Open Appeal to Foreign Media From Citizens of the United States!

Open Appeal to Foreign Media From Citizens of the United States!

After hearing how, thus far, only the media in other countries are willing to take on the story of Obama's lack of legitimate Constitutional status, I've come to a conclusion. We might be wasting our time sending our news releases and research to media outlets in the United States. The United States no longer has freedom of the press. Perhaps we should be sending our news releases and research to foreign media.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
PRAVDA publishes Mark McGrew's latest article
http://thesteadydrip.blogspot.com/2009/04/pravda-publishes-mark-mcgrews-latest.html

URGENT OBAMA UPDATE!Grand Jury: Indict Barry Soetoro aka Barack Obama
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Fokus, Macedonia 's leading magazine (read widely throughout the Balkans), dedicates four pages to a cover story regarding Obama's eligibility and his possible Narcissistic Personality Disorder.

Whistleblower Magazine is mentioned. Sam Sewell, Ali Sina, Sam Vaknin, and many others who are leaders in the effort to discover what AKA Obama is hiding are featured.

The article is very thorough and balanced, and regards the eligibility issue as a true problem, especially in light of Obama's curious refusal to come clean with countervailing evidence.

The article, written by the Deputy Editor, Zoran Dimitrovski, and published in the May 8th edition, is mentioned on the cover and on pages 24-29 under the subtitle: "Is Obama a Constitutional President?"
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
The United States once had allies. Most of them are now nervous, depressed, or outright ticked off. So, we appeal to our former allies. “We the People” can mail, email, fax, post, and call the media and officials of other nations throughout the world. We tell them that America is basically being held hostage.

Millions of Americans are well aware that Obama is not a legal president, but our institutions are involved in a conspiracy against the people, and this urgent issue is not being addressed. Remind our foreign allies that all the actions Obama is taking will be ruled invalid once this all comes to light, so it is important to resolve this issue before any more damage is done.

Appeal to our former allies to ask themselves the tough question; Why should they deal with a country when its new leader might not be legitimate? Should they agree to any summit or treaty when it might be attended by an usurper working against America's will and the world's best interests?

Once they realize the truth--that this is not just a few nuts on the internet—watch the rumble crescendo! England is already disgusted with this usurper. Israel realizes it has lost its number one partner. Australia has already started down the liberal path and knows where we are headed. When some of the most powerful nations on Earth start to ask questions, perhaps America will finally wake up and realize that she MUST deal with her problem!

We need to inform our own media and corrupt leaders that we plan to bring this issue to a bigger audience; to freedom loving people everywhere, and FREE press where ever it can still be found.

America has asked for and accepted help from other countries in the past. Without that aid, the Constitution might never have been written. It only seems natural that we ask for aid again, as we have another tyrannical foreign dictator to get off our backs.

So, the news release below is being sent to as many foreign media outlets as we can find. We invite others to locate foreign media contacts and forward this document.
Freedom loving peoples everywhere; we need your help!
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
"NATIONAL GRAND JURY INDICTS OBAMA FOR FRAUD AND TREASON" -


News Release
Press Contact:
Sam Sewell,
National Spokesperson for American Grand Jury
http://americangrandjury.org/
Email: writerpromo@comcast.net
Fax (239) 591-1987P
hone: Clinic Office – (239) 591-4565
Ask for Dr. Sam
“NATIONAL GRAND JURY INDICTS OBAMA FOR FRAUD AND TREASON”
No embargo: For immediate release

(United States of America) – April 29th 2009 - At 8 P.M, ET American Grand Jury convened and conducted a hearing with regard to CRIMINAL activity, complaints and allegations presented before said Jury. After reviewing the evidence and voting, American Grand Jury members from many states issued the documents for presentment to jurisdictions throughout the nation recommending that person(s) known as Barack Obama, aka: Barack Obama, Jr., aka: Barack Hussein Obama, aka: Barry Soetoro, aka: Barry Obama, aka: Barack H. Obama, aka: Barack Obama II, presumed President of the United States, be tried in Criminal Court for charges of fraud (eligibility) and treason.

Said Grand Jury was convened under the power and authority vested with the people as guaranteed under the Constitution of the United States of America.

The American Grand Jury was served by people of the United States; said people being citizens as were sworn under Oath as to Eligibility for and Service in behalf of the Grand Jury.

The American Grand Jury used established public evidence and testimony of recognized by expert witnesses with a long professional history of forensic experience.

Caveat: Contents of Grand Jury hearings are confidential, and can only be released by the presiding courts.

For an unofficial review and summary of the issues that is available in the public domain see:AKA Obama Fans: All together now – say OMG!!http://thesteadydrip.blogspot.com/2009/04/aka-obama-fans-all-together-now-say-omg.html

Pouring Oil on Troubled Waters

Pouring Oil on Troubled WatersThe calming effect of oil was known to the ancient Greeks. In 1762, Benjamin Franklin repeated an experiment first performed by Pliny, which he reported in A Letter from Benjamin Franklin to William Brownrigg, 1773:

“I then went to the windward side where they (the waves) began to form; and there the oil, though not more than a teaspoonful, produced an instant calm over a space several yards square which spread amazingly and extended itself gradually till it reached the lee side, making all that quarter of the pond, perhaps half an acre, as smooth as a looking glass.”

A strong wind that goes by many names is troubling the waters in America. I don’t have enough metaphorical oil to calm the metaphorical troubled waters of all America. However, maybe I have enough oil to calm the trouble stirred up by issues surrounding the Grand Jury effort to indict AKA Obama.

Something as dramatic as citizens themselves deciding to take action by forming Grand Juries to indict a President is certain to stir up emotions on both sides of the issue. My goal in this essay is to replace impulsive emotions with facts and reason.Let me start with the dangers that emotions can present as a component to solving problems.

Every thought we think changes the activity of specific chemicals in the brain called neuropeptides. What we are thinking about determines what our emotions are.

Interestingly, certain kinds of thinking produce more emotional chemicals than other types of thinking. Analytical, organizational, logistical, and mathematical thinking produces very few emotions. That is why accountants, technical professionals, and mathematicians seem to be so emotionally flat.

Conversely, creative, poetic, descriptive, and interpersonal thinking produces many emotions. People like actors, writers, musicians, and artists frequently have enough emotions for a family of four all by themselves.Emotions cloud our thinking, cause us to be impulsive, and alienate others. Problem solving is better served by reason than by feelings.

So let’s begin with all of those irrational fear mongers who are trying to discourage people from participating in a Grand Jury. From them, we are hearing things like: “People can’t go around just starting their own ‘pretend’ Grand Juries. That has got to be against the law. You’ll get arrested. You will go to jail for falsifying a court document and impersonating a court official. You have no right to do such a thing!”

Compare such scare tactics aimed at frightening citizens to this clearly stated, rational wording in the Handbook of Texas:“The grand jury's investigation of any matter may be initiated by the court, the district attorney, its own members, or any credible person. The grand jury may summon witnesses by subpoena and examine them under oath. On completion of an investigation the grand jury determines by vote whether or not an indictment should be presented to the court; nine votes are necessary for a decision to indict, and nine members also constitute a quorum.”

I have also heard anti-grand Jury people making emotionally driven arguments like: “Ordinary people can’t just go around making decisions in Grand Juries without being supervised by a lawyer. The whole justice system will fall apart if lawyers aren’t supervising Grand Juries. Who knows what horrible injustices they will commit without a lawyer to guide them?”

In many states governmental lawyers are not only NOT welcome in Grand Jury sessions, they are actually banned by law from any participation in Grand Jury sessions. Take Virginia, for example. The mere presence of a lawyer representing the government will invalidate any decision of a Grand Jury. Without the dramatic rhetoric, see how the State of Virginia explains the Grand Jury’s relationship to any such attorneys."To keep the Grand Jury free from any pressure from the State, Virginia makes it illegal for any attorney representing the State to appear before the Grand Jury, except as a witness.If, however, members of the Grand Jury have questions about their duties, they may ask the Commonwealth's Attorney for advice. Except for these two cases, if a Commonwealth's Attorney appears in the Grand Jury Room while the Grand Jury is there, any indictment returned "A True Bill" by the Grand Jury is invalid (no good). Therefore, while a Grand Jury may request the appearance of the Commonwealth's Attorney to testify as a witness or to explain some principle of law about the discharge of their duties, they cannot seek his advice as to whether they should return an indictment as "A True Bill." If a Grand Jury finds that it is in need of advice as to its duties but doesn't know if it can invite the Commonwealth's Attorney into the Grand Jury Room to explain, it should notify the judge that it desires further instructions, and it will receive such instructions in open court. "

So, far from citizens not having the authority to form Grand Juries, and far from citizens not being able to function in a grand jury without the advice of an attorney, we discover that the Grand Jury option is designed to be initiated by citizens and to function free from the influence of governmental attorneys.

Although the laws may vary from state to state, Grand Juries are viewed the way United States Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia sees them,“In fact, the whole theory of its function is that it belongs to no branch of the institutional Government, serving as a kind of buffer or referee between the Government and the people." Also, United States Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia ruled in the case of United States vs. Williams, 504 U.S. 36 at 48 (1992):“Rooted in long centuries of Anglo-American history, Hannah v. Larche, 363 US 420, 490 (1960) with J. Frankfurter concurring in result, the Grand Jury is mentioned in the Bill of Rights, but not in the body of the Constitution. It has not been textually assigned, therefore, to any of the three branches described in the first three Articles. It is a constitutional fixture in its own right.”

Clearly stated: The Grand Jury is a separate and equal Constitutional power.

The Grand Jury is not a tool for government to use against its citizens.

So my first teaspoon of rational oil is to still the waters roiled by those who intentionally promulgate unfounded rumors. They are so threatened by the constitutional power of the Grand Jury that they irresponsibly spread their reckless gossip in an attempt to frighten citizens away from exercising their legitimate constitutional rights.

My second teaspoon of rational oil is to be used to still all the angry anti-AKA Obama citizens who use more rhetoric than reason to express themselves.

There are not going to be any lynch parties for politicians. As much as we might mention ‘torches and pitchforks,’ the only revolution I support and the only revolutions supported by the leadership of the Grand Jury movement is a revolution as defined by the U. S. Constitution.

Our forefathers had the wisdom to provide a way for citizens to redress their grievances in a peaceful way.

If you personally have any other intentions, please remove yourself from my email list and do not post on this blog. If you express irresponsible rhetoric that even hints of any action that is not covered by your constitutional rights, please disassociate yourself from the Grand Jury movement. Such attitudes are more of a liability than an asset to the cause.We welcome and appreciate patriots who are committed to the principles of Constitutional Government.

A little reminder from some old friends of mine:
You say you got a real solution
Well, you know
We'd all love to see the plan
You ask me for a contribution
Well, you knowWe're doing what we can
But when you want moneyfor people with minds that hate
All I can tell is brother you have to wait

Now read this. Sit back, relax and enjoy. It is 3800 hopeful wordsAKA Obama Fans: All together now – say OMG!!