The CDC: A Truly
Corrupt and Dangerous Organization
Christina England September 10 2014
Over the years, the CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention)
has repeatedly deceived and lied to the public, yet they continue to state that
their mission is to protect America from health, safety and security threats,
both foreign and in the U.S.
They boldly announce on their website that the “CDC
increases the health security of our nation. As the nation’s health protection
agency, CDC saves lives and protects people from health threats. To accomplish
our mission, CDC conducts critical science and provides health information that
protects our nation against expensive and dangerous health threats, and
responds when these arise,” and yet there is more and more evidence to
suggest that their so called ‘scientific evidence’ has been skewed and
deliberately tampered with to gain the desired results. [1]
During the course of this article, I am going to give
five recent examples of CDC fraud or deception. Each one of my examples will
demonstrate when the CDC has deliberately altered or withheld scientific
evidence in a bid to misinform the public.
Example #1: CDC Whistleblower Announces That the MMR
Vaccine Causes Autism
Last month, Dr. Andrew Wakefield revealed that, during
telephone conversations between biochemist Brian Hooker and a CDC
whistleblower, later named as William Thompson, Thompson admitted that the CDC
had deliberately withheld crucial evidence proving that the MMR (measles, mumps
and rubella) vaccine caused autism.
Dr. Thompson told Dr. Hooker that, in 2003, research
carried out by the CDC in Atlanta, Georgia, revealed that when African-American
boys under the age of 36 months were given the MMR vaccine, the rate of autism
in this group rose by 340 percent.
In a desperate bid to cover up this tragedy, the CDC
decided to fix the data and eliminated all African-American boys without a
Georgia birth certificate. In doing so, the number of children suffering from
autism caused by the vaccine reduced significantly, giving the CDC the results
they desired.
In an article sourced from Focus Autism Foundation,
referenced by Roger Landry, founder of The Liberty Beacon, the authors stated:
“According to Dr. Hooker, the CDC whistleblower
informant— who wishes to remain anonymous (since named as William Thompson)—
guided him to evidence that a statistically significant relationship between
the age the MMR vaccine was first given and autism incidence in
African-American boys was hidden by CDC researchers. After data were
gathered on 2,583 children living in Atlanta, Georgia who were born between
1986 and 1993, CDC researchers excluded children that did not have a valid
State of Georgia birth certificate — reducing the sample size being studied by
41%. Hooker explains that by introducing this arbitrary criteria into the
analysis, the cohort size was sharply reduced, eliminating the statistical
power of the findings and negating the strong MMR-autism link in African American
boys.” [2]
On August 27, 2014, William Thompson, PhD, issued this
statement. He wrote:
“FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE-AUGUST 27, 2014
STATEMENT OF WILLIAM W. THOMPSON, Ph.D., REGARDING THE 2004 ARTICLE EXAMINING THE POSSIBILITY OF A RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN MMR VACCINE AND AUTISM
STATEMENT OF WILLIAM W. THOMPSON, Ph.D., REGARDING THE 2004 ARTICLE EXAMINING THE POSSIBILITY OF A RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN MMR VACCINE AND AUTISM
My name is William Thompson. I am a Senior
Scientist with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, where I have
worked since 1998.
I regret that my co-authors and I omitted
statistically significant information in our 2004 article published in the
journal Pediatrics. The omitted data suggested that African American males who
received the MMR vaccine before age 36 months were at increased risk for
autism.
Decisions were made regarding which findings to report
after the data were collected, and I believe that the final study protocol was
not followed.
I want to be absolutely clear that I believe vaccines
have saved and continue to save countless lives. I would never
suggest that any parent avoid vaccinating children of any race. Vaccines
prevent serious diseases, and the risks associated with their
administration are vastly outweighed by their individual and societal
benefits.
My concern has been the decision to omit relevant
findings in a particular study for a particular sub group for a
particular vaccine. There have always been recognized risks for
vaccination and I believe it is the responsibility of the CDC to properly
convey the risks associated with receipt of those vaccines.”
He continued:
“I have had many discussions with Dr. Brian Hooker
over the last 10 months regarding studies the CDC has carried out regarding
vaccines and neurodevelopmental outcomes including autism spectrum disorders. I
share his belief that CDC decision-making and analyses should be transparent. I
was not, however, aware that he was recording any of our conversations, nor was
I given any choice regarding whether my name would be made public or my
voice would be put on the Internet.” [3]
In other words, if Dr. Hooker had not had the tenacity
and foresight to record those telephone calls, lifting the lid on the CDC’s
deception, it is unlikely that this information would have ever been made
public.
Example #2: Fact – Thimerosal in Vaccinations Can
Cause Children to Develop Tics
It appears that Dr. Thompson’s guilty conscience has
caught up with him, because during his many telephone conversations with Dr.
Hooker, he dropped yet another bombshell. The whistleblower revealed that not
only had the MMR been responsible for an increase in the cases of autism seen
in African-American boys, but that vaccinating pregnant women with vaccinations
containing the preservative thimerosal is known to cause children to suffer
from tics (sudden, repetitive movements or sounds that can be difficult to
control) after they are born.
In an extremely revealing recording of the conversation
between whistleblower Dr. William Thompson and Dr. Brian Hooker, we can clearly
hear Thompson state:
“Thimerosal from vaccines causes tics. You start a
campaign and make it your mantra. Do you think a pregnant mother would want to
take a vaccine that they knew caused tics? Absolutely not, I would never give
my wife a vaccine that I thought caused tics. I can say tics are four times
more prevalent in kids with autism. There is a biological plausibility right
now to say that Thimerosal causes autism like features!” [4]
These are strong words from the whistleblower, because
during that conversation, he actually verified that giving a pregnant women a
vaccination containing thimerosal could heighten the risk of their unborn child
developing autism as a result.
Note: although thimerosal, a form of mercury, has been
removed from many of the vaccinations in use today, the preservative still
remains in flu vaccines given to pregnant women.
Example # 3: CDC Found to be Responsible for the Death
of Thousands of Unborn Children
Carrying on with the theme of vaccinations being given to
pregnant women, in 2012, Eileen Danneman from the National Coalition of
Organized Women (NCOW) accused the CDC of “willful misconduct,” stating that
she believed the CDC was responsible for causing the deaths of thousands of
unborn babies.
She stated that the CDC had deliberately misled the
nation’s obstetricians and gynecologists and colluded with the American
Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (AJOG) to mislead the public by
advertising the flu vaccine as a safe vaccine for pregnant women when members
of the CDC knew fully well that the vaccine was causing a massive spike in
fetal deaths.
Documentation received from Ms. Dannemann revealed that
that between 2009 and 2010, mercury-laden combined flu vaccinations increased
Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting Systems (VAERS) fetal death reports by 4,250
percent in pregnant women. Dannemann, NCOW’s director, made abundantly clear
that despite these figures being known to the CDC, the multiple-strain,
inactivated flu vaccine containing mercury (thimerosal) had been recommended to
pregnant women as a safe vaccination.
In a letter to Dr. Mercola, Dannemann wrote:
“The Advisory Committee on Childhood Vaccines (ACCV)
and CDC were confronted with the VAERS data from NCOW on September 3, 2010, in
Washington, D.C., and then again by conference call on September 10, and then
again in Atlanta, Georgia, on October 28, 2010. On both September 3 and
September 10, Dr. Marie McCormick clearly denied that there were any adverse
events for pregnant women from the 2009 flu vaccine.”
However, despite being presented with the facts and
figures regarding the dangers of the vaccination by the NCOW, evidence revealed
that the CDC deliberately concealed this fact.
At a conference a few weeks after the CDC had received
the information from the NCOW, the CDC’s Dr. Shimabakuru gave a presentation on
significant adverse reactions to the H1N1 vaccine, such as cases of
Guillan-Barre syndrome, which appeared to have risen three percent, claiming it
as an insignificant signal.
He made no mention of the adverse events related to
pregnant women.
As luck would have it, however, his attempts to pull the
wool over the eyes of the audience were foiled when he was challenged by a
member of the audience asking if the vaccine caused adverse events in
pregnancy. Feeling cornered, he reluctantly looked in his bag and rather
sheepishly presented a slide that corroborated the NCOW data, confirming that
the CDC knew of the spike in fetal deaths in the fall of 2010. [5]
So, why did Dr. Shimabkauru have a slide containing
compromising evidence in his bag? Why did he decide to hide the slide? Surely,
if he had prepared a slide outlining this crucial data, it would have made
sense to include the slide in his presentation. After all, a 4,250 percent
increase in fetal deaths is far more significant that a three percent increase
in Guillan-Barre syndrome, don’t you agree?
See reference [6] for full story and documents to support
this.
Example #4: The CDC Admitted That Polio Vaccinations Cause Polio but Promote Them
Anyway
In 2012, the CDC wrote a press release titled Update
on Vaccine-Derived Polioviruses — Worldwide. They wrote:
“In 1988, the World Health Assembly resolved to
eradicate poliomyelitis worldwide. One of the main tools used in polio
eradication efforts has been the live, attenuated oral poliovirus vaccine
(OPV). This inexpensive vaccine is administered easily by mouth, makes recent
recipients resistant to infection by wild polioviruses (WPVs), and provides
long-term protection against paralytic disease through durable humoral
immunity. Nonetheless, rare cases of vaccine-associated paralytic poliomyelitis
can occur both among immunologically normal OPV recipients and their contacts
and among persons who are immunodeficient. In addition, vaccine-derived
polioviruses (VDPVs) can emerge to cause polio outbreaks in areas with low OPV
coverage and can replicate for years in persons who are immunodeficient.”
(emphasis added)
They continued:
“VDPVs can cause paralytic polio in humans and
have the potential for sustained circulation. VDPVs resemble WPVs biologically
and differ from most vaccine-related poliovirus (VRPV) isolates by
having genetic properties consistent with prolonged replication or
transmission. VDPVs were first identified by sequence analyses of poliovirus
isolates.” (emphasis added)
The CDC recommended that the best way to deal with this
problem was “mass vaccination” and stated:
“To prevent VDPV emergence and spread, all countries
should maintain high vaccination coverage against all three poliovirus
serotypes.” [7]
This proves that yet again the CDC actively promote
vaccinations despite knowing their dangers.
Finally – Example # 5: CDC Caught Changing the Risk
Criteria for Ebola Transmission
It appears that the CDC has been secretly changing their
data on the risks of ebola entering the US on their website. Could this be in
preparation for an onslaught of new vaccinations that are heading our way?
On August 29, 2014, the CDC announced:
“On August 28, 2014, NIH announced that initial human
testing of an investigational vaccine to prevent Ebola virus disease will begin
next week by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID),
part of the National Institutes of Health.
The early-stage trial will begin initial human testing
of a vaccine co-developed by NIAID and GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) and will evaluate the
experimental vaccine’s safety and ability to generate an immune system response
in healthy adults. Testing will take place at the NIH Clinical Center in
Bethesda, Maryland.
The study is the first of several Phase 1 clinical
trials that will examine the investigational NIAID/GSK Ebola vaccine and an
experimental Ebola vaccine developed by the Public Health Agency of Canada and
licensed to NewLink Genetics Corp. The others are to launch in the fall. These
trials are conducted in healthy adults who are not infected with Ebola virus to
determine if the vaccine is safe and induces an adequate immune response.”
[8]
Given this fact, it is hardly surprising that the CDC has
been quietly changing certain ebola facts on their website, is it?
John Galt from the website Shenandoah has clearly
demonstrated that the CDC has been quietly revising the information regarding
transmission risks on their website, while steadfastly maintaining that there
is little chance of airborne transmission. He stated:
“On Thursday, August 7, the CDC quietly revised the
transmission risks while maintaining there was little chance of airborne
transmission of Ebola via their minions and bureaucrats speaking out in the
mainstream media. The shocking part of the revision is within the footnotes
which few civilians bother to read and put their trust in government officials
to protect their families and their livelihoods.”
Mr. Galt continued:
“From the CDC website, I took these screen shots just
in case they decided to “delete” or revise the changes made above so I can keep
a permanent record of what is happening with this latest contagious disease
outbreak.”
It is a good job he did, because, if he is correct, then
the screenshots that he has given on his website clearly show that on August 7,
2014, the CDC stated:
“Low risk exposures
A low risk exposure includes any of the following:
·
Household member or other casual contact
with an EVD patient
·
Providing patient care or casual contact1
without high-risk exposure with EVD patients in health care facilities in EVD
outbreak affected countries” (emphasis added)
The CDC carried on to state:
“Casual contact is defined as a) being within
approximately 3 feet (1 meter) or within the room or care area for a prolonged
period of time (e.g., healthcare personnel, household members) while not
wearing recommended personal protective equipment (i.e., droplet and contact
precautions–see Infection Prevention and Control Recommendations); or b) having
direct brief contact (e.g., shaking hands) with an EVD case while not wearing
recommended personal protective equipment (i.e., droplet and contact
precautions–see Infection Prevention and Control Recommendations). At this
time, brief interactions, such as walking by a person or moving through a
hospital, do not constitute casual contact.”
John Galt continued his article by adding the following
witty comment:
“Excuse me? Low risk exposure? Before this update on
August 7th the running mainstream media theme that there was little if any risk
of airborne exposure and suddenly they quietly revise the page among numerous
internet stories about aerial transmission of the disease in West Africa.
Perhaps if one is standing in one of these famous TSA check in lines, they
might start to think about the “low risk” propaganda the government is having
everyone believe at this time with the sudden revision.” [10]
He could be right, but could this sudden change have been
made with a new vaccine program in mind?
Conclusion
It is clear that the CDC cannot be trusted when it comes
to giving advice about vaccinations. Over the years, evidence has shown that
the CDC continually lies, withholds evidence and fixes data to obtain the
results that they want to achieve.
Due to their continual dishonesty, many children have
suffered lifelong disabilities as a result. Although, for many of their
parents, the latest revelations have offered a glimmer of hope in a very dark
world, it has also caused many parents to just break down and weep, like one mother
known to myself.
This is a tragic waste of the future potential of
thousands of children worldwide. How much longer are parents going to continue
to trust this corrupt and dangerous organization when it comes to the health of
their children?
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
Jeffrey P. Koplan
was a director at the Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and is a board member for the Global Polio Eradication Initiative.
Note: Bloomberg
Philanthropies was a funder for the Global
Polio Eradication Initiative, and is an umbrella organization for the Bloomberg Family Foundation.
Bloomberg
Family Foundation was a funder for the CDC
Foundation.
Emma Bloomberg is
a director at the Bloomberg Family
Foundation, Michael R. Bloomberg’s
daughter, and was the chief of staff for the Robin Hood Foundation.
Jeff
Zucker is a director at the Robin
Hood Foundation, and was the president & CEO for NBCUniversal.
Robert C. Wright
was the chairman for NBCUniversal,
and is a co-founder for the Autism
Speaks.
Michael R. Bloomberg
was a donor for the Robin Hood
Foundation, a benefactor for the Harlem
Children's Zone, a general partner at Salomon
Brothers, is the founder of the Bloomberg
Family Foundation, and Emma
Bloomberg’s father.
Deryck C. Maughan
was a chairman & CEO for Salomon
Brothers, the chairman & CEO for GlaxoSmithKline
plc, and is a director at GlaxoSmithKline
plc.
Foundation
to Promote Open Society was a funder for the Robin Hood Foundation, the Harlem
Children's Zone, the Human Rights Watch, and the Millennium Promise.
George
Soros was the chairman for the Foundation
to Promote Open Society, a benefactor for the Harlem Children's Zone, a benefactor for the Human Rights Watch, and is the founder & chairman for the Open Society Foundations.
Open
Society Foundations was a funder for the Human Rights Watch, and the Atlantic
Council of the United States (think tank).
Amy Robbins
Towers is a director at the Human
Rights Watch, a board member for the CDC
Foundation, was a director at the Millennium
Promise, and married to Larry
Robbins.
Jimmy
Carter was an honorary co-chairman for the Millennium Promise, and is a co-founder & trustee at the Carter Center.
Donald R. Hopkins
is the VP, health programs for the Carter
Center, and was a board member for the CDC
Foundation.
CDC Foundation
is a foundation for the Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
Robert Jeffrey
was a board member for the CDC
Foundation, and is a director at the Atlantic
Council of the United States (think tank).
Larry Robbins
was married to Amy Robbins Towers,
and is a director at the Robin Hood
Foundation.
Emma Bloomberg was
the chief of staff for the Robin Hood
Foundation, Michael R. Bloomberg’s
daughter, and is a director at the Bloomberg
Family Foundation.
Bloomberg
Family Foundation was a funder for the CDC
Foundation.
Bloomberg
Philanthropies is an umbrella organization for the Bloomberg Family Foundation, and was a funder for the Global Polio Eradication Initiative.
Jeffrey P. Koplan
is a board member for the Global Polio
Eradication Initiative, and was a director at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
CDC Foundation
is a foundation for the Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
No comments:
Post a Comment