If we cannot access his passports, his birth certificate, his college records:
1. Occidental College records -- Not released
2. Columbia College records -- Not released
3. Columbia Thesis paper -- "Not available"
4. Harvard College records -- Not released
5. Selective Service Registration -- Not released
6. Medical records -- Not released
7. Illinois State Senate schedule -- Not available
8. His Illinois State Senate records -- Not available
9. Certified Copy of original Birth certificate -- Not released
10. Embossed, signed paper Certification of Live Birth -- Not released
11. Record of baptism -- Not available
and if he has multiple names:
Barack Hussein Obama a/k/a Barry Hussein Obama a/k/a Barack Dunham a/k/a Barry Dunham a/k/a Barack Soetoro a/k/a Barry Soetoro
AND he specifically answered the "Any other names" on his bar application to obtain a law degree as "No", we can be sure MANY things about his past warrant serious and intense investigation !
From: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2152111/posts
8 comments:
This is so tinfoil hat that not only is Hannity not even talking about it but hes not even allowing it to be discussed on his forum at all.
http://forums.hannity.com/showthread.php?t=1214031
He must have joined the liberal left wing media or something.
Rupert has FOX gagged. Besides the bloggers are doing just fine without any help from the usual media outlets.
At this point those who think there is NOTHING wrong with this big city con-man with the funny name are in the minority. If he is inaugurated, he will be impeached. For the sake of the nation let's hope he is imprisoned before there is a need for impeachment.
Obama is going to fall. He has just too nay skeletons in his closet. Far better that he fall before January 20th.
Thanks Sam Sewell, I agree he should be locked up and the key thrown away forever. He should have his Law License ripped up and thrown away and never let him get that license back. He owes the American votes a pile of money and he has to come down off his high horse and face the facts. He is not President material
While the "October Surprise" credit crisis netted Obama the general election, a "January Surprise" constitutional crisis will NOT net Obama the Presidency!
Anonymous said...
"This is so tinfoil hat that not only is Hannity not even talking about it but hes not even allowing it to be discussed on his forum at all."
I'll bet that you are a young liberal, as you should be; If you are not a liberal when you are 25 you have no heart but if you are not a conservative by the time you are fifty you have no brain. Or; A conservative is an ex-liberal with a wife a home and two kids.
I say you are liberal because of the trademark personal insult, name calling and ad hominem attacks that so characterise the debate style of college age people these days. You also use phrases that adults don't use, like "you guys". Most liberals don't think or analyze they just use low level debate tactics that would disqualify them for the grade school debate team. That tactic has worked quite well on the ignorant and those who value feeling more than reason. Uninformed voted Obama - Informed voted McCain - Poll... http://thesteadydrip.blogspot.com/2008/12/uninformed-voted-obama-informed-voted.html However, I will expose it for the low level tactic that it is and put you on notice that it is not an effective tool when dealing with me.
If you can point out something inaccurate I would appreciate your contribution to accuracy. If all you can do is "label" the source with a derogatory comment your opinions are not welcome. I hope you take my suggestion because most of your posts have been civil and intelligent.
You might also consult an article on this blog entitled. Spot false arguments and make strong ones. http://thesteadydrip.blogspot.com/2008/11/spot-false-arguments-and-make-strong.html
A free hint on how to improve your posts. You will note that ad hominem arguments are at the lower end of the scale on the pyramid chart at the above link; only one step above name calling which is the other part of your content. Do you honestly expect to get somewhere with a post like that when many of the readers on this blog have triple digit IQs?
In case you need a little help with your Latin: An ad hominem argument, consists of replying to an argument or factual claim by attacking or appealing to a characteristic or belief of the person making the argument or claim, rather than by addressing the substance of the argument or producing evidence against the claim. The process of proving or disproving the claim is thereby subverted, and the argumentum ad hominem works to change the subject.
Have you had a logic class yet?
You might take a look at this site:
http://www.austhink.org/critical/pages/fallacies.html Critical Thinking on the Web.
LOL wow a little sensitive these days eh? I have seen you stereotype many times and attack liberals as a whole so don’t play the victim card or pretend that you always take the high road. I’m in my 30s not 20s and I talk and debate the way I do I don’t need your psychoanalyzation of my style. It is what it is.
If your blog cant take a little playful ribbing I understand. You brag quite a bit about your supposed IQ and that of your friends but you certainly dish it out more than you can take it. I can laugh at the follies of my side you can’t.
Obama is going to be president PERIOD. He will leave office in 8 years with a high approval rating than shrubya and the DOW will bee 3000 higher. Your girl Palin cinched it for us. THANK YOU SARAH!!!
Have a nice xmas Ill check back later and see how your tinfoil constitutional crisis is unfolding.=)
I wasn't offended. As I said your comments have been civil.
However, I would appreciate less rhetoric and more logic and facts. You might begin by treating me as an individual rather than a sterotype. I only voted for one Republican my whole life.
Your latest comments underlined my evaluation.
Made it all the way to your 30s and still a liberal? Give it time? Do you have a mortgage and a family? I don't really want an answer. I was just making a point.
Yep I have both,thanks.
I understand fiscal conservatism but detest social conservatism.
Post a Comment