Tuesday, April 29, 2014

Connections Everywhere!

by Chrue Blue
April 29th, 2014

Last week the Hamas terrorist group and Fatah announced that they had agreed to reconcile and will begin discussing the formation of a unity government. The Hamas charter calls for the destruction of Israel. As a response to this news, Israel canceled peace talks with the Palestinians.
On Friday US secretary of State John Kerry warned that the absence of a peace deal with Palestinians could lead Israel towards an apartheid-style situation. He made the comments on Holocaust Remembrance Day.”
Quoted from http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2014/04/breaking-john-kerry-releases-clarification-on-his-disgusting-apartheid-comments-on-israel/

Kerry then backed away from his comments, because they became public. He later inferred, that if he would have known those comments would be publicized, he would have chosen different terms. Hmmmmm...so he wasn't repentant for the term, he was embarrassed that they became news! Ahha! I see!!! 
Well, then let's take a look at the whole situation. Where was Mr. Kerry; Who was he talking to; and Why was he referencing the Israel situation. This is a very complicated situation and it will take a little time to get all the threads exposed (and this commentary will only barely break the tip of the ice berg off) We must understand clearly what apartheid is: Webster's definition is: (noun) a former social system in South Africa in which black people and people from other racial groups did not have the same political and economic rights as white people and were forced to live separately from white people. 
First, where was John Kerry when he made the now public comment about conditions in Israel being 'in danger of becoming apartheid in appearance. '
It will become clearer further on in this column that Mr. Kerry see's the issue in Israel as biased against Muslims living and working in the State of Israel. Kerry apparently doesn't take into consideration that Israel has consistently protected peaceful Muslims living in Israel, and have never denied them equal treatment in medical care when injuries arising from terrorist acts against citizens occurred. Let us confess, here and now, that Islamic aggression has injured and killed Muslims and non-Muslims alike. Should we harken back to how many Muslims were in the Twin Towers when they were destroyed???

Mr. Kerry make this heinous remark at a meeting of the Trilateral Commission. THAT is the bigger indication of what was going on with this comment.

What IS the Trilateral Commission? The Trilateral Comm. was founded in in 1973,by David Rockefeller and Zbigniew Brzezinski, and it's foundation was to to foster a New International Economic Order. The point is that there are several international orders who are guided by a single principle: establishing a unified, cohesive global organization of nation-states, with no specific national identity, but only a global identity. The list of organizations that support and actively pursue this concept is so long that I cannot list them all here...but make no mistake, their members are the elite of elites, international corporations and the even more powerful international banking interests. 
The objectives of the so-called new global order people are manifold. Mr. Kerry is an active, long time member of the Trilaterals, as well as a member of (or closely associated with through professional/political relationships) other globalist org's. like the Bilderbergs, the Council on Foreign Relations, the Club of Rome, the Royal Insitute of International Affairs, World Wildlife Fund, Sierra Club, Aspen Institute, Tavistock Institute, Bohemian Grove, Pilgrim Society, the Round Table groups and many other international business affiliations. 
This is the "brain trust" that is and has been developing the interconnected, interwoven and interdependent global construct whose final objective is world governance. You will notice some familiar names as you read through this piece. The Rockefellers have been an extremely powerful family for over a century...along with other powerful families and their bankers. They have a goal: A Royal Courtisean system, joined with a Monarchy of Crown Heads.
The continuation of the old European Feudal system, except those at the top will be allies with power as their common dynamic.. Kerry is what is euphemistically known as a Royal Courtisean. He has no true regal blood, except in his private fantasy. His “power” comes from his affiliations, governmental, public and private.

Actions taken by the Trilateral Commission generally help the banking industry. Jeremiah Novak, writing in the July 1977 issue of Atlantic, said that after international oil prices rose when Nixon set price controls on American domestic oil, many developing countries were required to borrow from banks to buy oil, many of them with doubtful repayment abilities. All told, private multinational banks, particularly Rockefeller's Chase Manhattan, have loaned nearly $52 billion to developing countries. An overhauled IMF would provide another source of credit for these nations, and would take the big private banks off the hook. This proposal is the cornerstone of the Trilateral plan. ” (emphasis inserted, and quoted from: http://www.jeremiahproject.com/newworldorder/nworder07.html)

In 1975, a report was commissioned, written by Michael Crozier, Samuel P. Huntington and Joji Watanuki for the Trilateral Commission, which was later turned into a book titled “The Crisis of Democracy: On the Governability of Democracies”. The report observed the political state of the United States, Europe and Japan and says that in the United States the problems of governance "stem from an excess of democracy" and thus (the report) advocates "to restore the prestige and authority of central government institutions”. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Crisis_of_Democracy

Did ya get that? The problems of governance arise from an excess of democracy! Well, I agree with that in the vein that a democracy is nothing more than civilized mob rule, not rule of law. Our United states, as a nation, was established as a Sovereign Republic with a set of laws ensconced in the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. THAT is rule of law republicanism. A democracy is the twin sister of oligarchy and one step away from Fascism. A Fascist government supports the rights of labor unions and corporate representatives (CEO's, company presidents, etc) to negotiate through a system called Corporatism. Currently, we are wavering between corporatism and collectivism. Corporatism is the socio-political organization of a society by major interest groups, or corporate groups, such as agricultural, business, ethnic, labor, military, patronage, or scientific affiliations, on the basis of common interests.

The Trilateral Commission is a true form of corporatism and it's mission is to bring all nations into it's corporate government tent...no longer restricting itself to the North America, Western Europe and Japan. So Kerry, being a member of the TC is devoted to global corporatism, and has been part of the socialist Progressive movement for decades.

"Collectivism means the subjugation of the individual to a group; whether to a race, class or state does not matter. Collectivism holds that man must be chained to collective action and collective thought for the sake of what is called 'the common good'." -- Ayn Rand.
So let's take a deeper look: It is very important to fascists, corporatists and collectivists that all schools in the country teach children that the state is the most important thing in the world. It is always a big crime in fascist countries to speak against the leader or ruling party (now think of the IRS scandal of targeting the Tea Party and other conservative groups). In countries led by fascist governments, the government tries to control all areas of life, including work, school, and family life. 
The Public Private Partnerships that have been formed over the past 136 years have been a deliberately designed elimination of national sovereignty, especially for the US. The European regalist and monarchical powers were furious that they lost the Revolutionary War and sought a way to regain the vast resources of the New American economy, taxes and fealty to the Crown. They found a way with the Central Bank system. It has been working like clockwork ever since. So how does all this fit with Kerry and the Trilateral Commission? How does all this fit together and why does it matter? Because we need to understand WHAT Kerry said and WHERE he said it to understand how he really meant it. Pay no attention to his reversal statement “I would have chosen a different word”. I seriously doubt it. John Kerry is the consummate elitist and serves his Master Controllers well.

Grab as cup of coffee and a couple of cookies and read on. 
This is what the Trilateral Home page says: “ The Commission was originally created in 1973 to bring together experienced leaders within the private sector to discuss issues of global concern at a time when communication and cooperation between Europe, North America, and Asia were lacking. The Commission has grown since its early days to include members from more countries in these regions, and it continues to find that study and dialogue about the pressing problems facing our planet remain as important today as in 1973. Problems and threats have changed, but their importance has only increased due to the more interconnected and interdependent world in which we now live. “ (emphasis inserted) http://www.trilateral.org/

The problem is that they do it behind closed doors without input by Citizens of the nations they seek to control. As an important addition to getting the full impact of how these nefarious organizations work together and the people who inform these “projects” on globalization, please see this piece, which I highly recommend; it is short, but chilling. “Sovereignty and Globalization”, by Richard Haass, President Council on Foreign Relations, Feb 17, 2006 http://www.cfr.org/sovereignty/sovereignty-globalisation/p9903

For instance: “ The near monopoly of power once enjoyed by sovereign entities is being eroded. As a result, new mechanisms are needed for regional and global governance that include actors other than states. This is not to argue that Microsoft, Amnesty International, or Goldman Sachs be given seats in the United Nations General Assembly, but it does mean including representatives of such organisations in regional and global deliberations when they have the capacity to affect whether and how regional and global challenges are met.
Moreover, states must be prepared to cede some sovereignty to world bodies if the international system is to function.” (end of excerpt)

So, if these “leaders of nations” gather together to discuss building consensus' and alliances for the betterment of the world, why is there a distinct division in terms of goals between them, the interests they represent and the People of the nations? Why would Kerry condemn Israel in terms such as apartheid, for wanting to protect itself against violent, aggressive terrorists like Hamas and Hezbollah? Not to mention Iran??? Or any other intrusion on it's national sovereign status?

Because the Nation of Israel is an impediment to full implementation of the new global order, these hysterical maniacs want to impose on every normal person on this planet. Becasue they have been working at this for over a century. Because they need to begin to cull the herd. Because they are evil right down to their toenails! What they say in private to each other and what they say in pubic to the People are 2 completely different things. 
Let's remember, Kerry didn't realize that the recording of his words would get out. Praise God it did! Those entities that have established a framework for the universal governance of our planet and wish to finally bring it out of the closet in it's fully functional form (and are salivating at the ultimate power and control it gives them, even now) simply cannot help themselves, but to enjoy the bliss their accomplishment is bringing them...

Here is an extremely small sample of US members, alone: (* denotes executive committee)

Sylvia Mathews Burwell, President, Global Development Programs, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, WA (Now the Sec'y of HHS, after Sebelius)
Dianne Feinstein, Member (D-CA), U.S. Senate (CFR and TC)
Martin S. Feldstein, Member, U.S. President’s Economic Recovery Advisory Board; George F. Baker Professor of Economics, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA; President Emeritus, National Bureau of Economic Research; former Chairman, U.S. President’s Council of Economic Advisors
(and while we're at it, here's a little quote from the documentary “Inside Job”, which everyone in America who cares about the national security of our country and in opposing the powers raging against us, should see:
Charles Ferguson: (q) Over the last decade, the financial services industries made about $5 billion worth of political contributions in the United States. That's kind of a lot of money. That doesn’t bother you?
Martin Feldstein: (a) No.
Narrative: Martin Feldstein is a professor at Harvard and one of the world's most prominent economists. As President Reagan's chief economic adviser, he was a major architect of deregulation. And from 1988 until 2009, he was on the board of directors of both AIG and AIG Financial Products, which paid him millions of dollars.”
(AIG and AIGFP received billions in the TARP bailout of 2008-9) Deregulation brought We The People untold agony in the thorough confiscation of our personal incomes through egregious taxation. But that's another talk show. These huge corporations, green start-ups gov't linked corporations with no bid contracts received hundreds of billions of dollars in the bailouts, which monies then were funneled to organizations such as labor unions and private executives, who in turn donated billions to campaign funds in PAC's and Super PAC's...it was the most heinous confiscation of the People's wealth there has ever been, except for the fraud known as the IRS and the Federal reserve. The Politicians borrowed “money” from the Fed, put the Taxpayers on the debt-hook for the “money”, gave it to their friends, their friends then gave it back in the form of contributions. It was an enormous shell game. We The People are left with holding the bill.

Richard N. Haass, President, Council on Foreign Relations, New York, NY; former Director, Policy Planning, U. S. Department of State; former Director of Foreign Policy Studies, The Brookings Institution
*Henry A. Kissinger, Chairman, Kissinger Associates, Inc., New York, NY; former U.S. Secretary of State; former U.S. Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs; Lifetime Trustee, Trilateral Commission (CFR, TC, BB, BG, RIIA, CoR, etc. Kissinger is at the top of the tops; nothing gets done without his intimate knowledge and approval)
Thomas R. Pickering, Vice Chairman, Hills & Company, International Consultants, Washington, DC; former Senior Vice President, International Relations, The Boeing Company, Arlington, VA; former U.S. Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs; former U.S. Ambassador to the Russian Federation, India, Israel, El Salvador, Nigeria, the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan, and the United Nations
Charles B. Rangel, Member (D-NY), U.S. House of Representatives
David Rockefeller, Founder, Honorary Chairman, and Lifetime Trustee, Trilateral Commission, New York, NY
John D. Rockefeller IV, Member (D-WV), U.S. Senate
George J. Tenet, Managing Director, Allen & Company, New York, NY; former U.S. Director of Central Intelligence
*Paul A. Volcker, Chairman, President’s Economic Recovery Advisory Board; former Chairman, Wolfensohn & Co., Inc., New York; Frederick H. Schultz Professor Emeritus, International Economic Policy, Princeton University; former Chairman, Board of Governors, U.S. Federal Reserve System; Honorary North American Chairman and former North American Chairman, Trilateral Commission
John Podesta, President and Chief Executive Officer, Center for American Progress, Washington, DC; former Chief of Staff to President William J. Clinton
Condoleezza Rice, Professor of Political Science, Stanford University, and Thomas and Barbara Stephenson Senior Fellow on Public Policy, Hoover Institution, Palo Alto, CA; former U. S. Secretary of State; former National Security Advisor to President George W. Bush
William H. Webster, Senior Partner, Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy LLP, Washington, DC; former U.S. Director of Central Intelligence; former Director, U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation; former Judge of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Timothy F. Geithner, U.S. Secretary of  The Treasury
Susan E. Rice, U.S. Permanent Representative to the United Nations (Yes, THAT Susan Rice who covered up for the criminal dysfunction in the WH and State Dept on Benghazi)
Dennis Ross, Senior Advisor, National Security Council
Anne-Marie Slaughter, Director of Policy Planning, U. S. Department of State
Lawrence H. Summers , Director, National Economic Council, The White House
Robert B. Zoellick, President, World Bank 
A complete listing of current members (as of May 2010) is here: http://publicintelligence.net/trilateral-commission-complete-membership-list-may-2010/

It's a little hard to get their 2014 membership list. They like their privacy...(here is another interesting look at who was among the members during the past Clinton Administration) http://www.apfn.org/apfn/cfr-members.htm
and the list for 2011: http://www.trilateral.org/download/file/TC list 8-11 (5).pdf

Now, we should examine Mr. Kerry's historical position when it comes to the State of Israel, “peace talks” and the entity it concerns, the Arab Muslims (Islam)

Senator Kerry’s record vis-à-vis the State of Israel
Kerry is not a mainstream Democrat,” said Senator Joe Lieberman (D), “just look at his record..;(Boston Herald 1/28/04) Senator John Kerry called Yasser Arafat a “Statesman” and “Role Model,” long after Arafat’s history as responsible for the deaths of both Americans and Israelis was well known (The New War, by Senator John Kerry) Arafat was a horrendous thug terrorist and murderer, responsible for tens of thousands of Jewish deaths.
Senator Kerry told Arab American leaders Israel’s Security Fence was “Counterproductive” and “Harmful.” “We don’t need another barrier to peace.” (Remarks to Arab American Institute, 10/17/03). A leading Arab-American organization, The Arab American Political Action Committee, endorsed Kerry during his presidential run in 2004.

Senator Kerry’s Voting Record on Israel (excerpted from an article linked below, from 2004)
Kerry was not an original co-sponsor of Senate Concurrent Resolution 81, the Kyl-Feinstein Iran Resolution which sought to stop Iran’s nuclear weapons program.

In 1996, Kerry did not sign on the Iran & Libya Sanctions Act. Forty-four of his colleagues did.
In 1993, Kerry did not sign the Lautenberg/Grassley letter urging the Secretary of State to include Hamas in the State Department’s terrorism report, although 55 other Senators did.
In 2000, Senator Kerry did not co-sponsor the Peace Through Negotiations Act (S. 3250) which warned against a Palestinian unilateral declaration of Independence. Sixty of his colleagues did. Senator Kerry was not the original co-sponsor of a single piece of pro-Israel legislation in his 20 years in the Senate.

In his 1997 book, “The New War”, Kerry who ha(d) the endorsements of both the
Muslim American PAC and the Arab America PAC spoke glowingly of Arafat as
a "statesman" and "role model." The last is correct. Arafat was slaughtering civilians as long ago as the 60s, and thus is a prototype for the current generation of terrorist leaders. In a November 17, 2003, speech to the Arab American Institute, Kerry called Israel’s security barrier, "a barrier to peace." (It is also a great inconvenience for suicide bombers.) When Jewish leaders complained, the Senator reversed himself. But his initial reaction was telling.

Kerry’s chief Middle East (choice for) adviser (was) former U.S. Ambassador to Israel Martin Indyk, who: 1) Helped devise the disastrous Olso Accords, 2) Persuaded Clinton that Arafat was a big teddy bear, 3) As ambassador, called for the division of Jerusalem, 4) At the outset of the latest Intifada, insisted that Israel to hold back its army to encourage Arafat (who orchestrated the bloodbath) to deal with the terrorists! and 5) Wants to station U.S. forces in the West Bank and Gaza to cover an Israeli withdrawal.

New Republic editor Martin Peretz charges: "I’ve searched to find one time when Kerry, even candidate Kerry, criticized a U.N. action or statement against Israel. I’ve come up
empty. Nor has he defended Israel against the European Unions continuous

From an Oct 28, 2004 article in FrontPage Magazine, “ the Former Malaysian Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamed put out a letter urging U.S. Moslems to vote for Kerry, "in the name of Islam." The ex-prime minister exhorted his fellow jihadists on their "duty to ensure that Bush will not be able to determine our fate for four more years." Said he, "There is an obvious connection between the sufferings of the Moslems and the policies and thinking of Bush." Mohamed could have saved his breath. According to a Zogby poll, on November 2, 2004, American Moslems will vote for Kerry by a 10-to-1 margin. (poster's reminder note: This was published back in 2004)

From the Washington Post, Oct 22, 2004: Charles Krauthammer wrote, "Re-engage in the peace process" is precisely what the Europeans, the Russians and the United Nations have been pressuring the United States to do for years. Do you believe any of them have Israel's safety at heart? They would sell out Israel in an instant, and they are pressuring America to do precisely that. 

Bush's sin
is that he also insists the Palestinians genuinely accept Israel and replace the corrupt, dictatorial terrorist leadership of Yasser Arafat. John Kerry says he wants to "rejoin the community of nations." There is no issue on which the United States more consistently fails the global test of international consensus than Israel. In July, the U.N. General Assembly declared Israel's defensive fence illegal by a vote of 150 to 6. ""

Additionally in the 2004 race for POTUS, Council for American Islamic Relations (CAIR) endorses Kerry for President . (poster's note: That should tell you ALOT!

From : 2004 WorldNetDaily.com October 16, 2004,  By Joe Kaufman and Larry Klayman
" An e-mail announcement, dated Oct. 13 was sent out by the president of the Muslim Student Organization of Florida Atlantic University, Asmaa Metwally. It stated the following: "Former Ambassador Osman Siddique, a representative from the John Kerry campaign, will be coming to the Pompano Beach Masjid this coming Saturday, Oct. 16 to rally up the Muslim vote for John Kerry."

CAIR, or the Council on American-Islamic Relations, is an organization that purports to be a harmless civil rights group fighting against discrimination of the Muslim community. Yet, evidence shows that CAIR is nothing more than a militant Islamist organization. CAIR is a spin-off of the Islamic Association for Palestine, an organization that was founded by current Hamas leader Mousa Abu Marzook. CAIR's executive director, Nihad Awad, himself, has stated that he supports Hamas.""

Pro-Iranian lobby funding Kerry
By Aaron Klein Thursday, October 14, 2004
Hundreds of thousands of dollars have been given to Kerry from the pro-Iranian lobby, possibly influencing the presidential candidate's startling call to provide Tehran with the nuclear fuel it seeks, according to Iran's Student Movement Coordination Committee for Democracy chairman Aryo Pirouznia. 
With top Iranian officials openly calling for the development of nuclear weapons within the next four months and overwhelming intelligence indicating Iran is seeking to create a nuclear arsenal, Kerry has been insisting as president he would provide Tehran with nuclear fuel as long as it is used for peaceful purposes only, a position that has many Middle East analysts baffled.
During the first presidential debate, Kerry said, "I think the United States should have offered the opportunity to provide the nuclear fuel, test them, see whether or not they were actually looking for it for peaceful purposes." The same policy of accommodation toward Iran's nuclear aspirations is clearly outlined on Kerry's campaign website as well. (emphasis inserted) http://www.israel-commentary.org/archives/2004_10.html

I seriously doubt that Mr. Kerry is sorry for using the term apartheid. In fact I think he stopped himself short of saying “sustained Jewish oppression of the Muslim community”...

No comments: