2. Click 'select' (the little arrow thingy), put a box around the text in standard Adobe. Right click mouse. Choose "Copy Image".
3. Paste into standard Microsoft Word. See what shows up.
3. Paste into standard Microsoft Word. See what shows up.
Dr. Polland’s Analysis of the Certificate of Live Birth Released on April 27, 2011
The morons forget to flatten the layers! You should see what this looks like in Photoshop or any other Adobe program that reads PDF’s and works with layers.
6 comments:
All the other birth, marriage, and death certificates that I have ever seen have a state seal pressed into the paper.
When I saw this so-called BC for the first time I said to myself immediately that it did not look right. Why? Where the hell was the embossed seal? Every copy of a birth certificate I have ever seen has one that shows up.
Yep, played with it myself in Acrobat Pro. The document number was doctored (to add the 1 at the end) and the date (box 20) has a 1 added to the date 196[1]. Lots of other stuff too... yeah, maybe when he said he'd be a transparent president, he was referring to the layers in the fake BC.
http://www.trippervision.com/Thatch.jpg
I added straight lines to show how the thatch lines do not conform to the curve of the paper. Apparently the scanned or photoshopped image was superimposed on the green thatch security paper then OCR processing was applied to further degrade the original. Anyway you look at it we are not seeing the real deal.
Google:
ANSWERS.COM: Is Obama's long form birth certificate a fraud?
It gives you new insights into Obama's birth certificate frauds other than computer analysis of his forged Long Form birth certificate file.
Just the tampering with the registrar's stamp (with the misspelled "TXE" and the smiley face in the "A" of Alvin T. Onaka's signature) is prima facie evidence that Obama's birth certificate is a forgery. And when you open up Obama's pdf file in Adobe Illustrator you can see that the registrar's stamp is a linked element from another source which was then scaled and rotated -90 degrees. So that means that the document on the WH website was not created by the scanning (and/or OCR) of a paper document.
In April White House Communications Director Dan Pfeiffer stated, “The State Department of Health in Hawaii will obviously attest that that is … what they have on file. As Bob said, it’s in a book in Hawaii.” So let's make the Hawaii DOH officials vouch for the document Obama put on the WH website like Pfeiffer said they would. If Hawaii says that the document Obama put on the WH website is a true and correct copy that they provided to Obama's attorney, then we know that Hawaii officials created a forgery. If that is the case, then it's highly likely that the forgery was created because there is no original 1961 Hawaiian birth certificate for Obama. That would concur with the affidavit that Hawaii Senior Election Official Tim Adams gave that no government official in Hawaii could find Obama's birth certificate. On the other hand if Hawaii officials say that they did not provide the forgery that Obama put on the WH website, then Obama is screwed.
Post a Comment