Monday, December 29, 2008

Keyes v. Lingle: Case Dismissed; Forensic Examiner Disproves Online COLB

"If you don't follow Phil's blog you will miss the latest and most important news and opinion on the net." - Aristotle the Hun

I think this is really important. One phrase in her report mentions “best available evidence”.

1. The COLB form posted by Obama supporters is not authentic.
Very poor evidence.

2. The only other evidence was a newspaper announcement.
Very poor evidence.

3. His younger sister who could not have witnessed anything about his birth say he was born in Hawaii but doesn’t seem sure of what hospital.
Not really evidence at all.

Right now Obama’s Kenyan Grandmother sworn affidavit of his being born in Kenya trumps all of the above.

The “best available evidence” is the Birth Certificate reported to be on file in Hawaii.

There will be a push by those who follow legal protocol to obtain the “best available evidence” and make a decision based on that evidence.

Let me go out on a limb here. I don’t see how the SCOTUS can avoid ordering Obama to provide the “best available evidence” for their decision making process.

* * * * * * * * * * * * *
Keyes v. Lingle: Case Dismissed; Forensic Examiner Disproves Online COLB"

Another case that had been flying under the radar was Keyes v. Lingle, where the Constitution Party and Dr. Amb. Alan Keyes were petitioning against Hawaii Governor Linda Lingle, Chief Elections Officer Kevin B. Cronin, and various other Defendants as a means of holding an official accountable for determining Barack Hussein Obama’s eligibility.


Dismissed on December 5 (HTML/PDF)

Motion to Reconsider dismissed on December 12 (HTML/PDF)

You will notice that the case was dismissed on a technicality (according to the judge, the Plaintiffs referred to the wrong Hawaiian statute(s)), not on content.

However, the bigger story to this lawsuit is the fact that forensic document examiner Sandra Ramsey Lines (pictured) has documented in an associated affidavit (PDF) the following:

2. I have reviewed the attached affidavit posted on the internet from “Ron Polarik,” [PDF] who has declined to provide his name because of a number of death threats he has received. After my review and based on my years of experience, I can state with certainty that the COLB presented on the internet by the various groups, which include the “Daily Kos,” the Obama Campaign, “” and others cannot be relied upon as genuine. Mr. Polarik raises issues concerning the COLB that I can affirm. Software such as Adobe Photoshop can produce complete images or alter images that appear to be genuine; therefore, any image offered on the internet cannot be relied upon as being a copy of the authentic document.

3. Upon a cursory inspection of the internet COLB, one aspect of the image that is clearly questionable is the obliteration of the Certificate No. That number is a tracking number that would allow anyone to ask the question, “Does this number refer to the Certification of Live Birth for the child Barack Hussein Obama II?” It would not reveal any further personal information; therefore, there would be no justifiable reason for oliterating it.

4. In my experience as a forensic document examiner, if an original of any document exists, that is the document that must be examined to obtain a definitive finding of genuineness or non-genuineness. In this case, examination of the vault birth certificate for President-Elect Obama would lay this issue to rest once and for all. [emphasis mine]

The above clearly illustrates that it is impossible to determine eligibility based on the widely-circulated certification of live birth and that the only way to determine Barack Hussein Obama’s natural born citizenship status is to retrieve the currently-sealed certificate of live birth.
It appears that we’re dealing with an individual who has so much to hide on so little a document.


1 comment:

Anonymous said...

A blind worm can clearly see the fast-talkin' Chicago charlatan is hiding something. And that's kinda' telling of the SCOTUS, the media and the liberals. That same worm months ago knew what forensic examiners now have discovered. Problematically, it was the blind worms who voted for this con-man and they don't care.