A
Roberts-Soetoro Primer
-----
Original Message -----
From: Devvy's Email
Alerts
Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2013 6:29 PM
Subject: Chief Justice of the Supreme Court John Roberts schedules
in conference before the full Supreme Court Forgerygate (Barry Soetoro)
(Mailing
list information, including how to remove yourself, is located at the end of
this message.)
Links are generally posted at my web site http://devvy.net/cgi-bin/dada/mail.cgi/r/alerts/251797582669/
______________
There's no question Barry Soetoro aka Barack Obama is using someone else's social security number.
There's no question his Selective Service Registration Card was altered; a forgery and a felony.
It also means he cannot hold any job in the U.S. government:
Register for the Draft: It's Still the Law
http://devvy.net/cgi-bin/dada/mail.cgi/r/alerts/319905187440/
"Federal Jobs - men born after December 31, 1959 must be registered to be eligible for jobs in the Executive Branch of the Federal government and the U.S. Postal Service."
Soetoro was born in August, 1961.
It has already been proven Soetoro's SSN didn't clear with E-Verify, the program designed to check SSNs to keep illegals from obtaining employment in the U.S. E-Verify says Soetoro's SSN doesn't match his name.
There's no question in my mind his passport records were sanitized:
Two Fired for Viewing Obama Passport File
http://devvy.net/cgi-bin/dada/mail.cgi/r/alerts/770213843686/
Did CIA pick sanitize Obama's passport records?
http://devvy.net/cgi-bin/dada/mail.cgi/r/alerts/582299425078/
There is no longer any question the birth certificate supplied by Soetoro for all the world to see is a poorly done forgery.
Soetoro cannot be impeached because he usurped the office of president. He has never held office. The Oval office has been empty since January 21, 2009.
Obama could be removed by his own signature
http://devvy.net/cgi-bin/dada/mail.cgi/r/alerts/619386644280/
"Is there any other way the putative president could be removed from office other than a quo warranto action? Mario Apuzzo, is an attorney who has been representing plaintiffs in cases involving the putative president's ineligibility. Mario has raised the issue of standing, a judicial hallucination, in a case, Bond v. United States, 564 U. S. decided by the U.S. Supreme Court, June 16, 2011 [emphasis mine]:
"Applying the Bond decision to a case challenging Obama's eligibility, one would have to be criminally charged or be compelled to pay money under a statute passed by Congress when Obama was President. One would argue that under Article I, Section 7, Clause 2, laws passed by Congress need the action or inaction of the President (the veto power) before they are allowed to become laws. This requirement satisfies separation of powers and checks and balances doctrine. One would argue that Congress passed the charging statute, with the President's action or inaction. One would argue that a legitimate President must satisfy the eligibility requirements of Article II, Section 1, Clause 5, which contains the "natural born Citizen" clause. Then one would argue that the law is not valid because it never was presented to a legitimate President for consideration under Article I, Section 7, Clause 2, arguing that Obama is not a legitimate President because he does not meet the requirements of the "natural born Citizen" clause..."
The gutless cowards in the Outlaw Congress, as quietly as possible, once again have all participated in the biggest fraud ever committed against the American people next to the Federal Reserve Banking Act of 1913:
Electoral College count affirms Obama's win
http://devvy.net/cgi-bin/dada/mail.cgi/r/alerts/448525752304/
January 4, 2013:
WASHINGTON — "Congress made the obvious official on Friday. President Barack Obama has been re-elected. In a joint session, Congress formally certified that Obama and Vice President Joe Biden were the winners in the November election with 332 electoral votes, well more than the 270 required. Republican Mitt Romney and his running mate, Rep. Paul Ryan of Wisconsin, won 206 votes."
I know Americans all across this country demanded electoral college delegates not cast their vote for the imposter. I know Americans practically begged the phony Michelle Bachmann, queen of the tea party movement to exercise her right to object to the vote. They also contacted Sen. Rand Paul to do it from the senate side. Both remained mute and refused to stand up for the U.S. Constitution, as did every member of Congress - including Mr. Constitution, Ron Paul, on January 9, 2009. THAT is how we got a fraud installed in the Dirty House in 2009.
One more try:
Chief Justice of the "Supreme" Court, John Roberts, who hallucinated the Obamacare as a tax, has scheduled a full hearing by the court for the Forgery-gate case that has been slowly moving along.
http://devvy.net/cgi-bin/dada/mail.cgi/r/alerts/119998619507/
Those of us following the most incredible acts of cowardice by federal judges and Secretary of States have seen every case kicked to protect an individual who committed perjury when he took the oath of office and has committed provable, criminal acts.
We know the "Supreme" Court has deliberately ducked the eligibility issue:
April 17, 2012: Justice Clarence Thomas: We're 'evading' eligibility
http://devvy.net/cgi-bin/dada/mail.cgi/r/alerts/708654534676/
"U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas told a House subcommittee that when it comes to determining whether a person born outside the 50 states can serve as U.S. president, the high court is “evading” the issue.
The comments came as part of Thomas’ testimony before a House appropriations panel discussing an increase in the Supreme Court’s budget earlier this week."
Will anything come of this latest conference scheduled by Roberts? I wish I could say yes, but look at the court. Ruth Bader Ginsburg, CFR liberal, Sotomayer who should have been indicted for fixing bankruptcy cases and tax evasion, Elena Kagan, a Marxist and so on. I guess we'll wait and see.
Personally, I think the court is just playing the American people, again. Throw the great unwashed some scaps from Longshanks table. Get everyone's hopes up and then dash them. They could care less because no matter how corrupt and how bad their decisions are, they know the U.S. Congress doesn't have the guts to remove one of them.
Links are generally posted at my web site http://devvy.net/cgi-bin/dada/mail.cgi/r/alerts/251797582669/
______________
There's no question Barry Soetoro aka Barack Obama is using someone else's social security number.
There's no question his Selective Service Registration Card was altered; a forgery and a felony.
It also means he cannot hold any job in the U.S. government:
Register for the Draft: It's Still the Law
http://devvy.net/cgi-bin/dada/mail.cgi/r/alerts/319905187440/
"Federal Jobs - men born after December 31, 1959 must be registered to be eligible for jobs in the Executive Branch of the Federal government and the U.S. Postal Service."
Soetoro was born in August, 1961.
It has already been proven Soetoro's SSN didn't clear with E-Verify, the program designed to check SSNs to keep illegals from obtaining employment in the U.S. E-Verify says Soetoro's SSN doesn't match his name.
There's no question in my mind his passport records were sanitized:
Two Fired for Viewing Obama Passport File
http://devvy.net/cgi-bin/dada/mail.cgi/r/alerts/770213843686/
Did CIA pick sanitize Obama's passport records?
http://devvy.net/cgi-bin/dada/mail.cgi/r/alerts/582299425078/
There is no longer any question the birth certificate supplied by Soetoro for all the world to see is a poorly done forgery.
Soetoro cannot be impeached because he usurped the office of president. He has never held office. The Oval office has been empty since January 21, 2009.
Obama could be removed by his own signature
http://devvy.net/cgi-bin/dada/mail.cgi/r/alerts/619386644280/
"Is there any other way the putative president could be removed from office other than a quo warranto action? Mario Apuzzo, is an attorney who has been representing plaintiffs in cases involving the putative president's ineligibility. Mario has raised the issue of standing, a judicial hallucination, in a case, Bond v. United States, 564 U. S. decided by the U.S. Supreme Court, June 16, 2011 [emphasis mine]:
"Applying the Bond decision to a case challenging Obama's eligibility, one would have to be criminally charged or be compelled to pay money under a statute passed by Congress when Obama was President. One would argue that under Article I, Section 7, Clause 2, laws passed by Congress need the action or inaction of the President (the veto power) before they are allowed to become laws. This requirement satisfies separation of powers and checks and balances doctrine. One would argue that Congress passed the charging statute, with the President's action or inaction. One would argue that a legitimate President must satisfy the eligibility requirements of Article II, Section 1, Clause 5, which contains the "natural born Citizen" clause. Then one would argue that the law is not valid because it never was presented to a legitimate President for consideration under Article I, Section 7, Clause 2, arguing that Obama is not a legitimate President because he does not meet the requirements of the "natural born Citizen" clause..."
The gutless cowards in the Outlaw Congress, as quietly as possible, once again have all participated in the biggest fraud ever committed against the American people next to the Federal Reserve Banking Act of 1913:
Electoral College count affirms Obama's win
http://devvy.net/cgi-bin/dada/mail.cgi/r/alerts/448525752304/
January 4, 2013:
WASHINGTON — "Congress made the obvious official on Friday. President Barack Obama has been re-elected. In a joint session, Congress formally certified that Obama and Vice President Joe Biden were the winners in the November election with 332 electoral votes, well more than the 270 required. Republican Mitt Romney and his running mate, Rep. Paul Ryan of Wisconsin, won 206 votes."
I know Americans all across this country demanded electoral college delegates not cast their vote for the imposter. I know Americans practically begged the phony Michelle Bachmann, queen of the tea party movement to exercise her right to object to the vote. They also contacted Sen. Rand Paul to do it from the senate side. Both remained mute and refused to stand up for the U.S. Constitution, as did every member of Congress - including Mr. Constitution, Ron Paul, on January 9, 2009. THAT is how we got a fraud installed in the Dirty House in 2009.
One more try:
Chief Justice of the "Supreme" Court, John Roberts, who hallucinated the Obamacare as a tax, has scheduled a full hearing by the court for the Forgery-gate case that has been slowly moving along.
http://devvy.net/cgi-bin/dada/mail.cgi/r/alerts/119998619507/
Those of us following the most incredible acts of cowardice by federal judges and Secretary of States have seen every case kicked to protect an individual who committed perjury when he took the oath of office and has committed provable, criminal acts.
We know the "Supreme" Court has deliberately ducked the eligibility issue:
April 17, 2012: Justice Clarence Thomas: We're 'evading' eligibility
http://devvy.net/cgi-bin/dada/mail.cgi/r/alerts/708654534676/
"U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas told a House subcommittee that when it comes to determining whether a person born outside the 50 states can serve as U.S. president, the high court is “evading” the issue.
The comments came as part of Thomas’ testimony before a House appropriations panel discussing an increase in the Supreme Court’s budget earlier this week."
Will anything come of this latest conference scheduled by Roberts? I wish I could say yes, but look at the court. Ruth Bader Ginsburg, CFR liberal, Sotomayer who should have been indicted for fixing bankruptcy cases and tax evasion, Elena Kagan, a Marxist and so on. I guess we'll wait and see.
Personally, I think the court is just playing the American people, again. Throw the great unwashed some scaps from Longshanks table. Get everyone's hopes up and then dash them. They could care less because no matter how corrupt and how bad their decisions are, they know the U.S. Congress doesn't have the guts to remove one of them.
No comments:
Post a Comment