Ed Griffin’s interview
with Norman Dodd in 1982
(The
investigation into the Carnegie Endowment for
International Peace uncovered the plans for population control by
involving the United States in war & the alteration
of the teaching of American history)
http://www.illuminati-news.com/110106a.htm
We
are now at the year 1908, which was the year that the Carnegie Foundation began
operations. In that year, the trustees, meeting for the first time, raised a
specific question, which they discussed throughout the balance of the year in a
very learned fashion. The question is: “Is there any means known more effective
than war, assuming you wish to alter the life of an entire people?” And they
conclude that no more effective means than war to that end is known to
humanity.
So then, in 1909, they raised the second question
and discussed it, namely: “How do we involve the United States in a war?”
Well, I doubt at that time if there was any subject
more removed from the thinking of most of the people of this country than its
involvement in a war. There were intermittent shows in the Balkans, but I doubt
very much if many people even knew where the Balkans were. Then, finally, they
answered that question as follows: “We must control the State Department.” That
very naturally raises the question of how do we do that? And they answer it by
saying: “We must take over and control the diplomatic machinery of this
country.” And, finally, they resolve to aim at that as an objective.
Then time passes, and we are eventually in a war,
which would be World War I. At that time they record on their minutes a
shocking report in which they dispatched to President Wilson a telegram,
cautioning him to see that the war does not end too quickly.
Finally, of course, the war is over. At that time
their interest shifts over to preventing what they call a reversion of life in
the United States to what it was prior to 1914 when World War I broke out. At
that point they came to the conclusion that, to prevent a reversion, “we must
control education in the United States.” They realize that that's a pretty big
task. It is too big for them alone, so they approach the Rockefeller Foundation
with the suggestion that that portion of education which could be considered
domestic be handled by the Rockefeller Foundation and that portion which is
international should be handled by the Endowment. They then decide that the key to success
of these two operations lay in the alteration of the
teaching of American history.
So they approach four of the then-most prominent
teachers of American history in the country – people like Charles and Mary Byrd
– and their suggestion to them is: will they alter the manner in which they
present their subject? And they got turned down flat. So they then decide that
it is necessary for them to do as they say, “build our own stable of
historians.”
Then they approach the Guggenheim Foundation, which
specializes in fellowships, and say: “When we find young men in the process of
studying for doctorates in the field of American history and we feel that they
are the right caliber, will you grant them fellowships on our say-so?” And the
answer is yes. So, under that condition, eventually they assembled assemble
twenty, and they take this twenty potential teachers of American history to
London, and there they're briefed on what is expected of them when, as, and if
they secure appointments in keeping with the doctorates they will have earned.
That group of twenty historians ultimately becomes the nucleus of the American
Historical Association.
Toward the end of the 1920's, the Endowment grants
to the American Historical Association $400,000 for a study of our history in a
manner which points to what can this country look forward to in the future.
That culminates in a seven-volume study, the last volume of which is, of
course, in essence a summary of the contents of the other six. The essence of
the last volume is: The future of this country belongs to collectivism administered
with characteristic American efficiency. That's the story that ultimately grew
out of and, of course, was what could have been presented by the members of
this Congressional committee to the congress as a whole for just exactly what
it said. They never got to that point.
Connecting
the Dots:
Open Society Foundations was a funder for the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace (think tank).
George Soros is
the founder & chairman for the Open
Society Foundations and was the
chairman for the Foundation to Promote Open
Society.
Foundation to Promote Open Society was a funder for the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace (think tank).
Resources:
Past Research
Alger Hiss - New Deal (Past Research on the Carnegie Endowment for International
Peace (think tank)
FRIDAY, MAY 30,
2014
http://thesteadydrip.blogspot.com/2014/05/alger-hiss-new-deal.html
No comments:
Post a Comment