DEBUNKING THE OBAMATOIDS

DEBUNKING THE OBAMATOIDS

By Lynn Stuter
March 10, 2009
NewsWithViews.com

The squall of the obamatoids is getting louder and louder as we learn more and more about Also Known As (AKA) Obama; as though they can, by sheer volume, drown out the facts.
With this in mind, let’s look at the claims of the obamatoids.
1) AKA has presented, for all to see, his birth certificate.
Not so. What AKA has presented, through his campaign and pro-Obama websites, is a Certification of Live Birth (COLB). That is so stated dead center of the top of the document. This is not a birth certificate or a certificate of birth.
This Certification of Live Birth (COLB), as presented, was presented by FactCheck.com, FighttheSmears.org, DailyKos.com and Snopes.com, all parroting the same claims, all obamatoid websites. While the claim has been made that the varying versions appearing on the internet all emanate from the same document, inconsistencies from one reproduction to the next tend to counter this claim. One of the more obvious inconsistencies is the folds that appear on some copies while not on others.
No one, outside a select group of obamatoids, has actually seen the original document from which the copies that appear on the internet were made. By the same token, not one of the copies of this COLB that have appeared on the internet is accompanied by a notarized affidavit that it is authentic copy of the original. In the day and age of photoshop; the credibility of this document is obviously questionable.
Now let’s look at the document itself. Since when did African become a race? On your birth certificate is your father’s ethnicity listed as American? Of course not; American is not a race. Neither is African. This document would be far more credible had it listed the father’s race as negro or Negroid just as white or Caucasian were also used in 1961.
Forensic specialists have signed sworn affidavits stating that the copies of the COLB, appearing on the internet, are forgeries; these sworn affidavits being inclusive of the qualifications of the forensic specialists to make that determination.
2) The Department of Health, Hawaii, has stated they have AKA’s Hawaii birth certificate.
Not so. What the State of Hawaii stated was,
“Therefore, I as Director of Health for the State of Hawai‘i, along with the Registrar of Vital Statistics who has statutory authority to oversee and maintain these type of vital records, have personally seen and verified that the Hawai‘i State Department of Health has Sen. Obama’s original birth certificate on record in accordance with state policies and procedures.”
There is nothing there that states the birth certificate Hawaii holds was issued by Hawaii; there is nothing there that states the State of Hawaii holds AKA’s “Hawaii birth certificate.”
It is very obvious, in reading the statement of the Director of Health, that this statement was very carefully worded, which leaves the inquiring mind asking why.
3) The State of Hawaii has certified authentic the various copies of the COLB appearing on the internet.
Not so. The only statement the State of Hawaii has made, regards AKA’s birth record, is above.
4) AKA was born on August 4, 1961 in Honolulu, Hawaii.
There has been not one shred of proof provided that this is so. The COLB presented by the obamatoids is not legal proof as outlined above.
We now have it on good authority that while Governor Linda Lingle of Hawaii claims that AKA’s birth certificate, held by the State of Hawaii, was not sealed, that the document has been sealed. It seems that someone forgot to tell the people at the Department of Health in Hawaii that said information was not for public consumption.
We cannot ignore the fact that Hawaii, at the time of AKA’s birth, allowed for the registration of foreign-born children so long as one parent was an American citizen and had claimed Hawaii as their permanent residence for at least one year prior to the birth. Stanley Ann Dunham met both of these requirements. The birth of Stanley Ann Dunham’s second child, Maya, an Indonesian citizen, is also registered in Hawaii.
We also know that not one hospital, then operating in Hawaii, and certainly not the two different hospitals AKA and his sister, Maya, have claimed he was born at, have any records indicating that Stanley Ann Dunham Obama was ever there. This does not discount the possibility that AKA was born outside the hospital and his birth simply attested to by his mother or his grandparents as was allowed at that time, causing the issuance of a certificate of late birth. The announcement of birth in the Honolulu Advertiser and Sunday Advertiser on August 13, 1961, however, would tend to discount the “late birth” scenario.
Private investigators have signed affidavits that the address, shown in the birth announcement, 6085 Kalanianaole Highway, is not an address the Obama’s ever lived at. And we now know that from sometime in August of 1961 through the Spring and Fall of 1962, Stanley Ann Dunham resided on Capitol Hill in Seattle, Washington, where she attended the University of Washington and where she had an in-house baby-sitter at least part of that time.
Then there is the matter of AKA’s paternal step-grandmother; one of the several wives of his paternal grandfather, who claims she was present at the birth of AKA in Kenya. She has stated this before witnesses; her statement recorded and transcribed; affidavits provided that the transcription is true and accurate.
Advertisement
There is also the matter of the WRIF live radio interview with Kenyan Ambassador Peter Ogego in which Ogego stated, quite plainly, that AKA was born in Kenya.
And there is also the matter of the Kenyan National Assembly, on the occasion of November 5, 2008, going on record stating, in reference to Kenyan celebrations at AKA’s election victory, that a “Kenyan is ruling the USA.”
5) AKA is a natural born American citizen.
There is not one shred of evidence that this is the case.
AKA’s own website, FactCheck.com, states he was a dual citizen at birth. Dual citizenship, therefore dual loyalties, does not meet the natural born citizen requirement of Article II, Section 1, Clause 5, United States Constitution.
Further, on January 1, 1967 Barack Obama was registered for school at the Fransiskus Assisi Primary School in Jakarta, Indonesia. We know that in order for AKA to attend school in Indonesia he had to be an Indonesian citizen. A picture of the registration page of Barry Soetoro was taken by an Associated Press photographer, Tatan Syuflana. This photograph shows Barack Obama as Barry Soetoro; his father as Lolo Soetoro; and his citizenship as Indonesian.
The Soetoro divorce papers, filed in Hawaii, lists two children of the Soetoro marriage: one minor which would have been Maya, born in Indonesia; and one over eighteen: this would be Barry Soetoro. And the only way Barry Soetoro could be listed as the legal child of Lolo Soetoro is if he were adopted.
When a child is adopted, and the adoption recorded, the original birth certificate is sealed and a new birth certificate issued. This would be the document on which the Certification of Live Birth abstract would be drawn.
So why does the COLB that the obamatoids have presented not show Lolo Soetoro as AKA’s father and his name as Barry Soetoro?
At the point of his becoming an Indonesian citizen, the question of his birth certificate becomes moot, also his dual American/Kenyan citizenship. As Indonesia, at that time, did not allow for dual citizenship, any prior citizenship claims by AKA would be terminated. There has been no proof presented that Barry Soetoro, a/k/a Barack Obama is even a naturalized American citizen.
At this point, we also know that
a) not only did Stanley Ann Dunham use social security numbers that were not hers, but that AKA has also used differing social security numbers. If either were American citizens, this would not be necessary.b) while AKA was attending Occidental College in Los Angeles, California, a foreign student aid grant was presented to a Soetoro of Indonesia by the California Assembly. Coincidence? Doubtful.
6) If there was anything to this issue of AKA’s eligibility, the United States Supreme Court would have addressed it.
Advertisement
State courts have dismissed cases brought, regards this issue, based on standing, stating that the plaintiff did not meet “Article III standing” which has three requirements:
1) the plaintiff has suffered ‘an injury in fact,’2) that injury bears a causal connection to the defendant’s challenged conduct, and3) a favorable judicial decision will likely provide the plaintiff with redress from that injury.
Further, “the Supreme Court has ‘consistently held that a plaintiff raising only a generally available grievance about government – claiming only harm to his and every citizen’s interest in proper application of the Constitution and laws, and seeking relief that no more directly and tangibly benefits him than it does the public at large – does not state an Article III case or controversy.’”
Before the fact, cases were dismissed at the state level on “standing”; after the fact, cases like Broe v Reed (Washington State), were dismissed as “moot.”
In the case of Keyes v Bowen (California), defendant AKA is claiming that this matter should have been addressed by the Congress; since it wasn’t, there is no judicial remedy.
At the Supreme Court level, applications for injunctive relief and writs of certiorari to stop the forward progress of the election were simply denied without comment
Whether at the state or federal court level, the courts have side-stepped the issue of AKA’s eligibility, based on administrative procedure, not based on merit — the facts of the case.
Last week, a federal district court judge dismissed a case in which his opinion was based on facts not in evidence. In so doing, he committed judicial misconduct.
7) AKA was vetted by the Democrat National Committee (DNC).
Not so. The DNC has no proof that AKA is a natural born citizen. Their claim that he is by virtue of his signing an affidavit to that effect falls flat when the courts refuse to order him to produce documents proving his eligibility. FOIA requests of Nancy Pelosi to produce the documents upon which she based her claim, when signing the affidavits of eligibility at the state level following the Democrat National convention, have gone unanswered.
8) AKA was vetted by the Federal Elections Commission (FEC).
Not so. Like the DNC, the FEC has no proof that AKA is a natural born citizen.
9) The American public vetted AKA by their vote.
Not so. If the people of the United States have no standing to demand AKA produce documents proving his eligibility, then they have no capacity to vet him whatsoever. And if voting for a candidate made the candidate eligible to be president, then the American people could vet Arnold Schwarzenegger or Róger Calero, the Socialist Party candidate, in the same manner.
10) His citizenship doesn’t matter as 66,000,000 Americans voted for him.
No so. America was established on rule of law as set down by the United States Constitution. Article II, Section 1, Clause 5, United States Constitution states that the president must be a natural born citizen. Either we have rule of law or we have anarchy.
And we have not touched on the fact that AKA traveled to Pakistan in 1981 on a passport that could not have been issued by the United States.
As debunked, it becomes quite clear that there is not one shred of evidence that AKA is a natural born citizen or even a naturalized citizen.

The sum result of the refusal of the United States Congress and United States Supreme Court to protect and defend the United States Constitution is growing anger among the American people that is reaching the boiling point as usurper AKA and Congress make one misstep after the next in addressing the downward economic spiral. This is further fueled by the extravagant lifestyle AKA is leading, entrenched in the White House at the people’s expense, and living large while the American people are suffering.

If the United States Congress and United States Supreme Court refuse to do their jobs, they leave the American people with no choice, under common law, but to take matters into their own hands.
We cannot stand by and allow this illegal alien usurper to destroy our nation while Congress fiddles and the Supreme Court diddles!
© 2009 Lynn M. Stuter - All Rights Reserved

E-mail This Page
Sign Up For Free E-Mail Alerts
Activist and researcher, Stuter has spent the last fifteen years researching systems theory and systems philosophy with a particular emphasis on education as it pertains to achieving the sustainable global environment. She home schooled two daughters. She has worked with legislators, both state and federal, on issues pertaining to systems governance, the sustainable global environment and education reform. She networks nationwide with other researchers and a growing body of citizens concerned with the transformation of our nation from a Constitutional Republic to a participatory democracy. She has traveled the United States and lived overseas.
Web site: http://www.learn-usa.com/

/