Removed From Oval Office in Handcuffs - A Possible Legal Outcome!
Lawyer who challenged Obama: Ineligibility could prove costly
USJF chief: 'This is completely uncharted territory'
USJF chief: 'This is completely uncharted territory'
6 hours ago
Thursday, March 31, 2011
Wednesday, March 30, 2011
Proofers and Birthers Get a Boost from Trump
With credentials like that, he couldn't
get a job as a postal clerk in most places!
* * * * * * * * * * *
Proofers and Birthers Get a Boost from Trump
Jim O'Neill Wednesday, March 30, 2011
“Nobody comes forward. Nobody knows who he is until later in his life. It’s very strange.”—Donald Trump on Obama
Proofers want PROOF that Obama is who he says he is. While birthers focus mainly on Obama’s birth certificate, or rather lack thereof, proofers are more concerned with the overall cover-up—the astonishing paucity of verifiable information about Obama’s life. Due to the lack of documented history, we are upposed to content ourselves with his self-serving “autobiography” “Dreams from My Father.” (Leaving aside the question of who actually wrote Obama’s book, who writes their autobiography before they have done anything worth writing about? Okay, there’s Hitler’s “Mein Kampf,” but I mean other than Hitler). (Link)
Obama’s autobiography was first published in 1995, BEFORE he had even run for the Illinois state legislature, let alone the US Congress, let alone the Presidency. The book was not exactly a bestseller when it first came out, as most people’s reaction to his autobiography was understandably, “Who?” (Link)
There are certainly a number of people that would love to know “who” today. Like modern-day versions of Butch and Sundance, we ask ourselves “Who is that guy?” Below is a partial list of the plethora of documents that proofers are interested in:
- Obama’s birth certificate—Not released
- Obama/Dunham marriage license—Not released
- Noelani Kindergarten records—Lost
- Soetoro/Dunham marriage license—Not released
- Soetoro adoption records—Not released
- Punahou School records—Not released
- Noelani 3rd Grade records—Not released
- Occidental College records—Not released
- Social Security documentation—Controversial
- Selective Service documentation—Controversial
- Passport—Not released
- Columbia College records—Not released
- Harvard College records—Not released
- Illinois Bar Records—Not released
- Medical records—Not released
- Illinois State Senate schedule—Lost
- Law practice client list—Not released
And this “dude” is POTUS? Unbelievable. Un-frigging-believable. With credentials like that, he couldn’t get a job as a postal clerk in most places. (Link)
Joseph Farah of WND, who knows a thing or two about the birth certificate cover-up, recently wrote, “I’m shocked that we have so many gullible people in the media. It’s appalling, and all those who have aided Obama in his cover-up will regret it someday.”
Indeed, one lives in hope. Which is why Donald Trump throwing his hat into the proofer/birther ring is so welcome. Say what you will about The Donald, he definitely garners attention, and the fact that he’s broaching the birth certificate issue is shining much needed light on the subject. (Link)
Trump is not merely mentioning the subject in passing either. One gets the sense that he has a hold of this issue like a junkyard dog with a T-bone. Bravo, Mr. Trump, about f—king time someone with a national presence stood up and demanded answers. (Link)
LTC Lakin, imprisoned in Ft. Leavenworth for the crime of asking to see his CINC’s (Commander IN Chief’s) birth certificate, and Lt. Cmdr Walter Fitzpatrick, thrown into jail in Monroe County, Tennessee, as the result of his efforts to force Obama to show his birth certificate, are just two of the millions of patriotic Americans who want answers, who want PROOF. Now.
That the “traitorous americanus” who staff the liberal media’s propaganda machine, vociferously demean proofers/birthers is to be expected, but I’ve been somewhat surprised by the reaction of purportedly patriotic pundits. Bill O’Reilly, for example, who seems to me to be patriotic enough, in a RINOesque, milquetoast kind of way, has repeatedly dissed the “birthers,” as being beyond the pale. (Link)
What gives? My guess is that the folks who dismiss the people who want to see proof that Obama is who he claims to be, are largely deluded. They are either deluded, or “in on the fix,” and it is obvious that the mass of sheeple who have swallowed the Sorelian myth surrounding Obama, are clueless regarding the particulars of the ongoing destruction of Western civilization—i.e., they are not “in on the fix.” (Link) (Link)
In the early part of the 20th century, Marxist Antonio Gramsci concluded that capitalism and Christianity were simply too deeply embedded into Western culture for atheistic Marxism to successfully take hold—ergo Western civilization had to go, root and branch, in order for Marxism to succeed. We are currently at the “end game” phase of his demented vision. Which way the world will tip, is very much an open question. “Hey, hey, ho, ho, Western civ has got to go!” (Link) (Link)
Our Treasury is blatantly looted by greedy, corrupt politicos, unions, bankers, and corporate scum
Meanwhile America is bogged down in money-draining “Tar Baby” wars, that cost us some of our best, bravest, and most patriotic citizens. Our Treasury is blatantly looted by greedy, corrupt politicos, unions, bankers, and corporate scum. Our freedoms are whittled away at by Agenda 21, and other insidious means. The American electorate, and military, continue to be dumbed down, indoctrinated, and neutered. And on and on it goes, while Officer O’Reilly and his ilk tell us “Nothing to see here folks, move along.” (Link) (Link)
It is not that hard to see what is going on. It is not rocket science to figure out who the main players are. You need not be Sherlock Holmes to deduce that “we the people” are being played for suckers, and very purposefully eradicated as a viable concern. Inspector Clouseau could sniff out the game plan, for God’s sake. (Link)
Too many honest, moderate Americans continue to delude themselves about the current state of affairs, and willfully blind themselves to the truth. The truth being that behind the cover of Islamists, Fascists, Communists, and other various “isms,” a global “Billionaire Boy’s Club” is setting itself up to rule the roost after the destruction of America as a world power—after the destruction of Western civilization itself. After the destruction of freedom. (Link) (Link)
A couple of members in good standing of the “Billionaire Boy’s Club” are Maurice Strong, and George Soros. “Environmentalist” Strong, one of the chief architects of such warm and fuzzy sounding eco-agendas as “sustainable development,” bides his time in Communist China, where the “dark Satanic mills” belch their toxins night and day, and over 80% of the rivers are polluted. George Soros, Fascist functionary extraordinaire, is busily engaged with his cronies in converting the world to a new global currency. Can you say “Bye-bye US dollar. Bye-bye American middle-class. Bye-bye United States of America?” (Link) and (Link) and(Link) (Link)
This is hardly a case where being able to say “I told you so” will hold any satisfaction. So I applaud Trump’s efforts to essentially say “All stop! What is going on here?” Maybe “we the people” will wipe the sleep from our eyes, and start to notice that we have been duped, cheated, lied to, and used—and that the regressive Progressives have pushed the world to the brink of a 21st century neo-Dark Age. (Link)
I think that is worth an “All stop! What is going on here?” Don’t you?
Laus Deo.
* * * * * * * * * * * * *
Born in June of 1951 in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, Jim O’Neill proudly served in the U.S. Navy from 1970-1974 in both UDT-21 (Underwater Demolition Team) and SEAL Team Two. A member of MENSA, he worked as a commercial diver in the waters off Scotland, India, and the United States. In 1998 while attending the University of South Florida as a journalism student, O’Neill won “First Place” in the “Carol Burnett/University of Hawaii AEJMC Research in Journalism Ethics Award.” The annual contest was set up by Carol Burnett with the money she won from successfully suing the National Enquirer for libel.
Jim can be reached at: Letters@canadafreepress.com
Tuesday, March 29, 2011
AN OPEN INVITATION TO DONALD TRUMP RE: AKA OBAMA
"The only people who don't want to disclose the truth are people with something to hide." -
Barack Hussein Obama - AKA Barry Soetoro - August 21, 2010
Dear Mr. Trump,
I have been researching the Obama eligibility issue since before the 2008 election. I honestly believe that I know as much as anyone about what is true on this issue and what is not.
I really admire your courage and tenacity. However, you need to do some home work. So I invite you to use any of my research that you may find useful.
Look at the latest version of my collected research. It is over 7000 words so grab a snack and a drink.
* * * * * * * * * * * * *
To those of you who question Mr. Trump's motives:
If you are not suspicious of a man who hides his history I have a bridge in the desert I want to sell you.
If you are not suspicious of a man who hides his history I have a bridge in the desert I want to sell you.
If you are unwilling to call for an investigation of a man who attempts to sell you a bridge in the desert I have some beach front property in Florida at the intersection of I-75 and Florida # 29 that I want you to buy.
If you place a down payment on a contract for the bridge in the desert and the beach front property in the swamp I would conclude that you voted for Obama
Do you really think AKA Obama would have won the election if all the things he is hiding were made known?
Do you really think AKA Obama will be able to finish his first term if all the things he is hiding are made known?
The only conspiracy is the media and the obots who suppress the revelation of AKA Obama's history
http://thesteadydrip.blogspot.com/2009/04/aka-obama-fans-all-together-now-say-omg.html
A MSWord version of the report is available upon request.
* * * * * * * * * * * * *
Obama’s Presidential Eligibility: What You Need to Know
Mostly facts and very little rhetoric, all properly cited. This is how research should be done.
Now what will the Obot PSYOPS agents do?
Let me Guess; ridicule, name calling, personal attacks and changing the subject.
http://www.therightsideoflife.com/?p=6216
Somehow, you know its coming. That OMG moment is just around the corner. You can feel the inescapable reality creeping up on you. Something will leak. Someone will spill the beans.
“Everything that is secret will be brought out into the open. Everything that is hidden will be uncovered. What you have said in the dark will be heard in the daylight. What you have whispered to someone behind closed doors will be shouted from the rooftops..” Luke 12:2
http://thesteadydrip.blogspot.com/2009/04/aka-obama-fans-all-together-now-say-omg.html
Intellectual Conservative Publishes my Latest Article
Intellectual Conservative Publishes my Latest Article
Obama's eligibility? - Shocking scientific poll!
You won't believe how few Americans think president has shown his qualification
http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2011/03/28/with-headlines-like-this-is-it-time-to-ask-hard-questions/
Obama's eligibility? - Shocking scientific poll!
You won't believe how few Americans think president has shown his qualification
http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2011/03/28/with-headlines-like-this-is-it-time-to-ask-hard-questions/
Sunday, March 27, 2011
Saturday, March 26, 2011
Huckabee, Rush, Palin, the Donald and a wild week
Huckabee, Rush, Palin, the Donald and a wild week
The fun thing about politics is there is never a dull week and the season never ends. This week has been no different.
First, a surprising poll from Gallup has as the leading Republican candidate, Mike Huckabee. Huckabee, over the last few months has been picking up support for President. In some ways, that is not surprising. Huckabee has a strong constituency in the evangelical community. Huckabee hits all the right notes on social issues and social conservatives, contrary to the myth being spread by some, will be out in droves in this upcoming primary season. Huckabee has a 4-point lead over Romney, followed by Palin and Gingrich. While many members of the Tea Party do support Huckabee on social issues, on fiscal issues, he is a disaster. For better or worse, Huckabee shows no signs of actually entering the race. Assuming he is out that leaves Romney as the front-runner and that is a disaster for the GOP.
Rush was asked on his show on Friday who he would endorse to run against Obama in 2012. Rush pointed out it was early and he would have to find someone to endorse who he was really “jazzed” about. While some interpret that as a dig against the current “field,” it actually is not. Michele Bachmann let the word out she is looking at an exploratory committee this week. Romney has been running since 2008. Tim Pawlenty is running. Gingrich is leaning towards a run. There are a lot of others who may or may not run, including Huckabee and Palin, both of whom are increasingly looking like they will not run.
The core of people who might be supporting Palin, if she decides to get in the race could be shrinking. Michele Bachmann has come out strong and aggressively and will certainly be a contender. She will draw a significant crowd away from Palin. The other surprising candidate who might be drawing from that pool of voters Palin would be looking at is Donald Trump. By coming out so strongly and so aggressively against Obama, particularly on the eligibility issue, Trump is starting to tap into that voter pool. Trump may well have decided that the strategy he needs to employ is to be the most anti-Obama candidate in the field. That will work well against not only Obama, but also a number of the RINO candidates, such as Romney.
The thirty-five cent question that became more pointed this week: Is Sarah Palin running for President? At this point, it actually looks less likely that she will run. If she does not run, there is a whole cadre of dedicated followers who will look for another candidate to get behind.
The candidate, as Rush so aptly put it in this video, might be milk toast; however, the ultimate goal is to defeat Obama. As much as it is important to defeat Obama, it is also very important to put a good conservative in power. As we have seen with John Boehner, it is not enough to simply put someone in because they have an “R” behind their name.
The candidate, who we pick, as Rush pointed out, must be able to defeat Obama in the general election. This election must be about Obama. If we can do that, we will win.
In regard to politics, one thing is certain, next week should be just as interesting.
First, a surprising poll from Gallup has as the leading Republican candidate, Mike Huckabee. Huckabee, over the last few months has been picking up support for President. In some ways, that is not surprising. Huckabee has a strong constituency in the evangelical community. Huckabee hits all the right notes on social issues and social conservatives, contrary to the myth being spread by some, will be out in droves in this upcoming primary season. Huckabee has a 4-point lead over Romney, followed by Palin and Gingrich. While many members of the Tea Party do support Huckabee on social issues, on fiscal issues, he is a disaster. For better or worse, Huckabee shows no signs of actually entering the race. Assuming he is out that leaves Romney as the front-runner and that is a disaster for the GOP.
Rush was asked on his show on Friday who he would endorse to run against Obama in 2012. Rush pointed out it was early and he would have to find someone to endorse who he was really “jazzed” about. While some interpret that as a dig against the current “field,” it actually is not. Michele Bachmann let the word out she is looking at an exploratory committee this week. Romney has been running since 2008. Tim Pawlenty is running. Gingrich is leaning towards a run. There are a lot of others who may or may not run, including Huckabee and Palin, both of whom are increasingly looking like they will not run.
The core of people who might be supporting Palin, if she decides to get in the race could be shrinking. Michele Bachmann has come out strong and aggressively and will certainly be a contender. She will draw a significant crowd away from Palin. The other surprising candidate who might be drawing from that pool of voters Palin would be looking at is Donald Trump. By coming out so strongly and so aggressively against Obama, particularly on the eligibility issue, Trump is starting to tap into that voter pool. Trump may well have decided that the strategy he needs to employ is to be the most anti-Obama candidate in the field. That will work well against not only Obama, but also a number of the RINO candidates, such as Romney.
The thirty-five cent question that became more pointed this week: Is Sarah Palin running for President? At this point, it actually looks less likely that she will run. If she does not run, there is a whole cadre of dedicated followers who will look for another candidate to get behind.
The candidate, as Rush so aptly put it in this video, might be milk toast; however, the ultimate goal is to defeat Obama. As much as it is important to defeat Obama, it is also very important to put a good conservative in power. As we have seen with John Boehner, it is not enough to simply put someone in because they have an “R” behind their name.
The candidate, who we pick, as Rush pointed out, must be able to defeat Obama in the general election. This election must be about Obama. If we can do that, we will win.
In regard to politics, one thing is certain, next week should be just as interesting.
Birther ^Trump - O'Reilly cowers - Misssing Records and lots of other stuff.
New Interview: Donald Trump Goes Full Birther; A Lot of Missing Records; Bill O'Reilly Cowards Down to Donald Trump on the Birther Issue
I wonder if Trump is aware that in Hawaii at the time of Obama's birth and even still today foreign-born children could/can easily obtain a Hawaiian COLB!? Which would have also triggered the newspaper announcements as they were produced from a list sent by the Hawaii DOH, not the Hospital. Not that it matters, right!?
P.S., Trump, Born a Brit Not Legit! ;-)
Obama’s House of Cards is Collapsing!
IF HE WASN’T AT COLUMBIA, THEN WHERE WAS HE?
by Bridgette, blogging at WTPOTUS(Mar. 25, 2011) — We recently reviewed Obama’s multiple Social Security numbers that investigators uncovered in the article “Whose Identity Did Obama Steal?”. Additionally, they found that he used different social security numbers within a couple of years of each other. Investigators associated social security numbers with addresses where he lived across the United States, and where he didn’t live. His most flagrant use of a card is one that wasn’t issued to him and that he is using today. Orly Taitz has uncovered new information that adds even more evidence proving Obama’s family, history, and integrity are seriously fraudulent. Lies about family associations, friends, college, travels, and work are being exposed with rapidity. The cards in question include his social security card, selective service card, and even his student report card! Evidence is mounting that his life is one of deceit, lies, and more lies.
Recent revelations are highlighted in Orly Taitz’s First Amended Complaint that was just filed. Below are the explosive allegations that were added to her amended lawsuit as well as the evidence to back up her allegations. (The entire lawsuit is available here).
Now it appears Obama lied about his attendance at Columbia! He was only there for 9 months NOT 2 years that he has stated! Where did he go for that other year and what was he doing? Was he taking courses in person at Columbia or was he enrolled in an overseas program? If he traveled overseas what name did he use? How did he get the credits to attend Harvard with only 9 months attendance at Columbia? Was it a Freudian slip when Obama said he went to Pakistan or is that one of the only truthful statements to come out of his mouth? Below if verification of Obama’s limited attendance at Columbia. Perhaps there will be apologies made to Dr. Manning?
Friday, March 25, 2011
MAJ. GEN. PAUL VALLELY: Trumps VP?
http://www.thepostemail.com/2011/03/24/breaking-news-presidential-ticket-paul-e-vallely-and-donald-trump/
MAJ. GEN. PAUL VALLELY: “YOU CAN TEST THE WATERS ON THIS”
by Sharon Rondeau
Donald Trump was born on June 14 (Flag Day), 1946 and according to one source, mentioned running for President as early as 2000
(Mar. 24, 2011) — In an email exchange with Maj. Gen. Paul E. Valley (Ret.) of the StandUpAmerica blog and former Fox News military analyst, a citizen asked the general of Donald Trump, “Are you saying here that you are willing to run with him? If so, can this be posted publicly? Certainly wanted to ask before doing it. What a wonderful ticket it would be!”
And the general answered:
Yes..you can test the waters on this. It has been suggested by others
Paul Vallely
MG US Army (Ret)
The email continued:
MG US Army (Ret)
Says Who? - Obama quote!
"The only people who don’t want to disclose the truth are people with something to hide."
Says who?
Barack Hussein Obama - AKA Barry Soetoro - August 21, 2010
Says who?
Barack Hussein Obama - AKA Barry Soetoro - August 21, 2010
Wednesday, March 23, 2011
ISLAM: Mainstream Media Ignorance Exposed!~
Mainstream Media Ignorance Exposed!~
http://loganswarning.com/
Besides having to fight Muslims in the information war, we are also battling the intentional ignorance of the mainstream media (MSM). I say “intentional ignorance” because it is obvious that many who report for the MSM have done little, if any, research on Islam. Let’s take a look at an outrageous example of this irresponsible reporting!
SNIP
The bottom line is that Shariah calls for the dominance of non-Muslims. Here is a recent statement from Al Azhar on this very matter:
SNIP
The 8th Amendment guarantees that punishments will be fair, and not cruel, and that extraordinarily large fines will not be set.
The penalty for theft under Islam:
http://loganswarning.com/
Besides having to fight Muslims in the information war, we are also battling the intentional ignorance of the mainstream media (MSM). I say “intentional ignorance” because it is obvious that many who report for the MSM have done little, if any, research on Islam. Let’s take a look at an outrageous example of this irresponsible reporting!
Islam is all-American for one U.S. Muslim leaderAl Azhar is considered the highest learning Islamic school in the world. They are obviously pro-Shariah Law, which contradicts the US Constitution. One example of this are the different views on slavery. The 13th Amendment abolished slavery in the entire United States. What does Reliance of the Traveller an Islamic Law manual approved by Al Azhar say about slavery?
(Reuters) – - Al Azhar, the centuries-old center of Islamic learning in Cairo, is a world away from Oklahoma City where William Suhaib Webb grew up.
But it was not until the American Muslim leader immersed himself in Islamic studies at Al Azhar that he realized just how American he was, regardless of his religion.
Jihad: o9:13Did Webb miss school that day because of an illness?!
When a child or a woman is taken captive, they become slaves by the fact of the capture, and the woman’s previous marriage is immediately annulled.
SNIP
Webb’s positions on issues such as women’s rights and religious community involvement are near the American mainstream. He denounces violence in the name of Islam, and encourages U.S. Muslim youth to be comfortable with their American roots.Webb can denounce brutality in the name of Islam all he wants, but it does not change the fact that violence is an integral part of Islam. Unfortunately, the author of the article does not ask the tough questions.
Bukhari Hadith Volume 1, Book 8, Number 387:What else does Webb have to say about Islam?
Narrated Anas bin Malik:
Allah’s Apostle said, “I have been ordered to fight the people till they say: ‘None has the right to be worshipped but Allah.’ And if they say so, pray like our prayers, face our Qibla and slaughter as we slaughter, then their blood and property will be sacred to us and we will not interfere with them except legally and their reckoning will be with Allah.” Narrated Maimun ibn Siyah that he asked Anas bin Malik, “O Abu Hamza! What makes the life and property of a person sacred?” He replied, “Whoever says, ‘None has the right to be worshipped but Allah’, faces our Qibla during the prayers, prays like us and eats our slaughtered animal, then he is a Muslim, and has got the same rights and obligations as other Muslims have.”
But in his early days as a convert, Muslim-majority countries became a mythical land where Webb said he felt like he could tap into an authentic Islam.The following is a sample of “authentic Islam”.
Bukhari Hadith Volume 9, Book 84, Number 57:This portion of “authentic Islam” is also corroborated by the Al Azhar-approved manual of Islamic Law.
Narrated ‘Ikrima:
Some Zanadiqa (atheists) were brought to ‘Ali and he burnt them. The news of this event, reached Ibn ‘Abbas who said, “If I had been in his place, I would not have burnt them, as Allah’s Apostle forbade it, saying, ‘Do not punish anybody with Allah’s punishment (fire).’ I would have killed them according to the statement of Allah’s Apostle, ‘Whoever changed his Islamic religion, then kill him.’”
o8.0 APOSTASTY FROM ISLAMI know…I know…Webb was still out sick that day.
o8.1 When a person who has reached puberty and is sane voluntarily apostatizes from Islam, he deserves to be killed.
Pundits and politicians who decry the growth of Islam in the United States often cite Muslim extremists’ desire to implement Shariah, or Islamic law. Some state legislators have gone as far as proposing legislation banning it.I see, it must be because “Webb” said so?! What a masterful piece of journalistic work this article was!
But Webb, who continues to spend lengthy periods studying at Al Azhar, said jurisprudence in Shariah, which means path, necessarily considers culture and custom in its interpretations.
The bottom line is that Shariah calls for the dominance of non-Muslims. Here is a recent statement from Al Azhar on this very matter:
Members of al-Azhar’s Islamic Research Council held an emergency meeting led by the institution’s head, Grand Imam Sheikh Ahmed al-Tayeb, repudiating Bishop Bishoy’s comments and accusing him of provoking sectarian tension.Apparently, Webb is not giving us the full story.
A “Statement to the Nation” was released by the Council on Saturday, September 25 in which al-Tayeb said “This kind of behavior is irresponsible and threatens national unity at a time when it is vital to protect it.” He also warned against repercussions these sorts of statements can have among Muslims in Egypt and abroad.
The Statement went on to say that the Council stresses the fact that Egypt is an “Islamic State”, according to the text of its Constitution, which represents the social contract among its people. “From this stems the rights of citizenship, as taught to us by the Messenger of Allah in his pact with the Christians of Najran, in which he decided that they were to enjoy rights and duties as the Muslims. However, these rights are conditional to respect for the Islamic Identity and the citizenship rights as set by the Constitution.”
The Christians of Najran, Medina, refused conversion to Islam in 631 A.D. and offered Mohamad to maintain their faith, accept the dominance of Muslims and pay an annual tribute (the jizya), he accepted and the pact was sealed between them.
For the Muslim clerics he knows throughout the world, an Islamic order in America makes “absolutely no sense, whatsoever.”A true reporter would have asked Webb to name exactly for whom it is that he speaks. But, like I said, he wants to take the easy way out and purposely remains blind to this glaring issue.
SNIP
American Muslims do not disagree that there is a real threat from extremism, according to Webb. He said the greatest danger comes when both non-Muslims and Muslims alike believe Islam is un-American.Want some more proof, Webb?
The 8th Amendment guarantees that punishments will be fair, and not cruel, and that extraordinarily large fines will not be set.
The penalty for theft under Islam:
o14.0 THE PENALTY FOR THEFT o14.1Sounds “fair”, doesn’t it? Sure.
A person’s right hand is amputated, whether he is a Muslim, non-Muslim subject of the Islamic state,…
“Muslims in America are going to have to somehow engage American culture in order to offer the answers to American culture, the problems of American culture,” he said.In other words, he is suggesting that Muslims change the country to suit Islam. My message to Webb is that he had better pray to Allah that I do not get picked up by the mainstream media! As for Wendell Marsh, people like him are not only irresponsible, they are downright detrimental to America. Do your job with journalistic integrity, Marsh!
Monday, March 21, 2011
Gulag Night - Along with guest panelist, Sher Zieve,
Gulag Night
Monday, March 21, 10pm-Midnight ET,,, 7-9pm PTClick to listen live, online or call 310/807-5060
We will take calls, during the program.
Along with guest panelist, Sher Zieve, we welcome both Theresa Cao and Walter Fitzpatrick. They know something of what it is to be Gulag Bound.
-- Theresa Cao
The Marxist mommies of Code Pink get off "free as a bird," time after time, but Theresa? Since she very briefly challenged Barack Obama’s eligibility in the House gallery, the prosecution and seeming persecution go on.And Walt Fitzpatrick is out of the Monroe County, Tennessee Jail now, but the pitched battle between American principles and deep-seated corruption goes on, there. Fitzpatrick will discuss the break-in to his home and his incarceration, also how the term “treason” applies.
Find out the latest from each and discover much more about yourself in
Background
“Theresa Cao: Another Obama Opponent Headed for Jail?” March 15, 2011, by Sher Zieve, in Gulag Bound.
AP video, “Raw Video: Heckler Interrupts Constitution Read“
And about Walt Fitzpatrick
“How Can there be an Arraignment without any Charges or Accuser?” July 7, 2010, by Sharon Rondeau, in The Post & Email
“Dictatorship Reigns Supreme in Tennessee and the USA,” October 24, 2010, by Walter Fitzpatrick, in The Post & Email
“Monroe County TN Corruption Turns Violent” (on the murder of Jim Miller) August 2010, by J.B. Williams, in The JAG Hunter
Hosts:
This announcement at Gulag Bound:
The Other Side of the Hedge - by E. M. Forster
A Short Story that Has Changed Lives!
The Other Side of the Hedge
by E. M. Forster
MY PEDOMETER TOLD me that I was twenty-five; and, though it is a shocking thing to stop walking, I was so tired that I sat down on a milestone to rest. People outstripped me, jeering as they did so, but I was too apathetic to feel resentful, and even when Miss Eliza Dimbleby, the great educationist, swept past, exhorting me to persevere, I only smiled and raised my hat. At first I thought I was going to be like my brother, whom I had had to leave by the roadside a year or two round the corner. He had wasted his breath on singing, and his strength on helping others. But I had travelled more wisely, and now it was only the monotony of the highway that oppressed me—dust under foot and brown crackling hedges on either side, ever since I could remember.
And I had already dropped several things—indeed, the road behind was strewn with the things we all had dropped; and the white dust was settling down on them, so that already they looked no better than stones. My muscles were so weary that I could not even bear the weight of those things I still carried. I slid off the milestone into the road, and lay there prostrate, with my face to the great parched hedge, praying that I might give up.
A little puff of air revived me. It seemed to come from the hedge; and, when I opened my eyes, there was a glint of light through the tangle of boughs and dead leaves. The hedge could not be as thick as usual. In my weak, morbid state, I longed to force my way in, and see what was on the other side. No one was in sight, or I should not have dared to try. For we of the road do not admit in conversation that there is another side at all.
I yielded to the temptation, saying to myself that I would come back in a minute. The thorns scratched my face, and I had to use my arms as a shield, depending on my feet alone to push me forward. Halfway through I would have gone back, for in the passage all the things I was carrying were scraped off me, and my clothes were torn. But I was so wedged that return was impossible, and I had to wriggle blindly forward, expecting every moment that my strength would fail me, and that I should perish in the undergrowth.
Suddenly cold water closed round my head, and I seemed sinking down for ever. I had fallen out of the hedge into a deep pool. I rose to the surface at last, crying for help, and I heard someone on the opposite bank laugh and say: “Another!” And then I was twitched out and laid panting on the dry ground.
Even when the water was out of my eyes, I was still dazed, for I had never been in so large a space, nor seen such grass and sunshine. The blue sky was no longer a strip, and beneath it the earth had risen grandly into hills—clean, bare buttresses, with beech trees in their folds, and meadows and clear pools at their feet. But the hills were not high, and there was in the landscape a sense of human occupation—so that one might have called it a park, or garden, if the words did not imply a certain triviality and constraint.
As soon as I got my breath, I turned to my rescuer and said:
“Where does this place lead to?”
“Nowhere, thank the Lord!” said he, and laughed. He was a man of fifty or sixty—just the kind of age we mistrust on the road—but there was no anxiety in his manner, and his voice was that of a boy of eighteen.
“But it must lead somewhere!” I cried, too much surprised at his answer to thank him for saving my life.
“He wants to know where it leads!” he shouted to some men on the hill side, and they laughed back, and waved their caps.
I noticed then that the pool into which I had fallen was really a moat which bent round to the left and to the right, and that the hedge followed it continually. The hedge was green on this side—its roots showed through the clear water, and fish swam about in them—and it was wreathed over with dog-roses and Traveller’s Joy. But it was a barrier, and in a moment I lost all pleasure in the grass, the sky, the trees, the happy men and women, and realized that the place was but a prison, for all its beauty and extent.
We moved away from the boundary, and then followed a path almost parallel to it, across the meadows. I found it difficult walking, for I was always trying to out-distance my companion, and there was no advantage in doing this if the place led nowhere. I had never kept step with anyone since I left my brother.
I amused him by stopping suddenly and saying disconsolately, “This is perfectly terrible. One cannot advance: one cannot progress. Now we of the road—”
“Yes. I know.”
“I was going to say, we advance continually.”
“I know.”
“We are always learning, expanding, developing. Why, even in my short life I have seen a great deal of advance—the Transvaal War, the Fiscal Question, Christian Science, Radium. Here for example—”
I took out my pedometer, but it still marked twenty-five, not a degree more.
“Oh, it’s stopped! I meant to show you. It should have registered all the time I was walking with you. But it makes me only twenty-five.”
“Many things don’t work in here,” he said. “One day a man brought in a Lee-Metford, and that wouldn’t work.”
“The laws of science are universal in their application. It must be the water in the moat that has injured the machinery. In normal conditions everything works. Science and the spirit of emulation—those are the forces that have made us what we are.”
I had to break off and acknowledge the pleasant greetings of people whom we passed. Some of them were singing, some talking, some engaged in gardening, hay-making, or other rudimentary industries. They all seemed happy; and I might have been happy too, if I could have forgotten that the place led nowhere.
I was startled by a young man who came sprinting across our path, took a little fence in fine style, and went tearing over a ploughed field till he plunged into a lake, across which he began to swim. Here was true energy, and I exclaimed: “A cross-country race! Where are the others?”
“There are no others,” my companion replied; and, later on, when we passed some long grass from which came the voice of a girl singing exquisitely to herself, he said again: “There are no others.” I was bewildered at the waste in production, and murmured to myself, “What does it all mean?”
He said: “It means nothing but itself”—and he repeated the words slowly, as if I were a child.
“I understand,” I said quietly, “but I do not agree. Every achievement is worthless unless it is a link in the chain of development. And I must not trespass on your kindness any longer. I must get back somehow to the road, and have my pedometer mended.”
“First, you must see the gates,” he replied, “for we have gates, though we never use them.”
I yielded politely, and before long we reached the moat again, at a point where it was spanned by a bridge. Over the bridge was a big gate, as white as ivory, which was fitted into a gap in the boundary hedge. The gate opened outwards, and I exclaimed in amazement, for from it ran a road—just such a road as I had left—dusty under foot, with brown crackling hedges on either side as far as the eye could reach.
“That’s my road!” I cried.
He shut the gate and said: “But not your part of the road. It is through this gate that humanity went out countless ages ago, when it was first seized with the desire to walk.”
I denied this, observing that the part of the road I myself had left was not more than two miles off. But with the obstinacy of his years he repeated: “It is the same road. This is the beginning, and though it seems to run straight away from us, it doubles so often, that it is never far from our boundary and sometimes touches it.” He stooped down by the moat, and traced on its moist margin an absurd figure like a maze. As we walked back through the meadows, I tried to convince him of his mistake.
“The road sometimes doubles, to be sure, but that is part of our discipline. Who can doubt that its general tendency is onward? To what goal we know not—it may be to some mountain where we shall touch the sky, it may be over precipices into the sea. But that it goes forward—who can doubt that? It is the thought of that that makes us strive to excel, each in his own way, and gives us an impetus which is lacking with you. Now that man who passed us—it’s true that he ran well, and jumped well, and swam well; but we have men who can run better, and men who can jump better, and who can swim better. Specialization has produced results which would surprise you. Similarly, that girl—”
Here I interrupted myself to exclaim: “Good gracious me! I could have sworn it was Miss Eliza Dimbleby over there, with her feet in the fountain!”
He believed that it was.
“Impossible! I left her on the road, and she is due to lecture this evening at Tunbridge Wells. Why, her train leaves Cannon Street in—of course my watch has stopped like everything else. She is the last person to be here.”
“People always are astonished at meeting each other. All kinds come through the hedge, and come at all times—when they are drawing ahead in the race, when they are lagging behind, when they are left for dead. I often stand near the boundary listening to the sounds of the road—you know what they are—and wonder if anyone will turn aside. It is my great happiness to help someone out of the moat, as I helped you. For our country fills up slowly, though it was meant for all mankind.”
“Mankind have other aims,” I said gently, for I thought him well-meaning; “and I must join them.” I bade him good evening, for the sun was declining, and I wished to be on the road by nightfall. To my alarm, he caught hold of me, crying: “You are not to go yet!” I tried to shake him off, for we had no interests in common, and his civility was becoming irksome to me. But for all my struggles the tiresome old man would not let go; and, as wrestling is not my specialty, I was obliged to follow him.
It was true that I could have never found alone the place where I came in, and I hoped that, when I had seen the other sights about which he was worrying, he would take me back to it. But I was determined not to sleep in the country, for I mistrusted it, and the people too, for all their friendliness. Hungry though I was, I would not join them in their evening meals of milk and fruit, and, when they gave me flowers, I flung them away as soon as I could do so unobserved. Already they were lying down for the night like cattle—some out on the bare hillside, others in groups under the beeches. In the light of an orange sunset I hurried on with my unwelcome guide, dead tired, faint for want of food, but murmuring indomitably: “Give me life, with its struggles and victories, with its failures and hatreds, with its deep moral meaning and its unknown goal!”
At last we came to a place where the encircling moat was spanned by another bridge, and where another gate interrupted the line of the boundary hedge. It was different from the first gate; for it was half transparent like horn, and opened inwards. But through it, in the waning light, I saw again just such a road as I had left—monotonous, dusty, with brown crackling hedges on either side, as far as the eye could reach.
I was strangely disquieted at the sight, which seemed to deprive me of all self-control. A man was passing us, returning for the night to the hills, with a scythe over his shoulder and a can of some liquid in his hand. I forgot the destiny of our race. I forgot the road that lay before my eyes, and I sprang at him, wrenched the can out of his hand, and began to drink.
It was nothing stronger than beer, but in my exhausted state it overcame me in a moment. As in a dream, I saw the old man shut the gate, and heard him say: “This is where your road ends, and through this gate humanity—all that is left of it—will come in to us.”
Though my senses were sinking into oblivion, they seemed to expand ere they reached it. They perceived the magic song of nightingales, and the odour of invisible hay, and stars piercing the fading sky. The man whose beer I had stolen lowered me down gently to sleep off its effects, and, as he did so, I saw that he was my brother.
Obama's eligibility? - Shocking scientific poll!
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?pageId=276865
BORN IN THE USA?
Shocking scientific poll
on Obama's eligibility
You won't believe how few Americans
think president has shown qualification
Posted: March 20, 2011
7:13 pm Eastern
By Bob Unruh
WorldNetDaily
Editor's note: This is another in a series of monthly "WND/WENZEL POLLS" conducted exclusively for WND by the public-opinion research and media consulting company Wenzel Strategies.
Not even one person in 10 believes Barack Obama has shown that he is eligible to be president of the United States, according to a stunning new scientific poll that also reveals political Independents have less tolerance than even Republicans for his efforts to obfuscate the issue.
"The shocking result in this survey is that just 9 percent said they believe Obama has met the requirements to prove he was born in the United States and is therefore qualified to be president," said Fritz Wenzel, chief of Wenzel Strategies, which conducted the assessment.
"Even when you combine those who say such questions are not valid with those who believe he has satisfied the requirements, it still falls short of equaling the percentage who said he should step forward and prove his birth origin once and for all," he said.
Wenzel Strategies, an independent public opinion research firm based in Ohio, conducted a nationwide telephone poll using a randomly selected sample of all adults. The survey, including 1,095 respondents, was conducted March 15-17, 2011, and carries a confidence interval of 95 percent and a margin of error of +/- 2.93 percentage points.
(Story continues below)
"The question of whether Barack Obama is eligible to hold the office of president is remarkable in that so many people are aware of the questions that remain unanswered. The survey shows that 77 percent are aware of the issue, and another 12 percent said they are unsure, which likely means they know a little but not enough to articulate details," Wenzel said in his analysis of the results.
"Given the level of interest that the American public now devotes to politics, especially in an off-election year, this finding is remarkable. It speaks volumes about Obama's unwillingness or inability to satisfy this question once and for all," he said.
It was back in June 2009 when Wenzel asked the simple question, "Are you aware of questions raised about Barack Obama's constitutional eligibility for the office of president?" and 51.3 percent responded yes.
This month, 77 percent of the Democrats who responded said they are. Nearly 82 percent of the Republicans are, and almost 69 percent of the Independents. Overall, 76.8 percent said yes, and another 11.7 percent said they were unsure. Only 11.5 percent said there were not aware of the questions.
"Half of those surveyed said they believe these questions about Obama's legitimacy as president are either troubling or should be satisfied by Obama. In fact, more people want Obama to prove his legitimacy – 42 percent – than believe that the lingering questions are not valid – 32 percent," Wenzel said.
That division is 41.9 percent who say Obama should prove his birth story, including 60.9 percent of Independents, 58.6 percent of Republicans and 13.2 percent of Democrats.
Another 7.9 percent the questions are troubling
"What is most interesting is the response on this question of Independent voters: Fully 61 percent of Independents said they want Obama to prove once and for all his birth origin, which is a higher percentage than even among Republicans. Men are also somewhat more skeptical than women," Wenzel said.
"At a time when this country faces dramatic problems both here at home and around the world, it does harm to Obama's credibility and undermines the confidence of the American people to have this question hanging out there," Wenzel explained. "One can only imagine the storm of controversy that might ensue if we discover definitively after his presidency is over that he was not qualified to hold office. The resignation of Richard Nixon would pale by comparison in terms of undermining public confidence in government."
"A corollary issue to the Obama birth certificate is the question about Obama's refusal to release educational records, which could hold some clue as to his birth origin and early citizenship," Wenzel said. "Two-thirds of all respondents want those records released, while the other third of respondents oppose the release of those records. It remains unclear why Obama will not comply with any requests to show those records to the public."
Only 26 percent strongly opposed the release of the records. Nearly 50 percent strongly favored release and another 17 percent said the president should release the records.
"The bottom line on these early-life records of Obama is that this issue lives on, regardless of how derisive some have been toward the so-called 'birther' movement," Wenzel said. "Obama supporters, particularly those in the national news media who have protected the president on this issue, have tried to ostracize those who still have doubts about Obama's birth, but try as they might, they have done little to quell the questions in the minds of the American public. This issue is far from over."
"Evidence of that springs from the strong support that the national telephone survey found among Americans for state laws that require candidates for president to prove they are constitutionally qualified to hold the office – before they will be allowed to appear on that state's presidential ballot," Wenzel said.
"Fully 65 percent said they support such state bills, while just 24 percent said they oppose such state measures. Huge majorities of both men and women agree with these state proposals and it is popular in every region of the nation," he said.
"The clear implication from this polling data is that Americans like the idea that, in the absence of full disclosure by presidential candidates and a press corps interested enough to ask and pursue tough questions, state governments will do their own vetting of presidential candidates," he said.
WND has reported that such proposals already have been made in 13 states, although several of the initiatives have been detoured by politics inside of committee meeting rooms.
Another recent poll, of only members of the GOP, said only about 30 percent believe Obama was born in the U.S.
The Public Policy Polling found that only 28 percent of the Republicans surveyed believe Obama was born in the U.S. while 51 percent do not. Another 21 percent say they are not sure.
"Any thought that the birther theory has been put to rest can be thrown out the window," Dean Debnam, the president of the Democratic-leaning polling firm, told Politico at the time.
"That view is still widely held in Republican circles," he said.
Other polls in recent months have shown Americans to be increasingly skeptical of Obama's official narrative:
Other Wenzel Poll questions revealed a large majority of Americans – nearly 66 percent, including 86 percent of Republicans and 75 percent of Independents – believe the country is on the wrong track.
They also give Obama a "poor" grade for his job performance, by about the same margin.
And they believe many of the drilling and energy production restrictions in the U.S. now should be lifted and are split on the idea of more nuclear plans.
If you are a member of the media and would like to interview Fritz Wenzel about this story, please e-mail.
See detailed results of survey questions:
Are you aware of questions raised about Barack Obama's constitutional eligibility for the office of president?
What is your view of lingering questions about Obama's eligibility to be president?
President Obama has refused to release his educational records, which could prove or disprove whether or not he was born in the United States as required by the Constitution. What is your opinion of the fact Obama has not released his educational records?
Some states have drafted legislation requiring candidates for president to prove that they were born in the United States and also meet all other constitutional requirements to be qualified to serve as president of the United States. Do you support or oppose such state legislation?
Generally speaking, do you think the United States is headed in the right direction, or is it off on the wrong track?
Overall, how would you rate the job performance of President Obama?
Thinking about energy and political developments in the Middle East, which of the following ideas comes closet to what you think should be done about drilling for oil and natural gas in America?
America is relying more and more on electric power today to run everything from computers to heaters to electric cars, and some parts of the country already suffer from a shortage of electricity. Some have said the only way to generate enough electricity is to build new nuclear power plants. But, in the aftermath of the nuclear disaster in Japan, new questions have arisen. Do you think America should press forward to once again begin building nuclear power plants, or should plans for nuclear power plants be shelved?
Please tell me which of the following statements comes closest to your thinking about alternative energy sources – that alternative energies will eventually replace fossil fuels and we must pay short-term high prices during the transition, or that alternatives will fail when government subsidies end, and we should stick with fossil fuels?
Do you believe that the U.S. government should continue to spend money to subsidize the alternative energy industry, or should it save money by ending all such subsidies?
BORN IN THE USA?
Shocking scientific poll
on Obama's eligibility
You won't believe how few Americans
think president has shown qualification
Posted: March 20, 2011
7:13 pm Eastern
By Bob Unruh
WorldNetDaily
Editor's note: This is another in a series of monthly "WND/WENZEL POLLS" conducted exclusively for WND by the public-opinion research and media consulting company Wenzel Strategies.
 Barack Obama |
Not even one person in 10 believes Barack Obama has shown that he is eligible to be president of the United States, according to a stunning new scientific poll that also reveals political Independents have less tolerance than even Republicans for his efforts to obfuscate the issue.
"The shocking result in this survey is that just 9 percent said they believe Obama has met the requirements to prove he was born in the United States and is therefore qualified to be president," said Fritz Wenzel, chief of Wenzel Strategies, which conducted the assessment.
"Even when you combine those who say such questions are not valid with those who believe he has satisfied the requirements, it still falls short of equaling the percentage who said he should step forward and prove his birth origin once and for all," he said.
Wenzel Strategies, an independent public opinion research firm based in Ohio, conducted a nationwide telephone poll using a randomly selected sample of all adults. The survey, including 1,095 respondents, was conducted March 15-17, 2011, and carries a confidence interval of 95 percent and a margin of error of +/- 2.93 percentage points.
(Story continues below)
"The question of whether Barack Obama is eligible to hold the office of president is remarkable in that so many people are aware of the questions that remain unanswered. The survey shows that 77 percent are aware of the issue, and another 12 percent said they are unsure, which likely means they know a little but not enough to articulate details," Wenzel said in his analysis of the results.
"Given the level of interest that the American public now devotes to politics, especially in an off-election year, this finding is remarkable. It speaks volumes about Obama's unwillingness or inability to satisfy this question once and for all," he said.
It was back in June 2009 when Wenzel asked the simple question, "Are you aware of questions raised about Barack Obama's constitutional eligibility for the office of president?" and 51.3 percent responded yes.
This month, 77 percent of the Democrats who responded said they are. Nearly 82 percent of the Republicans are, and almost 69 percent of the Independents. Overall, 76.8 percent said yes, and another 11.7 percent said they were unsure. Only 11.5 percent said there were not aware of the questions.
"Half of those surveyed said they believe these questions about Obama's legitimacy as president are either troubling or should be satisfied by Obama. In fact, more people want Obama to prove his legitimacy – 42 percent – than believe that the lingering questions are not valid – 32 percent," Wenzel said.
That division is 41.9 percent who say Obama should prove his birth story, including 60.9 percent of Independents, 58.6 percent of Republicans and 13.2 percent of Democrats.
Another 7.9 percent the questions are troubling
"What is most interesting is the response on this question of Independent voters: Fully 61 percent of Independents said they want Obama to prove once and for all his birth origin, which is a higher percentage than even among Republicans. Men are also somewhat more skeptical than women," Wenzel said.
"At a time when this country faces dramatic problems both here at home and around the world, it does harm to Obama's credibility and undermines the confidence of the American people to have this question hanging out there," Wenzel explained. "One can only imagine the storm of controversy that might ensue if we discover definitively after his presidency is over that he was not qualified to hold office. The resignation of Richard Nixon would pale by comparison in terms of undermining public confidence in government."
"A corollary issue to the Obama birth certificate is the question about Obama's refusal to release educational records, which could hold some clue as to his birth origin and early citizenship," Wenzel said. "Two-thirds of all respondents want those records released, while the other third of respondents oppose the release of those records. It remains unclear why Obama will not comply with any requests to show those records to the public."
Only 26 percent strongly opposed the release of the records. Nearly 50 percent strongly favored release and another 17 percent said the president should release the records.
"The bottom line on these early-life records of Obama is that this issue lives on, regardless of how derisive some have been toward the so-called 'birther' movement," Wenzel said. "Obama supporters, particularly those in the national news media who have protected the president on this issue, have tried to ostracize those who still have doubts about Obama's birth, but try as they might, they have done little to quell the questions in the minds of the American public. This issue is far from over."
"Evidence of that springs from the strong support that the national telephone survey found among Americans for state laws that require candidates for president to prove they are constitutionally qualified to hold the office – before they will be allowed to appear on that state's presidential ballot," Wenzel said.
"Fully 65 percent said they support such state bills, while just 24 percent said they oppose such state measures. Huge majorities of both men and women agree with these state proposals and it is popular in every region of the nation," he said.
"The clear implication from this polling data is that Americans like the idea that, in the absence of full disclosure by presidential candidates and a press corps interested enough to ask and pursue tough questions, state governments will do their own vetting of presidential candidates," he said.
WND has reported that such proposals already have been made in 13 states, although several of the initiatives have been detoured by politics inside of committee meeting rooms.
Another recent poll, of only members of the GOP, said only about 30 percent believe Obama was born in the U.S.
The Public Policy Polling found that only 28 percent of the Republicans surveyed believe Obama was born in the U.S. while 51 percent do not. Another 21 percent say they are not sure.
"Any thought that the birther theory has been put to rest can be thrown out the window," Dean Debnam, the president of the Democratic-leaning polling firm, told Politico at the time.
"That view is still widely held in Republican circles," he said.
Other polls in recent months have shown Americans to be increasingly skeptical of Obama's official narrative:
- A survey by Angus Reid Global Monitor, a division of Vision Critical Group, in October 2009 found three in 10 people in the U.S. believed Obama to be a foreigner.
"While only 13 percent of Democratic Party supporters believe Obama was not born in the U.S., the proportion rises to 25 percent among independents and 51 percent among Republican Party backers," the report said. - Then in January 2010, another WND/Wenzel Poll revealed on the one-year anniversary of Obama's tenure in office that fully one-third of Americans refused to believe Obama was a "legitimate president," with another 15.8 percent saying they were not sure.
Barely half the voters, 51.5 percent, said they believed the president legitimate even though he had not yet produced the documentation proving his constitutional eligibility. Even 14.6 percent of the Democrats said they did not consider him legitimate. - In May 2010, a WND/Wenzel Poll revealed that 55 percent of Americans wanted Obama to release all records relating to his childhood and his education, including "college records, Harvard Law School papers, passport records, travel records, and other similar documentation."
"Asked what should be done should it be found that Obama does not meet the qualifications to be president, 59 percent said he should be removed from office, and 35 percent said all bills signed into law by Obama should be repealed," the poll's analysis revealed. - By last June, other media were beginning to put their toes in the waters of the controversy. A 60 Minutes-Vanity Fair poll revealed only 39 percent of respondents believe Obama was born in Hawaii as he claimed in his book.
"A shocking 63 percent – very nearly two-thirds of us – went out on a limb and stated for the record that we believe in the United States. It's enough to make you proud to be an American – or 63 percent proud, at any rate."
But that figure included those who said they believe he was born in Kansas or some other unknown state, which still would conflict with Obama's story. - Last August, a poll by CNN said 6 of 10 people were uncertain Obama was born in the U.S. The poll said only 42 percent believe Obama "definitely" was born in the U.S.
The CNN report said that, "Hawaii has released a copy of the president's birth certificate – officially called a 'certificate of live birth.' And in 1961 the hospital where the president was born placed announcements in two Hawaiian newspapers regarding Obama's birth."
However, the online image released by the Obama campaign during his presidential race actually is called a "Certification of Live Birth," and those documents under the rules in the state of Hawaii were available for children not born in the state.
Other Wenzel Poll questions revealed a large majority of Americans – nearly 66 percent, including 86 percent of Republicans and 75 percent of Independents – believe the country is on the wrong track.
They also give Obama a "poor" grade for his job performance, by about the same margin.
And they believe many of the drilling and energy production restrictions in the U.S. now should be lifted and are split on the idea of more nuclear plans.
If you are a member of the media and would like to interview Fritz Wenzel about this story, please e-mail.
See detailed results of survey questions:
Are you aware of questions raised about Barack Obama's constitutional eligibility for the office of president?
What is your view of lingering questions about Obama's eligibility to be president?
President Obama has refused to release his educational records, which could prove or disprove whether or not he was born in the United States as required by the Constitution. What is your opinion of the fact Obama has not released his educational records?
Some states have drafted legislation requiring candidates for president to prove that they were born in the United States and also meet all other constitutional requirements to be qualified to serve as president of the United States. Do you support or oppose such state legislation?
Generally speaking, do you think the United States is headed in the right direction, or is it off on the wrong track?
Overall, how would you rate the job performance of President Obama?
Thinking about energy and political developments in the Middle East, which of the following ideas comes closet to what you think should be done about drilling for oil and natural gas in America?
America is relying more and more on electric power today to run everything from computers to heaters to electric cars, and some parts of the country already suffer from a shortage of electricity. Some have said the only way to generate enough electricity is to build new nuclear power plants. But, in the aftermath of the nuclear disaster in Japan, new questions have arisen. Do you think America should press forward to once again begin building nuclear power plants, or should plans for nuclear power plants be shelved?
Please tell me which of the following statements comes closest to your thinking about alternative energy sources – that alternative energies will eventually replace fossil fuels and we must pay short-term high prices during the transition, or that alternatives will fail when government subsidies end, and we should stick with fossil fuels?
Do you believe that the U.S. government should continue to spend money to subsidize the alternative energy industry, or should it save money by ending all such subsidies?
Sunday, March 20, 2011
Saturday, March 19, 2011
IS THIS DOCUMENT VALID? - YES OR NO AND REASON WHY
IS THIS DOCUMENT VALID? - YES OR NO AND REASON WHY
IS THIS DOCUMENT VALID? - YES OR NO AND REASON WHY
Here is my birth certificate. No, wait that isn’t true. To be accurate I need to say, “Here is a scanned copy of my alleged “CERTIFICATE OF VITAL RECORD” that has not been vetted by qualified forensic document examiners.”
I do not have a passport. If I send a link to the “scanned copy of my alleged birth certificate that has not been vetted by forensic document examiners” to the State Department, do you think they will send me a passport? No, they will not!
I might protest, “But I put it on the Internet for all to see! I released my birth certificate to the public.” “No”, they would say “You released a scanned copy of an alleged birth certificate that has not been vetted by forensic document examiners. We need the original document.”
I might protest by saying. “It hasn’t been altered (except for the little detail of obscuring the official number on the document); it has a doctor’s signature, the name of the hospital, my parent’s signature and everything!” “Nope,” they would say, and if I insisted they might notice the line at the bottom “WARNING: IT IS ILLEGAL TO DUPLICATE THIS COPY” or “ANY ALTERATION OR ERASURE VOIDS THIS CERTIFICATE.”
I might protest, “But I put it on the Internet for all to see! I released my birth certificate to the public.” “No”, they would say “You released a scanned copy of an alleged birth certificate that has not been vetted by forensic document examiners. We need the original document.”
I might protest by saying. “It hasn’t been altered (except for the little detail of obscuring the official number on the document); it has a doctor’s signature, the name of the hospital, my parent’s signature and everything!” “Nope,” they would say, and if I insisted they might notice the line at the bottom “WARNING: IT IS ILLEGAL TO DUPLICATE THIS COPY” or “ANY ALTERATION OR ERASURE VOIDS THIS CERTIFICATE.”
So, unless I am able to provide authentic documentation, I will not be able to go on my fabulous, all expense paid cruise.
Yet there are people who live among us, and even have the right to vote, who think that if I presented my scanned, altered "CERTIFICATE OF VITAL RECORD" during an election in the same manner, it would be enough evidence to prove that I am eligible to become President of the
And my altered, “scanned copy of an alleged birth certificate that has not been vetted by forensic document examiners” is far higher quality than has been offered by AKA Obama.
AKA Obama has spent lots of money to keep the best available evidence secret. Let's just add suppression of evidence to the other charges of election fraud, campaign finance violations, and filing fraudulent documents in all 50 states.
No matter what you might think, there is no escaping that AKA Obama is not practicing the virtue of full disclosure.
The entire reason there is a professional field known as forensic document examination is that a great deal can be told from examination of the original document itself. Far, far less can be told by looking at a photocopy of a document, and very little, if anything at all, can be told from looking at a digital image that purports to be an image of an original document. Too much opportunity for adulteration, no opportunity to examine the paper, the ink, and any impressions made on the paper, etc. These online arguments discussing images (especially photographic images) are like people studying animals by examining scat.
Forensic document examiner Sandra Ramsey Lines, (CV here ) a Former Federal Examiner with a long history of expert testimony in state and federal courts, has testified in an affidavit HERE that states, in part: “I can state with certainty that the COLB presented on the internet by the various groups, which include the “Daily Kos,” the Obama Campaign, “Factcheck.org” and others cannot be relied upon as genuine. Dr. Polarik raises issues concerning the COLB that I can affirm. Software such as Adobe Photoshop can produce complete images or alter images that appear to be genuine; therefore, any image offered on the internet cannot be relied upon as being a copy of the authentic document.” Sandra Ramsey Lines’ summary is also posted at U. S. Law Blog.
Excerpted from:
http://thesteadydrip.blogspot.com/2009/04/aka-obama-fans-all-together-now-say-omg.html
Can Obama supporters see the logic here? Oh, I forgot, Obama supporters don’t use logic; not “warm and fuzzy” enough for them.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
