Thursday, January 31, 2013

: 67% Of Repubs Want Obama Impeached; 15% Of Blacks Support Impeachment


Texas: 67% Of Repubs Want Obama Impeached; 15% Of Blacks Support Impeachment


67 Percent of Texas Republicans Want Obama Impeached
By Noel Sheppard @ News Busters

If Democrats are serious about trying to turn Texas blue, they should get a gander at a just-released poll of Lone Star State voters that found 67 percent of Republican respondents support theimpeachment of President Obama.

Of greater concern for liberals: the poll was conducted by the left-leaning Public Policy Polling.

As a whole, Texans opposed impeachment 50 percent to 39 percent.

But in the crosstabs, PPP broke this down by party affiliation with Democrats opposed 83 percent to 12 percent, Republicans in favor 67 percent to 18 percent, and Independents opposed 54 percent to 32 percent.

Amazing that even 12 percent of Democrats support impeachment.

Also interesting was the racial breakdown concerning this issue with Whites supporting impeachment 48 percent to 41 percent, Blacks opposed 80 percent to 15 percent, and Hispanics opposed 58 percent to 30 percent.

Again, it's amazing that even 15 percent of Blacks would support his impeachment.

CONTINUED HERE: http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2013/01/30/67-percent-texas-republicans-want-obama-impeached

Candidate For Nevada Governor: No Need To Impeach Obama; He Was Never Eligible - VIDEO HERE.



2006: Obama In Kenya: I Am So Proud To Come Back Home - VIDEO HERE. 

2007Michelle Obama Declares Obama Is Kenyan And America Is Mean - VIDEO HERE. 

2008: Michelle Obama Declares Barack Obama's Home Country Is Kenya - VIDEO HERE. 

FLASHBACK: Obama Is The Original Birther! Obama In 1991 Stated In His Own Bio He Was Born In Kenya. DETAILS HERE. 




WATCH SHERIFF OBAMA INVESTIGATION PRESS CONFERENCE HERECLICK HERE.

-ARTICLE II ELIGIBILITY FACTS HERE: http://www.art2superpac.com/issues.html

Fox News (News Corp) supports Democrats more than Republicans

For many Americans, Fox News is their “alternative” choice for news.
They’ve made it the No. 1 cable news network, largely because they believe its “fair and balanced” promotional slogan.

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2013/01/is-fox-news-really-different/#zmdzUO65xRIw1hqO.99 


Wednesday, January 30, 2013

How the Ruling Elite Plans to Kill the Rest of US!

MENSA HEALTH SCIENCE SEMINAR




 MENSA HEALTH SCIENCE SEMINAR
 N  TOXIC BREW  N
                                                                             (open to the public)

Are you exposing your family to a TOXIC BREW at home?

Exposure to many common household cleaners may be making you & your children sick!

“We are conducting an enormous experiment on our children.
People assume that if it is on the store shelf, it has been tested and it is safe, but you can not make that assumption…”
Kathy Cooper, Sr Environmental Law Researcher

2PM - SATURDAY, FEBRUARY 2ND
10202 Vanderbilt Dr, (NE corner @ 102nd Ave) Naples, FL 34108

We will be looking at some of the N hidden dangers N lurking under our sinks in products like:         

N  Air Freshener (aerosol)          N Automatic Dishwashing Liquid and Powder     N Bleach (liquid and powdered)
N Carpet Shampoo                     N Drain Cleaner                                                N Fabric Softener Sheets
N Mouthwash                N Perfume/Cologne                                           N Window Cleaner

Despite the chemical industry uproar and legal threats,
we have a copy of the video which cleaning product manufacturers DO NOT want you to see!

N  TOXIC BREW   N

Learn what we can do to be responsible caretakers for our loved ones and our earth!

We seem to be a society obsessed with cleanliness. We want our whites whiter and our bathrooms and kitchens hospital-grade disinfected. Industry has answered: today's cleaning products promise faster, easier, and better results with no scrubbing. But is our clean-freak streak harming our kids? In this video, we ask several experts, including a toxicologist, a senior researcher, a prominent pediatrician, an indoor air quality specialist, and an expert on chemical hazardous information. You'll be shocked at what they tell us.

Many childhood illnesses are rising at a very worrisome rate. Respiratory illness is now the leading cause of admission to hospitals for children. Childhood asthma has jumped by 400 percent over the last 20 years. Learning problems like ADD are on the rise. After injuries, cancer is now the leading cause of death in children between the ages of 5 and 9. Incredibly, most of the 80,000 chemicals in common use today have never been checked for harmful effects to our children's immature brains and immune systems.

Monday, January 28, 2013

Candidate For Nevada Governor: No Need To Impeach Obama; He Was Never Eligible - VIDEO BELOW: - Hat tip CommieBlaster.

Candidate For Nevada Governor: No Need To Impeach Obama; He Was Never Eligible  - VIDEO BELOW: - Hat tip CommieBlaster.







2006: Obama In Kenya: I Am So Proud To Come Back Home - VIDEO HERE. 

2007: Michelle Obama Declares Obama Is Kenyan And America Is Mean - VIDEO HERE. 

2008: Michelle Obama Declares Barack Obama's Home Country Is Kenya - VIDEO HERE. 

FLASHBACK: Obama Is The Original Birther! Obama In 1991 Stated In His Own Bio He Was Born In Kenya. DETAILS HERE. 




WATCH SHERIFF OBAMA INVESTIGATION PRESS CONFERENCE HERECLICK HERE.

-ARTICLE II ELIGIBILITY FACTS HERE: http://www.art2superpac.com/issues.html

Pastor Manning To Black Community: Obama's Entire History Nonexistent; All Records Sealed


Pastor Manning To Black Community: Obama's Entire History Nonexistent; All Records Sealed



Pastor Manning To Black Community: Obama's Entire History Nonexistent; All Records Sealed - VIDEO BELOW:





2006: Obama In Kenya: I Am So Proud To Come Back Home - VIDEO HERE. 

2007: Michelle Obama Declares Obama Is Kenyan And America Is Mean - VIDEO HERE. 

2008: Michelle Obama Declares Barack Obama's Home Country Is Kenya - VIDEO HERE. 

FLASHBACK: Obama Is The Original Birther! Obama In 1991 Stated In His Own Bio He Was Born In Kenya. DETAILS HERE. 




WATCH SHERIFF OBAMA INVESTIGATION PRESS CONFERENCE HERECLICK HERE.

-ARTICLE II ELIGIBILITY FACTS HERE: http://www.art2superpac.com/issues.html

Evidence Of Fraud: Private Investigator Neil Sankey & Obama's Social Security Numbers


Evidence Of Fraud: Private Investigator Neil Sankey & Obama's Social Security Numbers


hat tip sa ]
The Obama Investigation: Evidence of Fraud; Neil Sankey and Obama's Multiple Social Security Numbers - VIDEO BELOW:



For newcomers here's Mr. Sankey's list of addresses and social security numbers purportedly connected to Obama:


FLASHBACK: Private Investigators Response To Snopes About Obama's Connecticut Social Security Number - DETAILS HERE.



2006: Obama In Kenya: I Am So Proud To Come Back Home - VIDEO HERE. 

2007: Michelle Obama Declares Obama Is Kenyan And America Is Mean - VIDEO HERE. 

2008: Michelle Obama Declares Barack Obama's Home Country Is Kenya - VIDEO HERE. 

FLASHBACK: Obama Is The Original Birther! Obama In 1991 Stated In His Own Bio He Was Born In Kenya. DETAILS HERE. 




WATCH SHERIFF OBAMA INVESTIGATION PRESS CONFERENCE HERECLICK HERE.

-ARTICLE II ELIGIBILITY FACTS HERE: http://www.art2superpac.com/issues.html

Team Arpaio: New Evidence Will Convince Greatest Skeptic Document Is 100% Forgery


Team Arpaio: New Evidence Will Convince Greatest Skeptic Document Is 100% Forgery



Video Update: Sheriff Joe Arpaio's Lead Investigator Mike Zullo; 
Newly Found Evidence Will Convince Greatest Skeptic 
Document Is 100% Forgery; The Evidence Is Beyond A Reasonable Doubt

Sheriff Joe Arpaio's lead Obama investigator Mike Zullo appeared on Carl Gallups' radio show Freedom Friday. Zullo repeated that the Obama investigation never stopped and that the only thing that stopped is the media coverage around the investigation....

Zullo says; "We are so convinced... let me go out on limb... I am going to put my reputation out there that we have evidence beyond a reasonable doubt--the higher standard--beyond  a reasonable doubt that this document is an utter forgery."

Zullo also says; "the evidence we have acquired, new found evidence that we have never made public at any point in time, and we are not going to make public until we have the right opportunity, will convince even the greatest skeptic that this document is 100% a forgery."

Much more in the interview. The segments regarding the Obama investigation in one video here: - WEBY's podcasts here.





2006: Obama In Kenya: I Am So Proud To Come Back Home - VIDEO HERE. 

2007: Michelle Obama Declares Obama Is Kenyan And America Is Mean - VIDEO HERE. 

2008: Michelle Obama Declares Barack Obama's Home Country Is Kenya - VIDEO HERE. 

FLASHBACK: Obama Is The Original Birther! Obama In 1991 Stated In His Own Bio He Was Born In Kenya. DETAILS HERE. 




WATCH SHERIFF OBAMA INVESTIGATION PRESS CONFERENCE HERECLICK HERE.

-ARTICLE II ELIGIBILITY FACTS HERE: http://www.art2superpac.com/issues.html

Today’s “Perspective” section of the NDN published my “Doing Well By Doing Good” article.


Today’s “Perspective” section of the NDN published my “Doing Well By Doing Good” article.  The text is copied below.  Please share with your friends and send positive comments to Jeff Lytle - jflytle@naplesnews.com  I would also like feedback from all of you folks.



Doing Well by Doing Good
Marketing and Management Science in the 21st Century
By Samuel Sewell
(239) 591-4565

Benjamin Franklin understood that enlightened and ethical business practices produce more profit when he advised, “Do well by doing good.”  Over the history of American capitalism other entrepreneurs have prospered through application of this principle.   A short video featuring Harvard Business School historian Nancy Koehn makes the point that earlier entrepreneurs were driven by their own personal philosophy; that doing “good” for their people means that their business will do very well.

But it wasn’t until the 1960s that modern management science began to teach students that they can create stable wealth by doing “good” for their employees, their customers, and their communities. 

Today there is excellent data, both qualitative and quantitative, that a company’s successful relationship with people is positively related to its financial performance.

Maslow, Drucker, McGregor, and Nash is not a law firm. MDMN is an acronym I created to serve as a reference point for this discussion on modern marketing and management science.
Abraham Maslow, through his books and teachings brought us Management Psychology. Maslow, the father of modern management states: "The good society is one in which virtue pays."
Peter Drucker's 39 books have been translated into more than thirty languages; "I became an immediate convert--Maslow's evidence is overwhelming. But to date very few people have paid much attention." -- Peter Drucker, 1999
"He (Maslow) wrote Eupsychian Management to bring McGregor and me down to earth." -- Peter Drucker, 1995
Douglas McGregor, Ph.D. in psychology from Harvard University was a Management professor at the MIT Sloan School of Management.  His 1960 book The Human Side of Enterprise, had a profound influence on education practices; “The ingenuity of the average worker is sufficient to outwit any system of controls devised by management.”
“Any attempt by management to enforce behavior that is contrary to human nature is preordained to fail. Conversely, management methods that compliment human nature are sure to provide wealth and well being for all concerned.”
John Nash, In “A Beautiful Mind,” Nash is at a bar with a group of friends when he begins to develop the theory of what is now called Nash equalibria, the idea that won him the Nobel Prize and the respect of his colleagues and loved ones, despite his schizophrenia.
At the bar, he and his friends begin to compete for a beautiful blonde in a group of five women. “If we all go for the blonde,” Nash says, “we block each other; not a single one of us is going to get her…and we insult the other girls. But, what if no one goes for the blonde? We don’t get in each others’ way, and we don’t insult the other girls. It’s the only way to win….the best result comes from everyone in the room doing what’s best for himself and for the group.”
The two most important conclusions are gleaned from John Nash’s equations;
1. More profit is created through cooperation than through competition.
2. Nice guys finish first.
For more background we suggest becoming familiar with the works of Peter Drucker, "The Essential Drucker." Abraham Maslow “Maslow On Management” (originally titled Eupsychian Management) as well as Douglas McGregor’s “Managing the Human Side of Enterprise.” And find out why John Nash won the Nobel Prize for Economics in 1994.

While these ideas were slow to catch on, today’s upper echelon management professionals strive to find creative applications for these principles.  At Best Self USA we do Executive Coaching.  We have noticed that many business professionals are unfamiliar with modern management science. 

One can hardly complete a business course on the college level without being introduced to the difference between the “X” and “Y” theories of management, as well as Maslow’s needs hierarchy, these classes do not provide adequate familiarization with modern management science, nor do they really explain Maslow in relationship to management.

Most courses fail to adequately convey the idea that profits are maximized when respect for the “human side of enterprise” is obvious.  Maybe an additional problem is that students of business do the same thing with their subjects as I did with Algebra.  I did what I needed to graduate and have never worked another algebra problems for the rest of my life.

We have created a research paper tracking the history and guiding principles of modern management science and published it free of charge at: http://excellentexecutive.blogspot.com/  I hope this helps remind business people of their college days, and encourages them to use proven profit enhancement principles based on “good guys finish first.”

(Exactly 750 words sans title and attribution)
Sam Sewell, is Director of Best Self USA, a Psychotherapist, an Executive Coach, an ordained Christian clergyman, a member of Mensa, a U.S. Navy Veteran, and a Member of the Association For Intelligence Officers.  He is a frequent commentator on mental health issues and management science. His award winning research on Family issues is published in several languages.  Member of Sigma Delta Chi Honor Society 

Friday, January 25, 2013

Obama's Connecticut Social Security Number Failed E-Verify System


Obama's Connecticut Social Security Number Failed E-Verify System



- Obama's Connecticut Social Security Number Flagged By E-Verify -


Employer Linda Jordan Explains How Obama's CT Social Security Number Failed E-Verify System - VIDEO HERE:



LiveLeak.com: Obama's Connecticut Social Security Number Failed E-Verify - FULL INTERVIEW HERE

Linda Jordan Fined By The Court Nearly $13,000 For Challenging Obama's Eligibility - DETAILS HERE

Failed E-Verify Letter To Barack Obama  - Obama's Connecticut Social Security Number - LETTER HERE:


SSA Found Discrepancy In Obama's CT Social Security Number Record - DETAILS HERE 

Obama Guilty Of At Least One Felony Punishable By $250,000 Fine, Up To 5 years In prison. DETAILS HERE 

Letter to Senator Bill Nelson (D-FL)


Letter to Senator Bill Nelson (D-FL)

Last week I heard a sound byte in which you expressed apprehension over having to go after a huge python while being armed with only a machete. You then went on to say that you'd much prefer to be equipped with a shotgun. I also viewed a video clip depicting you embarking on a hunt for pythons in the Florida Everglades. Thus having learned that you are a hunter, I was moderately encouraged to the point of hoping that you might approach the issue of gun control with more rationality and less hysteria than many of your colleagues in the Senate are presently doing.

I have never owned a gun of any sort (except for a water-pistol which I occasionally used to extinguish cigarettes in the mouths of students who were openly violating a rule against smoking in the hallways at a foreign university where I taught for a while). However, well before the tragic shootings in Newtown, CT, on Dec 14, 2012, I had already been seriously considering purchasing one gun (only one) and taking instruction in its proper use for self-defense. I'm a 66-year-old never-married old-maid, only 5 feet tall and weighing only 100 pounds. I live alone with my Boston terrier (a dependable barker but an incapable protector) out in the boonies of [Redacted] County, [xx] miles from the county seat and about [x] miles from the nearest sheriff's department sub-station. If a hostile intruder should threaten me, even a prompt response to a 911 call would not be soon enough to prevent violence being done to me. In fact, my home was burglarized in [spring] 2003 while I was overseas for an extended period. My neighbor, knowing that I was away, called the sheriff's office when she noticed that my front door was open. When I subsequently obtained a copy of the official report on the incident, I was told that evidence of marijuana smoking had been found on the premises.

My father COULD have given me all the firearms instruction I would have ever needed, but I was not interested in learning such skills during my youth. I gave up after the first (and only) time that I pinched my finger while holding a gun under the careful supervision of my father, who was the most careful gun owner that I've ever known. He was meticulously careful with his large collection of assorted firearms, and he had very strict rules concerning handling them. If any visitor violated any of his rules, that person was firmly ordered to leave the premises. Furthermore, there was NEVER any gun-related accident in my parents' home where I lived for the first 22 years of my life, nor was there ever any such incident, even until the time my father died when I was 38 years old. I treasure his belt-buckle which says, "They'll take my guns from me when they pry them from my dead fingers."

Of course  Rep. Charles Rangel (D-NY) would patronizingly point to my father as a prime example for his [Rangel's] recent remark on MSNBC in endorsement of New York's new hastily legislated restrictions on private ownership of guns: "New York is a little different and more progressive in a lot of areas than some other states," he said. "Some of the southern areas have cultures that we have to overcome." Whose culture would he impose on us? Would it be one like that of New York City, which reportedly had  400+ murders, 1400+ rapes, 20000+ robberies, 19300+ felonious assaults, 19000+ burglaries and 42300+ grand larcenies last year alone?

Rep. Rangel and other like-minded members of both houses of Congress would do well to heed former President Bill Clinton's remarks to the Obama National Finance Committee on Jan 19 with regard to gun issues: Do not patronize the passionate supporters of your opponents by looking down your nose at them.” [http://www.politico.com/story/2013/01/bill-clinton-to-democrats-dont-trivialize-gun-culture-86443.html]

Sen. Nelson, the USA does NOT need any more gun-control laws! Criminals know where to go on the black market to obtain all the weapons they desire. Requiring nationwide registration of all firearms will eventually lead to nationwide confiscation from law-abiding citizens. "Confiscation could never happen in the USA"??? German citizens who elected Adolph Hitler in 1933 didn't think confiscation would ever occur there, either. 

Dr. David Healy, an internationally renowned psychiatrist, psychopharmacologist, professor of psychiatry in Wales, founder & CEO of Data Based Medicine Limited [https://www.rxisk.org], and former Secretary of the British Association for Psychopharmacology, is the author of more than 150 peer-reviewed articles, 200 miscellaneous articles, and 20 books. His research focuses on clinical trials in psychopharmacology, psychopharmacological history, and the impact of both trials and psychotropic drugs on Western culture. He has served as an expert witness in homicide and suicide trials involving psychotropic drugs, and has endeavored to bring problems with such drugs to the attention of both American and British regulatory agencies [http://davidhealy.org/david-healy-bio/ ; http://davidhealy.org/articles/#journalpublications ; http://davidhealy.org/books/]

In a recent interview with WorldNetDaily, Dr. Healy unequivocally stated that psychotropic drugs, widely used as antidepressants, “prescribed for school children cause violent behavior...." Moreover, such drugs can make children “aggressive and hostile” and possibly suicidal. He also warned concerning a very high correlation between mass shootings and the use of SSRI [selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor] drugs: “When roughly nine out of every 10 cases in these school shootings and mass shootings involve these drugs being prescribed, then at least a significant proportion of these cases were either caused by the drugs or the drugs made a significant contribution to the problem.” [http://www.wnd.com/2013/01/top-psychiatrist-meds-behind-school-massacres/]

Also, please consider the actual outcome of Australia's enactment of very strict gun laws in response to a mass shooting in 1996. Although former Prime Minister John Howard wrote in an Op-Ed published in the New York Times on Jan 17, "Few Australians would deny that their country is safer today as a consequence of gun control” [http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/17/opinion/australia-banned-assault-weapons-america-can-too.html?_r=1&], it should, nevertheless, be noted that the homicide rate in Australia had already been falling prior to 1996 and that mass shootings in fact constitute only a small percentage of all homicides.

A study published by the Brookings Institution in 2003, "Australia: A Massive Buy back of Low-Risk Guns,” observed that

. . .the interventions had modest effects on the extent of suicide and violent crime. Suicide rates did not fall, though there was a shift toward less use of guns, continuing a very long-term decline. Homicides continued a modest decline; taking into account die [sic] one-time effect of the Port Arthur massacre itself, the share of murders committed with firearms declined sharply. Other violent crime, such as armed robbery, continued to increase, but again with fewer incidents that involved firearms. This relatively small effect is hardly surprising given that the type of firearms prohibited had not previously been used frequently in crime or suicide, as well as the low power of the potential tests, with less than five years of postban data. However, the principal goal of the intervention was ending the mass murders; in the five years since the buyback, there has been a modest reduction in the severity of these murders, and none have involved firearms, though the frequency of these events is so low that not much can be inferred from this occurrence. [http://www.popcenter.org/problems/gun_violence/PDFs/Reuter_Mouzos_2003.pdf]

Moreover, researchers at the University of Melborne in 2008, after re-analyzing the same data used in earlier studies, concluded that "the NFA [National Firearms Agreement] did not have any large effects on reducing firearm homicide or suicide rates.”  [http://www.melbourneinstitute.com/miaesr/publications/working-paper-series/abstract-178.html]

Before any member of Congress votes to enact even one additional restriction on the Second Amendment rights of Americans, each should carefully study the Genocide Chart compiled by Jews for the Preservation of Firearms Ownership, available for download at http://jpfo.org/pdf02/genocide-chart.pdf. It is a historical fact that, in the 20th Century alone, evil governments in nations such as Ottoman Turkey, the Soviet Union, Nazi Germany, China, Guatemala, Uganda, Cambodia, and Rwanda eliminated 170,000,000 lives by execution after disarming their respective civilian populations.

Sen. Nelson, I agree with Corporal Joshua Boston, USMC (2004-2012), who recently wrote in an open letter to Sen. Diane Feinstein: "I will not register my weapons should this bill [the one introduced in the Senate on Jan 24] be passed, as I do not believe it is the government’s right to know what I own. Nor do I think it prudent to tell you what I own so that it may be taken from me by a group of people who enjoy armed protection yet decry me having the same a crime....” [http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=UR3IshaCZyY]

Sen. Nelson, please remember your oath of office: "I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic...." The US Constitution is currently under attack from domestic enemies of the Second Amendment, some of whom even claim to believe in it. I will be closely following this issue.

Cheryl J. Rutledge, Ph.D.
Musician, Educator, Editor
www.AcademicEnglishEditing-DrRutledge.com




Lord of the Flies - Beelzebub


Wednesday, January 23, 2013

The De Facto President Of The United States: Barack Obama Is Not A Natural Born Citizen


The De Facto President Of The United States: Barack Obama Is Not A Natural Born Citizen


Barack Obama: The De Facto President of the United States-
Maybe a Born Citizen But Not A "Natural Born Citizen"
By Mario Apuzzo, Esq.

Barack Obama eligibility supporters maintain that he is an Article II “natural born Citizen” and therefore eligible to be President. But to do so, they have blended together, through ignorance or intent, “citizen,” “born citizen,” and “natural born Citizen,” and denied that there is a critical constitutional distinction between these phrases. These supporters and enablers, who I call the citizen/born citizen/natural born citizen conflationists, in constitutionally supporting Barack Obama to be president, have allowed our Constitution, the rule of law, and our nation to be violated. Allow me to explain.

In order to understand the meaning of an Article II “natural born Citizen,” we have to understand the constitutional distinction between a “citizen,” “born citizen,” and “natural born Citizen.” The first constitutional distinction is between “citizen” and “natural born Citizen.” In Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 the Framers provided in pertinent part: “No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution shall be eligible to the Office of President.” Here, we see the Framers distinguished between a “natural born Citizen” and a “Citizen of the United States.” There is no other type of “citizen” mentioned. So, our Constitution, Acts of Congress, and treaties, call “citizens,” or members of the United States, either “natural born Citizens” or “citizens of the United States.” As we shall see, the former are defined by American common law (the definition being based on natural law and the law of nations) and the latter by the Fourteenth Amendment (the definition being in part based on colonial English common law), Congressional Acts, or treaties. From this we can see that a “citizen” is either a “natural born Citizen” or a “citizen of the United States.” Because of therequirement of having to be born in the country to citizen parents, a “natural born Citizen” will necessarily also qualify under these sources as a “citizen of the United States.”

CONTINUED HERE: http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2013/01/barack-obama-de-facto-president-of.html

Irrefutable Proof That Obama Is Not Eligible To Be President Of The United States - DETAILS HERE.





2006: Obama In Kenya: I Am So Proud To Come Back Home - VIDEO HERE. 

2007: Michelle Obama Declares Obama Is Kenyan And America Is Mean - VIDEO HERE. 

2008: Michelle Obama Declares Barack Obama's Home Country Is Kenya - VIDEO HERE. 

FLASHBACK: Obama Is The Original Birther! Obama In 1991 Stated In His Own Bio He Was Born In Kenya. DETAILS HERE. 




WATCH SHERIFF OBAMA INVESTIGATION PRESS CONFERENCE HERECLICK HERE.

-ARTICLE II ELIGIBILITY FACTS HERE: http://www.art2superpac.com/issues.html