How to obtain a copy of Obama's original long-form birth certificate, legally.
Full text of Hawaiian Legislation here:
http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/session2007/bills/sb1326_sd1_.pdf
Hit Tip to rumrunner
Does this give anyone any ideas?
Quick and to the point; according to Hawaiian law sb1326 any Law Enforcement Officer in the United States can access the vital statistics of the Hawaiian Government. Below is an excerpt from the Hawaiian law that regulates the release of records to law enforcement officers. Many people are very frustrated about Obama’s many secrets. As far as I know no one has attempted to obtain the birth records as part of an ongoing criminal investigation of election fraud. I think this should at least be attempted.
CLICK IMAGE FOR FULL VIEW
4 comments:
The tools for the Legal Removal of BO have been available to We the People from the beginning. The method for the Legal Removal of BO is simply stated in our Bill of Rights. The problem is that most people don't have the courage or the will to exercise their rights under the Constitution.
http://thesteadydrip.blogspot.com/2009/04/important-grand-juries-dont-need.html
If Patriots would simply convene Local Grand Juries, as is their right according to Our Constitution, and begin investigating the many crimes committed by the BO campaign in Cities throughout the Nation, they would have plenty of evidence sufficient to Legally Remove BO from POTUS.
There is an ongoing criminal conspiracy among Obama supporters in Nashville to cover up crimes committed by his campaign in 2007, 2008 and 2009. These crimes include, but are not limited to, VOTER FRAUD, IDENTITY THEFT, COMPUTER THEFT, INVASION OF PRIVACY and petty BURGLARIES similar to WATERGATE.
These seemingly petty burglaries are to the Nashville BO Campaign what Watergate was to the Nixon Campaign.
http://www.wsmv.com/news/15010922/detail.html
http://www.wsmv.com/news/15056621/detail.html?subid=1010669 1
http://www.nashvillecitypaper.com/content/city-news/metro-w ants-100k-wackenhut-over-laptop-thefts
http://www.newschannel5.com/global/story.asp?s=7568477&Clie ntType=Printable
http://www.eweek.com/c/a/Security/FBI-Investigating-Theft-of-10-Hospital-Computers/" target="_blank">http://www.eweek.com/c/a/Security/FBI-Investigating-Theft-o f-10-Hospital-Computers/">http://www.eweek.com/c/a/Security /FBI-Investigating-Theft-of-10-Hospital-Computers/
http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/PCWorld/story?id=4158989" target="_blank">http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/PCWorld/story?id=4158989"> http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/PCWorld/story?id=4158989
Evidence re: Crimes committed by the BO campaign for a Knoxville, Tennessee Citizen Grand Jury to investigate:
http://www.abcnews.go.com/Blotter/story?id=5984710&page=1
The son of a Tennessee state legislator pled not guilty to hacking into Sarah Palin's Yahoo! email account Wednesday . David C. Kernell, 20, of Knoxville, Tenn. turned himself in to federal authorities this morning, after a grand jury indicted him on one count relating to "accessing without authorization" the GOP vice presidential hopeful's email. Kernell is the son of Tennessee State Rep. Mike Kernell.
Gov. Sarah Palin's e-mail habit of using a private account to communicate with aides echoes the worst practices of the Bush administration, says one expert.
(ABCNews Photo Illustration)
The indictment, handed down Oct. 7 but unsealed Wednesday, alleges Kernell broke into Palin's Yahoo! account by answering several security questions and resetting her password. Kernell then read Palin's emails, and posted to the internet the new password as well as screenshots of her inbox and some emails, according to the indictment.
The Hawaiian Statute as it applies to the Bill of Rights is in full compliance with the Constitution and no Hawaiian officials can legally fail to comply with said Statute, nor can said officials lawfully fail to comply with the following Constitutional provisions:
As provided by Our Founding Fathers in Our Bill of Rights, the first 10 Amendments to Our Constitution, Patriots can form Grand Juries to exercise self governance and take Our Country back from those who aim to destroy it.
In the First Amendment, we the People are given the unalienable right "peaceably to assemble and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."
In the Fifth Amendment, we the people are given the right to make a "presentment" of criminal charges against corrupt government officials. Historically, a presentment was used when a prosecutor or district attorney would not seek an indictment against a government official. Thus, you see, our Founding Fathers vested we the people with the power to prosecute corrupt government officials without intervention by judges or government attorneys.
In the Ninth Amendment, it is unequivocally stated that, "The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people."
In the Tenth Amendment, it is clearly stated, "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution...are reserved...to the people."
What does that mean in the context of the power of Citizen Grand Jurors?
Simply stated it means that Citizens can form Grand Juries with or without the consent of any branch of the Judiciary, Federal or State. Furthermore, it means that any and all Federal or State Rules or Laws of Criminal Procedure are unconstitutional to the extent that they limit the formation of Citizen Grand Juries to prior or post approval by any Branch of the Judiciary, Federal or State.
It gets better for the Power of the People over Our Judiciary in the Eleventh Amendment, "The Judicial power of the United States shall not be construed to extend to any suit in law or equity, commenced or prosecuted against one of the United States by Citizen of another State..."
In reading the Eleventh Amendment as it pertains to Citizens Grand Juries, one must remember the legal context under which it was written. At the time of the ratification of the Eleventh Amendment, most Criminal prosecutions were commenced by Citizens utilizing the services of private Citizen Attorneys. You see, Our Founding Fathers never intended for us to be subjugated and controlled by district attorneys and judges. Quite the contrary, Our Founding Fathers intended for We the People to have control over Our Judiciary by action of the Fourth Branch of Government, the Citizens Grand Jury.
Seen in its true, original context, the Eleventh Amendment clearly states that Citizens can form Federal or State Grand Juries without interference by the Federal Government.
Furthermore, the Citizen Grand Juries can subpoena any and all of Barack Hussein Obama's personal records held in any State or Federal Government Office or Department and said Office or Department is compelled by the Supreme Law of the Land, Our Constitution, to produce said records for said Grand Juries.
In United States vs. Williams (USSC 1992) Justice Scalia : “Rooted in long centuries of Anglo-American history...the Grand Jury is mentioned in the Bill of Rights, but not in the body of the Constitution. It has not been textually assigned, therefore, to any of the three branches described in the first three Articles. It is a constitutional fixture in its own right.” In other words the power of the Grand Jury is assigned to We the People in order that we may obtain a "more perfect Union."
Post a Comment