Tom:
As
head of the CA Republican Party, please don't even think about nominating
Rubio, who is ineligible, for VP. Warn Romney and colleagues about this
disastrous error. Before you tell me I don't know what I'm talking about
and that he was born in the USA, read this: http://www.art2superpac.com/issues.html.
It outlines 400 years of history and law about natural born Citizenship, as it
applies to the Presidency and why it is important to the security of the USA.
Actually, you probably won't tell me anything, as you have yet to
acknowledge anything I've ever written you, but please pay attention to
this.
As
much as people despise Obama and might even vote for Romney to get Obama out,
Romney is a very unpoplular guy. He is a weak candidate and can't connect with
the public, although he was briefly Governor of a very Progressive state. If he
picks an ineligible running mate, he'll be even less popular. As it is,
Romney is in nearly in a dead heat with the worst President in U.S. history.
Add in an ineligible VP candidate and we will lose Conservative voters,
as we gain some clueless Latino voters. Most Latinos won't vote
Republican under ANY circumstances, anyway. We'll need to do more than throw
them that bone to bring them into the party. I saw some good stuff at that
forum you had at the Fall '11 Convention in LA.
You
may not be aware of it, but there's no love lost between Cubans and Mexicans.
At least, that's what my Cuban contacts in NJ and FL say.
The
party is asking for trouble if they attempt to perpetuate this. It's bad
enough that we have a faux "President" with a forged birth
certificate, and non-citizen father, but we don't need ineligible candidates in
both parties, unless this is some backhanded attempt to help legitimize the
Marxist usurper in the White House. We should consider having all
Presidential/Vice Presidential candidates show documentation of natural born
Citizenship, to avoid a recurrence of what we've endured the last four years.
Regards,
George
Miller
UPDATE:
UPDATE:
Hey,
I just called Rubio's office and spoke to Steve...D. C. office.
If there was any question at all...there is no longer.
After telling him that we...many patriots from all
Parities...really liked Rubio and believed his rhetoric about fiscal
responsbility and so on. That right now adherence to the Constitution is
job one....and that he seems to be veering off that road.
Granting Amnesty of any kind is a train wreck...we have spent far
too much on illegal alien invaders and on legal immigrants and that any form of
amnesty is the antithesis of fiscal responsbility and against the wishes of the
majority of Americans; particularly those who foot the bill. He said he'd
pass that opinion on.
Now, here is where it gets interesting:
He only said he would pass my comments along on the amnesty.
When I then proceeded to address the fact that the only way Rubio can begin to
recover the trust and credibility we had thus far invested in him was to face
America unequivocally and explain that he would not be running for V.P. because
he is not legally eligible; this guy became a total ASS.
He let the cat out of the bag, just as Cornyn's guy Josh did when
I addressed him with this problem.
Steve started sighing loudly and even snickering like a damn
teenager. He proceeded to launch into an elevated argument about case law
supporting the fact that Rubio IS a Natural Born Citizen. He carried on
about Kim Wong Ark and anyone being born to TWO Chinese parents on American
soil was a U. S. citizen and then quickly added that the case law stated that
made him 'Natural Born'.
Now, this is good in one respect; his statements blow Obama out of
the water...but have you read an official statement about Obama from him or his
office on this? And I said Rubio should be publicly helping us expose the
criminal in the White House while being forthright about his own lack of
Natural Born status.
I challenged him with the FACT that if it wasn't a problem; then
why had both sides of the political fence worked so hard for several years and
through eight attempts to change the law prior to the illegal installation of
Obama?
He kept arguing over me and I told him he was rude and
unprofessional considering he is paid through our tax dollars. He was
offended because, as an intern, he is not paid. I said "Well, you're
certainly working your way up to self appointed royal status, aren't you?
And he was stumped...because it's true. I also pointed out that with his
attitude and misinformation; he is a bad front man for Rubio. He kept on
with the indignant "EXCUSE ME?..." crap.
I told him we would fight Rubio as hard as we have fought Obama
'Y' Company on this legal issue.
Is it not the Vatel case that the original case law was
decided? And what the hell are these asswipes arguing about precendent
for when they know 'original intent' and definition?
I'm not the lawyer here; but sounds like Rubio's office needs to
be pounded by those who are 'in the know'. Any questions about the GOP
involvement in this ongoing and growing fraud?
No comments:
Post a Comment