note: It will quickly be obvious to the reader why details have been obscured, omitted or fictionalized in this narrative of events that began nearly forty years ago.
Why the Founding Fathers Were “Birthers”
Along with Millions of Americans, not willing to let their Constitution die without a good ole patriot's fight!
Why the Founding Fathers Were “Birthers”
By JB Williams Saturday, August 1, 2009
The label of “birther” is fast becoming a noble badge of honor for millions of Americans who are not willing to let their Constitution die without a good ole patriot’s fight!
The leftist Obama propaganda press would love for you to believe that “birthers” are just a bunch of “crazy racists” that number in the hundreds, and that they have NO basis to demand proof of whom and what Barack Hussein Obama really is…
But the “birthers” actually number in the millions and the basis for their demands were set in stone by the men who wrote and ratified the US Constitution. If millions of American “birthers” are “right-wing nuts,” they are in good company with men like Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, John Adams and Ben Franklin.
Obama has been running from his entire past all of his political life. His many minions in the press have been running interference every step of the way.
For the record, the following Obama records remain under lock and key, more than two years into public demands for Obama “transparency"… and Obama has spent a reported $1 Million in legal fees to keep them SEALED!
Obama’s official birth records -SEALED
His Occidental College records -SEALED
His Columbia College records -SEALED
His Harvard College records -SEALED
His College Thesis -SEALED
His Harvard Law Review articles -SEALED
His Indonesia Adoption records -SEALED
His Passport file -SEALED
His connection to countless foreign and domestic thugs -SEALED
Yet the American press, now to include Fox News Channel’s Bill O’Reilly, insist that they somehow inherently know with absolute certainty, that Barack Hussein Obama was indeed born in Hawaii, a “natural born citizen,” not just “a citizen” or a “native citizen,” and that millions of Americans who think he should provide a minimum level of proof, are just “crazy” -"racists" or possibly even “potential domestic terrorists” as Obama’s Department of Homeland Security recently suggested.
Since ALL Obama records remain SEALED, what files did O’Reilly and others investigate in order to draw their absolute conclusion that Obama is legit and millions of Americans are nuts?
What’s all of the stink about?
US Law establishes that while there are several ways one can become a US citizen, there are actually only three different types of US Citizens with three very different sets of qualifications and citizen rights.
A US Citizen
A Native Born Citizen
A Natural Born Citizen
Today, we have to add one more category, the “illegal” US citizen. But that story is for another day.
A foreign born immigrant, who has successfully navigated the naturalization process, is a legal US citizen with all of the Constitutional rights afforded a US Citizen with the exception of one, the right to be President of the United States. As a matter of Constitutional case law, - 94 ”Whatever the term ‘’natural born’’ means, it no doubt does not include a person who is ‘’naturalized.’’
In this regard, the issue of Obama’s adoption by Indonesian citizen Lolo Soetoro is also of consequence, as Obama could only be a US citizen by way of “naturalization.” There is no record of Obama naturalizing as a U.S. citizen upon returning from Indonesia.
All of this is at the heart of the debate over where Barack Hussein Obama II was born. His family and friends say that he was born in Kenya. His political allies say that he was born in Hawaii, our fiftieth state. Obama has stated that he was born in Hawaii and he has presented as proof, THREE different Certifications of Live Birth (COLBs) [ NOT the same as a Certificate of Live Birth ] and he has named TWO different hospitals located in Hawaii, as his official place of birth.
But since he has refused to open up his official birth records in Hawaii, nobody knows for certain where Barack Hussein Obama II was born. Contrary to leftist attempts to spin, the mere fact that such a constitutional requirement exists implies that one must provide proof of compliance, if and when asked to do so.
NOTE: One can be a US citizen without being a “native citizen” or a “natural born citizen.” It must also be stated that Hawaii issued Certifications of Live Birth to foreign born non-citizens of the US as a regular practice.
If Barack Hussein Obama II was indeed born in Hawaii, and this can be verified by authenticating his official birth records alleged to exist in Hawaii, then he could be a “US Citizen” and maybe even a “Native Born Citizen” having been born on American soil. To date, no such evidence has been made available for purposes of authentication.
However, one can be both a “US citizen” and a “Native Born citizen” and still NOT be a “Natural Born Citizen.”
As an example, what are often referred to as “anchor babies” are both US citizens and Native Born citizens as a matter of federal law. But as a matter of the US Constitution, specifically Article II -Section I, they are NOT a “natural born citizen” as their parents were NOT citizens of the U.S.
NOTE: Barack Hussein Obama I, Obama’s legal birth father was NOT a US citizen. He was a British subject and a legal citizen of Kenya.
Under “natural law” at the foundation of the “natural born citizen” clause, a blood descendent will inherit by way of natural law, the fathers name and citizenship, no matter where they were born.
Until the election of Barack Hussein Obama, all Presidents since and including Martin Van Buren were born in the United States, a descendent of parents who were both US citizens.
Why the Founders were “Birthers”
It was the Founding Fathers who wrote and ratified, “No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President;”
They based this clause on the following; “Congress, in which a number of Framers sat, provided in the Naturalization act of 1790 that ‘’the children of citizens of the United States, that may be born beyond the sea, . . . shall be considered as natural born citizens. . . .’’ 96 This phrasing followed the literal terms of British statutes, beginning in 1350, under which persons born abroad, whose parents were both British subjects, would enjoy the same rights of inheritance as those born in England; beginning with laws in 1709 and 1731, these statutes expressly provided that such persons were natural-born subjects of the crown.”
So, had both of Obama’s parents been US citizens, he would indeed be a “natural born citizen” of the US, even if he had been born in Kenya. By way of “natural law,” he inherited the name and citizenship of his father, in Kenya, not the US.
As his father was not a US citizen, but rather a citizen of Kenya, Obama inherited by birthright, natural law, his fathers name and citizenship. He is NOT a “natural born citizen” of the US, no matter where he was born.
The Founders exempted themselves from the “natural born citizen” clause because at the time of ratification, there were no “natural born citizens,” - US citizens born to two parents who were both US citizens.
But from President Martin Van Buren on, US born descendents of two US citizens did exist and up until the election of Barack Hussein Obama, those who became president passed the “natural born citizen” requirement in the Constitution.
Clearly, the Founders were very serious “birthers.” But why were they “birthers?” What were they so worried about?
Dual or Divided Loyalties
The president of the United States has unfettered access to ALL national security information. He is afforded powers unlike any other individual on earth. His finger rests on the Red button and his office is respected and revered around the globe. He is the international representative of every American citizen.
Such an office cannot be held by one with even the potential for dual or divided loyalties. The international pressure to act upon global interests instead of American interests is immense. Only one with completely undivided loyalties can be trusted. He MUST be a “natural born citizen” as the Constitution requires.
Above all else, the Founding Father’s feared a despotic central government that would one day turn its abusive power on its people. They went to great pains to design a Representative Republic limited in scope and power by constitutional text that would best secure the people against such an event, including Article II -Section I, intended to keep leaders with foreign loyalties from ever holding the broadest power on earth.
Then, they told us to alter or abolish any government that became a threat to Life, Liberty or the pursuit of Happiness.
They were “extremists...” They didn’t trust central power and they sure didn’t trust that power in the hands of someone with dual or divided loyalties.
Why the “Birther” Movement is EXPLODING!
Demonstrated by plummeting approval ratings only six months into office, the American people have seen enough of Obama’s “global” agenda, at odds with American interest, and what was once “hope” for “change” six months ago, has become fear, anger and discontent. Obama took office six months ago with a +28 point strong approval rating. Six months later, Obama finds himself at a -12 point approval rating, an unprecedented 40 point swing!
The Obama administration has named more unelected Czars in six months than pre-Soviet Russia named in its thousand year existence. They have forced industries into bankruptcy only to emerge the property of the federal government. They are ramming Marxist laws through a leftist congress so fast that members of congress don’t even have time to read them before they pass.
Members of congress are now afraid to hold town meetings for fear of being attacked by angry constituents who have had enough of watching DC elitists run roughshod over the other side of the aisle, the states and the American people. (http://news.yahoo.com/s/politico/20090731/pl_politico/25646)
There are TWO reasons why the “birther” movement is EXPLODING instead of going away, despite daily attacks and name calling from the lamestream press.
The Constitution, including Article II -Section I either stands or it doesn’t.
The people are watching the utter hourly destruction of their nation in Washington DC and they need a peaceful way to end that destruction legally, before things become violent.
The flaw in the left’s plan to change the Unites States into a secular socialist One World Order is they have foolishly underestimated the desire for freedom and liberty in the hearts and minds of most Americans.
They have miscalculated… The 22.4% of the population who voted for Marxism in the last two election cycles thought that they won the right to shove Marxism down the throats of every American. They are horrifically mistaken…
By launching a heavy handed all-out assault on individual freedom and liberty from every possible front at breakneck speed, they have sent the nation into shock and dismay. Even many, who foolishly voted for the mystery messiah last November, are now jumping ship after watching him make a mockery of the US Constitution and the principles and values that made America the greatest free nation ever known to mankind.
The people need to right the ship and remove every anti-American fraud from the halls of the federal government before things get really ugly. Afraid to confront their constituents, law-makers are running for cover. When representatives stop listening to the people they work for, the people will stop talking and start acting!
If Obama is a “constitutional” president, he is going to have to prove it and fast. If not, he is going to have to leave the people’s White House, in handcuffs if need be! The issue will not go away. The Constitution stands or all bets are off!
Every member of his administration and his party who had knowledge of, participated in or provided cover for the greatest hoax every perpetrated on the American people, must step down with him.
The people will have to figure out what to do next, but one thing is certain, - this “silent coup” will not stand much longer. The walls are closing in and Obama & Co. are trapped in their own massive web of deceit.
People do NOT spend a million dollars to hide something that there is no reason to hide.
The inescapable reality is this… - We have an unconstitutional resident of the White House and a whole lot of people working around the clock to keep him in office, for God only knows what purpose.
Although 22.4% of Americans don’t seem to care about that, millions of American “birthers” do, as did the Founding Fathers.
Sooner or later, Obama is going to have to prove that he is legitimate. The longer it takes for him to come forward and do so, the more dangerous the situation will become, as citizens grow increasingly angry over the utter destruction of their country.
The truth exists in Obama’s official birth, adoption, college and passport records. Nobody hides the truth unless the truth will expose a lie…
Even Obama’s political allies had better start calling for the truth and fast, or they will sink with him! The Founders had it right and on that basis alone, so do the “birthers.”
We’re keeping a list of all who have chosen badly… (7) Reader Feedback Subscribe
JB Williams Most recent columns
JB Williams is a business man, a husband, a father, and a writer. A no nonsense commentator on American politics, American history, and American philosophy. He is published nationwide and in many countries around the world. JB Williams’ website is jb-williams.com/
JB_Williams@comcast.net
Older articles by JB Williams
Somehow, you know its coming. That OMG moment is just around the corner. You can feel the inescapable reality creeping up on you. Something will leak. Someone will spill the beans.
“For nothing is hid that shall not be made manifest, nor anything secret that shall not be known and come to light.” Luke 8:17
http://thesteadydrip.blogspot.com/2009/04/aka-obama-fans-all-together-now-say-omg.html
Why the Founding Fathers Were “Birthers”
By JB Williams Saturday, August 1, 2009
The label of “birther” is fast becoming a noble badge of honor for millions of Americans who are not willing to let their Constitution die without a good ole patriot’s fight!
The leftist Obama propaganda press would love for you to believe that “birthers” are just a bunch of “crazy racists” that number in the hundreds, and that they have NO basis to demand proof of whom and what Barack Hussein Obama really is…
But the “birthers” actually number in the millions and the basis for their demands were set in stone by the men who wrote and ratified the US Constitution. If millions of American “birthers” are “right-wing nuts,” they are in good company with men like Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, John Adams and Ben Franklin.
Obama has been running from his entire past all of his political life. His many minions in the press have been running interference every step of the way.
For the record, the following Obama records remain under lock and key, more than two years into public demands for Obama “transparency"… and Obama has spent a reported $1 Million in legal fees to keep them SEALED!
Obama’s official birth records -SEALED
His Occidental College records -SEALED
His Columbia College records -SEALED
His Harvard College records -SEALED
His College Thesis -SEALED
His Harvard Law Review articles -SEALED
His Indonesia Adoption records -SEALED
His Passport file -SEALED
His connection to countless foreign and domestic thugs -SEALED
Yet the American press, now to include Fox News Channel’s Bill O’Reilly, insist that they somehow inherently know with absolute certainty, that Barack Hussein Obama was indeed born in Hawaii, a “natural born citizen,” not just “a citizen” or a “native citizen,” and that millions of Americans who think he should provide a minimum level of proof, are just “crazy” -"racists" or possibly even “potential domestic terrorists” as Obama’s Department of Homeland Security recently suggested.
Since ALL Obama records remain SEALED, what files did O’Reilly and others investigate in order to draw their absolute conclusion that Obama is legit and millions of Americans are nuts?
What’s all of the stink about?
US Law establishes that while there are several ways one can become a US citizen, there are actually only three different types of US Citizens with three very different sets of qualifications and citizen rights.
A US Citizen
A Native Born Citizen
A Natural Born Citizen
Today, we have to add one more category, the “illegal” US citizen. But that story is for another day.
A foreign born immigrant, who has successfully navigated the naturalization process, is a legal US citizen with all of the Constitutional rights afforded a US Citizen with the exception of one, the right to be President of the United States. As a matter of Constitutional case law, - 94 ”Whatever the term ‘’natural born’’ means, it no doubt does not include a person who is ‘’naturalized.’’
In this regard, the issue of Obama’s adoption by Indonesian citizen Lolo Soetoro is also of consequence, as Obama could only be a US citizen by way of “naturalization.” There is no record of Obama naturalizing as a U.S. citizen upon returning from Indonesia.
All of this is at the heart of the debate over where Barack Hussein Obama II was born. His family and friends say that he was born in Kenya. His political allies say that he was born in Hawaii, our fiftieth state. Obama has stated that he was born in Hawaii and he has presented as proof, THREE different Certifications of Live Birth (COLBs) [ NOT the same as a Certificate of Live Birth ] and he has named TWO different hospitals located in Hawaii, as his official place of birth.
But since he has refused to open up his official birth records in Hawaii, nobody knows for certain where Barack Hussein Obama II was born. Contrary to leftist attempts to spin, the mere fact that such a constitutional requirement exists implies that one must provide proof of compliance, if and when asked to do so.
NOTE: One can be a US citizen without being a “native citizen” or a “natural born citizen.” It must also be stated that Hawaii issued Certifications of Live Birth to foreign born non-citizens of the US as a regular practice.
If Barack Hussein Obama II was indeed born in Hawaii, and this can be verified by authenticating his official birth records alleged to exist in Hawaii, then he could be a “US Citizen” and maybe even a “Native Born Citizen” having been born on American soil. To date, no such evidence has been made available for purposes of authentication.
However, one can be both a “US citizen” and a “Native Born citizen” and still NOT be a “Natural Born Citizen.”
As an example, what are often referred to as “anchor babies” are both US citizens and Native Born citizens as a matter of federal law. But as a matter of the US Constitution, specifically Article II -Section I, they are NOT a “natural born citizen” as their parents were NOT citizens of the U.S.
NOTE: Barack Hussein Obama I, Obama’s legal birth father was NOT a US citizen. He was a British subject and a legal citizen of Kenya.
Under “natural law” at the foundation of the “natural born citizen” clause, a blood descendent will inherit by way of natural law, the fathers name and citizenship, no matter where they were born.
Until the election of Barack Hussein Obama, all Presidents since and including Martin Van Buren were born in the United States, a descendent of parents who were both US citizens.
Why the Founders were “Birthers”
It was the Founding Fathers who wrote and ratified, “No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President;”
They based this clause on the following; “Congress, in which a number of Framers sat, provided in the Naturalization act of 1790 that ‘’the children of citizens of the United States, that may be born beyond the sea, . . . shall be considered as natural born citizens. . . .’’ 96 This phrasing followed the literal terms of British statutes, beginning in 1350, under which persons born abroad, whose parents were both British subjects, would enjoy the same rights of inheritance as those born in England; beginning with laws in 1709 and 1731, these statutes expressly provided that such persons were natural-born subjects of the crown.”
So, had both of Obama’s parents been US citizens, he would indeed be a “natural born citizen” of the US, even if he had been born in Kenya. By way of “natural law,” he inherited the name and citizenship of his father, in Kenya, not the US.
As his father was not a US citizen, but rather a citizen of Kenya, Obama inherited by birthright, natural law, his fathers name and citizenship. He is NOT a “natural born citizen” of the US, no matter where he was born.
The Founders exempted themselves from the “natural born citizen” clause because at the time of ratification, there were no “natural born citizens,” - US citizens born to two parents who were both US citizens.
But from President Martin Van Buren on, US born descendents of two US citizens did exist and up until the election of Barack Hussein Obama, those who became president passed the “natural born citizen” requirement in the Constitution.
Clearly, the Founders were very serious “birthers.” But why were they “birthers?” What were they so worried about?
Dual or Divided Loyalties
The president of the United States has unfettered access to ALL national security information. He is afforded powers unlike any other individual on earth. His finger rests on the Red button and his office is respected and revered around the globe. He is the international representative of every American citizen.
Such an office cannot be held by one with even the potential for dual or divided loyalties. The international pressure to act upon global interests instead of American interests is immense. Only one with completely undivided loyalties can be trusted. He MUST be a “natural born citizen” as the Constitution requires.
Above all else, the Founding Father’s feared a despotic central government that would one day turn its abusive power on its people. They went to great pains to design a Representative Republic limited in scope and power by constitutional text that would best secure the people against such an event, including Article II -Section I, intended to keep leaders with foreign loyalties from ever holding the broadest power on earth.
Then, they told us to alter or abolish any government that became a threat to Life, Liberty or the pursuit of Happiness.
They were “extremists...” They didn’t trust central power and they sure didn’t trust that power in the hands of someone with dual or divided loyalties.
Why the “Birther” Movement is EXPLODING!
Demonstrated by plummeting approval ratings only six months into office, the American people have seen enough of Obama’s “global” agenda, at odds with American interest, and what was once “hope” for “change” six months ago, has become fear, anger and discontent. Obama took office six months ago with a +28 point strong approval rating. Six months later, Obama finds himself at a -12 point approval rating, an unprecedented 40 point swing!
The Obama administration has named more unelected Czars in six months than pre-Soviet Russia named in its thousand year existence. They have forced industries into bankruptcy only to emerge the property of the federal government. They are ramming Marxist laws through a leftist congress so fast that members of congress don’t even have time to read them before they pass.
Members of congress are now afraid to hold town meetings for fear of being attacked by angry constituents who have had enough of watching DC elitists run roughshod over the other side of the aisle, the states and the American people. (http://news.yahoo.com/s/politico/20090731/pl_politico/25646)
There are TWO reasons why the “birther” movement is EXPLODING instead of going away, despite daily attacks and name calling from the lamestream press.
The Constitution, including Article II -Section I either stands or it doesn’t.
The people are watching the utter hourly destruction of their nation in Washington DC and they need a peaceful way to end that destruction legally, before things become violent.
The flaw in the left’s plan to change the Unites States into a secular socialist One World Order is they have foolishly underestimated the desire for freedom and liberty in the hearts and minds of most Americans.
They have miscalculated… The 22.4% of the population who voted for Marxism in the last two election cycles thought that they won the right to shove Marxism down the throats of every American. They are horrifically mistaken…
By launching a heavy handed all-out assault on individual freedom and liberty from every possible front at breakneck speed, they have sent the nation into shock and dismay. Even many, who foolishly voted for the mystery messiah last November, are now jumping ship after watching him make a mockery of the US Constitution and the principles and values that made America the greatest free nation ever known to mankind.
The people need to right the ship and remove every anti-American fraud from the halls of the federal government before things get really ugly. Afraid to confront their constituents, law-makers are running for cover. When representatives stop listening to the people they work for, the people will stop talking and start acting!
If Obama is a “constitutional” president, he is going to have to prove it and fast. If not, he is going to have to leave the people’s White House, in handcuffs if need be! The issue will not go away. The Constitution stands or all bets are off!
Every member of his administration and his party who had knowledge of, participated in or provided cover for the greatest hoax every perpetrated on the American people, must step down with him.
The people will have to figure out what to do next, but one thing is certain, - this “silent coup” will not stand much longer. The walls are closing in and Obama & Co. are trapped in their own massive web of deceit.
People do NOT spend a million dollars to hide something that there is no reason to hide.
The inescapable reality is this… - We have an unconstitutional resident of the White House and a whole lot of people working around the clock to keep him in office, for God only knows what purpose.
Although 22.4% of Americans don’t seem to care about that, millions of American “birthers” do, as did the Founding Fathers.
Sooner or later, Obama is going to have to prove that he is legitimate. The longer it takes for him to come forward and do so, the more dangerous the situation will become, as citizens grow increasingly angry over the utter destruction of their country.
The truth exists in Obama’s official birth, adoption, college and passport records. Nobody hides the truth unless the truth will expose a lie…
Even Obama’s political allies had better start calling for the truth and fast, or they will sink with him! The Founders had it right and on that basis alone, so do the “birthers.”
We’re keeping a list of all who have chosen badly… (7) Reader Feedback Subscribe
JB Williams Most recent columns
JB Williams is a business man, a husband, a father, and a writer. A no nonsense commentator on American politics, American history, and American philosophy. He is published nationwide and in many countries around the world. JB Williams’ website is jb-williams.com/
JB_Williams@comcast.net
Older articles by JB Williams
Somehow, you know its coming. That OMG moment is just around the corner. You can feel the inescapable reality creeping up on you. Something will leak. Someone will spill the beans.
“For nothing is hid that shall not be made manifest, nor anything secret that shall not be known and come to light.” Luke 8:17
http://thesteadydrip.blogspot.com/2009/04/aka-obama-fans-all-together-now-say-omg.html
Exclusive: To Bill O’Reilly: Show it or Fold
Exclusive: To Bill O’Reilly: Show it or Fold
Margaret Hemenway
On Bill O'Reilly's FOX News show, O'Reilly reassured his viewers that there is nothing to the Obama birth certificate controversy, that it is bogus, and so forth. He said,
".....The Factor investigated. Found out that it's bogus.....and again, we found that President Obama was born in Hawaii. We sent (for) the documents....."
Later in the same show, O'Reilly repeated this assurance after a segment with Ann Coulter:
".....As we mentioned, The Factor debunked the whole Birth Certificate deal more than a year ago. It was easy. The State of Hawaii sent us a copy of the document. End of story."
We expect better than this from the cable news network that promises us "fair and balanced" reporting and which has been a large reason up until now that FOX has been drawing viewers away from the liberal networks that used to dominate the television airwaves. We expect even more, however, from Mr. O'Reilly who proudly labels his program the "No Spin Zone." I don't know about you - but I think lately he's spinning like a top.
I recently received an email from a proud "birther", Bob from New York, a Democrat who voted for Mr. Obama and believes that he should end this unnecessary controversy over his "natural born" status by publicly releasing his vital records. Bob is the type of person who has practically made Chris Matthews (who worked as a staffer for liberal Massachusetts Democrat, former House Speaker Tip O'Neill, before launching his journalism career) foam at the mouth (as opposed to tingling in his leg).
Bob points out a major discrepancy between O'Reilly's boast that he's seen the goods, and CNN's Lou Dobbs' explanation of restrictions under Hawaii law about the “goods”, which he articulated on his own show:
"There have been repeated requests from some of the president's skeptics about the release of his original Birth Certificate. Hawaii Law, however, prevents the actual release of the document to a third party....."
In fact, Hawaii officials have repeatedly avowed that state law prevents them from releasing the birth certificate to anyone without a tangible interest which they, amazingly, interpret to mean any US citizen or voter. One would assume this would include Mr. O’Reilly.
So, how did O'Reilly get his documents from Hawaii, if indeed he did? Did some Hawaiian official violate state law and sneak Bill O'Reilly a bootlegged copy of the birth certificate - and does it offer up Obama's doctor and hospital since that critical, identifying information is missing on the "online" version, the Certification of Live Birth (not to be confused with an actual "long form" or "vault" certificate)? Besides, why did Mr. Obama have his vital records, his passport file and his school records all sealed and vaulted at considerable expense by his legal defense team?
As Bob notes,
"If that's the case, then O'Reilly should do precisely what Lou Dobbs and countless others are doing – that is, demand of the President (82% in a recent AOL poll) to ‘Show us the birth certificate.’ So, let's see Mr. O'Reilly's evidence - the copy of the original birth certificate. We are all calling his hand. Show it or fold. "
O'Reilly seemed to imply on this program that the reason Lou Dobbs keeps talking about the birth certificate issue is...due to ratings. As Bob points out in his email,
“My goodness, does O'Reilly mean that television viewership/advertising dollars are all about ratings? So, after months of ducking the issue, why is O'Reilly now running the story more than once? Because of the ratings? I’m shocked! Programs generally cover the issues that viewers want to hear about ...and viewers are what advertisers pay for. Because the birth certificate scandal - to the dismay of Obamaphiles - has become one of the hottest issues around, especially on the internet which competes for viewership time; and because the birth certificate issue has now burst into the mainstream media, numerous shows on CNN, MSNBC, and CBS... and now including Bill O'Reilly's…are covering it.”
And it isn't going to go away, because the resolution to the controversy is so simple that it makes you perplexed as to why Obama is putting up such stiff resistance to the obvious, which is merely to release his original birth documents. (He could release his under-lock-and-key school and other relevant documents as well, while he’s at it.) If this isn’t about his much-vaunted transparency initiative, I don’t know what is.
Each and every one of us (including American children wanting to participate in organized sports) has to comply with this simple request: "Show us the birth certificate." Now, it's being demanded of O'Reilly since he's mimicking the Obama team's legal defense. Does he show us the proof he's received from Hawaii, or fold his hand? I don't know about everyone else, but I'll be tuning in to Lou Dobbs to try to get some answers.
Bob kindly provided a list of the show's advertisers, in the event that any "birthers" should decide to contact them to express their disappointment with the lack of facts on "The Factor" concerning this important Constitutional question of Obama's "natural born" status:
"Here are the advertisers of the 7-29-08 O'Reilly's program (in order of appearance). Do let them know your feelings:
1) Golden Corral, 2) ADT Security (Home), 3) Capital One, 4) IHOP (Hawaiian Pancakes), 5) Walmart, 6) Lipitor, 7) The New York Times, 8) SERVPRO (Cleanup), 9) DIRECTV, 10) Neckline Slimmer, 11) GEICO (geico.com), 12) BMW, 13) 1-800-641-1806, 14) Liver Aid (liverite.com), 15) Expedia, 17) SAM (getasam.com) 18) Optimum Business, 19) Drunk Driving (Ad Council), 20) Westchester Toyota, 21) WaterJet (buwaterjet.com), 22) State Farm. "
We had long ago trusted Mr. O’Reilly to be fair and balanced…and accurate. Now his credibility is on the line.
FamilySecurityMatters.org Contributing Editor Margaret Calhoun Hemenway spent fifteen years on Capitol Hill, in both the House and Senate, and five years as a White House appointee serving President Bush at both DoD and NASA.
You can find this online at: http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/publications/id.3890/pub_detail.asp
Margaret Hemenway
On Bill O'Reilly's FOX News show, O'Reilly reassured his viewers that there is nothing to the Obama birth certificate controversy, that it is bogus, and so forth. He said,
".....The Factor investigated. Found out that it's bogus.....and again, we found that President Obama was born in Hawaii. We sent (for) the documents....."
Later in the same show, O'Reilly repeated this assurance after a segment with Ann Coulter:
".....As we mentioned, The Factor debunked the whole Birth Certificate deal more than a year ago. It was easy. The State of Hawaii sent us a copy of the document. End of story."
We expect better than this from the cable news network that promises us "fair and balanced" reporting and which has been a large reason up until now that FOX has been drawing viewers away from the liberal networks that used to dominate the television airwaves. We expect even more, however, from Mr. O'Reilly who proudly labels his program the "No Spin Zone." I don't know about you - but I think lately he's spinning like a top.
I recently received an email from a proud "birther", Bob from New York, a Democrat who voted for Mr. Obama and believes that he should end this unnecessary controversy over his "natural born" status by publicly releasing his vital records. Bob is the type of person who has practically made Chris Matthews (who worked as a staffer for liberal Massachusetts Democrat, former House Speaker Tip O'Neill, before launching his journalism career) foam at the mouth (as opposed to tingling in his leg).
Bob points out a major discrepancy between O'Reilly's boast that he's seen the goods, and CNN's Lou Dobbs' explanation of restrictions under Hawaii law about the “goods”, which he articulated on his own show:
"There have been repeated requests from some of the president's skeptics about the release of his original Birth Certificate. Hawaii Law, however, prevents the actual release of the document to a third party....."
In fact, Hawaii officials have repeatedly avowed that state law prevents them from releasing the birth certificate to anyone without a tangible interest which they, amazingly, interpret to mean any US citizen or voter. One would assume this would include Mr. O’Reilly.
So, how did O'Reilly get his documents from Hawaii, if indeed he did? Did some Hawaiian official violate state law and sneak Bill O'Reilly a bootlegged copy of the birth certificate - and does it offer up Obama's doctor and hospital since that critical, identifying information is missing on the "online" version, the Certification of Live Birth (not to be confused with an actual "long form" or "vault" certificate)? Besides, why did Mr. Obama have his vital records, his passport file and his school records all sealed and vaulted at considerable expense by his legal defense team?
As Bob notes,
"If that's the case, then O'Reilly should do precisely what Lou Dobbs and countless others are doing – that is, demand of the President (82% in a recent AOL poll) to ‘Show us the birth certificate.’ So, let's see Mr. O'Reilly's evidence - the copy of the original birth certificate. We are all calling his hand. Show it or fold. "
O'Reilly seemed to imply on this program that the reason Lou Dobbs keeps talking about the birth certificate issue is...due to ratings. As Bob points out in his email,
“My goodness, does O'Reilly mean that television viewership/advertising dollars are all about ratings? So, after months of ducking the issue, why is O'Reilly now running the story more than once? Because of the ratings? I’m shocked! Programs generally cover the issues that viewers want to hear about ...and viewers are what advertisers pay for. Because the birth certificate scandal - to the dismay of Obamaphiles - has become one of the hottest issues around, especially on the internet which competes for viewership time; and because the birth certificate issue has now burst into the mainstream media, numerous shows on CNN, MSNBC, and CBS... and now including Bill O'Reilly's…are covering it.”
And it isn't going to go away, because the resolution to the controversy is so simple that it makes you perplexed as to why Obama is putting up such stiff resistance to the obvious, which is merely to release his original birth documents. (He could release his under-lock-and-key school and other relevant documents as well, while he’s at it.) If this isn’t about his much-vaunted transparency initiative, I don’t know what is.
Each and every one of us (including American children wanting to participate in organized sports) has to comply with this simple request: "Show us the birth certificate." Now, it's being demanded of O'Reilly since he's mimicking the Obama team's legal defense. Does he show us the proof he's received from Hawaii, or fold his hand? I don't know about everyone else, but I'll be tuning in to Lou Dobbs to try to get some answers.
Bob kindly provided a list of the show's advertisers, in the event that any "birthers" should decide to contact them to express their disappointment with the lack of facts on "The Factor" concerning this important Constitutional question of Obama's "natural born" status:
"Here are the advertisers of the 7-29-08 O'Reilly's program (in order of appearance). Do let them know your feelings:
1) Golden Corral, 2) ADT Security (Home), 3) Capital One, 4) IHOP (Hawaiian Pancakes), 5) Walmart, 6) Lipitor, 7) The New York Times, 8) SERVPRO (Cleanup), 9) DIRECTV, 10) Neckline Slimmer, 11) GEICO (geico.com), 12) BMW, 13) 1-800-641-1806, 14) Liver Aid (liverite.com), 15) Expedia, 17) SAM (getasam.com) 18) Optimum Business, 19) Drunk Driving (Ad Council), 20) Westchester Toyota, 21) WaterJet (buwaterjet.com), 22) State Farm. "
We had long ago trusted Mr. O’Reilly to be fair and balanced…and accurate. Now his credibility is on the line.
FamilySecurityMatters.org Contributing Editor Margaret Calhoun Hemenway spent fifteen years on Capitol Hill, in both the House and Senate, and five years as a White House appointee serving President Bush at both DoD and NASA.
You can find this online at: http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/publications/id.3890/pub_detail.asp
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
