NEW RELEASE
MAKES A DOUBLE PLAY
Contact:
Another Case, and Another
The attention of
news reporters is drawn to the Florida Ballot Challenge case heard in Tallahassee on June 18.
Sam Sewell, Project Manager for the Florida Ballot Challenge is very
busy responding to inquiries about the case that is being reported by local,
state and national media. Sewell is also
reminding all interested parties that the Florida Ballot Challenge does not
have all of their eggs in one basket. “Our strategy from the beginning was to have
multiple cases in multiple jurisdictions using multiple legal tactics. We can provide legal fees for citizen
activists in every county in Florida
for what it costs to hire one attorney. Florida has other cases
pending”
Also on June 18th, the response to dismiss on one of those cases was filed. So, on July 10, 2012, at 3:30 pm, Florida Circuit Court Judge Stanley Mills will conduct a hearing on motions to dismiss on behalf of the defendants, Barack Obama and the State Executive Committee of the Florida Democratic Party. The hearing will be held at the
The
plaintiff in this case is Jerry Collette, a paralegal and the creator of the “Do It Yourself Ballot Challenge Kit.”
Collette’s creation can be used by citizens who want to start actions
against candidates not eligible to be on the Florida ballot. The organization’s goal is to have several
cases filed in the various Florida Judicial Districts. The Pasco County
suit is a different from the Mike Voeltz case in Tallahassee , and brought to the court under a
different legal theory. Voeltz brought his case under the election code,
whereas Collette has filed his case as a common law tort action. Collette is handling
his case himself. Jerry Collette
commented on his involvement in the case “As a paralegal, I follow legal cases in the same way other
people follow celebrities or sports. I have been following the eligibility
issue since it was first raised in 2008, but did not get involved. In February 2012, when an
administrative hearing was scheduled on the subject in Georgia, I was very
excited that it was finally going to be litigated. When I saw how the
administrative judge did a sideshow, rather than allowing the plaintiffs to
really get the evidence from Hawaii, I decided to see how I could help. I
looked into various possible strategies, and came up with a tort approach.”
Mike Voeltz, Sam Sewell, Jerry
Collette
Florida Ballot Challenge Press Conference
Florida Ballot Challenge Press Conference
Judge Mills,
in a previous election related case, ordered documentation produced. Collette
is hoping the judge will take a similar approach in this case, and order Obama
to provide Collette access to inspection of the original government and hospital
birth records, which Obama claims exist in Hawaii .
Collette is asking court to keep Obama’s name off the Florida
ballot if the court does not find him eligible.
The
defendants claim that the Florida Democratic Party can nominate whomever it
wants, then put its candidate onto the Florida
ballot, and the state cannot interfere. Collette says that the Democrats are
free to nominate whoever they want, even Humpty Dumpty. However, if they want
to put their candidate on the state funded ballot, Florida
has the right to first make sure that the candidate is eligible.
The
defendants are also claiming that Collette cannot bring this type of claim in a
Florida court. Collette responded by citing
Article 1, Section 21, of the Florida Constitution, which says that Florida
courts are open to “every person” to resolve “any injury.” Collette humorously
said, “I swear that I am in the class of
‘every person’ and that the injuries I am asking the court to remedy are within
the category of ‘any injury’.”
The case is Collette
v. Obama, case number: 512012CA 2041WS.
Links:
Committee’s motion to dismiss Collette’s opposition to dismissal
The complaint
Collette’s website
Obama State Ballot Challenge
Are you
interested in being a plaintiff? We have developed a "Do It Yourself Ballot
Challenge Kit" that is useable in many states and is available at:
WE NEED YOUR HELP! If you are interested in lending support to a Do It Yourself citizen activist filing in one of the local jurisdictions, please mark your donation: DIY Challenge. By filing cases in multiple jurisdictions, we greatly reduce our financial output, and multiply our chances of finding ONE courageous judge who will move on this case in a timely manner.
or send a check to:
Constitution
Action Fund
10202
Vanderbilt Drive
Naples, FL
34108
Donations to this PayPal account go directly to Sam Sewell's LLC which is acting as trustee for one of the nonprofit ballot challenge orgs, ConstitutionalElections.org.
Sam takes no trustee fees for this and has already personally contributed over $5,000 to support the Florida Ballot Challenge.
5 comments:
1) The long form birth certificate that Obama released through the White House web site has proven to be a forgery by 99% of the experts who examined it!!
2) Sheriff Arpaio's Cold Case Posse has proven that Obama's long form birth certificate as well as Obama's selective service card are all forgeries!!!
3) Obama's Connecticut social security number that Obama uses is fraudulent, as it belongs to a deceased person and Obama never lived regularly in Connecticut!
4) Obama is NOT a "natural born citizen", a unique and INDISPENSABLE requirement by THE CONSTITUTION OF THE USA only for the position of President of the USA, as BOTH of Obama's parents were NOT American citizens at the time of his birth (his father was Kenyan).
Obama being a lawyer by formation knew perfectly well this important "detail" before running for the Presidency of the USA, making him the most scandalous usurper of the American people to have ever lived!!
Isn't it interesting you will only publish comments that support your agenda? Shame on you Sam. Mensa members all over the world are turning in their memberships.
1) This statement is patently untrue. 99% of the true experts have found the long form birth certificate sound.
2) Arpaio is not an expert in forgeries, but he is an expert in: abuse of power, election law violation, racial profiling, misuse of funds.
3) Obama's SS# is not the same as the deceased gentleman's SS#. See Snopes.com for explanation.
4) The US Constitution does not require both parents to be born in the US to become a "naturalized" citizen. None of you have been able to provide the citation for this claim after repeated requests.
You do damage to the cause you claim to serve with this kind of comment.
Sue Ellen actually got one thing correct. #3 is a false statement,
Post a Comment