Tuesday, April 24, 2012

RUBIO - As head of the CA Republican Party

Tom:
As head of the CA Republican Party, please don't even think about nominating Rubio, who is ineligible, for VP. Warn Romney and colleagues about this disastrous error.  Before you tell me I don't know what I'm talking about and that he was born in the USA, read this: http://www.art2superpac.com/issues.html. It outlines 400 years of history and law about natural born Citizenship, as it applies to the Presidency and why it is important to the security of the USA.  Actually, you probably won't tell me anything, as you have yet to acknowledge anything I've ever written you, but please pay attention to this. 

As much as people despise Obama and might even vote for Romney to get Obama out, Romney is a very unpoplular guy. He is a weak candidate and can't connect with the public, although he was briefly Governor of a very Progressive state. If he picks an ineligible running mate, he'll be even less popular.  As it is, Romney is in nearly in a dead heat with the worst President in U.S. history.  Add in an ineligible VP candidate and we will lose Conservative voters, as we gain some clueless Latino voters.  Most Latinos won't vote Republican under ANY circumstances, anyway. We'll need to do more than throw them that bone to bring them into the party. I saw some good stuff at that forum you had at the Fall '11 Convention in LA.


You may not be aware of it, but there's no love lost between Cubans and Mexicans. At least, that's what my Cuban contacts in NJ and FL say.


The party is asking for trouble if they attempt to perpetuate this.  It's bad enough that we have a faux "President" with a forged birth certificate, and non-citizen father, but we don't need ineligible candidates in both parties, unless this is some backhanded attempt to help legitimize the Marxist usurper in the White House.  We should consider having all Presidential/Vice Presidential candidates show documentation of natural born Citizenship, to avoid a recurrence of what we've endured the last four years.


Regards,
George Miller

UPDATE:

Hey,



I just called Rubio's office and spoke to Steve...D. C. office.



If there was any question at all...there is no longer.



After telling him that we...many patriots from all Parities...really liked Rubio and believed his rhetoric about fiscal responsbility and so on.  That right now adherence to the Constitution is job one....and that he seems to be veering off that road.



Granting Amnesty of any kind is a train wreck...we have spent far too much on illegal alien invaders and on legal immigrants and that any form of amnesty is the antithesis of fiscal responsbility and against the wishes of the majority of Americans; particularly those who foot the bill.  He said he'd pass that opinion on.



Now, here is where it gets interesting:



He only said he would pass my comments along on the amnesty.  When I then proceeded to address the fact that the only way Rubio can begin to recover the trust and credibility we had thus far invested in him was to face America unequivocally and explain that he would not be running for V.P. because he is not legally eligible; this guy became a total ASS.



He let the cat out of the bag, just as Cornyn's guy Josh did when I addressed him with this problem.



Steve started sighing loudly and even snickering like a damn teenager.  He proceeded to launch into an elevated argument about case law supporting the fact that Rubio IS a Natural Born Citizen.  He carried on about Kim Wong Ark and anyone being born to TWO Chinese parents on American soil was a U. S. citizen and then quickly added that the case law stated that made him 'Natural Born'.



Now, this is good in one respect; his statements blow Obama out of the water...but have you read an official statement about Obama from him or his office on this?  And I said Rubio should be publicly helping us expose the criminal in the White House while being forthright about his own lack of Natural Born status.



I challenged him with the FACT that if it wasn't a problem; then why had both sides of the political fence worked so hard for several years and through eight attempts to change the law prior to the illegal installation of Obama?



He kept arguing over me and I told him he was rude and unprofessional considering he is paid through our tax dollars.  He was offended because, as an intern, he is not paid.  I said "Well, you're certainly working your way up to self appointed royal status, aren't you?  And he was stumped...because it's true.  I also pointed out that with his attitude and misinformation; he is a bad front man for Rubio.  He kept on with the indignant "EXCUSE ME?..." crap.



I told him we would fight Rubio as hard as we have fought Obama 'Y' Company on this legal issue.



Is it not the Vatel case that the original case law was decided?  And what the hell are these asswipes arguing about precendent for when they know 'original intent' and definition?



I'm not the lawyer here; but sounds like Rubio's office needs to be pounded by those who are 'in the know'.  Any questions about the GOP involvement in this ongoing and growing fraud?




No comments: