Saturday, July 31, 2010

Taking AKA Obama Directly before SCOTUS


Taking BHO Directly before SCOTUS
By Leo Patrick Haffey


It is noteworthy that it has been over a year and a half since I first began to write about the Citizens Grand Jury Process and Original Jurisdiction in the Supreme Court of cases against Barrack Hussein Obama and, to date, BHO's lawyers have never been able to refute my Constitutional Theories.

The precedent for getting standing and bringing a case directly to the United States Supreme Court upon Original Jurisdiction is the landmark case of Marbury v. Madison 5 U.S. (1 Crunch) 137, 2 L.Ed. 60 (1803). As succinctly stated by Chief Justice Marshall in Marbury, "If a persons duty is backed by law and not by political in nature, then he becomes subject of the law and is examinable by the court."

Article III, Section 2 of the United States Constitution states, "In all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, and those in which a State shall be Party, the supreme Court shall have original Jurisdiction."

Marbury was a case involving a minor public minister. The case against Barrack Hussein Obama involves all "Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls" of the United States and of all foreign nations with diplomatic status with the United States. Furthermore, the case against Barrack Hussein Obama involves all States of the United States as parties.

As in Marbury, We the People shall prosecute our cases against Barrack Hussein Obama petitioning the United States Supreme Court for a Writ of Mandamus compelling Barrack Hussein Obama to abide by the Constitutional Contract that he entered into with We the People on January 20, 2009 and uphold his Oath to abide by the Supreme Law of the Land, the Constitution of the United States of America.

It is stated in United States v. Butterworth, 18 S. Ct. 441, 169 U.S. 600 at 602 (1898),
"The office of a writ of mandamus is to compel the performance of a duty resting upon the person to whom the writ is sent. That duty may have originated in one way or in another. It may, as alleged in the present case, have arisen from the acceptance of an office which has imposed the duty upon its incumbent. But no matter out of what fact or relations the duty has grown, what the law requires, and what it seeks to enforce by a writ of mandamus, is the personal obligation of the individual to whom it addresses the writ."

Following much good faith research regarding the issue of original jurisdiction in the Supreme Court of the United States, We the People have found no cases in the history of jurisprudence of the United States of America wherein a Defendant disputed the Constitutional fact that the Supreme Court of the United States has original jurisdiction over "all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls" as plainly stated in the Constitution of the United States, Article III, Section 2.

That being the case, "We the People" respectfully request that the Barack Hussein Obama stipulate to the fact that the Supreme Court of the United States has original jurisdiction over all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls; or, in the alternative, that Barack Hussein Obama show good cause why the Supreme Court of the United States shall not have original jurisdiction

These 12 Simple Steps are the way Patriots can use our Bill of Rights to keep control of the Government and to Clean up Corruption in government:

1) Advertise and Promote the Fact that you are forming a Grand Jury in Blogs, Local Newspapers and Community Organizations.

2) Form the Grand Jury and select a Foreman.

3) Select a Private Attorney General to make Presentments to Grand Jury, if local DA refuses to make presentments.

4) Select a convenient Meeting Place.

5) Communicate with all Citizens who have criminal information to present.

6) Schedule presentments by said Citizens.

7) Subpoena documents from Government Offices and Officials.

8) Schedule presentment of said Documents to Grand Jury by Grand Jury Attorney General.

9) Have Grand Jury Attorney General present said Documents to Grand Jury.

10) After investigation and deliberation is completed, vote and issue a True Bill (Indictment) or No True Bill.

11) Announce all Indictments to the Press and schedule News Conferences in front of your local Court House.

12) Serve the Indictment on the Judiciary at Court House News Conferences for the Issuance of Arrest Warrants.


http://thesteadydrip.blogspot.com/2009/05/citizens-grand-jury-speech-by-gerry.html

http://grandjury.blogtownhall.com/

http://www.constitution.org/duepr/standing/winter_standing.htm

http://citizenwells.wordpress.com/category/nashville

http://freeleohaffey.blogspot.com/

www.riseupforamerica.com/grandjurynews.html

Do you really think AKA Obama would have won the election if all the things he is hiding were made known?


Do you really think AKA Obama will be able to finish his first term if all the things he is hiding are made known?


The only conspiracy is the media and the obots who suppress the revelation of AKA Obama's history




Leo Patrick Haffey is a lawyer in Nashville, Tennessee who has worked in the music, motion picture and television industries as a producer. Mr. Haffey’s productions have been broadcast on most of the major television networks. Mr. Haffey has done extensive legal research on the Constitution, in particular the Constitutional qualifications for the Presidency of the United States of America.

3 comments:

John Smith said...

naturalborncitizen2.blogspot.com

It's such a shame that the Obama eligibility issue has been unnecessarily focused on (and distracted by) the search for hidden documents. His ineligibility can be proven with the facts that are already in the public domain combined with a thorough understanding of what the Constitution says about the Executive. It's all there - we just have to read it.

see naturalborncitizen2.blogspot.com

Aristotle The Hun said...

The dual citizenship issue will take the involvement of the SCOTUS and will take the wheels of the law grinding very slowly.

Documentation that AKA Obama was not born in the US will facilitate the goal of removing him and be much quicker.

AristotleTheHun

Leo the Lawyer said...

I agree John Smith to the extent that BHO's ineligibility can be proven with facts already known, however, Aristotle is correct that proof of BHO's criminal fraud regarding his birth certificate would result in a faster removal of BHO through the criminal courts.