Jay Leno & The Dumb Millennials
by Gary Larson December 24th, 2008
Generation Y's brazen disregard for books and learning portends dismal implications for the nation's intellectual future. A review of Mark Bauerlein's The Dumbest Generation.
The Dumbest Generation: How the Digital Age Stupefies Young Americans and Jeopardizes Our Future (Or, Don't Trust Anyone Under 30)
by Mark Bauerlein
published by Tarcher (May 15, 2008)
Hdbk., 272 pgs.
ISBN-10: 1585426393
ISBN-13: 978-1585426393
Ignorance takes center stage on NBC-TV's Tonight Show's hilarious "Jaywalking" segments. Genial host Jay Leno goes to the street to ask young people simple, basic questions. Their astounding answers reveal cultural illiteracy, a knowledge gap with staggering implications. Examples:
Q. "How many stars on the American flag?"
A. "Fifty-two?"
Q. "What's another term for the War Between the States?"
A. "Are we supposed to know this stuff? What kind of question is THAT?"
English professor Mark Bauerlein of Emory University in Atlanta explores the phenomenon of the "Gen Y's" falling into the dismal swamp of cultural illiteracy in this provocative new book. The "Gen Ys" are immersed, he finds, in an insular, self-absorbed world of i-Pods, cell phones, video games and computers, deaf to the world around them. Born along the information superhighway, they have retreated into self-imposed immaturity.
Bauerlein observes: "For all their technological adroitness, they don't read or write or add or divide very well . . ." A spate of studies he cites shows his allegations hold up about the dumbing down of America.
They are the Millennials, Americans born between roughly 1980 and 2000. The term derives from Charles Finn's What Do Our 17-Year Olds Know? (1987). As a generation, no doubt many in Prof. Bauerlein's classes at Emory, they serve as his catchy title, "the dumbest generation." The author gives credit for the title to Philip Roth's 2000 novel, The Human Stain (2000), about a troubled professor in deep dung for putting down his students' native intelligence.
Bauerlein's thesis: Twenty and thirty-somethings live in a cocoon-like cyberworld unto themselves. Averse to exploring key issues, they opt for a state of blissful, perpetual adolescence. Yet they are mentally agile, street-smart, and test well (with focused practice) particularly in their SATS, a gateway to their futures.
They are turned off by dusty old legacy stuff, such as history, geography, politics and certainly, fiction, as so much needless crap, like Latin, and oh-so dull. They draw blanks on the names of their representatives and senators, even the vice president of the United States (39%, not a clue). Leno's anecdotal "Jaywalking" segments, not totally representative, naturally, are not far off the mark. Bauerlein calls it "the knowledge problem."
With countless brilliant exceptions (think youthful "Jeopardy" champs, and the bright kid down your street) the Millennials collectively are largely immune to the grown-up world. It's a turn-off to them, full of hypocrisy and Bill Clinton-type antics. They do not lack personal honesty, although cheating on tests is somehow okay, maybe on the theory "everyone does it" and it's a tough world after all.
They can read with the best but choose not to, unless forced, as in cramming for tests. Then they discard temporarily "learned" material as so much jetsam. They must get back to their favorite websites, Facebook and MySpace, and John Madden's NFL video game. First things first.
Bauerlein calls it "a-literacy," not illiteracy. They do not read books and newspapers (circulations nosedive) or much anything "serious," at least on their own. When they visit libraries they flock bird-like to the computers, or to the A/V Room, while book stacks gather dust, devoid of inquisitive live bodies.
Roughly 50 million Millennials inhabit America. (It does not appear to be an international phenomenon.) These post-Baby Boomers reflect a "blatant disregard for books and learning," Bauerlein asserts, a point made twenty-one years ago by a like-minded professor writing in the identical genre, Allan Bloom in his landmark book, The Closing of the American Mind (1987).
Want proof of the problem (today, an "issue")? Easy. Twenty percent (20%) of Millennials end up in remedial classes when they hit college unprepared. "Proficient reading" is a problem for at least 31% of freshman. (Any wonder?) Fully half think Orwell's Nineteen Eighty Four (1949) is a story about the end of the world. They are six times (6X!) more likely to know the latest Teen Idol's name, than the Speaker of the House. (Okay, so Dennis Hastert was a toughie. Nancy Pelosi would fare better.)
Chances are the Millennials will never delight in the poetry of Wordsworth, or engage an essay by Emerson or a Huxley — or, heavens forbid!, a play by William Shakespeare. Dead old white guy, you know. Hey!, who needs THAT? Why, that's worse than reading Plato's Republic.
What caused this trendy Know-Nothingness? Not being sparked by inspiring teachers? Bedazzled by a digital age, by the enticing siren song of cyberculture? (See Bauerlein's too-long subtitle.) Spoiled by abundance? Their two-job parents, with no time for their offspring's cultural education? Broken homes? Dysfunctional ones? Mental exertion too much like work? Peer pressure?
Bauerlein's take, it's youthful society:
An anti-intellectual outlook prevails in their leisure lives, squashing the lessons of school. Instead of producing knowledgeable, querulous young minds, the youth culture [sic] of American society yields an adolescent consumer immersed in juvenile matters secluded from adult realities.
As to their political life, such as it is, Bauerlein suggests young conservatives are more apt "to analyze ideas and history" than young liberals do. To "novice left-wingers," Bauerlein writes, "everything is topical." (Anyone hear echoes of young Hillary Rodham's Sixties mentor, Chicago Marxist community activist Saul Alinsky, insisting "all politics are personal"? Make that, er, "topical"? It's in Chicagoan Alinsky's Rules for Radicals, 1971, post-Machiavellian rules practiced by some area politicians ever since!)
Bauerlein describes members of the campus Students for a Democratic Society (SDS), as "energetic," adept at organizing to be sure,"but [with] hardly any traces of theories, arguments, books or thinking."
As for the Right, Bauerlein observes: "College Republicans who read books such as The Conservative Mind: From Burke to Eliot [by Russell Kirk], and track the acts of Congress, find hostility to their reasoned outlooks" from the likes of SDS members — and, Bauerlein might well have added, hostility also from the one-sided elite media. Millennials on the left, he suggests without any evidence, "show less aptitude, as yet, for research and political analysis." But college Republicans can also be set in their ways, he adds, less likely to examine issues competing with their hardened viewpoints.
This ideological standoff recalls for this reviewer what Saul Bellow wrote in the Foreword to Allan Bloom's The Closing of the American Mind in 1987: ""The habits of civilized discourse have suffered a scorching. Antagonists [on the Left and the Right] seem no longer to listen to one another . . .." No less than "the higher mental life in a democratic United States is as stake," writes the novelist about the the angst-ridden epistle-writer-to-nobody Herzog (1963).
Why is this problem – today, termed an "issue" — so damn important? Cultural illiteracy, or "a-literacy," as Bauerlein calls it, carries a stiff price tag. He complains with ample good reason: "As of 2008, the intellectual future of the United States looks dim." Call it a disconnect between present Gen "Y" and our cultural past, offering scant hope for the orderly transfer of our Western intellectual traditions.
The dumbest generation might be the weak link in intellectual tradition that bonds us as Americans, not warring Balkanized tribes, or an insular society unto only computers and video games. The late intellectual guru Allan Bloom, in my dog-eared copy of his 1987 book, sums up the cultural generational disconnect in a succinct sentence, one really for the ages:
The delicate fabric of the civilization into which successive generations are woven, has unraveled, and children are raised, not educated.
("Amen" this reviewer had jotted in a marginal note to himself twenty years ago.)
What this cultural deafness portends is scary: Unwilling to face reality? Unable to make rational decisions, as in voting in creeps? Lacking critical abilities to sniff out political demagogues, charlatans and other phonies? The Millennials' problem seems to be a chronic inability to link the present to past, let alone to the future, evoking George Santayana's forever-enduring line about condemnation for not knowing history? Did I say, it's scary as hell?
This is a readable, "serious" book, well-researched, a Godsend follow-on to Bloom's benchmark 1987 work. It lacks only a full indexing by subject for those so inclined to retrace stuff, but that's No Big Deal. While Bauerlein savagely puts down the dumbing down of America, as Allan Bloom did, he is not smart-alecky or disrespectful in his withering prose. Just the facts, shouting out. No political correctness here, folks; no malice aforethought, not a diatribe, only a deep concern for the intellectual future of our nation. Most union teachers are sure to dispute it, even the empirical facts set forth in this book. Dumbness is like that.
If you seek partisan treatise, this is not it. The author dismisses the Millennials' "politics" in a couple of pages, summed up in this review. Most of the "Y" Generation has a disdain for politics, and does not closely follow public issues. They vote viscerally, based on images and sound bites, not knowledge-based reality. Politics is dirty business to them, fostered no doubt by some cruddy politicians.
Finally, if you appreciated the expose of the dumbing down of America by the late Professor Bloom in The Closing of the American Mind, you'll embrace Bauerlein's passionate plea for America's future, and want this book on your books shelf, too. Highly recommended!
http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2008/12/24/jay-leno-the-dumb-millennials/
Stupid is as stupid does - IMPORTANT!
And if it were not for ignorant liberals Obama wouldn't be President
Uninformed voted Obama - Informed voted McCain - Poll...
22 hours ago
4 comments:
Isnt it always cool to hate the young generation? I saw this as a gen Xer and I think its happened for every generation yours included.
Old people despise youth. Is that an ignorant generalization? Yep but no more so than the one being made in this article. I deal with this generations brighter crop on a daily basis in my job and yeah they are different but you know its fun to be young let them enjoy it. Hell they better enjoy it because they are about to enter a crap economy a ton of friggin debt and parents who havent save enough for retirement.
I know its annoying to you guys that they are socially liberal by in large but its just the way it is some of them will change that over time some will not. They arent phased by fundamentalist dogma and threats of hell because to them its illogical and hypocritical.
Thats not to say they arent religious but they tend to flock to "new churches" that are more accepting and less judgmental. So while I envy their youth I dont have disdain for them I hope they enjoy this time in their lives as much as possible because it only happens once.
Kael
I doubt that many, even conservatives, would agree with me on this one. My take is much less sophisticated and simple-minded. The reason all these nimble minds are so astonishingly ignorant is directly due to government school liberalism. It stopped educating and began indoctrinating to ensure a majority for the growing and powerful left wing. Tom2
As someone born in 1984.. I am one of the rare ones that this doesn't apply to. :) I agree with Tom2 that the public schools are largely to blame. They are so bad here in southern California that our community colleges are affected too. Even in the upper English classes offered here I am amazed that the students are even in the room. When we have to trade papers to critique the papers. I see faulty arguments, filled with feeling instead of fact, and worst of all most of them don't know enough English (even though they speak it!) to have passed junior high English. One classmate had no idea what was going on the whole class in a Econ 101. Sadly our teacher has written the most perfect syllabus that told us everything we needed and supplied us with her notes. These alone if read and studied would be sufficient for an A in the class!
Part of me knows that college isn't going to give me the education that I would like. I am a young conservative and I refuse to be a lemming of this generation.
Comment from email:
Sam,you know what man, I listen to books on my I phone because I can do that while I workout.
Im 30, and while jay leno kids on the street is no more rediculious that full grow people on the street, or shit ask some old folks about, what they dont know about the majority of our poulation.
ask anyone over 40 if they checked there Twitter and you will prrobably get a puzzled look. as you may have on right now!
I tell you kids these days have checked there email and facebook and myspace so much by 3:00 they have more info in them than a scholar from 100 years ago.
Its just much more info than one can get out of the slow 1900's paper book read, dont get me wrong theres something romantic about paper and ink from one author.
I personally feel old and out of the loop when Im around 15 yearolds on there I phones.
is there nothing it cant do!!! you have know idea, and nether do most retires.
so while its fun to imagine that kids are dumb now, its also true that our youth is in a different time of potential.
A true new place of science, nutrition, spirituality and perhaps a global conciousness of sorts we have never seen on this planet. it is happening.
have you seen the little green computers in Africa WOW what a dream, to plug in to the world.
hold on tight were about to go warpspeed.... seriously
you cant predict the implications of how close and fast our world has become.
Our world is a changin, lets hope theres somebody incharge of all this. not that he cares to much what we want!!
Seems pretty constant that lower IQ folks will continue to produce more children than High IQ folks.
God does what he wants when he wants!!
this ain't china we let em breed
gotta get these great minds breeding, wait didn't hitler try that?!
crap!
have a nice day
Post a Comment