Sam on Bob Harden Stress and CBT

Monday, November 30, 2009

Obama's star falls from the heavens


Obama's star falls from the heavens
November 30, 8:07 AM


Allan Erickson

It is truly astonishing to watch the cataclysmic implosion of the Obama administration.
No one had ever been ushered into the White House with such pomp and enthusiasm. No one had spent so many hundreds of millions of dollars to convince people to vote. No one had garnered such global adoration. And no one had assumed the office with less experience.
Yet here we are, only 10 months into the odyssey, and Obama's presidency is viewed a failure. Approval ratings have fallen dramatically. Disapproval ratings increase. Youth are alienated. Unemployment ranks swell. Military morale plummets. Racial strife is heightened. The recession deepens. For all the talk of change, hope is gone.


Regardless of political orientation people sense we've elected a thoroughly unqualified bumbler without a lick of financial or military sense, a man who has assembled a mob of fringe lunatics driven by radicalism, a pie-in-the-sky radicalism completely out of place in a world demanding common sense and hyper pragmatism.


With each passing week people come to understand the mob in Washington is out to fundamentally change the country founded by Christian intellectuals who created the most liberty and prosperity ever available to humankind. People see the pervasive changes imagined by the mob are antithetical to our traditions, our principles and our very well-being. And people see that the mob must be run out of town before it is too late.


Still the mob marches on led by a man seemingly oblivious to the consequences of his serial missteps.


And now the howlers have turned their ire from Bush to Obama. Murderer turned radic educator Bill Ayers sobbed weeks back he feared the brilliant one would be consumed by foreign wars. Senator Leahy has apparently attacked Obama for his policy on land mines. Far left Dems, the majority it appears, condemn the President for his lackluster performance on healthcare reform, gay rights, and environmental issues. The media, once a part of the mob, issuing one adoring proclamation after another, is now increasingly critical. Even Couric is ready to ride the bandwagon playing the derision dirge. Michael Moore has issued a edict, proclaiming an Obama surge in Afghanistan will mean the end of the dream, leaving an army of youth disillusioned and dismayed.


Add to the malaise Obama's crazed AG bringing terrorists for trial in New York just blocks from where the Twin Towers once stood, and the idiotic insistence we go thoroughly broke behind government takeover of healthcare, not to mention cap and trade psychosis, and you have a mob so run amok it now appears clownish, the ring master deranged.


More than a year ago, long before the election, this writer, along with many others, predicted Obama would fail within two years for simple reasons: he would try to govern a center right country from the far left and would thus alienate the majority; he would also try to appease the middle in many ways, alienating the far left; given his lack of experience and core values, all the ensuing chaos would force him into survival mode which only aggravates chaos; given his weakness in foreign policy he would project that weakness thus encouraging our enemies; and saving the worst for last, his economic policies would drive a serious recession into depression.
Until recently Obama supporters have stood silent, watching implosion, the self-demolition, with a sense of having been betrayed and manipulated. Now, they are speaking out. From the folks at Salon and Daily Kos, to the writers on SNL, to Paglia and even Olbermann, Obama's critics are lining up and taking shots almost without restraint. They see little difference between Obama and Bush when it comes to the war on terror and national security issues, and say so, with a vengeance. Long gone are the days Obama could dump on Bush, and everyone except Obama appears to understand that reality.


We all wish we could say good things about our President. We all wish we could have a sense of enthusiasm. We all wish for better days and a returning sense of national pride, optimism and productivity.


However, growing numbers of us realize these good outcomes will only materialize when we return to traditional Americanism as articulated by the Founders and by people like Ronald Reagan, Theodore Roosevelt, Harry Truman, Dwight Eisenhower, John Kennedy, and Abraham Lincoln.

Sunday, November 29, 2009

DEBTOR' REVOLT - New stimulus plan! Keep the money for yourself - DON'T FEEL GUILTY

New stimulus plan! Keep the money for yourself.

Go ahead. Break the chains. Stop paying on your mortgage if you owe more than the house is worth. And most important: Don't feel guilty about it. Don't think you're doing something morally wrong.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Also: Don't pay credit cards 'til banks return our tax dollars - VIDEO
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
That's the incendiary core message of a new academic paper by Brent T. White, a University of Arizona law school professor, titled "Underwater and Not Walking Away: Shame, Fear and the Social Management of the Housing Crisis."

White argues that far more of the estimated 15 million American homeowners who are underwater on their mortgages should stiff their lenders and take a hike.

Doing so, he suggests, could save some of them hundreds of thousands of dollars that they "have no reasonable prospect of recouping" in the years ahead. Plus the penalties are nowhere near as painful or long-lasting as they might assume.

"Homeowners should be walking away in droves," according to White. "But they aren't. And it's not because the financial costs of foreclosure outweigh the benefits." Sure, credit scores get whacked when you walk away, he acknowledges. But as long as you stay current with other creditors, "one can have a good credit rating again - meaning above 660 - within two years after a foreclosure."

Better yet, you can default "strategically": buy all the major items you'll need for the next couple of years - a new car, even a new house - just before you pull the plug on your current mortgage lender.

"Most individuals should be able to plan in advance for a few years of limited credit," says White, with minimal disruptions to their lifestyles.

What kind of law school professorial advice is this? Aren't mortgages legal contracts? In an interview, White said that in so-called anti-deficiency states such as Arizona and California, mortgage lenders have limited or no legal rights to pursue defaulting homeowners' assets beyond the house itself. In other states, lenders may decide it is not worth the legal expense to pursue walkaways, or consumers may be able to find flaws in the mortgage documents, disclosures or underwriting to challenge the original contract.

The main point, he says, is that too often people's "emotions" get in the way of clear financial thinking about mortgages, turning them into what he calls "woodheads" - "individuals who choose not to act in their own self-interest." Most owners are too worried about feelings of shame and embarrassment following a foreclosure, and ignore the powerful financial reasons for doing so.

Buttressing these emotions is a system that White labels "the social control of the housing crisis" - pressures and messages continually sent to consumers by the "social control agents," namely banks, government and the media. The mantra these agents - all the way up to President Obama - pound into owners' heads, says White, is that "voluntarily defaulting on a mortgage is immoral."

Yet there is an inherent imbalance in the borrower-lender relationship which makes this morality message unfair to consumers: Banks set the rules during the housing boom, handing out home loans with no down payments, no income checks, and inflated appraisals. Now that property values have dropped 20 percent to 50 percent in many areas, banks have been slow to modify troubled mortgages and reluctant to reduce principal debts.

Only when homeowners cut through the emotional fog and default strategically in large numbers, White argues, will this inequitable situation be seriously addressed.

How does White's 52-page manifesto go over with mortgage lenders? Predictably, not well. Officials at Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac - investors who fund the bulk of all new mortgages in the country - disputed White's characterization of how quickly after foreclosure a walkaway borrower can obtain a new loan. It's not three years, they said, it's a minimum of five years, absent extenuating circumstances such as medical or employment problems that caused the foreclosure.

"Borrowers who walk away from their mortgage obligations face serious consequences" including severely depressed credit scores for extended periods, said Brian Faith of Fannie Mae. In addition, he said, "there's a moral dimension to this as homeowners who simply abandon their homes contribute to the destabilization of their neighborhood and community."

Lewis Ranieri, CEO of several major mortgage-related companies and one of the pioneers of the mortgage securities industry, called White's entire argument "incredibly irresponsible and misinformed." Not only is the professor urging consumers to break legally binding contracts, said Ranieri, but if large numbers of them did so it would send home mortgage rates soaring and "tear apart the very basis" upon which mortgage lending rests - the understanding that borrowers will honor their commitments and pay back the money they borrowed.

E-mail Kenneth Harney at kenharney@earthlink.net.

Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2009/11/29/REG81AP4K1.DTL&tsp=1#ixzz0YH2QP6Nw
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Aristotle the Hun's post from Wednesday, March 4, 2009

Don't pay money to banks - They owe you!

The politicians and the bankers ganged up on the people.
We are mostly powerless when it comes to politicians because no matter who we vote for they do what they please once elected.

"Meet the new boss
Same as the old boss
I'll tip my hat to the new constitution
Take a bow for the new revolution
Smile and grin at the change all around me
Pick up my guitar and play
Just like yesterday
Then I'll get on my knees and pray
We don't get fooled again
Don't get fooled again
No, no!"
The Who

The banks are vulnerable to the power of the people. Just stop paying off your credit cards. If it makes financial sense to stop paying your mortgage, do it!

None of us has an ethical obligation to pay one cent to banks.

The banks are the reason you are having trouble paying your credit cards in the first place so why would you pay money to the people who ripped you off and lowered your income?

New stimulus plan! Keep the money for yourself.

What about the credit rating boogeyman? Your credit will be ruined anyway. Don't pay off banks until banks reform and pay off what they owe us.

Saturday, November 28, 2009

Two really important links - Breaking news Obama BC

PS My personal suspicion / speculation: They issued a COLB based solely on the Grandmother’s Affidavit that she has a new Grandson. Beyond that, they’ve got squat as supporting evidence. He could have been born ANYWHERE to ANYBODY. Hence, “Filed” instead of “Accepted”.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2395708/posts
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

http://thepostnemail.wordpress.com/2009/11/28/hi-dept-of-health-admits-obamas-colb-is-faked/
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

What does Pelosi know about Obama's eligibility?
"We are talking about the top-down leadership of the ruling political party knowingly and wantonly defrauding voters by way of playing monkey business with fraudulent election documents." --JB Williams

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

*Like Aristotle the Hun has been saying all along. "The Democratic leadership and AKA Obama have committed election fraud in all 50 states!"
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Wednesday, October 14, 2009Barack Obama and State of Hawaii on the ropes
http://thesteadydrip.blogspot.com/2009/10/barack-obama-and-state-of-hawaii-on.html
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

If you are not suspicious of a man who hides his history I have a bridge in the desert I want to sell you.

If you are unwilling to call for an investigation of a man who attempts to sell you a bridge in the desert I have some beach front property in Florida at the intersection of I75 and Florida # 29 that I want you to buy.

If you place a down payment on a contract for the bridge in the desert and the beach front property in the swamp I would conclude that you voted for Obama.

Can you pass the: Obama Eligibility Logic Test? http://thesteadydrip.blogspot.com/2009/09/obama-eligibility-logic-test.htm

Or get educated and read:

Somehow, you know its coming. That OMG moment is just around the corner. You can feel the inescapable reality creeping up on you. Something will leak. Someone will spill the beans. “For nothing is hid that shall not be made manifest, nor anything secret that shall not be known and come to light.” Luke 8:17 Obama “I have nothing to hide but I’m hiding it.” http://thesteadydrip.blogspot.com/2009/04/aka-obama-fans-all-together-now-say-omg.html

AL! AL Gore! take it back and give it back or go to jail.


I am not a vindictive person. I believe grace can bless even the most evil people. I believe in redemption. If one wants redemption one must confess sins, try to right the wrongs they have caused and change future behavior. So, I don't really want Al Gore to go to jail.

I want All Gore to take back his mistatements in "An Inconvenient Truth" and give back his Academy Award and his Nobel Peace Prize and all monetary rewards associated with his fraudulent claims.

If Al can see his way clear to take the above action I will not support criminal charges against Al Gore. However if he remains unrepentant I am sure he will reap what he has sown. ATH

Climategate Criminals, and Getting Our Money Back

By Jim O'Neill Friday, November 27, 2009

“They are not merely bad scientists — they are crooks. And crooks who have perpetrated their crimes at the expense of British and U.S. taxpayers. I am angry, and so should you be.”
Lord Christopher Monckton November 23, 2009

In a recent article, Lord Monckton pointed out that, far from suffering from global warming, the planet has experienced “rapid and significant cooling” over the past nine years.

That bears repeating. Over the past nine years the world has experienced “rapid and significant cooling.” There has been no global warming—it is a Big Lie.

The whole “global warming” myth is a scam, a fraud, and most significantly, a crime.
We need to start throwing some of the people responsible for this outrage into jail. And we need to start suing to get our money back, and stop this swindle by corrupt politicians, Marxist ideologues, and their dupes.

I say “Marxist ideologues” because behind the veneer of Progressivism, Communitarianism, Statism, Global Collectivism, et al., is an agenda that is rooted in Marxist/Communism.

When the Cold War ended, the old bugaboo of Communism didn’t just go away—it hid for awhile, and then reemerged in new clothes. People wearing those “new clothes” are now running the U.S. government, and “we the people” are increasingly waking up to that fact.

In the “boiled frog” scenario, a frog in a pot of water is cooked to death if the temperature is slowly increased by small increments, but jumps out of the pot, if the temperature is abruptly increased.

America was being “boiled alive” quite nicely, thank you, until the Obama Administration came along and cranked up the heat. Now the “frog’s” awake—and wants to get the heck out of the pot. Our lives depend on it.

These wolves in sheep’s clothing are hell-bent on “social justice,” “sustainable development,” and “redistributing wealth.” They are dedicated to wiping out America’s middle-class, destroying America as a world power, and installing a repressive planetary regime that will quash individual liberty, and freedom of expression.

One of the chief ways that they are going about doing this, is through crippling America’s production capacity, by making it exorbitantly expensive, illegal, or impossible, to produce food and goods.

Agenda 21, Carbon Credits, Global Warming Scam

The Cap and Trade bill is designed to put the finishing touches on a process already well underway, via the UN’s Agenda 21, and laws enacted because of the “global warming” scam.
Corporation shareholders should be insisting that their CEOs instigate lawsuits to recover funds paid for “carbon credits” and other expensive nonsense.

Taxpayers should be instigating class-action lawsuits to reclaim the money that has been misspent in various bogus “global warming” agendas.

And yes, people who were instrumental in propagating the “global warming” fraud, should be sent to jail.

The “global warming” lie, is the largest rip-off in history. It is nothing less than the criminal attempt (largely successful) to defraud the public, and bilk us out of billions, possibly trillions, of dollars.

The LSM (Lame Stream Media) is doing their best to sweep Climategate under the rug—hoping that by ignoring it, it’ll just go away. “We the people” must insure that it is put on the front burner, and stays there.

Let’s get out of the pot, and put them in it.
Laus Deo.

(9) Reader Feedback Subscribe

Jim O'Neill Most recent columns
Born in June of 1951 in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, Jim O’Neill proudly served in the U.S. Navy from 1970-1974 in both UDT-21 (Underwater Demolition Team) and SEAL Team Two. A member of MENSA, he worked as a commercial diver in the waters off Scotland, India, and the United States. In 1998 while attending the University of South Florida as a journalism student, O’Neill won “First Place” in the “Carol Burnett/University of Hawaii AEJMC Research in Journalism Ethics Award.” The annual contest was set up by Carol Burnett with the money she won from successfully suing the National Enquirer for libel.
Jim can be reached at: Letters@canadafreepress.com

I'm from the government and I'm here to help.


"The nine most terrifying words in the English language are: 'I'm from the government and I'm here to help.'" - Ronald Reagan


Twelve Step Program for Obots - Step One


Little Barry AKA Obama (the Kenyan-Indonesian-African-American lad ) Goes to School

Little Barry Goes to School
By John Armor Published Today From Our Writers Unrated
John Armor
John Armor practiced law in the U.S. Supreme Court for 33 years, and is currently the counsel for the American Civil Rights Union, whose website is at: www.theacru.org. He lives now in Highlands, N. Carolina, and is working on a book about Thomas Paine. View all articles by John Armor
From Our Writers:
It has been almost a year that little Barry What’s-His-Name, the Kenyan-Indonesian-African-American lad has been going to school as President of the United States. This is an interim Report Card to his political parents, the voters of the United States.
English Comprehension: Barry has the more extraordinary ability to speak in English than all but a small handful of students who have ever attended this school. However, this ability to speak in complete sentences, using words that seem appropriate to the subject at hand, is coupled with a near total lack of content in those speeches. A+ for delivery, F for content. As Benjamin Franklin observed, "Here comes the Orator! With his flood of words, and his drop of reason."
Social Studies: With Barry’s approval, one of his confederates, Little Harry Reid, spent $300 million to purchase the one-time services of Little Mary Landrieu to vote yes to put the Health Care Bill on the floor in the Senate. But, it turned out that Little Mary thought it was only $100 million. They paid 200% more than Little Mary was willing to go for. ''C'' for sizing up the situation. ''F'' for acting appropriately. As Oscar Wilde said, "A cynic is a man who knows the price of everything but the value of nothing."
Science: The very week that internal documents in a British university surface, showing that the scientists who most support global warming have falsified their data, Little Barry decides to take part in a meeting that assumes that those false data are true. Barry and his selected playmates persist in the view that science is decided by the number of scientists who hold a particular view, rather than which scientist has a theory which best fits the observed facts. ''F'' for comprehension of what science consists of. ''F'' for application of science in the real world. When Galileo was challenged on his theory that the Earth revolved around the Sun rather than the Sun around the Earth (the common belief of the day) he is reported to have said, "Eppur Si Muove"--"And Yet It Moves."
Economics: Little Barry has shown a distressing tendency to equate borrowed money with earned money, that either can be spent for "investment" with equal effect. Even if there were no waste in the spending, and no fraud in the counting of the results, the radical difference between borrowing which must be repaid, and spending of present, real money, would remain. ''F'' for understanding the basics. ''F'' for application in the real world. Milton Friedman from ''Free to Choose'': "You can be sure that we'll all be able to find very good reasons why we should be the ones to spend somebody else's money." Ben Franklin from Poor Richard’s Almanack: "A penny saved is a penny earned."
History: Little Barry has given several speeches in class about the conduct of warfare and the manner of ending a war successfully. Apparently, he has
been neglecting his homework assignments. ''F'' for comprehension. ''F'' for application. As Vince Lombardi observed, and Winston Churchill also did before him, "Winning isn’t everything, it’s the only thing." Actually, that precise quote came from a John Wayne movie and was attributed to Lombardi.
There is no doubt, however, about Churchill’s position. Spoken in Commons, "You ask, what is our policy? I will say: It is to wage war, by sea, land, and air, with all our might and with all the strength that God can give us; to wage war against a monstrous tyranny, never surpassed in the dark, lamentable catalogue of human crime. That is our policy. You ask, what is our aim? I can answer in one word: Victory--victory at all costs, victory in spite of all terror, victory, however long and hard the road may be; for without victory there is no survival."
Conclusion: Little Barry is not doing well here at the school. Not only do I fear that he will not be promoted at the end of this session, without serious private tutoring to fill in the gaps in his current knowledge, I do not think he can successfully complete the current year. The voters should come and see me, at their earliest opportunity.
Signed:Miss Irmingard Sweeney, Sixth Grade, Unified School District of the United States of America

Little Barry AKA Obama (the Kenyan-Indonesian-African-American lad ) Goes to School

Little Barry Goes to School
By John Armor Published Today From Our Writers Unrated
John Armor
John Armor practiced law in the U.S. Supreme Court for 33 years, and is currently the counsel for the American Civil Rights Union, whose website is at: www.theacru.org. He lives now in Highlands, N. Carolina, and is working on a book about Thomas Paine. View all articles by John Armor
From Our Writers:
It has been almost a year that little Barry What’s-His-Name, the Kenyan-Indonesian-African-American lad has been going to school as President of the United States. This is an interim Report Card to his political parents, the voters of the United States.
English Comprehension: Barry has the more extraordinary ability to speak in English than all but a small handful of students who have ever attended this school. However, this ability to speak in complete sentences, using words that seem appropriate to the subject at hand, is coupled with a near total lack of content in those speeches. A+ for delivery, F for content. As Benjamin Franklin observed, "Here comes the Orator! With his flood of words, and his drop of reason."
Social Studies: With Barry’s approval, one of his confederates, Little Harry Reid, spent $300 million to purchase the one-time services of Little Mary Landrieu to vote yes to put the Health Care Bill on the floor in the Senate. But, it turned out that Little Mary thought it was only $100 million. They paid 200% more than Little Mary was willing to go for. ''C'' for sizing up the situation. ''F'' for acting appropriately. As Oscar Wilde said, "A cynic is a man who knows the price of everything but the value of nothing."
Science: The very week that internal documents in a British university surface, showing that the scientists who most support global warming have falsified their data, Little Barry decides to take part in a meeting that assumes that those false data are true. Barry and his selected playmates persist in the view that science is decided by the number of scientists who hold a particular view, rather than which scientist has a theory which best fits the observed facts. ''F'' for comprehension of what science consists of. ''F'' for application of science in the real world. When Galileo was challenged on his theory that the Earth revolved around the Sun rather than the Sun around the Earth (the common belief of the day) he is reported to have said, "Eppur Si Muove"--"And Yet It Moves."
Economics: Little Barry has shown a distressing tendency to equate borrowed money with earned money, that either can be spent for "investment" with equal effect. Even if there were no waste in the spending, and no fraud in the counting of the results, the radical difference between borrowing which must be repaid, and spending of present, real money, would remain. ''F'' for understanding the basics. ''F'' for application in the real world. Milton Friedman from ''Free to Choose'': "You can be sure that we'll all be able to find very good reasons why we should be the ones to spend somebody else's money." Ben Franklin from Poor Richard’s Almanack: "A penny saved is a penny earned."
History: Little Barry has given several speeches in class about the conduct of warfare and the manner of ending a war successfully. Apparently, he has
been neglecting his homework assignments. ''F'' for comprehension. ''F'' for application. As Vince Lombardi observed, and Winston Churchill also did before him, "Winning isn’t everything, it’s the only thing." Actually, that precise quote came from a John Wayne movie and was attributed to Lombardi.
There is no doubt, however, about Churchill’s position. Spoken in Commons, "You ask, what is our policy? I will say: It is to wage war, by sea, land, and air, with all our might and with all the strength that God can give us; to wage war against a monstrous tyranny, never surpassed in the dark, lamentable catalogue of human crime. That is our policy. You ask, what is our aim? I can answer in one word: Victory--victory at all costs, victory in spite of all terror, victory, however long and hard the road may be; for without victory there is no survival."
Conclusion: Little Barry is not doing well here at the school. Not only do I fear that he will not be promoted at the end of this session, without serious private tutoring to fill in the gaps in his current knowledge, I do not think he can successfully complete the current year. The voters should come and see me, at their earliest opportunity.
Signed:Miss Irmingard Sweeney, Sixth Grade, Unified School District of the United States of America

Friday, November 27, 2009

"The Natural Advocate" - HOLIDAY HEALTH SPECIAL - Friday, Nov 27th (8-10 PM ET)


Sam and Bunny Sewell



"The Natural Advocate" for November 27th
HOLIDAY HEALTH SPECIAL
Friday, Nov 27th (8-10 PM ET)

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

To listen to this program online, go to:http://www.blogtalkradio.com/Sentinel_Radio To listen by phone or to call in with questions & comments: (646) 727-2652

(We’re always eager for your feedback!)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

CLICK THE LINK FOR RESEARCH

Fat people get sick and die sooner than fit people!Now, that isn't breaking news, is it?The single most significant thing people can do to naturally prevent or reverse disease is to achieve a healthy weight
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Losing inches and gaining health - naturally
One of our favorite scientists who contribute to knowledge on how to live in harmony with nature is Dr. Stephen Chaney, PhD. Here are some recent comments from Dr. Chaney on common mistakes made by well-intentioned people. Ah yes, good intentions and “road building material.” :-)Whether you just want to maintain, take off a few unwanted pounds, or achieve a healthier silhouette, let us help you achieve success that lasts!ARE YOU NEXT TO GET “CINCHED?”
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

If you want to see before and after pictures of Sam’s transformation go here:
http://bestself.myshaklee.com/us/en/about.html

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

We have been eagerly waiting for this. We heard this research being presented at the Global Conference we attended in August and wanted to get this information out to the public as soon as possible.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Here is the latest research posted on the Natural Advocate blog
Natural Brain Health

Naturally Healthy Infants and Children
· Taking Fitness to Another Level
· Natural Solutions to ADD/ADHD
· · Losing inches and gaining health - naturally
Do you really want that government flu shot?
Natural Solutions to Male Health Risk from Toxins
VIVIX: The science behind this breakthrough produc...
Natural Molecule Increases Lifespan and "Healthspa...
Household Toxins and the Natural Solution
Economist lectures - starting a wellness business
Natural Wisdom - Don’t believe everything you hear...
Preventing and Reversing Disease Naturally
Natural way to look younger and live longer
Doctors Are the Third Leading Cause of Death
Natural Supplements Work - landmark study key find...
ALWAYS GREEN-ALWAYS POWERFUL -ALWAYS SAFE
A Little Goes a Long Way and Costs Less
Cost Comparison Chart "Green" Cleaners
Cancer rate higher in home than at work
Non-Drug Mood Therapy Techniques Scientifically Va...
Natural Solutions for Mood and Stress Problems
The Natural Advocate!


Support blog for this program is at: www.thenaturaladvocate.blogspot.com
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * * *

AARP back stabs seniors - AMAC is the alternative

In the end, AARP is just another group advocating Big Government - including big government experiments, just as long as the money flows and AARP can latch on to some of it. Its high time that seniors dumped this group.

Sen. John McCain in a recent Town Hall tells attendees to rip up their AARP membership cards.


Press Release: 10 Million Seniors to get Medicare Benefits Cut
by The Association of Mature American Citizens Found in the AMAC Action, In The News category

AMAC attends a rally opposing government healthcare
Dan Weber, president of the Association of Mature American Citizens (AMAC), said today over 10 million seniors will have their Medicare benefits cut under all versions of the health care reform proposed by Democratic legislators in both the House and the Senate. Weber said, ”President Obama promised to reduce costs in his health care proposals by eliminating support for Medicare Advantage plans. All versions from the Democrats contain this provision.

It would mean the 10 million seniors who have Medicare Advantage will have to buy expensive supplements to replace the benefits and coverage that would be eliminated.”

According to Weber, the average cost to each senior would be over $2,000 per year per individual. With over 10 million seniors affected, the proposed changes would shift a twenty billion dollar burden onto the backs of mostly low income seniors. “AMAC will fight to stop these changes”, Weber said.

Basic Medicare contains a $1,068 deductible for Part A, Hospital coverage and a 20% copayment requirement for Part B. Doctor/ Medical Coverage. Medicare Advantage plans provided by private companies eliminate these charges and usually add additional benefits such as vision, hearing and dental care along with prescription drug coverage for affordable premiums.

AMAC vs. AARP - David vs. Goliath
There are two organizations representing citizens 50 plus.


AMAC, the Association of Mature American Citizens has 10’s of thousands of members
AARP has 26 million Members.

The leadership of AARP has proven themselves to be a liberal leaning group that endorsed expensive Obamacare, without the consent of their members.

AMAC (pronounced A- Mack) is one of the leading groups fighting against President Obama’s health care initiative. AMAC has organized “Tea Parties” and participated in rallies against expanding government and raising taxes.

AMAC is pro-life, pro Second Amendment, and thinks government has grown too large and powerful. AMAC feels our elected officials are ignoring the will of the people. The proof of this can be seen in the way Congressmen and Senators have been treating their constituents at the various town hall meetings.

We need more members so we can have more clout with office holders. We need to counter the influence of AARP when they say they are speaking on behalf of Americans aged 50 and over.
AMAC will lead this fight knowing we can win, if you and other patriot Americans stand behind us.

Please go to www.amac.us and sign on as a member. For $12.50/year, you will know we are working on your behalf to stop socialism in America.

David conquered Goliath- and AMAC can beat AARP. Please check out our website and if you agree with us, please tell your friends.

Members receive our magazine and qualify for member discounts on Insurance and other services.

HELP US INFLUENCE CONGRESS LET YOUR VOICE BE HEARD LOUD AND CLEAR!!

Thursday, November 26, 2009

Global Warming - We are no longer The Skeptics. We are The Vindicated.

The Trouble With Smart People
As a Mensa member I have long known about how intellectuals fall in love with their own ideas to the extent that they make colossal mistakes. Above link: Thomas Sowell says much the same thing.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Oh the pain of misguided idealists. The pain they inflict on humanity and the pain they experience when their high minded/Thin air/aerie/fairie schemes fall apart.
Remember this: Hitler was an idealist.
Lord, save me from evil consequences of good intentions.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Illustrative quotes from various ecofools:

"No matter if the science is all phony, there are collateral environmental benefits.... Climate change [provides] the greatest chance to bring about justice and equality in the world." Christine Stewart, Canadian Minister of the Environment in a quote from the Calgary Herald

"Even if the theory of global warming is wrong, we will be doing the right thing -- in terms of economic policy and environmental policy." Tim Wirth , while U.S. Senator, Colorado. After a short stint as United Nations Under-Secretary for Global Affairs. Served as President, U.N. Foundation, created by Ted Turner and his $1 billion "gift"

"On the one hand, as scientists we are ethically bound to the scientific method, in effect promising to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but - which means that we must include all the doubts, the caveats, the ifs, ands, and buts. On the other hand, we are not just scientists but human beings as well. And like most people we'd like to see the world a better place, which in this context translates into our working to reduce the risk of potentially disastrous climatic change. To do that we need to get some broadbased support, to capture the public's imagination. That, of course, entails getting loads of media coverage. So we have to offer up scary scenarios, make simplified, dramatic statements, and make little mention of any doubts we might have. This 'double ethical bind' we frequently find ourselves in cannot be solved by any formula. Each of us has to decide what the right balance is between being effective and being honest. I hope that means being both." Steven Schneider, Climatologist, Stanford University. Quoted in Discover, pp. 45-48, Oct. 1989; see also (Dixy Lee Ray in 'Trashing the Planet', 1990) and (American Physical Society, APS News August/September 1996).

“A massive campaign must be launched to de-develop the United States. De-development means bringing our economic system (especially patterns of consumption) into line with the realities of ecology and the world resource situation.” Paul Ehrlich and Anne H. Ehrlich, “Population, Resources, Environment” (W.H. Freeman, San Francisco, 1970, 323) This quote has also been attributed to John Holdren, Erlich's co-author, who now works with Obama in the White House.

“People are the cause of all the problems; we have too many of them; we need to get rid of some of them, and this (ban of DDT) is as good a way as any.” Charles Wurster, Environmental Defense Fund.

“We can and should seize upon the energy crisis as a good excuse and great opportunity for making some very fundamental changes that we should be making anyhow for other reasons.” — Russell Train (EPA Administrator at the time, and soon thereafter became head of the World Wildlife Fund), Science 184 p. 1050, 7 June 1974 "Scientists who want to attract attention to themselves, who want to attract great funding to themselves, have to (find a) way to scare the public ... and this you can achieve only by making things bigger and more dangerous than they really are." Petr Chylek (Professor of Physics and Atmospheric Science, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia) Commenting on reports by other researchers that Greenland's glaciers are melting. (Halifax Chronicle-Herald, August 22, 2001)

“The world has a cancer, and that cancer is man”. Alan Gregg, former longtime official of the Rockerfeller Foundation

“Isn’t the only hope for the planet that the industrialised civilizations collapse? Isn’t it our responsibility to bring that about?” Maurice Strong, head of the 1992 Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro and Executive Officer for Reform in the Office of the Secretary General of the United Nations.

“Man is always and everywhere a blight on the landscape.” John Muir, founder of the Sierra Club

“Phasing out the human race will solve every problem on earth, social and environmental.” Dave Foreman, Earth First! and Sierra Club director (1995-1997
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Climategate’s Perry Mason Moment

Posted By Steve Milloy On November 26, 2009 @ 12:55 am In . Feature 01, Europe, Science, Science & Technology, US News, World News 59 Comments

What’s the real smoking gun among the emails allegedly “hacked” from the University of East Anglia’s Climate Research Unit? We’ll get to that in a moment, but let’s first address the alarmists’ first line of defense — that the emails were stolen, and more than likely by some dastardly skeptic.

Since news of embarrassing, if not incriminating emails broke [1] last Friday, it has become clear that the CRU computer system was not “hacked” and the emails were not stolen. In fact, the file containing the emails had been assembled by CRU staff in preparation for compliance with a Freedom of Information request. The file was then stored in a publicly accessible portion of the CRU computer network — making it just a matter of time before someone discovered it. Why the file was so stored may never be known, but that’s not really what’s important.

Nothing illegal or unethical was done to affect the file’s release.

Moving on.
Much has been written already about the now infamous “trick” to explain away recent global cooling, and the alarmists’ conspiratorial machinations to silence their critics. But the real “mushroom cloud” among the emails comes from Kevin Trenberth, a senior scientist with the National Center for Atmospheric Research and a lead author of the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) reports on global warming.

In an October 14 email to fellow alarmist Tom Wigley, Trenberth plaintively writes:
How come you do not agree with a statement that says we are no where close to knowing where energy is going or whether clouds are changing to make the planet brighter. We are not close to balancing the energy budget. The fact that we can not account for what is happening in the climate system makes any consideration of geoengineering quite hopeless as we will never be able to tell if it is successful or not! It is a travesty!

It’s a Perry Mason moment.

First, by admitting that we “are nowhere close” to understanding atmospheric energy flows, the much-vaunted Trenberth has trashed all the climate models on which the gloom-and-doom IPCC forecasts are based. If energy flows in the climate system cannot be accounted for, then they cannot be modeled — and there can be no basis upon which to make predictions of future temperatures.

That’s case closed, right there. But there’s more.
Two years ago, I privately surveyed U.S. scientists [2] who participated in the IPCC’s review of climate science. Trenberth was one of those who responded to the survey.

One question asked:
Which best describes the role of manmade CO2 emissions in climate change?

Trenberth checked off the following answer:

Manmade CO2 emissions drive climate change, but other natural and human-related factors are also important.

So — while in October 2007 Trenberth seemed pretty convinced that he understood energy flows in the climate system, two years later he underwent such an about-face that he is now trying to get his colleagues to admit, at least privately, that they really don’t know squat.

It’s not surprising that Trenberth had a hard time convincing Wigley, since Wigley’s responses to the survey were extreme in terms of the significance of manmade CO2 emissions. On that same question, Wigley checked off this answer:

Manmade CO2 emissions are the principal driver of climate change.

Were the framing of CO2 as climate-culprit a TV drama, at this point Perry Mason would be cruising off into the sunset with Della Street in his gas-guzzling black 1957 Cadillac El Dorado convertible. But the magnitude of the global warming fraud is immense and widespread — too many politician/celebrity egos, corporate fortunes, and activist political dreams have too much invested in the scam to simply say “nevermind.”

They have no shame, and they will not go away. So our struggle against them will continue.
The difference now is that we are no longer The Skeptics. We are The Vindicated.

http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/steve-milloy-climategate%e2%80%99s-perry-mason-moment-pjm-exclusive/

URLs in this post:
[1] broke: http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/hacker-releases-data-implicating-cru-in-global-warming-fraud/

[2] surveyed U.S. scientists: http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,309919,00.html

AKA Obama appointees: Less Than 10 Percent have private sector experience

Less Than 10 Percent

Nick Schulz, editor of the American Enterprise Institute's The American magazine, catches this eye-popping graph from a J.P. Morgan research report, that shows that less than 10 percent of the Obama cabinet has any private sector experience.

So as Obama attempts to turn the economy around, less than ten percent of the cabinet officials he would presumably turn to for advice have ever worked in the private sector -- not very encouraging.

Liberal Scinetists Have Been Misleading us for a long Time

http://biggovernment.com/2009/11/25/climategate-is-not-the-first-time-progressive-scientists-have-lied-to-the-world/

Now that global warming is being exposed as a gross manipulation of junk science, it is important to remember that this is not the first time in our nation’s history that the Progressive community has used junk science in order to force their social agenda on an unsuspecting population.

Back in the early 1900’s, up through World War Two, the progressive movements of America and Europe committed large scale genocide with their progressive Eugenic “science”. In fact the term genocide was coined to describe what the Progressive Eugenic movement did in this country and in Germany.

Not many people understand the crime these American Progressives committed, because public educators and other liberal professors just can’t wrap their rigid minds around the concept that the origins of their current religion are soaked in the blood of their own dark history.
The whole ugly truth about how American Progressives directly inspired Adolf Hitler and his Reich, is contained in a masterpiece of writing by Edwin Black, War Against The Weak.
From the book’s website:

Ultimately, 60,000 Americans were coercively sterilized — legally and extra-legally. Many never discovered the truth until decades later. Those who actively supported eugenics include America’s most progressive figures: Woodrow Wilson, Margaret Sanger and Oliver Wendell Holmes.

American eugenic crusades proliferated into a worldwide campaign, and in the 1920s came to the attention of Adolf Hitler. Under the Nazis, American eugenic principles were applied without restraint, careening out of control into the Reich’s infamous genocide. During the pre-War years, American eugenicists openly supported Germany’s program. The Rockefeller Foundation financed the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute and the work of its central racial scientists. Once WWII began, Nazi eugenics turned from mass sterilization and euthanasia to genocidal murder. One of the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute doctors in the program financed by the Rockefeller Foundation was Josef Mengele who continued his research in Auschwitz, making daily eugenic reports on twins. After the world recoiled from Nazi atrocities, the American eugenics movement — its institutions and leading scientists — renamed and regrouped under the banner of an enlightened science called human genetics.

To see just how involved the American Progressive movement was in the global effort to murder the “inferior” in the name of their junk science of Eugenics, we dare you to click through to this Google Books page for Black’s book, War Against The Weak. The link highlights the word Progressive everywhere it appears in the text.

And before the folks at Media Matters try to destroy the source of the detailed research which reveals how America’s Progressive movement collaborated with the Nazis to commit genocide, we would simply like to wish you good luck with that.
Again, from Mr. Black’s website:

In 2005, Black won the World Affairs Council’s award for the Best World Affairs Book for Banking on Baghdad, and the Doña Gracia Medal for Best Book of The Year. In 2004, he won the coveted Rockower First Prize Award for Investigative Journalism from the American Jewish Press Association for “Funding Hate,” his acclaimed, syndicated investigation of the Ford Foundation’s systematic funding of hate groups. In 2003, he received the top two editorial awards from the American Society of Journalists and Authors: Best Book of the Year for IBM and the Holocaust and Best Article of the Year for “IBM in Auschwitz” in the Village Voice. Also in 2003, Black received the International Human Rights Award from the World Affairs Council for War Against the Weak.

We would also like to direct Neo-Progressives doubters, who still don’t want to believe the truth about their movement’s blood stained history, to listen to this interview Tavis Smiley conducted with Mr. Black on NPR.

Edwin Black is unimpeachable! His reputation as a consummate researcher is undisputed by every liberal rag in the land. He doesn’t care about the politics of his discoveries. He only cares about finding the truth.

The Progressive movement in this country is so fond of highlighting the darkest elements of the history of these United States, but for some reason, they always leave out the significant role the Progressive movement had in all of those ugly chapters.

That’s probably because if people were educated as to the history of Eugenics, they might make the connection that the anti-miscegenation inspired Ku Klux Klan was a direct product of American Progressives, who loathed the idea of interracial breeding. Golly that would be embarrassing!

People might also come to the conclusion that the National Socialist movement in Europe was a Progressive movement. None of this makes for very good PR.

None of this is to say that Neo-Progressives are Nazis. They are not. Obama is not Hitler and we have said as much on Founding Bloggers. But when the government proposes a federal mandate requiring everyone to buy a product or service, or face jail time, that sure does feel like some flavor of social fascism.

Either way, the Neo-Progressives should at least be held to their own standard, and have their racist history hung around their necks like a scarlet letter.

The Progressive movement owns the Klan.
The Progressive Movement owns Nazi Eugenics.
The Neo-Progressive Movement owns Global Warming.

As a side note, how ironic is it that so many Jews and Blacks lead today’s Progressive movement, when the same ideology murdered millions of them throughout the previous century? I would think Progressive is the last thing a Jew or Black person would want to identify with. Despite the abysmal track record of the movement, they are embracing the newest flavor of scientific fraud, global warming, perpetrated in a recycled effort to socially engineer society according to today’s Progressive standards.

The more things change, the more they stay the same.

Obama as America's first post-American President.

http://spectator.org/archives/2009/11/25/americas-rebirth/
America's Rebirth
By Peter Ferrara on 11.25.09 @ 6:08AM

John Bolton has referred to President Obama as America's first post-American President. By this he means that instead of pursuing America's interests in relation to the rest of the world, President Obama is pursuing the rest of the world's interests in relation to America. In other words, Obama is imposing on America the policies the rest of the world would like to see stuffed down our throats. This is why it seems like we are losing our country piece by piece, and that America is in an accelerating downward spiral. To those who are paying attention, and not just blindly accepting the Obama/Democrat talking points, everything suddenly seems so different, because America was conquered by an alien ideology in 2008.

Reagan's Peace and Prosperity
The rest of America experienced the Reagan Revolution starting in 1980. The failed Keynesian economics from the 1970s was producing double-digit inflation, double-digit unemployment, and double-digit interest rates. Reagan's strong dollar monetary policies cut inflation in half by 1982, and cut it in half again by 1983, taming it still to this very day. In 1983, the greatest economic boom in world history took off, as a result of Reagan's free market economics. The Keynesian-induced business cycle that produced four increasingly worse recessions from 1969 to 1982 was replaced by a shocking 25-year economic boom, with only mild, short downturns in 1990 and 2001. As Art Laffer and Steve Moore point out in The End of Prosperity, more wealth was created in America during that 25-year boom than in the entire previous history of America combined, from George Washington up to Ronald Reagan. The boom spread worldwide, boosted by other countries adopting Reaganomics as well. We began to see a blooming middle class as a result in places like India, Brazil, and even China. Reagan also aggressively fought the Cold War by pursuing his powerful defense buildup, funding and supporting revolutionaries on the outskirts of the Soviet Empire like the mujahedeen in Afghanistan and the contras in Nicaragua, and affirmatively seeking to cut off the sources of hard currency for the weak and unproductive Soviet Communist economy. As a result, in 1989 the Berlin Wall fell, and the Soviet Empire collapsed. As the British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher said, "Reagan won the Cold War without firing a shot." These are the reasons that Reagan will be recognized as the most successful President in American history. Clinton brilliantly recognized the Reagan-led transformation of American politics, and led the Democrats to more moderate positions through the Democrat Leadership Council (DLC) and his path-breaking 1992 campaign. As Dan Mitchell now of the Cato Institute has rightly observed, President Clinton pursued the most conservative economic policies of any postwar President except Reagan. He was greatly aided in this by Newt Gingrich and his Republican takeover of Congress in 1994, as Clinton primarily just went along with the economic policies of the Republican Congressional majorities. Tony Blair basically did the same with the Labour Party in Great Britain as President Clinton did for the Democrats in America, resulting in a 12-year run for Labour Party rule in that country. With the 2007 retirement of Blair, that is now about to end.

The Democrat Wing of the Democrat Party
But for what Howard Dean termed, "The Democrat wing of the Democrat Party," by which he meant those left-wing Democrats who viewed President Clinton as a repulsive Reagan sellout, the post-1980 history recounted above never happened. These Democrats rejected both Reagan and Clinton, and have just been moving farther and farther left since 1980. With the passing of the Clinton-Gore era, these left-wing Democrats took back their party in 2004, with the ultraliberal John Kerry winning the nomination after the collapse of the ultraliberal Howard Dean. George Soros led other badly deluded, trendy left billionaires in massively financing a dominating left-wing political machine. That machine joined with an increasingly ultraleft, formerly mainstream media to defeat the Clinton camp in 2008, and then win it all, behind their chosen front man, lifelong Marxian Barack Obama. Meanwhile, in the Republican Party, the moderates finally managed to bust up the Reagan Coalition, so certain that they had a more enduring political strategy all along. During his Administration, President Bush slowly departed from each one of the planks of Reaganomics, though it is not clear that he ever understood what he was doing. Going back to 2001, the Bush Administration pursued weak dollar monetary policies that led to the housing bubble. Bush departed from Reagan's budget cut policies to rapidly expand federal spending. Bush went along with Democrat regulatory policies regarding housing and finance to further boost the housing bubble. Finally, as the housing bubble burst and the financial crisis started to appear, Bush abandoned the tax rate cut policies of supply-side economics, joining with the Democrat Congressional leadership at the start of 2008 to enact a Keynesian tax rebate stimulus, fully supported by then Senator Barack Obama. That stimulus, of course, failed to accomplish anything, because Keynesian economics is confused nonsense, thoroughly discredited way back in the 1970s. But it was the eventual abandonment of every plank of Reaganomics by the Bush-led Republicans and the New Left Democrat Congress that resulted in the financial crisis of 2008, and the end of the 25-year Reagan economic boom. With the Republican nomination of John McCain, the moderates had finally taken complete control of the party. McCain and his moderate campaign honchos led the Republicans to a historic rout. Colin Powell's advice to the Republicans to follow a moderate champion like McCain was so bad that even he voted for Obama. The elections of 2008 can be viewed as a successful takeover bid for America by George Soros. As a result, the best way to understand Washington today is to recognize that the New Left from the 1960s has completely taken over the White House and Congress, and now rules the formerly mainstream media as well. These people are quite certain that they enjoy a new, higher level of consciousness, and so they are not willing to listen to anything from anybody. They already know everything, about economic policy, tax policy, environmental policy, health care, "national defense," foreign policy, diplomacy. Nothing happened after 1980. Everything about Reagan and his policies is down the memory hole. History ended in 1979, and has just started up again in 2009.
If you disagree with them, they denounce you as a yahoo, a Nazi, or a tea bagger. They won't consider the views of average people at town halls on health care, they won't consider what tea party protesters have to say about deficits, spending, and taxes, they refuse to allow even a hearing for the latest science disproving the theory of man-made global warming. They are now racing pell-mell to create a future where most of everything produced goes to the government to be spent on welfare and other entitlements, in accordance with the "morality" of "social justice." The mega-entitlements of Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid were already projected to lead federal spending as a percent of GDP to almost double, from its longtime stable range around 20% to close to 40%, as the Baby Boomers retire and these old entitlement structures show their long-term structural defects. Yet, President Obama and the Congressional New Left increased federal spending in just their first two months in office by well over a trillion dollars, or close to 30%, between the stimulus, the omnibus, and the Obama budget. On top of the runaway entitlement promises we already can't afford to pay, our New Left ruling class has already increased annual welfare spending by one-third, from $522 billion to almost $700 billion, according to Robert Rector of the Heritage Foundation. By 2014, total welfare spending, federal and state, will reach $1 trillion per year. Over the next 10 years, according to President Obama's own budget projections, this welfare spending will total $10.3 trillion, about $250,000 for every person in poverty in the U.S., $1 million for a poor family of four. Rector concludes, "Most of Obama's increases in welfare spending are permanent expansions of the welfare state, not temporary increases in response to the current recession." But the resurgent New Left now suddenly in power is just warming up. They are now adding the biggest entitlement of all, national health insurance, to the burden on America's taxpayers. Over the first full 10 years, that will mean $3 trillion more in additional spending. And this assumes that only 30 million people will qualify for the middle class entitlement subsidies, with 162 million in employer provided coverage not eligible for the subsidies as a result. As employers discover it is cheaper for them to drop their coverage and pay the mandate tax penalties (especially with health insurance premiums soaring under Obamacare), the total cost could easily more than double. Counting state and local spending climbing towards 15% of GDP, this will all add up to total government spending at close to 60% of GDP. And if they pass cap and trade, or enact the pending EPA global warming regulations, that will mean another $2-$3 trillion in additional costs for the American economy. If the economy heads downward under all these burdens (more likely than the Yankees ever again winning a World Series), then government spending as a percent of GDP will be even higher.

America the Pitiful, Blinded Giant
Because of the New Left takeover of America, our country is today like a pitiful, blinded giant. We are spiraling downward in vicious cycles of decline. The steadily depreciating dollar is scorned by rising formerly Third World powers, from Brazil to India to Saudi Arabia to China, increasingly plotting to replace it as the world's reserve currency. And who can blame them? In just two years, America under Obamanomics will have the seventh-highest government debt to GDP ratio in the world, rivaling such economic powers as Zimbabwe, Jamaica, and Lebanon. The economies and stock markets of other nations are already soaring towards healthy recovery, while we languish in stagnation. The declining dollar means a decline in America's standard of living, as everything we buy from the rest of the world, from oil to home electronics, becomes more expensive. Reflecting this decline as well, rationing of American health care, formerly the best in the world by far, has already begun, with drastic cuts under Medicare for doctors and hospitals who treat patients for heart disease and cancer, and recommendations to deny tests for breast cancer that have already proved to save women's lives. The bills currently before Congress would involve an all-out assault on the health care infrastructure for the sickest and those most in need of advanced medical care now enjoyed by the middle class, to save money for Obama's new health care entitlement. Federal and state policymakers plot regulations to force us out of our big, beautiful, powerful automobiles into glorified lawnmowers. They want to give up on the production of energy to heat and cool our homes, and power our modern household appliances, from picture perfect flat screen TVs, to powerful new computers surfing the Internet. While China announces plans to build 100 nuclear power plants over the next 20 years, the left-wing environmentalists ensconced in Obama's political machine still prevent us from building any. Vast national wealth in great domestic stores of natural gas and oil lie untapped, blocked by the same extremists. Around the world, America is in retreat. National wise men tell us to learn to live with Iranian nukes, while we withdraw the missile defenses from Europe that would protect both us and our allies. Tin pot dictators in North Korea test nukes and fire off missiles, while we cut our own national missile defense budgets, withdrawing planned additional missile defense sites from Alaska. While the budget for everything else is soaring, only national defense is cut. President Obama himself talks on the world stage of phasing out America's nuclear deterrent entirely, and his budget policies take steps in that direction. With that goes our leading superpower status. He travels the world over apologizing for both real and imagined American misdeeds, failing adequate notice of the misdeeds of others. He withdraws from the War on Terrorism, assigning the threat to the police to counter. But this spiraling decline does not trouble the New Left that has taken over America, for they find our formerly exceptional prosperity and our waning superpower status morally embarrassing. As President Obama insists, we are just another country in their view, one among many others.

The Rebirth of America
Yet, while these are dangerous and deeply troubling times for America, they are also historic times of rebirth, renewal and breathtaking opportunity. The American people are in the process of decisively rejecting the socialist economic policies and the Peace through Weakness defense policies of the New Left. Longtime American institutions that went in whole hog on the Left Wing takeover of America, from the New York Times to the Democrat party, are going to be swept away in the social tsunami that is coming.
The fundamental issue is this: watch not where the pendulum is today, but to where it is swinging, and with what force. Politically, this means over the next two election cycles there will be astounding new opportunities that almost no one can conceive today. Longtime left-wing Democrat incumbents will be shockingly vulnerable to sudden defeat. Example given: the Senate race shaping up in California next year between the incumbent Barbara Boxer and the challenger Carly Fiorina can now be more accurately characterized as an IQ test rather than an election. Especially vulnerable will be those now representing trendy left upper income locales, where what has been in style for a generation will so suddenly be out of style. Indeed, the biggest threat right now to the coming political revolution is that the sweeping new opportunities will be underestimated. Opportunities abound to take out long time incumbents in Democrat primaries as well as in general elections. Economically, this means that fortunes will be lost by those betting on continued government subsidies in pursuit of left-wing fallacies like green energy and socialized medicine. Business pigs like General Electric now going whole hog into the public trough of corporate welfare will be unhappily shocked when it is suddenly closed down. Those who are pursuing a meaningful alternative energy opportunity that can survive on its own if government just gets out of the way can go ahead and prosper. Those who are investing billions on the expectation of billions in taxpayer subsidies, or favorable regulations that will impose huge costs on the rest of society, shouldn't come crying that they will be driven into bankruptcy when policy suddenly changes. That won't be a consideration after the coming political revolution, no matter who their lobbyist is. For public policy, this means sweeping, fundamental reforms that are considered hopeless now, and beyond consideration, will suddenly be in vogue, and quite possible. Those who believe in restoring the fundamentals of America, a new, historic prosperity, and Peace through Strength, should be planning now for the reforms they will enact after the Restoration. Think 1981 times 1995, squared.

Oath to defend the constitution does not expire.

We have not begun to fight, but when that day comes we will remember our oath of loyalty.
Frightening assessment of whats on the horizon by Naval Aviator, Commander Jerry



Here is the language of the oath taken by both enlisted and officers:"I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic"



Tremble AKA Obama. Resign of face us!

A letter written by Naval Aviator, Commander Jerry Wilson:

We lived in California during the winters of 2007 and 2008. We
became addicted to Fox News and watched O'Reilly and Hannity
and Colmes every night. When we got back home, we upgraded our
cable to get Fox. I watched the Presidential campaign very
closely. Initially because I thought the Democrats would
nominate Hillary Clinton and then in astonishment when they
chose an even more hard-left candidate. All of last year I
told everyone I could that Obama was not a Democrat, he was a
Marxist. He is far to the left of any European leader and even
our far left party, the NDP.

I read Saul Alinsky when I was in the University. I studied
him and his writing carefully. When Bill Ayers and his idiot
wife were bombing and killing people at random in the Weather
Underground. Weather Underground and the Black Panthers were
closely allied. I read David Horowitz's account of changing
from a Marxist to a conservative after seeing that the
government was afraid to prosecute members of the Panthers for
murdering his personal assistant. He suddenly understood the
evil that Marxism really was.

After the student radicals failed in creating a Marxist
revolution in the United States by violent means, they
embraced Alinsky. You would be wise to read "Rules for
Radicals" because it outlines how Hillary and Obama planned to
get into power, and what they intended to do when they got it.

Socialism is not the correct descriptor for what Obama and the
Democrats are doing. They are going to be much more far
reaching than anything Sweden has ever been able to do. Obama
is following Alinsky's plans, those set out in "Rules for
Radicals" and his other writing. The Democrats are attempting
to create one party rule in the U.S. and in achieving that,
will create crisis after crisis by their own actions and use
those crisis to nationalize the means of production in the
U.S. You are in the middle of a communist revolution and few
in the U..S. can actually see it for what it truly is.

The U.S. is now on the path of financial destruction. The
Constitution has been shredded and individual human rights are
being trampled. In less than 8 months. Obama has used a
recession to take over the two largest industries in the U.S.
He will debase the Dollar and is on the road to creating an
incredible energy shortage that will allow him and Congress to
take over the energy industry.

But by and large I think that by the 2010 elections, the
Democrats will have gerrymandered electoral districts to the
point that it will be impossible for them to lose control of
both houses of Congress. The incredible increase in the money
supply is going to create Zimbabwe and Venezuela style
inflation, and with it, controls on the currency and the
amount of money that can be taken out of the country.

I love America , I cannot believe how the ignorance of the
American public has created a situation where by they are
going to lose their Republic and slip into an age of
repression and tyranny.

I may be nuts, but so far I have been 100% in my predictions
of what Obama was going to do, because I merely had to look at
"Rules for Radicals" to see what was coming next.

I read Glenn Beck's book, "Common Sense" and in it re-read
Thomas Paine's pamphlet with the same name. I recommend the book.

When the storm finally hits (and it will), those of you who
supported the Obama administration will be affected as well.
It won't just be us gun owners or Flat-Taxers, or Pro-Lifers
that get hit. You'll be right there next to us.

You all thought the Conservatives were nut cases. You know,
all of us who believe in God, small government, the Second
Amendment, etc. You thought you could just go back to sleep
after the election was over. In your world, America will
continue as before. You'll still have the same rights, the
same nice house, the same big screen television. After all,
your high school football team won and the other team lost "go
team"! Even if you have bothered to look up from the daily
grind since Nov 4th, you dismissed everything that has
occurred as "politics as usual"the same old stuff.

In the end, it'll all be OK won't it? Not this time.

There are a growing number of citizens in the US that are
ready to fight to shut down the government's grab of personal
freedom, it's blatant abuse of the constitution, and it's
attempt to replace the American way of life with socialism.
You have to listen carefully to hear them, but they are there.
I won't start that fight, but when it goes down I will join it.

As for you, why, you'll be shocked because you didn't see it
coming. And eventually you'll be saddened when you see that we
have truly lost the way of life with which you grew up. You'll
be saddened that your children and grandchildren live in a
socialist, government-controlled gulag where their every
movement from cradle to grave is tracked by the government.
But most of all, you'll be saddened by the death of friends
and relatives who are brave enough to fight and die for
something they believe in.

You know, McCain wasn't much of a candidate. I'll give you
that. He was the lesser of two evils for most of us. I don't
blame you for not voting for him since, at the time, you
didn't know what we all know now.. But at least John McCain
was an American. He was a supporter of the American way of
life and he understood that you can't negotiate with
terrorists. He understood and appreciated the sacrifice made
by my father and other members of the Greatest Generation.

Mark my words friends. All across America groups are forming.
They are forming out of anger and out of desperation at the
thought of losing America . They're not militia groups,
terrorists as the Department of Homeland security would have
you believe; they are Americans, loyal to the constitution.
They are mothers and fathers and grandparents. They belong to
groups like the Minutemen Civil Defense Corps, the Peaceful
Resistance, the Constitution Party, the Young Conservatives,
the 9/12 Project, and Grassfire.. Right now they are
fragmented, each focused on their own cause.. But sometime in
the next two years, our government is going to do something
really stupid and these groups will come together. Watch for
it, wait for it's get ready. It will happen.

When that event happens, whatever "it" is, our great country
is going to plunge into chaos for a while. I pray to God that
we make it through that time and emerge a stronger, smarter
country.

Naval Aviator, Commander Jerry Wilson,
Live Free or Die Fighting

"A government big enough to give you everything you want, is strong enough to take everything you have."
Thomas Jefferson

"Dissent is the highest form of patriotism" - 'Benjamin Franklin'

"A nation of sheep will beget a government of wolves" -- 'Edward R. Murrow'

"Its a rare person who wants to hear what he doesn’t want to hear" – 'Dick Cavett'

"In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act" – 'George Orwell'

Neo: What truth? Morpheus: That you are a slave, Neo. That you, like everyone else, was born into
bondage... kept inside a prison that you cannot smell, taste, or touch – a prison for your mind.
-From the movie, 'The Matrix'

"The world is a dangerous place, not because of those who do evil, but
because of those who look on and do nothing." - 'Albert Einstein'

Implanted Microchip in Patients Included in Healthcare Bill

As if we were not suspicious enough!

Microchip included in Healthcare Bill ?

It is definitely a device for storing information. I am skeptical of lots of stuff I get as fwds. Since I wear a pacemaker/defib I assumed someone had just made the wrong conclusion. I was wrong. This devise is described as: “implantable radiofrequency transponder system for patient identification and health information”. I don’t really have a problem with it so long as it is the individual’s decision to implant or remove the device. It looks like they are setting it up to be something other than a personal decision.

http://www.hitachi.com/New/cnews/030902.htmlhttp://www.nvic.org/vaccine-laws/tra...-registry.aspxI have read pp 1001-1006 of the bill. On page 1001 you will find the clause that speaks of the implantable device(nanochip).

http://waysandmeans.house.gov/media/pdf/111/AAHCA09001xml.pdf“Buried deep within the over 1,000 pages of the massive US Health Care Bill (PDF) in a “non-discussed” section titled: Subtitle C-11 Sec. 2521— National Medical Device Registry, and which states its purpose as:“The Secretary shall establish a national medical device registry (in this subsection referred to as the ‘registry’) to facilitate analysis of postmarket safety and outcomes data on each device that—‘‘(A) is or has been used in or on a patient; and ‘‘(B) is a class III device; or ‘‘(ii) a class II device that is implantable.

Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff
Class II Special Controls Guidance
Document: Implantable
Radiofrequency Transponder
System for Patient Identification
and Health Information
http://www.fda.gov/downloads/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/GuidanceDocuments/ucm072191.pdf

Wednesday, November 25, 2009

Obama in a Bind Over Country of Birth

Obama in a Bind Over Country of Birth
By Alan Gray, NewsBlaze


President Obama is in a fix over his country of birth.

The President started to dig the hole as Senate candidate and now he is president, the hole is getting deeper and uglier, mainly because of his evasive actions. Many Democrat supporters are either ignoring the problem or are vehemently attacking "birthers" who question the President's eligibility.

Republicans are not the only ones concerned about his eligibility. Libertarians, independents, constitutionalists and even democrats are wondering why Obama is fighting so hard to hide his origin.

Unfortunately, Obama dug the hole himself, and like a hole created when a water main leaks and then bursts, the hole is expanding day by day and as it does, the fallout is increasing.

The President and his legal teams have done everything in their power to prevent anyone from accessing his real birth certificate, if he has one, but there are other lines of investigation they cannot block.

During his campaign for the Senate, he and his team touted his Kenyan birth, possibly because it made him more appealing to the voters they needed. Unfortunately, admitting to his birth in Kenya makes him ineligible for the Presidency.

So the question now is, was he really born in Kenya and he told the truth in the Senate campaign, or was he really born in Hawaii, and the Kenya story was a lie, used to deceive Illinois voters.

Obama can't have it both ways. The answer to this question will be interesting!

Of course, he could say the campaign and the reporters all got it wrong, but it will be interesting to follow the trail on this investigation and discover the sources for the AP story that documents the apparent fact that Obama was Kenyan born.

If it wasn't the truth back then, why didn't he stop the campaign using that information and why didn't he make the AP issue a retraction?

Obama supporters who say it is nobody's business, need to take a step back, imagine the president is George Bush and ask themselves the same question they should ask now. "Is it OK for the President to hide his origin and what are his motives for doing it?"

I want there to be a simple, truthful answer to these questions, but I have a strange feeling the answer is not what any of his supporters wants to hear.

Political Correctness Kills People!

Sixty-three percent (63%) of voters believe that political correctness kept the military from preventing the Fort Hood shootings.

Ft. Hood Killer at Work in Annapolis
by Anonymous Writer

11/25/2009


Political correctness was responsible for the death of thirteen people at Ft. Hood. Of this I am certain. I have watched political correctness at work in the military for more than three decades while serving in two different military branches. I may not have seen it all but, I have seen quite a bit of it.

Aside from academia and the civilian government workforce, there is no place else in America where political correctness is as rampant as military. The rules of political correctness are not listed in military regulations. It is like knowing where to find the chow hall. Everyone just knows.

Press reports indicate Army Major Nidal Malik Hasan grossly misbehaved for years. Not only wasn’t he seriously reprimanded, but he was actually promoted in spite of engaging in behavior that would have quickly ended the careers of others. Many of us who have witnessed similar behavior know what occurred. Hasan’s activities were virtually ignored because he is Muslim.


Politically correctness is a major cancer in today’s military. There are favored minority groups that are given special rights, privileges and treatment not available to non-minorities. Military awards are one example. Sister services -- the Navy and Marine Corps -- have between them at least 15 awards reserved only for women or minorities including Black Engineer of the Year, National Organization for Mexican American Rights Meritorious Service, and the Society of American-Indian Government Employees awards.

The Army’s hands-off approach toward the Muslim Hasan contrasts significantly with how Defense officials have handled those practicing mainstream religions.

Hasan was a medical professional serving in a sacred role administering to the most vulnerable; yet, he was proselytizing to his patients about Islam. In spite of this, he was twice promoted.

About the same time Hasan was preaching Islam to the wounded, complaints arose of alleged proselytizing by Evangelical Christians at the U.S. Air Force Academy. A major Pentagon task force was dispatched, investigated and found a "perception of religious bias." Nonetheless, nearly six years after complaints first arose at USAFA, Christian activity at the school is still closely scrutinized.

Military political correctness is rampant much closer to the nation’s capital. The U.S. Naval Academy is to train young adults to serve in the combat arms of the Navy and Marine Corps. However, Superintendent and Vice Admiral Jeffrey Fowler -- apparently unaware that the U.S. is engaged in two wars -- states his number one priority is to increase diversity.

Fowler is not alone in pumping up multiculturalism. Joint Chiefs Chairman Admiral Mike Mullen claims diversity is a “strategic imperative.” Following the Ft. Hood massacre, Army Chief of Staff General George Casey was seemingly more concerned about preserving religious diversity in the Army’s ranks than in weeding out soldiers who kill other soldiers.

Naval Academy officials promote the fact that 35% of this year’s freshman class is comprised of favored minority groups: Hispanic, black, Asian/Pacific Islander, and Native American. Twenty percent are female. Admissions officials privately acknowledge they are directed to dramatically increase these percentages each year. This should be easy to achieve since about one-half of the admissions department is devoted exclusively to minority recruiting.

This overemphasis on minority recruiting is both misguided and completely unnecessary considering the USNA admissions process. All 100 Senators and each member of the U.S. House representing 435 diverse Congressional districts nominate youngsters. It may be the single-most diversity-focused college acceptance program in the nation.

Still, it does not appear to be enough for USNA officials. Only about one-half of each incoming freshman class is admitted through the Congressional nominating process, giving the school unfettered discretion in picking the other half.

Naval Academy Professor Bruce Fleming, who served on the admissions board, has reported it has an unofficial two-track admissions process in which nonwhite candidates are graded against easier admissions requirements than white candidates. Fleming claims USNA admits some minority students who are incapable of performing college-level work.

Gender-based political correctness has fostered a poisonous atmosphere, according to numerous midshipmen. The previous Superintendent, Vice Admiral Rodney Rempt, implemented a policy unprecedented anywhere else in the entire military.

Female midshipmen who allege they were victims of sexual misconduct would be given blanket immunity for all rules violations in return for identifying alleged perpetrators. The consequence is that females caught violating regulations would immediately allege they were sex victims sometime previously. It became a Get Out of Jail Free card that was abused repeatedly. According to multiple sources, the blanket immunity program is still in effect.

Scores of females who abide by the rules are understandably angered by this discriminatory policy. The unintended consequence is that many male midshipmen will not associate with any females in order to avoid one-day becoming the target of a baseless allegation. This is a classic example of the breakdown of unit cohesion.

Recently, USNA launched a sexual assault response team staffed almost exclusively with female officers. According to a source, the presumption of the team is that males are always the guilty perpetrators and females are always the innocent victims.

Earlier this year, thousands of pages of Navy documents detailing sexual and other misconduct cases were reviewed by The (Annapolis) Capital. The school practiced a double-standard when punishing men and women guilty of identical offenses. Males were frequently dismissed from the academy and sometimes required to reimburse the Navy upwards of $100,000 in school costs while females generally received only light punishment. In one five-year period, every male midshipman accused of sexual assault but acquitted in a military court martial was still kicked out of the academy, a form of double-jeopardy.

Political correctness has led to officially-sanctioned discrimination against non-minorities. Consider the case of the USNA color guard, the six midshipmen who carry the U.S., Navy, Marine Corps and Naval Academy flags during ceremonial events and home football games.

This year, the color guard was invited to perform at game 2 of the World Series in front of a national television audience. However, two of the six midshipmen who had been longtime members of the color guard were fired the day before the game and replaced with two newcomers. The offense, they were told, was being white males. The new members were a female and a first-generation Pakistani-American. One can only wonder if a similar fate will befall the Navy football team before it plays in a nationally-televised New Year’s Eve bowl game.

The Naval Academy makes no effort to hide its bias toward promoting only female and minority faces. The school’s 60-second “Fulfill Your Destiny” recruiting video, which has played prominently on television the past two years, has not one discernible white face in it except in the distant background. The commercial features two Hispanics, two blacks and an Asian. The video is not representative of the actual student body.

The question arises as to what the Naval Academy will do when President Barack Obama follows through on his promise to end the military’s “Don’t Ask Don’t Tell” prohibition against homosexuals openly serving in the military. Will USNA pursue minimum quotas of male homosexuals, lesbians and transgender students?


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The writer is a Colonel (or Navy Captain) stationed in the Washington, D.C. area who desires to keep his identity withheld in order to protect his career.