Saturday, September 5, 2009

Obama Eligibility Logic Test

Obama Eligibility Logic Test

Here is my birth certificate. No, that isn’t true. To be accurate I need to say, “Here is a scanned copy of my alleged “CERTIFICATE OF VITAL RECORD” that has not been vetted by qualified forensic document examiners.”

Bunny and I are about to leave on an all expense paid trip to the Mayan Riviera compliments of Shaklee Corporation.
Click this link above to see a virtual tour of our destination!

I do not have a passport. If I send a link to the “scanned copy of my alleged birth certificate that has not been vetted by forensic document examiners” to the State Department, do you think they will send me a passport? No, they will not! I might protest, “But I put it on the Internet for all to see! I released my birth certificate to the public.” “No”, they would say “You released a scanned copy of an alleged birth certificate that has not been vetted by forensic document examiners. We need the original document.” I might protest by saying. “It hasn’t been altered (except for the little detail of obscuring the official number on the document); it has a doctor’s signature, the name of the hospital, my parent’s signature and everything!” “Nope,” they would say, and if I insisted they might notice the line at the bottom “WARNING: IT IS ILLEGAL TO DUPLICATE THIS COPY” or “ANY ALTERATION OR ERASURE VOIDS THIS CERTIFICATE.”

So, unless I am able to provide authentic documentation, I will not be able to go on my fabulous, all expense paid vacation to the Mayan Riviera.

Yet there are people who live among us, and even have the right to vote, who think that if I presented my scanned "CERTIFICATE OF VITAL RECORD" during an election in the same manner, it would be enough evidence to prove that I am eligible to become President of the United States. And my altered, “scanned copy of an alleged birth certificate that has not been vetted by forensic document examiners” is far higher quality than has been offered by AKA Obama

AKA Obama has spent lots of money to keep the best available evidence secret. Let's just add suppression of evidence to the other charges of election fraud, campaign finance violations, and filing fraudulent documents in all 50 states. No matter what you might think, there is no escaping that AKA Obama is not practicing the virtue of full disclosure.

The entire reason there is a professional field known as forensic document examination is that a great deal can be told from examination of the original document itself. Far, far less can be told by looking at a photocopy of a document, and very little, if anything at all, can be told from looking at a digital image that purports to be an image of an original document. Too much opportunity for adulteration, no opportunity to examine the paper, the ink, and any impressions made on the paper, etc. These online arguments discussing images (especially photographic images) are like people studying animals by examining scat.

Forensic document examiner Sandra Ramsey Lines, (CV here ) a Former Federal Examiner with a long history of expert testimony in state and federal courts, has testified in an affidavit HERE that states, in part: “I can state with certainty that the COLB presented on the internet by the various groups, which include the “Daily Kos,” the Obama Campaign, “” and others cannot be relied upon as genuine. Dr. Polarik raises issues concerning the COLB that I can affirm. Software such as Adobe Photoshop can produce complete images or alter images that appear to be genuine; therefore, any image offered on the internet cannot be relied upon as being a copy of the authentic document.” Sandra Ramsey Lines’ summary is also posted at U. S. Law Blog.

Excerpted from:

Can Obama supporters see the logic here? Oh, I forgot, Obama supporters don’t use logic; not “warm and fuzzy” enough for them.


Raphael Hythloday said...

You're an idiot.

Aristotle The Hun said...

Hey Raphael,

See this:

Exposing Obama’s PSYOPS Agents and Tactics

Or this:

euphgeek said...

Very good, now let's see if you can just answer a few simple questions:

1) Where in the Constitution or any law does it say that a presidential candidate must hand his birth certificate over to members of the general public?

2) How many previous presidents have presented a copy of their birth certificate to the general public in any medium?

3) Do you really believe that Obama's worst political enemies, let something this big slide for whatever reason you think they let him win?

4) If Republicans' secret objective was to get a Democrat in the White House, why wouldn't Hillary Clinton have done just as well? All she would have had to do was expose Obama as someone who wasn't an American citizen and she'd be president today.

5) What will you do if somehow some activist conservative judge goes against all legal precedent as well as the Constitution, grants a lawyer discovery, Obama releases all his papers and they confirm that he was indeed born in Honolulu?

Aristotle The Hun said...

I would have expected a poll on how many people think Obama should release what he has been hiding to be 100%. Those who think he is a con-man would want it and those who think he is innocent of fraud would wan’t it. It would settle the matter. It is beyond me why any decent person would be opposed to the release of a politicians history, excepting the politician and his supporters, of course.

However, the missing birth certificate mjight just be a false clue:

Other records that he refuses to release are:

Obama/Dunham marriage license

Soetoro/Dunham marriage license

Soetoro adoption records

Punahou School records

Selective Service Registration(Released. But, is possibly an altered Document)

Occidental College records


Columbia College records

Columbia thesis

Harvard College records

Harvard Law Review articles(None (maybe 1, Not Signed)

University of Chicago scholarly articles(None)

Baptism certificate

Medical records

Law practice client list

Illinois State Senate records(None (Locked up to prohibit public view)

Illinois State Senate schedule(Lost (All other Illinois state senators’ records are intact)

With all of Obama’s different names, with his documented long term relations to convicted criminals, with his active efforts to prohibit us from knowing where he was born, with his active efforts to keep us from seeing his credentials, with his documented registration to practice law showing only one name, with his being an ex-attorney not authorized to practice law, but representing himself as such, with his non-existent “Office of The President Elect”, with the dozen or so lawsuits against him to prove his citizenship, with the various promises he made to voters and has since reneged on, with his documented complete lack of respect to America, with his refusal to salute the American flag and refusal to say the Pledge of Allegiance with others on stage and his other disrespectful actions, with his many millions of dollars in campaign funds suspected to be from foreign sources, with campaign donations accepted from possible terrorists groups, with his planned first official act as President to make a speech to the Muslim world in a Muslim Capitol, Obama has proven beyond a shadow of a doubt that he can not in any way, shape or form be trusted.

Aristotle The Hun said...

The party is charged with certifying the candidate.

The issue hasn't come up before in any substantial way. That is how Obama slithered through the cracks.

Soon there will be a law.

If there were a law do you think Obama will run again?