As if we were not suspicious enough!
Microchip included in Healthcare Bill ?
It is definitely a device for storing information. I am skeptical of lots of stuff I get as fwds. Since I wear a pacemaker/defib I assumed someone had just made the wrong conclusion. I was wrong. This devise is described as: “implantable radiofrequency transponder system for patient identification and health information”. I don’t really have a problem with it so long as it is the individual’s decision to implant or remove the device. It looks like they are setting it up to be something other than a personal decision.
http://www.hitachi.com/New/cnews/030902.htmlhttp://www.nvic.org/vaccine-laws/tra...-registry.aspxI have read pp 1001-1006 of the bill. On page 1001 you will find the clause that speaks of the implantable device(nanochip).
http://waysandmeans.house.gov/media/pdf/111/AAHCA09001xml.pdf“Buried deep within the over 1,000 pages of the massive US Health Care Bill (PDF) in a “non-discussed” section titled: Subtitle C-11 Sec. 2521— National Medical Device Registry, and which states its purpose as:“The Secretary shall establish a national medical device registry (in this subsection referred to as the ‘registry’) to facilitate analysis of postmarket safety and outcomes data on each device that—‘‘(A) is or has been used in or on a patient; and ‘‘(B) is a class III device; or ‘‘(ii) a class II device that is implantable.
Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff
Class II Special Controls Guidance
Document: Implantable
Radiofrequency Transponder
System for Patient Identification
and Health Information
http://www.fda.gov/downloads/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/GuidanceDocuments/ucm072191.pdf
7 hours ago
No comments:
Post a Comment