State Dept’s Marie
Harf Fights with Family Friend for Posting Critical Article on Facebook
by John Hayward12 Apr 2015
Last week, legendary former Secretaries of State Henry Kissinger and George
P. Shultz wrote a scathing Wall Street Journal op-ed
critical of the Obama Administration’s nuclear
dealmaking with Iran. The Obama State Department has responded, not with
criticisms of the detailed argument in the piece, but by dismissing it
as “a lot of big words and big thoughts.”
It was a very weighty piece, filled with serious criticism
that even if Iran stops accusing Obama of lying about the deal and sticks with
the framework presented by the Administration, the agreement still would not do
much to slow down Iran’s nuclear ambitions, assuming its inspection provisions
could even be enforced.
In one of the toughest passages of their article, Kissinger
and Shultz point out that the inspections regime envisioned by the Lausanne
framework is enormously complicated, based on vague criteria, and calls for
manpower and technical resources the International Atomic Energy Agency probably does not have.
“In a large country with multiple facilities and ample
experience in nuclear concealment, violations will be inherently difficult to
detect,” wrote the former Secretaries of State. “Devising theoretical models of
inspection is one thing. Enforcing compliance, week after week, despite
competing international crises and domestic distractions, is another. Any
report of a violation is likely to prompt debate over its significance—or even
calls for new talks with Tehran to explore the issue. The experience of Iran’s
work on a heavy-water reactor during the “interim agreement” period–when
suspect activity was identified but played down in the interest of a positive
negotiating atmosphere–is not encouraging.”
State Department Spokeswoman Marie Harf, already the subject
of much humor for her unserious demeanor and suggestions such as combating the
threat of ISIS with a jobs program for young jihadis, responded
to this op-ed by dismissing it as “a lot of big words and big
thoughts.”
Columnist David Brooks of the New York Times called
this “the lamest rebuttal of a piece by two senior and very well-respected
foreign policy people as I’ve heard” on the Hugh Hewitt radio
show. “Are we in nursery school? We’re not, no polysyllabic words?”Brooks
asked.
William M. Todd, an old family friend of Harf’s, linked to
an article describing Harf’s performance and Brooks’ criticism on
Facebook, crowing “Team Obama bans polysyllabic words!” Harf ended up in an angry Facebook
exchange with Todd. “I’m not sure how you could think this article
accurately portrays me or how I view complicated foreign policy issues, given
how long you’ve personally known me and my family,” she wrote. “Does your
hatred of this administration matter so much to you that it justifies posting a
hurtful comment and a mean-spirited story about the daughter of someone you’ve
known for years and used to call a friend?”
Other Facebook folk got into the discussion (including a
victim of IRS
targeting who asked if Harf had an official position on that)
before Todd replied: “I certainly can understand why your Team would disagree
with Henry Kissinger and George Schultz on policy matters. However, what is
amazing to me was your condescending and, almost childish criticism of what I
considered to be a well-reasoned and thoughtful op-ed on the current Middle
East crisis.”
Todd told Harf that, given his relationship with her family,
he did not like writing something critical of her personally, but the fact that
he felt compelled to do so should “tell you how disappointed about the Department’s
response to this op-ed” he was.
What Harf seems to be missing in all of this, and throughout
many of her appearances on behalf of the State Department, is that spokespeople
are responsible for delivering both factual content and setting the tone of the
Department’s responses. She comes off as a lightweight, and so does her entire
Department, which did not give her much room to drop a sound bite
as absurd and shallow as complaining about the big words Henry Kissinger and
George Shultz used. (And how is complaining that they had “big ideas”
a criticism of their piece?)
Kissinger and Shultz caught Team Obama flatfooted, at a
moment when the Iranians are taking great delight in ripping that Lausanne
framework to pieces, throwing the pieces in Obama’s face, and daring him to
walk away. If this Administration cannot respond to such a critique from elder
American statesmen with equal gravity, how are they going to handle the mad
mullahs of Iran?
International Atomic Energy Agency
David
A. Kay was the chief nuclear weapons inspector for the International Atomic Energy Agency, and is a member of the Secretary of State's International Security
Advisory Board.
Note: William J. Perry
is a member of the Secretary of State's
International Security Advisory Board, a co-author for A World Free of Nuclear Weapons, interviewed in the Nuclear Tipping Point, an honorary
director at the Atlantic Council of the
United States (think tank), and a director at the Nuclear Threat Initiative (think tank).
George
P. Shultz is a co-author for A World
Free of Nuclear Weapons, interviewed in the Nuclear Tipping Point, an honorary director at the Atlantic Council of the United States (think
tank).
Open
Society Foundations was a funder for the Atlantic Council of the United States (think tank), and the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
(think tank).
George
Soros is the founder & chairman for the Open Society Foundations.
Charles O.
Rossotti is a director at the Atlantic
Council of the United States (think tank), and was a commissioner for the Internal Revenue Service (IRS).
Henry A. Kissinger is a director at the Atlantic
Council of the United States (think tank), a co-author for A World Free of Nuclear Weapons, interviewed
in the Nuclear Tipping Point, a
director at the American Friends of Bilderberg (think tank), and a 2008 Bilderberg
conference participant (think tank).
Carnegie
Endowment for International Peace (think
tank) was a funder for the Nuclear
Threat Initiative (think tank).
Ted
Turner is a co-chairman for the Nuclear
Threat Initiative (think tank), and the underwriter for the Nuclear Tipping Point.
Warren E. Buffett
is an adviser for the Nuclear Threat
Initiative (think tank), and was underwriter for the Nuclear Tipping Point.
William
J. Perry is a director at the Nuclear
Threat Initiative (think tank), interviewed in the Nuclear Tipping Point, a co-author
for A World Free of Nuclear Weapons,
an honorary director at the Atlantic
Council of the United States (think tank), and a member of the Secretary of State's International Security
Advisory Board.
David
A. Kay is a member of the Secretary
of State's International Security Advisory Board, and was the chief nuclear
weapons inspector for the International
Atomic Energy Agency.
No comments:
Post a Comment